Re: Remove unused code from the KnownAssignedTransactionIdes submodule
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:24 AM Jacob Champion wrote: > On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 17:32 +0800, Quan Zongliang wrote: > > In the KnownAssignedTransactionIdes sub-module, two lines of unused code > > were found in a previous change. > > Huh. Looks like this code died as part of 2fc7af5e966? > > CC'ing Thomas just in case we're missing something, but I'll mark this > Ready for Committer. Thanks! Thanks! Agreed. No change to generated code on my machine. Pushed.
Re: Remove unused code from the KnownAssignedTransactionIdes submodule
On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 17:32 +0800, Quan Zongliang wrote: > Hi, > > In the KnownAssignedTransactionIdes sub-module, two lines of unused code > were found in a previous change. Huh. Looks like this code died as part of 2fc7af5e966? CC'ing Thomas just in case we're missing something, but I'll mark this Ready for Committer. Thanks! --Jacob
Remove unused code from the KnownAssignedTransactionIdes submodule
Hi, In the KnownAssignedTransactionIdes sub-module, two lines of unused code were found in a previous change. -- Quan Zongliang CPUG diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c index b448533564..99ce8c752a 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c @@ -3363,8 +3363,6 @@ RecordKnownAssignedTransactionIds(TransactionId xid) /* ShmemVariableCache->nextFullXid must be beyond any observed xid */ AdvanceNextFullTransactionIdPastXid(latestObservedXid); - next_expected_xid = latestObservedXid; - TransactionIdAdvance(next_expected_xid); } }