Re: Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, mike wilson wrote: From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/07/11 Tue PM 02:40:20 GMT To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!) Funny, but I used to date a Jewish Russian emigre. She could rant. Boy could she rant! She claimed it was a cultural thing, but after seeing Boris' rant, I'm beginning to wonder about her claim. LOL There's a gender bias to that cultural thing. 8-))) I think I will wait for the pdmladies to exhaust themselves on you before I confirm that bunny-ears is not gay. Kostas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/07/11 Tue PM 09:28:28 GMT To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!) On 7/11/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's a gender bias to that cultural thing. 8-))) Who, me or her? ;-) Both of you, obviously. 8-) Males can produce some spectacular rants but, for sustain, females win hands down. Although JCO comes close. - Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/07/12 Wed AM 07:17:56 GMT To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!) On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, mike wilson wrote: From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/07/11 Tue PM 02:40:20 GMT To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!) Funny, but I used to date a Jewish Russian emigre. She could rant. Boy could she rant! She claimed it was a cultural thing, but after seeing Boris' rant, I'm beginning to wonder about her claim. LOL There's a gender bias to that cultural thing. 8-))) I think I will wait for the pdmladies to exhaust themselves on you before I confirm that bunny-ears is not gay. The fantasies that the first phrase generates do not bear public examination. I want to take the pictures for the second. 8-) - Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Nothing wrong with the silver version either ;-) I just recieved slides back made with this lens. A 360 degree panorama in fact. They laook pretty good! I'll have to wait for some bad wheater. Scanning all these slides, whike the sun is shining doesn't seem right. Yes, I guess my MZ-S will see a little juse again. I'm glad too that there's film - and 31mm lenses ;-) Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248 -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Boris Liberman Sendt: 11. juli 2006 09:51 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: Just a little rant (or not rant?!) Hello there. Although I mostly shoot digital (*istD) I still have my trusty MZ-6. It is always loaded with film (usually Fuji NPC 160) and I take it for a spin every now and then. Today I received the prints and scans from the most recent roll. It took me roughly half a year to finish the roll *blush*. Mostly I've been trying my limited lenses, notably 31 Ltd, and the fish eye zoom. Man, it is amazing. This 31 Ltd lens is mind blowing... I have the scans (roughly of 6 MegaPixels worth) which I will review and see if I can post anything to underline my point here. Nevertheless, the 10x15 (cm) proofs look alive. You know, I usually (target) practice on my daughter. Few shots are more or less impossible to express in words. The quality is more than superb... Well, I am not saying that I'll be abandoning *istD because of that. But obviously my film camera will see more use. Not to mention that (silver, darn it) MZ-6 with FG grip and black ;-) 31 Ltd balance very nicely in my hands... And the viewfinder view is bloody bigger ;-). Like Cotty keeps saying every now and then - Jumpin' Jupiter! ;-) -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/384 - Release Date: 07/10/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/385 - Release Date: 07/11/2006 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Boris Liberman wrote: Hello there. Although I mostly shoot digital (*istD) I still have my trusty MZ-6. It is always loaded with film (usually Fuji NPC 160) and I take it for a spin every now and then. Today I received the prints and scans from the most recent roll. It took me roughly half a year to finish the roll *blush*. Think of how long it might take if you were using an Olympus Pen! To keep this germane, did Pentax ever make a half-frame? keith whaley Mostly I've been trying my limited lenses, notably 31 Ltd, and the fish eye zoom. Man, it is amazing. This 31 Ltd lens is mind blowing... I have the scans (roughly of 6 MegaPixels worth) which I will review and see if I can post anything to underline my point here. Nevertheless, the 10x15 (cm) proofs look alive. You know, I usually (target) practice on my daughter. Few shots are more or less impossible to express in words. The quality is more than superb... Well, I am not saying that I'll be abandoning *istD because of that. But obviously my film camera will see more use. Not to mention that (silver, darn it) MZ-6 with FG grip and black ;-) 31 Ltd balance very nicely in my hands... And the viewfinder view is bloody bigger ;-). Like Cotty keeps saying every now and then - Jumpin' Jupiter! ;-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On 7/11/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello there. Although I mostly shoot digital (*istD) I still have my trusty MZ-6. It is always loaded with film (usually Fuji NPC 160) and I take it for a spin every now and then. Today I received the prints and scans from the most recent roll. It took me roughly half a year to finish the roll *blush*. Mostly I've been trying my limited lenses, notably 31 Ltd, and the fish eye zoom. Man, it is amazing. This 31 Ltd lens is mind blowing... I have the scans (roughly of 6 MegaPixels worth) which I will review and see if I can post anything to underline my point here. Nevertheless, the 10x15 (cm) proofs look alive. You know, I usually (target) practice on my daughter. Few shots are more or less impossible to express in words. The quality is more than superb... Well, I am not saying that I'll be abandoning *istD because of that. But obviously my film camera will see more use. Not to mention that (silver, darn it) MZ-6 with FG grip and black ;-) 31 Ltd balance very nicely in my hands... And the viewfinder view is bloody bigger ;-). Like Cotty keeps saying every now and then - Jumpin' Jupiter! ;-) Film still rules, dude! g cheers, frank the film guy -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] Film still rules, dude! g cheers, frank the film guy ahem THE film guy? Tom (another film guy) Reese -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Well, I am not saying that I'll be abandoning *istD because of that. But obviously my film camera will see more use. Not to mention that (silver, darn it) MZ-6 with FG grip and black ;-) 31 Ltd balance very nicely in my hands... And the viewfinder view is bloody bigger ;-). Like Cotty keeps saying every now and then - Jumpin' Jupiter! ;-) Film still rules, dude! I like to think that I have the best of both worlds. I shoot film but then scan it and work with the resulting digital files. About 30 years ago I shot a bunch of astrophotos with GAF Anscochrome 200 and 500. I am just getting around to scanning them. Even after all these years I cannot believe how nice they look! -- Steve Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://earth.delith.com/photo_gallery.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
So what about this was a rant? ]'-) G On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:51 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: Although I mostly shoot digital (*istD) I still have my trusty MZ-6. It is always loaded with film (usually Fuji NPC 160) and I take it for a spin every now and then. Today I received the prints and scans from the most recent roll. It took me roughly half a year to finish the roll *blush*. Mostly I've been trying my limited lenses, notably 31 Ltd, and the fish eye zoom. Man, it is amazing. This 31 Ltd lens is mind blowing... I have the scans (roughly of 6 MegaPixels worth) which I will review and see if I can post anything to underline my point here. Nevertheless, the 10x15 (cm) proofs look alive. You know, I usually (target) practice on my daughter. Few shots are more or less impossible to express in words. The quality is more than superb... Well, I am not saying that I'll be abandoning *istD because of that. But obviously my film camera will see more use. Not to mention that (silver, darn it) MZ-6 with FG grip and black ;-) 31 Ltd balance very nicely in my hands... And the viewfinder view is bloody bigger ;-). Like Cotty keeps saying every now and then - Jumpin' Jupiter! ;-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
In a message dated 7/11/2006 6:44:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So what about this was a rant? ]'-) G === Thanks for asking that. I was wondering too. Boris, you don't know how to rant. :-) Marnie aka Doe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Hi! Marnie, Godders, I am mere 35 years old (not just yet, but soon, I hope) and I am a member of PDML for how long - merely 3 or 4 years... I've much to learn yet... ;-). In a message dated 7/11/2006 6:44:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So what about this was a rant? ]'-) G === Thanks for asking that. I was wondering too. Boris, you don't know how to rant. :-) Marnie aka Doe -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On 7/11/06, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ahem THE film guy? Tom (another film guy) Reese I didn't mean THE film guy (in caps). I suppose I should have said, frank, a film guy. Or perhaps, frank, a film guy along with Tom, who's a film guy, too. g cheers, frank, a film guy along with Tom -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On 7/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for asking that. I was wondering too. Boris, you don't know how to rant. :-) Funny, but I used to date a Jewish Russian emigre. She could rant. Boy could she rant! She claimed it was a cultural thing, but after seeing Boris' rant, I'm beginning to wonder about her claim. LOL cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Frank, if I substitute rant for vent, will it help things? LOL On 7/11/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for asking that. I was wondering too. Boris, you don't know how to rant. :-) Funny, but I used to date a Jewish Russian emigre. She could rant. Boy could she rant! She claimed it was a cultural thing, but after seeing Boris' rant, I'm beginning to wonder about her claim. LOL cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Not really. Ranting or venting implies that you were upset about something and you decided to share your grievances with others. As the saying goes, A problem shared is a problem halved You original post read more like you had an epiphany (in its non religious meaning. Though considering some of the film v digital debates) ;-). Dave On 7/11/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank, if I substitute rant for vent, will it help things? LOL On 7/11/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for asking that. I was wondering too. Boris, you don't know how to rant. :-) Funny, but I used to date a Jewish Russian emigre. She could rant. Boy could she rant! She claimed it was a cultural thing, but after seeing Boris' rant, I'm beginning to wonder about her claim. LOL cheers, frank -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:09 AM, David Savage wrote: Not really. Ranting or venting implies that you were upset about something and you decided to share your grievances with others. As the saying goes, A problem shared is a problem halved You original post read more like you had an epiphany (in its non religious meaning. Though considering some of the film v digital debates) lol ... Going on in that vein, the thread will turn into yet another rant/vent/debate/stupid thing. ;-) I didn't see anything in Boris' initial post that suggested anything other than that he was delighted with the performance of his new lenses, he found he still likes his MZ-6 a lot, and that a photofinisher made a pretty nice set of prints from a roll of film shot with them. Drawing a conclusion about film vs digital quality, or that Boris had anything to be angry/surprised/outraged over (the usual reason for a rant) seems quite a lot to read into the message, and he didn't seem to be ranting at all in his message ... Thus my question. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On 7/11/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/11/06, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ahem THE film guy? Tom (another film guy) Reese I didn't mean THE film guy (in caps). I suppose I should have said, frank, a film guy. Or perhaps, frank, a film guy along with Tom, who's a film guy, too. g cheers, frank, a film guy along with Tom What's this film stuff you two are going on about? -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com Shoot more film! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On Jul 11, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Scott Loveless wrote: What's this film stuff you two are going on about? Heh -- has anyone gone to see Superman Returns on a big screen? As both a Film (movie) Guy and a Film (the stuff you take pictures on) Guy, I have to say that the bell is tolling for motion picture film. While the second and third Star Wars prequels looked kind of crappy and acceptable, respectively, Superman Returns does not look like a film that was shot digitally. In fact, I would say that it looks less digital than the Lord of the Rings films (which were shot on film and processed heavily in the digital realm). I was really surprised -- I sat close and was prepared to be underwhelmed, and I wasn't. It looked great, and that's not just my low expectations talking. I thought when I heard that interview with Singer, the director, that his chatter about testing out all of the different motion picture formats and comparing them projected before making his choice was a load of publicity hooey (much like Lucas' no one noticed the one digital scene in the Phantom Menace -- I noticed it, it looked wretched), but I'm with Singer. It looked better than Super 35 and yet held all of Super 35's advantages with lens lengths and depth of field. (I saw it projected on film, by the way.) Oh well. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On 7/11/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's this film stuff you two are going on about? Okay, Mr. I Developed My Own TriX @ GFM, Scanned It and Submitted The Scans into the Digital Contest. I guess you can be in the club, too. G cheers, frank a film guy along with Tom and Scott -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Or perhaps knarF a mlif guy? Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 10:21 AM Subject: Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!) On 7/11/06, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ahem THE film guy? Tom (another film guy) Reese I didn't mean THE film guy (in caps). I suppose I should have said, frank, a film guy. Or perhaps, frank, a film guy along with Tom, who's a film guy, too. g cheers, frank, a film guy along with Tom -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On 7/11/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or perhaps knarF a mlif guy? LOL -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On 7/11/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, Mr. I Developed My Own TriX @ GFM, Scanned It and Submitted The Scans into the Digital Contest. I guess you can be in the club, too. That reminds me, Mr. Frank-whose-prints-really-ARE-sharp, you still owe me some information about what your photofinisher uses to develop Tri-X. :-) -Mat (who also still shoots film. And has _6_ rolls of Provia from GFM still to scan...) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On 7/11/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/11/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's this film stuff you two are going on about? Okay, Mr. I Developed My Own TriX @ GFM, Scanned It and Submitted The Scans into the Digital Contest. I guess you can be in the club, too. G Shoot more mlif! -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com Shoot more film! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Snob. frank theriault wrote: On 7/11/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's this film stuff you two are going on about? Okay, Mr. I Developed My Own TriX @ GFM, Scanned It and Submitted The Scans into the Digital Contest. I guess you can be in the club, too. G cheers, frank a film guy along with Tom and Scott -- When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Hi! I didn't see anything in Boris' initial post that suggested anything other than that he was delighted with the performance of his new lenses, he found he still likes his MZ-6 a lot, and that a photofinisher made a pretty nice set of prints from a roll of film shot with them. Drawing a conclusion about film vs digital quality, or that Boris had anything to be angry/surprised/outraged over (the usual reason for a rant) seems quite a lot to read into the message, and he didn't seem to be ranting at all in his message ... Thus my question. Well, I guess I really don't know how to rant properly. You could call it rant^-1 or 1/rant or anti-rant if you want ;-). Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On 7/11/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I guess I really don't know how to rant properly. You could call it rant^-1 or 1/rant or anti-rant if you want ;-). What happens if a rant comes into contact with an anti-rant? cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Hi! frank theriault wrote: On 7/11/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I guess I really don't know how to rant properly. You could call it rant^-1 or 1/rant or anti-rant if you want ;-). What happens if a rant comes into contact with an anti-rant? GESO of four images? Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Frank wrote: What happens if a rant comes into contact with an anti-rant? um... They form a cormorant? Jostein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
The universe implodes. frank theriault wrote: On 7/11/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I guess I really don't know how to rant properly. You could call it rant^-1 or 1/rant or anti-rant if you want ;-). What happens if a rant comes into contact with an anti-rant? cheers, frank -- When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On 7/11/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The universe implodes. Close. The universe ~as we know it~ implodes. There could be a difference. But, you're close enough that you win the prize. You must have read Superman comix when you were a kid (or maybe you do now). cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On 7/11/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GESO of four images? Does one need a Lomo for that? g cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/07/11 Tue PM 02:40:20 GMT To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!) On 7/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for asking that. I was wondering too. Boris, you don't know how to rant. :-) Funny, but I used to date a Jewish Russian emigre. She could rant. Boy could she rant! She claimed it was a cultural thing, but after seeing Boris' rant, I'm beginning to wonder about her claim. LOL There's a gender bias to that cultural thing. 8-))) - Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On 7/11/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's a gender bias to that cultural thing. 8-))) Who, me or her? ;-) cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
It's the end of the world as we know it. It's the end of the world as we know it. It's the end of the world as we know it, and I fee fine. frank theriault wrote: On 7/11/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The universe implodes. Close. The universe ~as we know it~ implodes. There could be a difference. But, you're close enough that you win the prize. You must have read Superman comix when you were a kid (or maybe you do now). cheers, frank -- When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Goo, I'm gla to ear it. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 7:36 PM Subject: Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!) It's the end of the world as we know it. It's the end of the world as we know it. It's the end of the world as we know it, and I fee fine. frank theriault wrote: On 7/11/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The universe implodes. Close. The universe ~as we know it~ implodes. There could be a difference. But, you're close enough that you win the prize. You must have read Superman comix when you were a kid (or maybe you do now). cheers, frank -- When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Scott Loveless wrote: Shoot more mlif! That's _way_ too close to milf. ;- -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
On 7/11/06, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scott Loveless wrote: Shoot more mlif! That's _way_ too close to milf. ;- Yeah, but you don't _shoot_ those. g -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com Shoot more film! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Just a little rant (or not rant?!)
Scott Loveless wrote: On 7/11/06, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scott Loveless wrote: Shoot more mlif! That's _way_ too close to milf. ;- Yeah, but you don't _shoot_ those. g U, not going there. No way, no how. ;- -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
