Re: PUG Commentary: Frank Theriault

2001-06-10 Thread Frank Theriault

Thanks, Paul,

I visit my Mother in Mahone Bay, Nova Scotia two or three times per year,
and I walk by that house dozens of times per visit, often with my camera
around my neck, but I never took it's photo until last year.  Just something
about the light and shadows that day appealled to me.  I'm especially glad
therefore, that you noticed and commented positively on lighting of that
shot

I don't take a lot of architectural shots, so I'm not very practised or good
at it.  Your positive feedback is therefore much appreciated.

Which gets me to thinking that this is exactly why I think that these PUG
commentaries are so valuable.  There were so many amazing submissions this
month, that a shot like mine is not going to get noticed as someone's
favourite of the month.  Yet (with the greatest of humility), I don't
think my shot is so glaringly awful that it will garner notice for that
reason.  So it's nice that I get some criticism regarding an image that
would otherwise likely be lost in the shuffle.

Which further reminds me that I'd better get off my ass and do my critiques!

Thanks again, Paul.

frank

PAUL STENQUIST wrote:

 Frank Theriault, Gingerbread
 I'm a big fan of Victorian architecture, and Frank's rendering of
 gingerbread detail invokes a warm and fuzzy feeling. I'd love to pull up
 a chair on that porch and spend an afternoon sipping iced tea -- or,
 better yet, a good single malt. From a technical perspective, I like the
 balance of light and shadow. The little bit of light that spills over
 into the shadowed portion of the shot is a nice touch. The framing
 appears to be a good choice in terms of illustrating the gingerbread
 detail without turning the shot into just another picture of a house.
 Lens choice seems to be just right. The slightly wider than normal 35
 gives the shot a sense of expansiveness without excessive distortion.
 Nice work.
 Paul Stenquist
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




PUG Commentary: Frank Theriault

2001-06-09 Thread PAUL STENQUIST

Frank Theriault, Gingerbread
I'm a big fan of Victorian architecture, and Frank's rendering of
gingerbread detail invokes a warm and fuzzy feeling. I'd love to pull up
a chair on that porch and spend an afternoon sipping iced tea -- or,
better yet, a good single malt. From a technical perspective, I like the
balance of light and shadow. The little bit of light that spills over
into the shadowed portion of the shot is a nice touch. The framing
appears to be a good choice in terms of illustrating the gingerbread
detail without turning the shot into just another picture of a house.
Lens choice seems to be just right. The slightly wider than normal 35
gives the shot a sense of expansiveness without excessive distortion.
Nice work.
Paul Stenquist
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




PUG Commentary, Frank Theriault

2001-05-02 Thread PAUL STENQUIST

Moss Corner, Mosport, 1973 by Frank Theriault.
I love motorsports and motorsport photography, and this is an excellent
example of the art.  I'm not familiar with the Praktica LTL, but I
suspect that it's manual focus, which makes this shot all the more
commendable. Are you certain  that the shutter speed was1/250; it looks
like somthing in the neighborhood 1/60? However, I ask that on the
assumption that the car was not moving extremely fast at this point on
the race track. Achieving a smooth pan at optimum focus is something
that can only be learned through extensive practice. You apparently have
learned it. In terms of BW craftsmanship, I would cite the photo's nice
range of middle grays, along with almost white highlights and almost
black shadows. Your exposure and processing must have been just about
dead on. This one's a keeper for me. It goes in my files.
Paul Stenquist
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: PUG Commentary, Frank Theriault

2001-05-02 Thread Frank Theriault

Thanks, Paul.  I'm glad you liked it.  More reaction below:

PAUL STENQUIST wrote:

 Moss Corner, Mosport, 1973 by Frank Theriault.
 I love motorsports and motorsport photography, and this is an excellent
 example of the art.  I'm not familiar with the Praktica LTL, but I
 suspect that it's manual focus, which makes this shot all the more
 commendable.

The LTL basically had the features of an SP.  Manual focus, TTL stop-down
aperture match-needle metering (except the LTL had centre-weighted
metering).  I guess that everything in the mid-70's was manual focus!  :-)

 Are you certain  that the shutter speed was1/250; it looks
 like somthing in the neighborhood 1/60?

I usually panned at around 1/250th for races.  This one may have been as
slow as 1/125th (hard to remember after all these years), but I'm certain it
wasn't 1/60th.

 However, I ask that on the
 assumption that the car was not moving extremely fast at this point on
 the race track.

Moss Corner is a hair-pin, and is the slowest part of the track.

 Achieving a smooth pan at optimum focus is something
 that can only be learned through extensive practice.

You're right, you get better with practice.  Pretty simple, though.  Small
aperture for depth of field.  Pre-focus on the track, pick up your car in
the viewfinder as early as you can, follow it through to the pre-focus
point.  Someone once told me that the secret to panning is the same as a
golf or a baseball swing:  it's all in the follow though.  Keep following
the car well after you squeeze the shutter - it really smooths things out.

 You apparently have
 learned it. In terms of BW craftsmanship, I would cite the photo's nice
 range of middle grays, along with almost white highlights and almost
 black shadows. Your exposure and processing must have been just about
 dead on. This one's a keeper for me. It goes in my files.

Keep in mind, too, that I would normally bring 10 to 20 rolls of film with
me to a race weekend.  If I got 20 or 30 good race shots, I'd be happy.
So, my success rate wasn't particularly high, although it did get a bit
better with experience.  I guess if you take enough shots, a few of them
will turn out okay!

Thanks again.
-frank


 Paul Stenquist
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .