Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8690] Re: self-R

2015-05-27 Thread Benjamin Udell

John C.,

Just curious, by an _/individual species/_ do you mean something like an 
individual kind or do you mean (and I suspect that you don't) the 
species population as a large, somewhat scattered, collective concrete 
individual?


Best, Ben

On 5/26/2015 2:27 PM, John Collier wrote:

We mean something different by “individual”, Edwina. I am using it in 
the sense that species are individuals. It was David HulI who put the 
ecologists onto me because of my work on individuality.  I don’t think 
that further discussion with you on this topic is likely to be 
fruitful for either of us.


John

From: Edwina Taborsky
Sent: May 26, 2015 8:23 PM
To: John Collier; biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee
Cc: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8690] Re: self-R

I don't see an ecosystem as an individual but as a system, in its 
case, a CAS. It doesn't have the distinctive boundaries of an 
individual - either temporally or spatially. I see a human being as a 
system, in that its parts co-operate in a systemic manner; and it is 
also an individual - with distinctive temporal and spatial 
boundaries. But a human being is not a CAS, for it lacks the wide 
range of adaptive flexibility and even transformative capacities of a 
CAS.


I have long argued that societies are a CAS; they are socioeconomic 
ecological systems, operating as logical adaptations to environmental 
realities - which include soil, climate, water, plant and animal 
typologies etc. All of these enable a particular size of population 
to live in the area and this in turn, leads to a particular method of 
both economic and political organization.


Unfortunately, the major trends in the social sciences have been to 
almost completely ignore this area  - except within the alienated 
emotionalism of AGW or Climate Change...Instead, the social sciences 
tend to view 'culture' or 'ideology' as the prime causal factors in 
societal development and organization. Whereas I view these areas as 
emotionalist psychological explanations, as verbal narratives for the 
deeper causal factors of ecology, demographics, economic modes.


Edwina

- Original Message -
From: John Collier
To: John Collier ; biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee
Cc: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 1:59 PM
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8690] Re: self-R


-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on Reply List or Reply All to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .






RE: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8690] Re: self-R

2015-05-27 Thread kirstima

John,

Just butting in. Quite accidentally happened to open this mail of yours. 
Quite interesting. The topic I am working on.


Left me wondering how this may be connected with the concept on 
continuity in CSP's later work. - Pointing out any point in a continuous 
line, means breaking  up the continuity, he writes. It is only allowed 
temporarily, and then it should be done consciously, with the 
determination of coming back to continuity.


With species, there is not and cannot be, any point you can point out as 
the starting point, or the ending point. - It is possible to define the 
middle (whatever it is), but the start as well as the end,can never be 
pinpointed.


Do you (and the phylogenetists you are refering to) agree with this?

Kirsti

John Collier kirjoitti 27.5.2015 19:04:

Ben, Lists,

I mean a historical individual with an origin and probably an end,
localized in space. A concrete individual. This is the Hull-Ghiselen
view that

Is almost universally accepted by systematists and evolutionary
biologists these days. It follows from the phylogenetic view of
species, developed by Cladists and for which the standard text for a
long time was Phylogenetic Systematics by my friend Ed Wiley.

John

FROM: Benjamin Udell [mailto:bud...@nyc.rr.com]
 SENT: May 27, 2015 2:43 PM
 TO: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee; peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
 SUBJECT: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8690] Re: self-R

John C.,

Just curious, by an __individual species__ do you mean something like
an individual kind or do you mean (and I suspect that you don't) the
species population as a large, somewhat scattered, collective concrete
individual?

Best, Ben






-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on Reply List or Reply All to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .