Re: OT: Digital black & white
On 11/8/2015 5:25 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote: I went with some friends to the Lee Miller exhibition at the Imperial War Museum today - it's a superb exhibition and I recommend it very highly. I took my Fuji X20 with me because one of my friends has one on my recommendation but couldn't figure out how to set it to black & white only, which is all she's interested in shooting. So before going I set mine up - I normally shoot raw - so I would know what to do, and would look like I knew what I was doing. I took some snaps to see how it all plays out. This is one of them, and I have a question about it. http://www.web-options.com/IWM.jpg If you enlarge it to its full size the 'grain', for want of a better term, is very blobby as if I'd shot it through rippled bathroom glass. I don't think this is noise - the iso was 200 - but it's pretty ugly. I've never noticed anything like this when rendering in b from raw. Is this normal for in-camera b jpg? Whether it's normal or not, what is the cause? Ta, B This is just a SWAG, with *NO* actual expertise to back it up, but could the camera be using only the data from one channel to create the B image and what you're seeing is the pattern of the Beyer sensor? -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
OT: Digital black & white
I went with some friends to the Lee Miller exhibition at the Imperial War Museum today - it's a superb exhibition and I recommend it very highly. I took my Fuji X20 with me because one of my friends has one on my recommendation but couldn't figure out how to set it to black & white only, which is all she's interested in shooting. So before going I set mine up - I normally shoot raw - so I would know what to do, and would look like I knew what I was doing. I took some snaps to see how it all plays out. This is one of them, and I have a question about it. http://www.web-options.com/IWM.jpg If you enlarge it to its full size the 'grain', for want of a better term, is very blobby as if I'd shot it through rippled bathroom glass. I don't think this is noise - the iso was 200 - but it's pretty ugly. I've never noticed anything like this when rendering in b from raw. Is this normal for in-camera b jpg? Whether it's normal or not, what is the cause? Ta, B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Digital black & white
Bob, that looks just like the kind of image you get from an older gen cellphone with a fairly lo-rez sensor, like 3-4 mpix. How have you got the JPG rendering configured? They usually provide two adjustments. Eg: in Ricoh's case, number of pixels (image size) and JPEG Quality (1 to 4 stars). If you reduce the size I'd expect something like you're seeing here. But if that's the result from using the highest Q settings, then I'd never use anything but raw. :) On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Bob W-PDMLwrote: > I went with some friends to the Lee Miller exhibition at the Imperial War > Museum today - it's a superb exhibition and I recommend it very highly. > > I took my Fuji X20 with me because one of my friends has one on my > recommendation but couldn't figure out how to set it to black & white only, > which is all she's interested in shooting. So before going I set mine up - I > normally shoot raw - so I would know what to do, and would look like I knew > what I was doing. > > I took some snaps to see how it all plays out. This is one of them, and I > have a question about it. > > http://www.web-options.com/IWM.jpg > > If you enlarge it to its full size the 'grain', for want of a better term, is > very blobby as if I'd shot it through rippled bathroom glass. I don't think > this is noise - the iso was 200 - but it's pretty ugly. I've never noticed > anything like this when rendering in b from raw. > > Is this normal for in-camera b jpg? > > Whether it's normal or not, what is the cause? > > Ta, > B > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Digital black & white
On 8/11/15, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed: >http://www.web-options.com/IWM.jpg > >If you enlarge it to its full size the 'grain', for want of a better >term, is very blobby as if I'd shot it through rippled bathroom glass. I >don't think this is noise - the iso was 200 - but it's pretty ugly. I've >never noticed anything like this when rendering in b from raw. > >Is this normal for in-camera b jpg? > >Whether it's normal or not, what is the cause? That's not normal. I have no such patterning - will investigate in the morning and send you a camera-output jpeg file you can examine. I'll go through my settings and list off what i do cheers -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production -- _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Digital black & white
On 8/11/15, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed: > Actually, I suspect I'm leading people up the garden path, because I >did tweak the shot in LR You stuck the fucking craquelure filter onto it ;) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production -- _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Digital black & white
I remember the first time I went with my girlfriend to the print room at the Photographers' Gallery here in London flipping through albums of original prints by HCB that we could have had for a couple of hundred pounds each. Of course back then we didn't have anything remotely like £200-. 2 or 3 years ago I was in the Paris Magnum print room and a young couple were flipping through an album of original prints by HCB. When they heard they were from about 2000 euros they blanched in exactly the same way we did 30 years previously. B > On 9 Nov 2015, at 00:03, knarfwrote: > > Maybe ten years ago there was a Magnum exhibit that showed up at a gallery > here in Toronto. I think the only HCB was ~Sur le Rue Mouffetard~. Can't > remember the size but it was by far the most expensive print there at > $8,000CDN. > > Everything else was $2,000 to $4,000. Even at the higher price I thought > Henri's was quite reasonable. > > As for yours, I'll have to think about it... > > Cheers, > > frank > >> On November 8, 2015 6:49:02 PM EST, Bob W-PDML wrote: >> Thanks Frank. I don't think mine's even half as good as Henry's, so >> I'll let you have a copy for 1/4th what Christies are asking. >> >> B >> >>> On 8 Nov 2015, at 23:36, knarf wrote: >>> >>> I don't see what you're talking about on my phone. And if I did see >> it I wouldn't have an answer as to what it is. >>> >>> I do like the shot a lot, though. >>> >>> My turn to be reminded of something: >> http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/photographs/henri-cartier-bresson-dans-un-train-roumanie-1975-5494182-details.aspx >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> frank >>> On November 8, 2015 5:25:32 PM EST, Bob W-PDML >> wrote: I went with some friends to the Lee Miller exhibition at the >> Imperial War Museum today - it's a superb exhibition and I recommend it very highly. I took my Fuji X20 with me because one of my friends has one on my recommendation but couldn't figure out how to set it to black & >> white only, which is all she's interested in shooting. So before going I >> set mine up - I normally shoot raw - so I would know what to do, and >> would look like I knew what I was doing. I took some snaps to see how it all plays out. This is one of them, >> and I have a question about it. http://www.web-options.com/IWM.jpg If you enlarge it to its full size the 'grain', for want of a better term, is very blobby as if I'd shot it through rippled bathroom >> glass. I don't think this is noise - the iso was 200 - but it's pretty >> ugly. I've never noticed anything like this when rendering in b from >> raw. Is this normal for in-camera b jpg? Whether it's normal or not, what is the cause? Ta, B >>> >>> -- >>> >>> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson >>> >>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >> and follow the directions. > > -- > > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson > > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Digital black & white
Thanks, I was hoping you'd jump in. My Q button doesn't do anything. My settings are consistent with yours, although I have IS switched off. I shot this with raw+jpeg, but I don't think that would account for it. Actually, I suspect I'm leading people up the garden path, because I did tweak the shot in LR and that might well have introduced some foolishness. It certainly nullifies any straight comparisons. I'll have to do some experimenting. Thanks to all for the help. B > On 8 Nov 2015, at 22:56, Steve Cottrellwrote: > > On 8/11/15, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> http://www.web-options.com/IWM.jpg >> > >> Is this normal for in-camera b jpg? > > I have the following settings saved to my 'C2' on the main dial: > > > press the 'Q' button lower right to access these settings: > > (reading from top left to bottom right) > > P for Programme > ISO auto 800 > DR400 > WB auto > > NR 0 > L 3:2 > FINE > B (for Black and white) > > H tone 0 > S tone 0 > Color 0 > Sharp 0 > > (timer) OFF > centre focus box > stabilisation (hand icon)2 > screen brightness (sun icon) 0 > > > I suspect that the problem your image exhibited could be a problem with > the IS function? > > I'll send you an image off list with the above settings applied > > > -- > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, > || (O) |Web Video Production > -- > _ > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Digital black & white
Thanks - I was on BWR too, but 0 on the others. I'll try that combo. As I said to Cotty though - squirting it through LR has queered the pitch, so I'll play around a bit. B > On 8 Nov 2015, at 23:09, David J Brookswrote: > > Bob, i have my X30 set tp yhis: > > My favorite B settings on the Fuji cameras for most situations are: > > – Film simulation: BR (B Red Filter) > > – Sharpness: +1 > > – Highlight Tone: +1 > > – Shadow Tone: +2 > > – Noise Reduction: -2 > > This will give you a fairly contrasty B look when exposed correctly. > > from this website: > http://weshootfuji.com/2015/04/03/how-to-get-great-bw-results-from-your-fuji-x-camera-and-become-a-better-bw-photographer/ > > Dave > >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote: >> I went with some friends to the Lee Miller exhibition at the Imperial War >> Museum today - it's a superb exhibition and I recommend it very highly. >> >> I took my Fuji X20 with me because one of my friends has one on my >> recommendation but couldn't figure out how to set it to black & white only, >> which is all she's interested in shooting. So before going I set mine up - I >> normally shoot raw - so I would know what to do, and would look like I knew >> what I was doing. >> >> I took some snaps to see how it all plays out. This is one of them, and I >> have a question about it. >> >> http://www.web-options.com/IWM.jpg >> >> If you enlarge it to its full size the 'grain', for want of a better term, >> is very blobby as if I'd shot it through rippled bathroom glass. I don't >> think this is noise - the iso was 200 - but it's pretty ugly. I've never >> noticed anything like this when rendering in b from raw. >> >> Is this normal for in-camera b jpg? >> >> Whether it's normal or not, what is the cause? >> >> Ta, >> B >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > > -- > Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. > www.caughtinmotion.com > http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ > York Region, Ontario, Canada > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Digital black & white
Bob, i have my X30 set tp yhis: My favorite B settings on the Fuji cameras for most situations are: – Film simulation: BR (B Red Filter) – Sharpness: +1 – Highlight Tone: +1 – Shadow Tone: +2 – Noise Reduction: -2 This will give you a fairly contrasty B look when exposed correctly. from this website: http://weshootfuji.com/2015/04/03/how-to-get-great-bw-results-from-your-fuji-x-camera-and-become-a-better-bw-photographer/ Dave On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Bob W-PDMLwrote: > I went with some friends to the Lee Miller exhibition at the Imperial War > Museum today - it's a superb exhibition and I recommend it very highly. > > I took my Fuji X20 with me because one of my friends has one on my > recommendation but couldn't figure out how to set it to black & white only, > which is all she's interested in shooting. So before going I set mine up - I > normally shoot raw - so I would know what to do, and would look like I knew > what I was doing. > > I took some snaps to see how it all plays out. This is one of them, and I > have a question about it. > > http://www.web-options.com/IWM.jpg > > If you enlarge it to its full size the 'grain', for want of a better term, is > very blobby as if I'd shot it through rippled bathroom glass. I don't think > this is noise - the iso was 200 - but it's pretty ugly. I've never noticed > anything like this when rendering in b from raw. > > Is this normal for in-camera b jpg? > > Whether it's normal or not, what is the cause? > > Ta, > B > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Digital black & white
I don't see what you're talking about on my phone. And if I did see it I wouldn't have an answer as to what it is. I do like the shot a lot, though. My turn to be reminded of something: http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/photographs/henri-cartier-bresson-dans-un-train-roumanie-1975-5494182-details.aspx Cheers, frank On November 8, 2015 5:25:32 PM EST, Bob W-PDMLwrote: >I went with some friends to the Lee Miller exhibition at the Imperial >War Museum today - it's a superb exhibition and I recommend it very >highly. > >I took my Fuji X20 with me because one of my friends has one on my >recommendation but couldn't figure out how to set it to black & white >only, which is all she's interested in shooting. So before going I set >mine up - I normally shoot raw - so I would know what to do, and would >look like I knew what I was doing. > >I took some snaps to see how it all plays out. This is one of them, and >I have a question about it. > >http://www.web-options.com/IWM.jpg > >If you enlarge it to its full size the 'grain', for want of a better >term, is very blobby as if I'd shot it through rippled bathroom glass. >I don't think this is noise - the iso was 200 - but it's pretty ugly. >I've never noticed anything like this when rendering in b from raw. > >Is this normal for in-camera b jpg? > >Whether it's normal or not, what is the cause? > >Ta, >B -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Digital black & white
Thanks Frank. I don't think mine's even half as good as Henry's, so I'll let you have a copy for 1/4th what Christies are asking. B > On 8 Nov 2015, at 23:36, knarfwrote: > > I don't see what you're talking about on my phone. And if I did see it I > wouldn't have an answer as to what it is. > > I do like the shot a lot, though. > > My turn to be reminded of something: > > http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/photographs/henri-cartier-bresson-dans-un-train-roumanie-1975-5494182-details.aspx > > Cheers, > > frank > >> On November 8, 2015 5:25:32 PM EST, Bob W-PDML wrote: >> I went with some friends to the Lee Miller exhibition at the Imperial >> War Museum today - it's a superb exhibition and I recommend it very >> highly. >> >> I took my Fuji X20 with me because one of my friends has one on my >> recommendation but couldn't figure out how to set it to black & white >> only, which is all she's interested in shooting. So before going I set >> mine up - I normally shoot raw - so I would know what to do, and would >> look like I knew what I was doing. >> >> I took some snaps to see how it all plays out. This is one of them, and >> I have a question about it. >> >> http://www.web-options.com/IWM.jpg >> >> If you enlarge it to its full size the 'grain', for want of a better >> term, is very blobby as if I'd shot it through rippled bathroom glass. >> I don't think this is noise - the iso was 200 - but it's pretty ugly. >> I've never noticed anything like this when rendering in b from raw. >> >> Is this normal for in-camera b jpg? >> >> Whether it's normal or not, what is the cause? >> >> Ta, >> B > > -- > > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson > > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Digital black & white
On 8/11/15, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed: >http://www.web-options.com/IWM.jpg > >Is this normal for in-camera b jpg? I have the following settings saved to my 'C2' on the main dial: press the 'Q' button lower right to access these settings: (reading from top left to bottom right) P for Programme ISO auto 800 DR400 WB auto NR 0 L 3:2 FINE B (for Black and white) H tone 0 S tone 0 Color 0 Sharp 0 (timer) OFF centre focus box stabilisation (hand icon)2 screen brightness (sun icon) 0 I suspect that the problem your image exhibited could be a problem with the IS function? I'll send you an image off list with the above settings applied -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production -- _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Digital black & white
Thanks Bruce. I think I shot myself into the foot with LR. B > On 8 Nov 2015, at 22:40, Bruce Walkerwrote: > > Bob, that looks just like the kind of image you get from an older gen > cellphone with a fairly lo-rez sensor, like 3-4 mpix. > > How have you got the JPG rendering configured? They usually provide > two adjustments. Eg: in Ricoh's case, number of pixels (image size) > and JPEG Quality (1 to 4 stars). If you reduce the size I'd expect > something like you're seeing here. > > But if that's the result from using the highest Q settings, then I'd > never use anything but raw. :) > > >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote: >> I went with some friends to the Lee Miller exhibition at the Imperial War >> Museum today - it's a superb exhibition and I recommend it very highly. >> >> I took my Fuji X20 with me because one of my friends has one on my >> recommendation but couldn't figure out how to set it to black & white only, >> which is all she's interested in shooting. So before going I set mine up - I >> normally shoot raw - so I would know what to do, and would look like I knew >> what I was doing. >> >> I took some snaps to see how it all plays out. This is one of them, and I >> have a question about it. >> >> http://www.web-options.com/IWM.jpg >> >> If you enlarge it to its full size the 'grain', for want of a better term, >> is very blobby as if I'd shot it through rippled bathroom glass. I don't >> think this is noise - the iso was 200 - but it's pretty ugly. I've never >> noticed anything like this when rendering in b from raw. >> >> Is this normal for in-camera b jpg? >> >> Whether it's normal or not, what is the cause? >> >> Ta, >> B >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > > -- > -bmw > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Digital black & white
On 8 Nov 2015, at 23:21, Steve Cottrellwrote: > > On 8/11/15, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> Actually, I suspect I'm leading people up the garden path, because I >> did tweak the shot in LR > > You stuck the fucking craquelure filter onto it ;) > I thought it would make my bum look nicer - it's French for crack allure. B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: Digital black & white
Maybe ten years ago there was a Magnum exhibit that showed up at a gallery here in Toronto. I think the only HCB was ~Sur le Rue Mouffetard~. Can't remember the size but it was by far the most expensive print there at $8,000CDN. Everything else was $2,000 to $4,000. Even at the higher price I thought Henri's was quite reasonable. As for yours, I'll have to think about it... Cheers, frank On November 8, 2015 6:49:02 PM EST, Bob W-PDMLwrote: >Thanks Frank. I don't think mine's even half as good as Henry's, so >I'll let you have a copy for 1/4th what Christies are asking. > >B > >> On 8 Nov 2015, at 23:36, knarf wrote: >> >> I don't see what you're talking about on my phone. And if I did see >it I wouldn't have an answer as to what it is. >> >> I do like the shot a lot, though. >> >> My turn to be reminded of something: >> >> >http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/photographs/henri-cartier-bresson-dans-un-train-roumanie-1975-5494182-details.aspx >> >> Cheers, >> >> frank >> >>> On November 8, 2015 5:25:32 PM EST, Bob W-PDML > wrote: >>> I went with some friends to the Lee Miller exhibition at the >Imperial >>> War Museum today - it's a superb exhibition and I recommend it very >>> highly. >>> >>> I took my Fuji X20 with me because one of my friends has one on my >>> recommendation but couldn't figure out how to set it to black & >white >>> only, which is all she's interested in shooting. So before going I >set >>> mine up - I normally shoot raw - so I would know what to do, and >would >>> look like I knew what I was doing. >>> >>> I took some snaps to see how it all plays out. This is one of them, >and >>> I have a question about it. >>> >>> http://www.web-options.com/IWM.jpg >>> >>> If you enlarge it to its full size the 'grain', for want of a better >>> term, is very blobby as if I'd shot it through rippled bathroom >glass. >>> I don't think this is noise - the iso was 200 - but it's pretty >ugly. >>> I've never noticed anything like this when rendering in b from >raw. >>> >>> Is this normal for in-camera b jpg? >>> >>> Whether it's normal or not, what is the cause? >>> >>> Ta, >>> B >> >> -- >> >> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson >> >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >and follow the directions. -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.