Re: [DOCS] Array function

2004-11-27 Thread Bruce Momjian

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.

---


David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 08:47:05PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > David Fetter wrote:
> > > Please find attached a different diff :)
> > 
> > If you want to write a note, use the  element.
> 
> Thanks for the tip :)
> 
> Fixed, attaching a diff against CVS HEAD.
> 
> Cheers,
> D
> -- 
> David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/
> phone: +1 510 893 6100   mobile: +1 415 235 3778
> 
> Remember to vote!

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
  subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
  message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [DOCS] Array function

2004-11-27 Thread Bruce Momjian

FYI, this discussion about adding a separate array section to the docs
(which we already have, as Peter pointed out) is independent of the
ARRAY() documentation addition I just put in the patch queue.

---

David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:59:13PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 04:36:14PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > > Folks,
> > > 
> > > Here's a little addition to the array functions & operators
> > > section of the manual.  It adds a function array() to the list.
> > > 
> > > Cheers, D
> >
> > BTW, it seems it would be useful to dedicate a chapter to array
> > handling, since it's something that's not very common amongst
> > databases.
> 
> I guess it depends what you mean. Oracle has "subtables," and other
> things have stuff like that.  Also, it's in the SQL standard...
> 
> Anyhow, where do you think it should go?
> 
> Cheers,
> D
> -- 
> David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/
> phone: +1 510 893 6100   mobile: +1 415 235 3778
> 
> Remember to vote!
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>   joining column's datatypes do not match
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend