Re: Okay to remove mention of mystery @ and ~ operators?
Thanks all! On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 13:59, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 19 Apr 2024, at 13:49, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > >> On 19 Apr 2024, at 12:31, Aleksander Alekseev > wrote: > > >> Here is the patch. > > > > Nice catch, and thanks for the patch. I'll apply it with a backpatch to > when > > they were removed. > > Done, thanks for the report and the patch! > > -- > Daniel Gustafsson > >
Re: Okay to remove mention of mystery @ and ~ operators?
> On 19 Apr 2024, at 13:49, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> On 19 Apr 2024, at 12:31, Aleksander Alekseev >> wrote: >> Here is the patch. > > Nice catch, and thanks for the patch. I'll apply it with a backpatch to when > they were removed. Done, thanks for the report and the patch! -- Daniel Gustafsson
Re: Okay to remove mention of mystery @ and ~ operators?
> On 19 Apr 2024, at 12:31, Aleksander Alekseev > wrote: > > Hi, > >>> This page says that the `@` and `~` operators on various types can be >>> accelerated by a GiST index. >>> >>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/gist-builtin-opclasses.html >>> >>> These operators have been listed in the file since it was created in 2014, >>> but if they exist then I don't know how to use them or what they do. >>> >>> Code examples, for clarity: >>> select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' ~ box '(2,2),(3,3)'; >>> operator does not exist: box ~ box >>> select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' @ box '(2,2),(3,3)'; >>> operator does not exist: box @ box >>> >>> If they're a typo or some removed thing then I'd like to remove them from >>> the page. This email is me asking to find out if I'm wrong about that >>> before I try to submit a patch (also very happy for someone with a >>> committer bit to just fix this). >> >> Indeed, there is no @(box,box) or ~(box,box) in the \dAo output. These >> operators were removed by 2f70fdb0644c back in 2020. >> >> I will submit a patch for the documentation shortly. Thanks for reporting. > > Here is the patch. Nice catch, and thanks for the patch. I'll apply it with a backpatch to when they were removed. -- Daniel Gustafsson
Re: Okay to remove mention of mystery @ and ~ operators?
Hi, > > This page says that the `@` and `~` operators on various types can be > > accelerated by a GiST index. > > > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/gist-builtin-opclasses.html > > > > These operators have been listed in the file since it was created in 2014, > > but if they exist then I don't know how to use them or what they do. > > > > Code examples, for clarity: > > > > > select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' ~ box '(2,2),(3,3)'; > > operator does not exist: box ~ box > > > > > select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' @ box '(2,2),(3,3)'; > > operator does not exist: box @ box > > > > If they're a typo or some removed thing then I'd like to remove them from > > the page. This email is me asking to find out if I'm wrong about that > > before I try to submit a patch (also very happy for someone with a > > committer bit to just fix this). > > Indeed, there is no @(box,box) or ~(box,box) in the \dAo output. These > operators were removed by 2f70fdb0644c back in 2020. > > I will submit a patch for the documentation shortly. Thanks for reporting. Here is the patch. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev v1-0001-Remove-mention-of-and-operators.patch Description: Binary data
Re: Okay to remove mention of mystery @ and ~ operators?
Hi, > This page says that the `@` and `~` operators on various types can be > accelerated by a GiST index. > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/gist-builtin-opclasses.html > > These operators have been listed in the file since it was created in 2014, > but if they exist then I don't know how to use them or what they do. > > Code examples, for clarity: > > > select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' ~ box '(2,2),(3,3)'; > operator does not exist: box ~ box > > > select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' @ box '(2,2),(3,3)'; > operator does not exist: box @ box > > If they're a typo or some removed thing then I'd like to remove them from the > page. This email is me asking to find out if I'm wrong about that before I > try to submit a patch (also very happy for someone with a committer bit to > just fix this). Indeed, there is no @(box,box) or ~(box,box) in the \dAo output. These operators were removed by 2f70fdb0644c back in 2020. I will submit a patch for the documentation shortly. Thanks for reporting. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
Okay to remove mention of mystery @ and ~ operators?
Hello This page says that the `@` and `~` operators on various types can be accelerated by a GiST index. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/gist-builtin-opclasses.html These operators have been listed in the file since it was created in 2014, but if they exist then I don't know how to use them or what they do. Code examples, for clarity: > select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' ~ box '(2,2),(3,3)'; operator does not exist: box ~ box > select box '(0,0),(1, 1)' @ box '(2,2),(3,3)'; operator does not exist: box @ box If they're a typo or some removed thing then I'd like to remove them from the page. This email is me asking to find out if I'm wrong about that before I try to submit a patch (also very happy for someone with a committer bit to just fix this). Cheers, Col
