Re: Filtering
I am guessing that Doug has figured out the change and reverted it (on Feb 9, shortly after sending the message quoted below), but just in case: The update has changed at least one small detail. For a few days, from (approximately) Sun Feb 7 09:57 2021 until Tue Feb 9 16:21 2021, the internal "From" (aka "envelope-from") information changed from pdml-boun...@pdml.net to pdml-bounces+USER=domain@pdml.net (where u...@domain.com would be the subscriber's address) After Feb. 9 it reverted to the old behavior. My message filtering was also thrown off by this change. HTH, Igor Doug Brewer Tue, 09 Feb 2021 12:57:38 -0800 wrote: Yes, we moved to the latest version of the list software over the weekend, which is why it was down for a bit. I don't know why it would affect your client's filters. I use Thunderbird myself and have not seen this issue. Everything still goes where it's supposed to go. Have you made recent adjustments to your filters? On 2/9/21 2:29 PM, John wrote: My list filter stopped working. Thunderbird no longer moves the PDML messages to the PDML folder. Did something change with the list software? -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Filtering
Yes, we moved to the latest version of the list software over the weekend, which is why it was down for a bit. I don't know why it would affect your client's filters. I use Thunderbird myself and have not seen this issue. Everything still goes where it's supposed to go. Have you made recent adjustments to your filters? On 2/9/21 2:29 PM, John wrote: My list filter stopped working. Thunderbird no longer moves the PDML messages to the PDML folder. Did something change with the list software? -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Filtering
Am 09.02.21 um 20:29 schrieb John: My list filter stopped working. Thunderbird no longer moves the PDML messages to the PDML folder. I've had a similar prob with several groups I'm subscribed to, recently. The following trick cured it: Right-click on the PDML folder -> this opens a pop-up with 'properties' at the bottom -> the 'properties' window has a button labelled 'repair'. This did it for me. Ralf -- Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf Web : http://www.fotoralf.de -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Filtering
Yes On February 9, 2021 11:29:02 AM PST, John wrote: >My list filter stopped working. Thunderbird no longer moves the PDML >messages to >the PDML folder. > >Did something change with the list software? > > >-- >Science - Questions we may never find answers for. >Religion - Answers we must never question. >-- >%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List >To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Filtering
My list filter stopped working. Thunderbird no longer moves the PDML messages to the PDML folder. Did something change with the list software? -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Portrait Professional 10 and Paint Engine filtering
Thanks Daniel and Bruce. Regards Jens -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. On Mar 20, 2013 14:42 Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: That is an engaging portrait, Jens Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote: Hi guys I've been spending lots of time filtering images. I've been using Topaz Simplify 4 and ImpressionFX Paint Engine software. And once in a while Portrait Professional 10 Studio. I thought you'd like to se some of my work: This set is from a portrait workshop I run once a month. The girl is Nanna (22), the daughter of a friend of mine: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157633043684748/show/ This set shows images currently exhibited at a local Culture Building, wher the local camera club is showing appr. 100 photographs: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157632924577297/show/ Enjoy :-) Regards Jens Bladt -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
OT: Portrait Professional 10 and Paint Engine filtering
Hi guys I've been spending lots of time filtering images. I've been using Topaz Simplify 4 and ImpressionFX Paint Engine software. And once in a while Portrait Professional 10 Studio. I thought you'd like to se some of my work: This set is from a portrait workshop I run once a month. The girl is Nanna (22), the daughter of a friend of mine: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157633043684748/show/ This set shows images currently exhibited at a local Culture Building, wher the local camera club is showing appr. 100 photographs: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157632924577297/show/ Enjoy :-) Regards Jens Bladt -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Portrait Professional 10 and Paint Engine filtering
I like the way you shot her, and the original is good. I like a couple of the first few with minor revisions. But the final result appears way overdone and cartoonish to my eye. Paul On Mar 20, 2013, at 6:42 AM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote: Hi guys I've been spending lots of time filtering images. I've been using Topaz Simplify 4 and ImpressionFX Paint Engine software. And once in a while Portrait Professional 10 Studio. I thought you'd like to se some of my work: This set is from a portrait workshop I run once a month. The girl is Nanna (22), the daughter of a friend of mine: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157633043684748/show/ This set shows images currently exhibited at a local Culture Building, wher the local camera club is showing appr. 100 photographs: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157632924577297/show/ Enjoy :-) Regards Jens Bladt -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Portrait Professional 10 and Paint Engine filtering
A very nicely done portrait, Jens. The final three filter-processed images are not to my liking though. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote: Hi guys I've been spending lots of time filtering images. I've been using Topaz Simplify 4 and ImpressionFX Paint Engine software. And once in a while Portrait Professional 10 Studio. I thought you'd like to se some of my work: This set is from a portrait workshop I run once a month. The girl is Nanna (22), the daughter of a friend of mine: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157633043684748/show/ This set shows images currently exhibited at a local Culture Building, wher the local camera club is showing appr. 100 photographs: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157632924577297/show/ Enjoy :-) Regards Jens Bladt -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Portrait Professional 10 and Paint Engine filtering
That is an engaging portrait, Jens Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote: Hi guys I've been spending lots of time filtering images. I've been using Topaz Simplify 4 and ImpressionFX Paint Engine software. And once in a while Portrait Professional 10 Studio. I thought you'd like to se some of my work: This set is from a portrait workshop I run once a month. The girl is Nanna (22), the daughter of a friend of mine: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157633043684748/show/ This set shows images currently exhibited at a local Culture Building, wher the local camera club is showing appr. 100 photographs: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157632924577297/show/ Enjoy :-) Regards Jens Bladt -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Lightroom filtering/sorting question - is this possible?
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi The selected images now are all those images which have not been included in a collection. You can mark them all with a custom label ... Not-In-Collection or something like that But in doing that, don't they then become a collection of sorts? Philosophically speaking ...;-D -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Lightroom filtering/sorting question - is this possible?
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:06 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote: From: Godfrey DiGiorgi The selected images now are all those images which have not been included in a collection. You can mark them all with a custom label ... Not-In-Collection or something like that But in doing that, don't they then become a collection of sorts? Philosophically speaking ... ;-D ... If a tree falls in the forest and Helen Keller was there, did it make a sound? ... ]'-) Lightroom doesn't know that ypu've located and grouped the 'not-in-collection' set of files, and that's what's important. -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: Lightroom filtering/sorting question - is this possible?
The selected images now are all those images which have not been included in a collection. You can mark them all with a custom label ... Not-In-Collection or something like that But in doing that, don't they then become a collection of sorts? Philosophically speaking ... ;-D ... If a tree falls in the forest and Helen Keller was there, did it make a sound? ... ]'-) has she been cutting trees down again? I've told her before about that, but does she listen? Lightroom doesn't know that ypu've located and grouped the 'not-in- collection' set of files, and that's what's important. Russell's Lightroom paradox: is the collection of all collections, a collection? Lightroom should embody Zermelo's axiomatic set theory. Or is that too obvious? B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Lightroom filtering/sorting question - is this possible?
Bob W wrote: Russell's Lightroom paradox: is the collection of all collections, a collection? Can I make Lightroom show the set of all collections that do not contain themselves? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Lightroom filtering/sorting question - is this possible?
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Bob W wrote: Russell's Lightroom paradox: is the collection of all collections, a collection? No, it is a Collection Set. Can I make Lightroom show the set of all collections that do not contain themselves? It is mathematically impossible. Breaks the assumption of identity in the definition of a set. See Set Theory 1. -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Lightroom filtering/sorting question - is this possible?
Bob W wrote: The selected images now are all those images which have not been included in a collection. You can mark them all with a custom label ... Not-In-Collection or something like that But in doing that, don't they then become a collection of sorts? Philosophically speaking ...;-D ... If a tree falls in the forest and Helen Keller was there, did it make a sound? ... ]'-) has she been cutting trees down again? I've told her before about that, but does she listen? Turns a blind eye every time. Lightroom doesn't know that ypu've located and grouped the 'not-in- collection' set of files, and that's what's important. Russell's Lightroom paradox: is the collection of all collections, a collection? Lightroom should embody Zermelo's axiomatic set theory. Or is that too obvious? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Lightroom filtering/sorting question - is this possible?
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Can I make Lightroom show the set of all collections that do not contain themselves? It is mathematically impossible. Breaks the assumption of identity in the definition of a set. See Set Theory 1. Yes, Godfrey. That was the joke I was making. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Lightroom filtering/sorting question - is this possible?
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Can I make Lightroom show the set of all collections that do not contain themselves? It is mathematically impossible. Breaks the assumption of identity in the definition of a set. See Set Theory 1. Yes, Godfrey. That was the joke I was making. Oh, that was a joke? I'm a little distracted today. ;-) -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Lightroom filtering/sorting question - is this possible?
Is there a way to filter my view of images to see: Only images that are NOT part of collection? Here's why I want to do it: Sometimes when I shoot, say, a live concert... I'll have tons and tons of machine-gun sequences. I'll sort through and pick the one which works best for me from that sequence and then I'd like to delete the rest. For the initial sorting, I've been using the x to tag for deletion, and the b key to throw the candidates into the quick collection. Every once in awhile I hit cmd-delete to get rid of the duds - y'know, whittling down the huge stack It would be handy, when all is said and done and I've published my web gallery or whatnot, to see everything from that show which DIDN'T end up in the collection/gallery so that I could just nuke 'em all (or figure out why I ought to keep an image that I didn't think was good enough to share). Right now my backwards way of doing it is to assign a color of some sort to every image in the collection. Then when I look at the hundreds of images from a show all together, I can see that the images with the red frame are in a collection and I try to figure out if I need to keep any of the neighboring images which do not have a red frame. It's a little tedious. -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Lightroom filtering/sorting question - is this possible?
No idea but I'd be happy to know as well. 2010/9/16, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com: Is there a way to filter my view of images to see: Only images that are NOT part of collection? Here's why I want to do it: Sometimes when I shoot, say, a live concert... I'll have tons and tons of machine-gun sequences. I'll sort through and pick the one which works best for me from that sequence and then I'd like to delete the rest. For the initial sorting, I've been using the x to tag for deletion, and the b key to throw the candidates into the quick collection. Every once in awhile I hit cmd-delete to get rid of the duds - y'know, whittling down the huge stack It would be handy, when all is said and done and I've published my web gallery or whatnot, to see everything from that show which DIDN'T end up in the collection/gallery so that I could just nuke 'em all (or figure out why I ought to keep an image that I didn't think was good enough to share). Right now my backwards way of doing it is to assign a color of some sort to every image in the collection. Then when I look at the hundreds of images from a show all together, I can see that the images with the red frame are in a collection and I try to figure out if I need to keep any of the neighboring images which do not have a red frame. It's a little tedious. -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs -- Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ... Laptop: Macbook 13 Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 Programing: Delphi 2009 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Lightroom filtering/sorting question - is this possible?
There's no specific function or filter to do it, but it's pretty easy to do with a short sequence of steps: - Select all collections in the Collections panel * - Edit-Select All with Grid view displayed (all thumbnails should now be selected - Click on All Photographs in the Catalog panel - Edit-Invert Selection The selected images now are all those images which have not been included in a collection. You can mark them all with a custom label ... Not-In-Collection or something like that ... using the Label field in the Metadata panel. That would then let you find them all by doing a filtered search on the Custom Label items. ** * Click on the first, shift-click on the last, or use command/control-click on each one to select them all ** A custom label will over-ride any current label set setting (like Red or Green, etc). Another strategy would be to mark them with a keyword, eg: NIC or some such that has no other meaning. Hope that helps!™ ]'-) On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote: Is there a way to filter my view of images to see: Only images that are NOT part of collection? Here's why I want to do it: Sometimes when I shoot, say, a live concert... I'll have tons and tons of machine-gun sequences. I'll sort through and pick the one which works best for me from that sequence and then I'd like to delete the rest. For the initial sorting, I've been using the x to tag for deletion, and the b key to throw the candidates into the quick collection. Every once in awhile I hit cmd-delete to get rid of the duds - y'know, whittling down the huge stack It would be handy, when all is said and done and I've published my web gallery or whatnot, to see everything from that show which DIDN'T end up in the collection/gallery so that I could just nuke 'em all (or figure out why I ought to keep an image that I didn't think was good enough to share). Right now my backwards way of doing it is to assign a color of some sort to every image in the collection. Then when I look at the hundreds of images from a show all together, I can see that the images with the red frame are in a collection and I try to figure out if I need to keep any of the neighboring images which do not have a red frame. It's a little tedious. -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Lightroom filtering/sorting question - is this possible?
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote: Sometimes when I shoot, say, a live concert... I'll have tons and tons of machine-gun sequences. I'll sort through and pick the one which works best for me from that sequence and then I'd like to delete the rest. For the initial sorting, I've been using the x to tag for deletion, and the b key to throw the candidates into the quick collection. Every once in awhile I hit cmd-delete to get rid of the duds - y'know, whittling down the huge stack It would be handy, when all is said and done and I've published my web gallery or whatnot, to see everything from that show which DIDN'T end up in the collection/gallery so that I could just nuke 'em all (or figure out why I ought to keep an image that I didn't think was good enough to share). Right now my backwards way of doing it is to assign a color of some sort to every image in the collection. Then when I look at the hundreds of images from a show all together, I can see that the images with the red frame are in a collection and I try to figure out if I need to keep any of the neighboring images which do not have a red frame. It's a little tedious. My methodology for similar things is to use the flags in the following manner: - Looking at the images in the Folder view, I step through the images one at a time using the caps-lock-key-down auto-advance and the P, U, and X keys. P sets the pick flag on the image, X sets the reject flag, U simply passes over and advances to the next image. - Once done with that, I filter on the Rejected images. If they're all really rejects, I delete them. If any have any possibilities, I unset the Reject flag. - Then I filter on the Picks. Select all, and create a collection with name MMDD - event name PICKs. The view now automatically jumps to the collection where I can refine my picks more deliberately. * * Remember that flags exist only in the context of a specific view ... that is, dropping a set of picked images into a collections, the flags do not follow, they are all cleared in the collection view ... so once into the collection you can do your pick sequence again and refine the set down further. Labels and ratings, on the other hand, persist across context boundaries with the result that you can now, in the collection, use labels and ratings to further grade and pick your selections. Later, when you want to see all the photos made on 20100916 - All Boy Band concert PICKs, just select that collection, then choose the Go to Folder in Library command to find all the others in the Folder structure made that same day. Your labels and ratings will all be there, along with your initial flag settings. (And if you didn't delete the rejected ones, they'll be there too.) -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Lightroom filtering/sorting question - is this possible?
On Sep 16, 2010, at 13:26, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: My methodology for similar things is to use the flags in the following manner: - Looking at the images in the Folder view, I step through the images one at a time using the caps-lock-key-down auto-advance and the P, U, and X keys. P sets the pick flag on the image, X sets the reject flag, U simply passes over and advances to the next image. - Once done with that, I filter on the Rejected images. If they're all really rejects, I delete them. If any have any possibilities, I unset the Reject flag. - Then I filter on the Picks. Select all, and create a collection with name MMDD - event name PICKs. The view now automatically jumps to the collection where I can refine my picks more deliberately. * * Remember that flags exist only in the context of a specific view ... that is, dropping a set of picked images into a collections, the flags do not follow, they are all cleared in the collection view ... so once into the collection you can do your pick sequence again and refine the set down further. Labels and ratings, on the other hand, persist across context boundaries with the result that you can now, in the collection, use labels and ratings to further grade and pick your selections. Later, when you want to see all the photos made on 20100916 - All Boy Band concert PICKs, just select that collection, then choose the Go to Folder in Library command to find all the others in the Folder structure made that same day. Your labels and ratings will all be there, along with your initial flag settings. (And if you didn't delete the rejected ones, they'll be there too.) That is useful. I will practice this a bit because it sounds a bit more efficient than what I've been doing. Thank you! (In the days of iPhoto, this would have just been a nightmare. All hail Lightroom!) -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: A warning about mail filtering
I'll have you know that I switched from digest to individual so that I would have the privilege of using my filter. It's actually the first time I've actually kill-filed someone in all the years I've surfed and played in cyberspace. To quote a television commercial from the 1970...Oh, what a relief it is! YIPPEE! Yolanda Mark Roberts wrote: Really? Anything (anyone) in particular you want to filter? Evil Grin David J Brooks wrote in response to Cotty: Hell, i;'d be happy to get the dam thing to actually filter something./ Cotty wrote in response to Boris: Live by the sword, die by the sword!! On 19/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed: Ladies and gentlemen, as of now it happened several times: the e-mail I sent out or I received from fellow PDMLers ended up either in my spam folder or marked as spam by GMail filtering. It did not happen too many times, but it indeed took place. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: A warning about mail filtering
David J Brooks wrote: Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 19/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed: Ladies and gentlemen, as of now it happened several times: the e-mail I sent out or I received from fellow PDMLers ended up either in my spam folder or marked as spam by GMail filtering. It did not happen too many times, but it indeed took place. Live by the sword, die by the sword!! Hell, i;'d be happy to get the dam thing to actually filter something./ Really? Anything (anyone) in particular you want to filter? Evil Grin -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
A warning about mail filtering
Hi! Ladies and gentlemen, as of now it happened several times: the e-mail I sent out or I received from fellow PDMLers ended up either in my spam folder or marked as spam by GMail filtering. It did not happen too many times, but it indeed took place. Thanks. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: A warning about mail filtering
Yes, it happens. I manually empty my spam filter frequently, so I can check to see if any of the messages are genuine. If too much builds up it all goes into the bit bucket. :-) Cheers, Dave On 1/19/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Ladies and gentlemen, as of now it happened several times: the e-mail I sent out or I received from fellow PDMLers ended up either in my spam folder or marked as spam by GMail filtering. It did not happen too many times, but it indeed took place. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: A warning about mail filtering
- Original Message - From: Boris Liberman Subject: A warning about mail filtering Hi! Ladies and gentlemen, as of now it happened several times: the e-mail I sent out or I received from fellow PDMLers ended up either in my spam folder or marked as spam by GMail filtering. It did not happen too many times, but it indeed took place. It's an imperfect world. Sometimes the problem lies with server side spam filtering, which is a little more difficult to control. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: A warning about mail filtering
Of course Bill, it is imperfect. I just wanted to point out something that made me think would be helpful if said out loud. Boris - Original Message - From: Boris Liberman Subject: A warning about mail filtering Hi! Ladies and gentlemen, as of now it happened several times: the e-mail I sent out or I received from fellow PDMLers ended up either in my spam folder or marked as spam by GMail filtering. It did not happen too many times, but it indeed took place. It's an imperfect world. Sometimes the problem lies with server side spam filtering, which is a little more difficult to control. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: MARK! A warning about mail filtering
Mark! It's an imperfect world. from William Robb Tom C. From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: A warning about mail filtering Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:22:09 -0600 - Original Message - From: Boris Liberman Subject: A warning about mail filtering Hi! Ladies and gentlemen, as of now it happened several times: the e-mail I sent out or I received from fellow PDMLers ended up either in my spam folder or marked as spam by GMail filtering. It did not happen too many times, but it indeed took place. It's an imperfect world. Sometimes the problem lies with server side spam filtering, which is a little more difficult to control. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: A warning about mail filtering
On 19/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed: Ladies and gentlemen, as of now it happened several times: the e-mail I sent out or I received from fellow PDMLers ended up either in my spam folder or marked as spam by GMail filtering. It did not happen too many times, but it indeed took place. Live by the sword, die by the sword!! -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: A warning about mail filtering
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 07:29:45PM +, Cotty wrote: On 19/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed: Ladies and gentlemen, as of now it happened several times: the e-mail I sent out or I received from fellow PDMLers ended up either in my spam folder or marked as spam by GMail filtering. It did not happen too many times, but it indeed took place. Live by the sword, die by the sword!! That's one reason I have an account on Panix. They don't do *any* pre- filtering of my mail; if a message ends up in my spam folder, or in the bit bucket, it's because I've asked for it. They do offer spamassasin if you want to use it (and I call it from within my .procmailrc script), and one of the other panix users has a pretty good Virus Snagger (TM) which is free to panix mail users. But apart from that all filtering and sorting of mail is under my explicit control; if you end up in my $JUNK folder client list it's because I've intentionally put you there. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: A warning about mail filtering
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 19/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed: Ladies and gentlemen, as of now it happened several times: the e-mail I sent out or I received from fellow PDMLers ended up either in my spam folder or marked as spam by GMail filtering. It did not happen too many times, but it indeed took place. Live by the sword, die by the sword!! Hell, i;'d be happy to get the dam thing to actually filter something./ Dave -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net Equine Photography in York Region -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: A warning about mail filtering
Cotty, I am perfectly certain neither you or I would want to die by the tools of our respective crafts ;-). Cotty wrote: On 19/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed: Ladies and gentlemen, as of now it happened several times: the e-mail I sent out or I received from fellow PDMLers ended up either in my spam folder or marked as spam by GMail filtering. It did not happen too many times, but it indeed took place. Live by the sword, die by the sword!! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
OT - web filtering software
Sorry to be so far off topic here, but you guys and gals seem like the right crowd to ask. Can anyone recommend / point me in the right direction to some good web filtering software that I can install on my son's iMac, allowing me to restrict access to inappropriate internet sites - basically to censor out porn and violence? Hate to do it but there are things that a 10 year old should not see yet... Please contact me offlist to keep noise down. Must be Mac OS X friendly, but really any pointers gratefully received. New territory for me. email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _ Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
Filtering Darkroom Chemicals
Would using one of those cone-style, Melitta-type filters work well for filtering developer? Anyone tried it? -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Filtering Darkroom Chemicals
- Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff Subject: Filtering Darkroom Chemicals Would using one of those cone-style, Melitta-type filters work well for filtering developer? Anyone tried it? I tried it once to remove some precipitate that had occured in a developer. I recall that it didn't work well at all. Why are you wanting to filter your chemistry? William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Filtering Darkroom Chemicals
It's just an old habit. Whenever I mix powdered chemistry, I filter it if I'm going to use it within a few hours. William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff Subject: Filtering Darkroom Chemicals Would using one of those cone-style, Melitta-type filters work well for filtering developer? Anyone tried it? I tried it once to remove some precipitate that had occured in a developer. I recall that it didn't work well at all. Why are you wanting to filter your chemistry? -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/darkroom-rentals/index.html - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Filtering Darkroom Chemicals
They seem to work ok when filtering selenium, it just takes a while On 31 Mar 2002 at 15:21, Shel Belinkoff wrote: It's just an old habit. Whenever I mix powdered chemistry, I filter it if I'm going to use it within a few hours. William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff Subject: Filtering Darkroom Chemicals Would using one of those cone-style, Melitta-type filters work well for filtering developer? Anyone tried it? I tried it once to remove some precipitate that had occured in a developer. I recall that it didn't work well at all. Why are you wanting to filter your chemistry? -- Shel Belinkoff - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
OT: A question about filtering posts
Please answer off list. If I choose to block messages from some 'extremists' on both sides of the WTC issue, does it create a problem of bounced messages for PDML? I would prefer not to read the indictments leveled against the USA -- I have been a teacher/student of history nearly all my life and am aware of problems and disasters (whether by intent or through bad judgment) that we and others have caused. To go further, I have traveled extensively and have had almost exclusively good experiences with people of many nationalities, thus I do not care to read the 'kill them all and let God sort them out' posts. Considering poster's inclination to answer in indictments or extremes without changing the subject line, deleting is not a particularly viable solution. Back to the original question -- does blocking cause a PDML problem? If so, I will unsubscribe to avoid causing a problem. Best regards to most, Ed M. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: OT: A question about filtering posts
Filtering posts won't have any effect on the rest of the list with any email software I'm aware of: It just auto-deletes the stuff after it hits your inbox. If you're looking for software I can heartily recommend Forte Agent. Very versatile filtering capabilities (which I've been making use of long before last Tuesday). -- Mark Roberts www.robertstech.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
