sizeof(IV)
Are we assuming that sizeof(IV) = sizeof(char*). If so, we should probably assert this somewhere in the configure system. Tanton
Re: bytecode and sizeof(IV)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:48:25AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: When trying to configure parrot with an IV = 'long long' (64-bit) but with int, long, and pointers only 32-bit, I get either This isn't Parrot bytecode! (on SPARC) or a segfault (on i686). Segfault in alpha even when IVs and pointers are both 8 bytes since the code tries to dereference the pointers (to read IVs) at four byte offsets. I'd offer a patch, but I'm not sure which end of the process we want to change. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
Re: bytecode and sizeof(IV)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:52:24PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: Segfault in alpha even when IVs and pointers are both 8 bytes since the code tries to dereference the pointers (to read IVs) at four byte offsets. Yep, and the latest pedantic patch doesn't help. Also, I'm seeing this, which is weird: ld -ldbm -ldb -lm -liconv -o test_prog global_setup.o interpreter.o parrot.o register.o basic_opcodes.o memory.o bytecode.o string.o strnative.o test_main.o ld: Error: Undefined: exit _iob fprintf fputs strncmp _OtsDivide64 printf time acos asin atan atan2 cosh exp log log10 pow sinh tan tanh cos sin _OtsRemainder64 malloc __CFE_print_puts free realloc _OtsMoveMinimum _OtsZero _OtsMove mmap stat open errno strcmp *** Exit 1 -- The UNIX system is harder to use than a toaster. -Kaare Christian
RE: bytecode and sizeof(IV)
You probably don't want to use ld as your linker. You should try cc instead. -Original Message- From: Simon Cozens To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 9/18/2001 9:46 AM Subject: Re: bytecode and sizeof(IV) On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:52:24PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: Segfault in alpha even when IVs and pointers are both 8 bytes since the code tries to dereference the pointers (to read IVs) at four byte offsets. Yep, and the latest pedantic patch doesn't help. Also, I'm seeing this, which is weird: ld -ldbm -ldb -lm -liconv -o test_prog global_setup.o interpreter.o parrot.o register.o basic_opcodes.o memory.o bytecode.o string.o strnative.o test_main.o ld: Error: Undefined: exit _iob fprintf fputs strncmp _OtsDivide64 printf time acos asin atan atan2 cosh exp log log10 pow sinh tan tanh cos sin _OtsRemainder64 malloc __CFE_print_puts free realloc _OtsMoveMinimum _OtsZero _OtsMove mmap stat open errno strcmp *** Exit 1 -- The UNIX system is harder to use than a toaster. -Kaare Christian
Re: bytecode and sizeof(IV)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 11:10:36AM -0500, Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs wrote: You probably don't want to use ld as your linker. You should try cc instead. Then that's a bug in Configure! :) -- If that makes any sense to you, you have a big problem. -- C. Durance, Computer Science 234
[PATCH Makefile.in] RE: [doughera@lafayette.edu: Re: bytecode and sizeof(IV)]
Easy Makefile.in patch. I was worried that Win32 might need the linker
(the change to $(LD) was submitted as part of a Win32 compatibility
patch) but that doesn't seem to be the case. I don't have a MinGW
toolkit installed, however--can someone check that it works there? It
also works on a BSD box, so I'm applying.
--Brent Dax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They *will* pay for what they've done.
--- ..\..\parrot-cvs\parrot\Makefile.in Tue Sep 18 10:54:52 2001
+++ Makefile.in Tue Sep 18 10:53:54 2001
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
$(CC) -shared $(C_LIBS) -o $@ $(O_FILES)
$(TEST_PROG): test_main$(O) $(O_FILES)
- $(LD) $(C_LIBS) ${ld_debug} ${ld_out}$(TEST_PROG) $(O_FILES)
test_main$(O)
+ $(CC) $(C_LIBS) $(CFLAGS) -o $(TEST_PROG) $(O_FILES)
test_main$(O)
test_main$(O): $(H_FILES)
Re: [PATCH Makefile.in] RE: [doughera@lafayette.edu: Re: bytecode and sizeof(IV)]
Easy Makefile.in patch. I was worried that Win32 might need the linker (the change to $(LD) was submitted as part of a Win32 compatibility patch) but that doesn't seem to be the case. I don't have a MinGW Fine here Regards Mattia
Re: bytecode and sizeof(IV)
Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yep, and the latest pedantic patch doesn't help. Also, I'm seeing this, which is weird: ld -ldbm -ldb -lm -liconv -o test_prog global_setup.o interpreter.o parrot.o register.o basic_opcodes.o memory.o bytecode.o string.o strnative.o test_main.o Definitely bugs in Configure there; cc has to be used as the linker or -lc isn't added (and possibly some of the other crt.o files too), and libraries have to be after all the object files. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
RE: bytecode and sizeof(IV)
Russ Allbery: # Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: # # Yep, and the latest pedantic patch doesn't help. Also, I'm seeing # this, which is weird: # # ld -ldbm -ldb -lm -liconv -o test_prog global_setup.o # interpreter.o parrot.o register.o basic_opcodes.o memory.o # bytecode.o string.o strnative.o test_main.o # # Definitely bugs in Configure there; cc has to be used as the # linker or -lc # isn't added (and possibly some of the other crt.o files too), and # libraries have to be after all the object files. I've already patched Makefile.in to fix this. --Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED] They *will* pay for what they've done.
