Re: Is it too soon for a PG12 open items wiki page?
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 1:03 AM Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:06:43PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 7:52 PM Julien Rouhaud wrote: > >> It seems like a good timing to me. > > It would be a good timing as some issues are already showing up. And > abracadabra: > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_12_Open_Items Thank you Michael!
Re: Is it too soon for a PG12 open items wiki page?
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 13:03, Michael Paquier wrote: > It would be a good timing as some issues are already showing up. And > abracadabra: > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_12_Open_Items Thanks. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Re: Is it too soon for a PG12 open items wiki page?
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:06:43PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 7:52 PM Julien Rouhaud wrote: >> It seems like a good timing to me. It would be a good timing as some issues are already showing up. And abracadabra: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_12_Open_Items -- Michael signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Is it too soon for a PG12 open items wiki page?
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 7:52 PM Julien Rouhaud wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:49 AM David Rowley > wrote: > > > > Is it too soon for a PG12 open items wiki page? > > It seems like a good timing to me. > > > I've got a few things I need to keep track of. Normally writing a > > patch and putting on the next open CF is a good move, but since the > > next one is not for PG12, it seems like not the best place. > > Agreed, I had the same thought a couple of days ago. +1 Thanks, Amit
Re: Is it too soon for a PG12 open items wiki page?
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:49 AM David Rowley wrote: > > Is it too soon for a PG12 open items wiki page? It seems like a good timing to me. > I've got a few things I need to keep track of. Normally writing a > patch and putting on the next open CF is a good move, but since the > next one is not for PG12, it seems like not the best place. Agreed, I had the same thought a couple of days ago.
Is it too soon for a PG12 open items wiki page?
Is it too soon for a PG12 open items wiki page? I've got a few things I need to keep track of. Normally writing a patch and putting on the next open CF is a good move, but since the next one is not for PG12, it seems like not the best place. Any objections to me making one now? -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
