Re: Question about MC circular polarizers

2007-05-09 Thread Joseph Tainter
Since one ideally uses a polarizer at a right angle to the sun, I have 
never been certain that adding coating to a polarizer accomplishes very 
much. I believe that Pentax does not add SMC coating to their 
polarizers, while they add SMC coating to nearly everything else that 
light goes through.

Tiffens and Hoyas will usually give you good quality at a decent price.

For coated filters I prefer Pentax, B+W, or Heliopan.

Joe

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Question about MC circular polarizers

2007-05-09 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
The purpose to applying an antireflection coating has nothing at all  
to do with the effects of a polarizing grid on light passing through  
it. Antireflection coatings reduce scatter at the air-glass  
interface, which causes flare. This is just as much a problem with a  
polarizing filter's surfaces as it is with any other optical surface.

Godfrey

On May 9, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Joseph Tainter wrote:

 Since one ideally uses a polarizer at a right angle to the sun, I have
 never been certain that adding coating to a polarizer accomplishes  
 very
 much. I believe that Pentax does not add SMC coating to their
 polarizers, while they add SMC coating to nearly everything else that
 light goes through.

 Tiffens and Hoyas will usually give you good quality at a decent  
 price.

 For coated filters I prefer Pentax, B+W, or Heliopan.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Question about MC circular polarizers

2007-05-08 Thread Igor Roshchin

Hello!

I have a few questions about Multi-Coated circular polarizers.
I am considering buying one for my SMCP F-70-210/4-5.6, FA 50/1.4
and future D-FA100/2.8.

For other lenses I am using BW 77E slim c-polarizer which works fine
on my both Tokinas. The only problem I have with it is that it is so
slim that I cannot use standart lens caps with it, and the cap it came with 
is a bit loose - so it doesn't stay on the filter attached to the lens.

So, do you have any recommendations for a good quality polarizer that
is not too expensive? Or even better - can you compare or point
to a web-site that has comparison of different polarizer brands?
If you have one that you've been considering to part with, - please
let me know.

Using the opportunity, - if you have any advice on the cap that will
stay on my existing polarizer, - let me know.

Thanks in advance to all your reponses!

Igor


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Question about MC circular polarizers

2007-05-08 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Don't get the slim version, get the standard. Slim versions of  
filters generally dispense with most if not all of the front mounted  
threads to help prevent vignetting with short focal length lenses,  
which isn't a problem with portrait to tele lenses.

G

On May 8, 2007, at 1:52 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:

 I have a few questions about Multi-Coated circular polarizers.
 I am considering buying one for my SMCP F-70-210/4-5.6, FA 50/1.4
 and future D-FA100/2.8.

 For other lenses I am using BW 77E slim c-polarizer which works fine
 on my both Tokinas. The only problem I have with it is that it is so
 slim that I cannot use standart lens caps with it, and the cap it  
 came with
 is a bit loose - so it doesn't stay on the filter attached to the  
 lens.

 So, do you have any recommendations for a good quality polarizer that
 is not too expensive? Or even better - can you compare or point
 to a web-site that has comparison of different polarizer brands?
 If you have one that you've been considering to part with, - please
 let me know.

 Using the opportunity, - if you have any advice on the cap that will
 stay on my existing polarizer, - let me know.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Question about MC circular polarizers

2007-05-08 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 04:52:41PM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote..
 
 Hello!
 
 I have a few questions about Multi-Coated circular polarizers.
 I am considering buying one for my SMCP F-70-210/4-5.6, FA 50/1.4
 and future D-FA100/2.8.
 
 For other lenses I am using BW 77E slim c-polarizer which works fine
 on my both Tokinas. The only problem I have with it is that it is so
 slim that I cannot use standart lens caps with it, and the cap it came with 
 is a bit loose - so it doesn't stay on the filter attached to the lens.
 
 So, do you have any recommendations for a good quality polarizer that
 is not too expensive? Or even better - can you compare or point

I own a Rodenstock C-polariser which works fine for me.

Wilko

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Question about MC circular polarizers

2007-05-08 Thread Igor Roshchin

Yep. It is exactly why I bought the slim version: so that I can use
it on Tokina 19-35 (yet with the film camera).
 It might have been an overkill, - but I definitely had no vignetting.
:-)
I am not looking for a slim version in this case: all the focal lengths
are =50mm.

Any recommendations on the brands?
This is the part where I have no feel for the comparative quality
(and quality/price ratio).

Igor

Tue May 8 16:59:53 EDT 2007
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:

 Don't get the slim version, get the standard. Slim versions of  
 filters generally dispense with most if not all of the front mounted  
 threads to help prevent vignetting with short focal length lenses,  
 which isn't a problem with portrait to tele lenses.



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Question about MC circular polarizers

2007-05-08 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
B+W makes the best polarizers, and their mounts, MRC coatings are  
state of the art.
I wouldn't consider anything else.

G

On May 8, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:


 Yep. It is exactly why I bought the slim version: so that I can use
 it on Tokina 19-35 (yet with the film camera).
  It might have been an overkill, - but I definitely had no vignetting.
 :-)
 I am not looking for a slim version in this case: all the focal  
 lengths
 are =50mm.

 Any recommendations on the brands?
 This is the part where I have no feel for the comparative quality
 (and quality/price ratio).

 Don't get the slim version, get the standard. Slim versions of
 filters generally dispense with most if not all of the front mounted
 threads to help prevent vignetting with short focal length lenses,
 which isn't a problem with portrait to tele lenses.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Question about MC circular polarizers

2007-05-08 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
On 2007-05-08, at 22:52, Igor Roshchin wrote:

 So, do you have any recommendations for a good quality polarizer that
 is not too expensive? Or even better - can you compare or point
 to a web-site that has comparison of different polarizer brands?
 If you have one that you've been considering to part with, - please
 let me know.

 Using the opportunity, - if you have any advice on the cap that will
 stay on my existing polarizer, - let me know.
Try Marumi polarizers - either WPC or the newest DHG. Both has output  
thread despite being slim, so that you can put your ordinary lens cap  
on them without any problems. Their latest water and dirt repellent  
coatings are similar to B+W's MRC:
http://www.marumi-international.com/english/filter_en/Web_en_Seiten/ 
02_web_en_DHG.html
I think new Pro 1 D filters from Hoya have output thread too, but I'm  
not sure, you have to check it before buy.
http://www.hoyafilter.com/products/hoya/pro1d-01.html
Both should be a good choice, and even if slightly worse than B+W,  
that is not a significant difference.


--
Best regards
Sylwek



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net