Re: [HACKERS] New timezones used in regression tests

2014-05-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 07:16:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de writes:
  84df54b22e8035addc7108abd9ff6995e8c49264 introduced timestamp
  constructors. In the regression tests, various time zones are tested,
  including America/Metlakatla. Now, if you configure using
  --with-system-tzdata, you'll get an error if that zone isn't there.
  Unfortunately, this is what I'm getting now when trying to build beta1
  on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) with tzdata 2010i-1:
 
 I agree, that seems an entirely gratuitous choice of zone.  It does
 seem like a good idea to test a zone that has a nonintegral offset
 from GMT, but we can get that from almost anywhere as long as we're
 testing a pre-1900 date.  There's no need to use any zones that aren't
 long-established and unlikely to change.

If we want a nonintegral offset, why are we not using 'Asia/Calcutta',
which is +5:30 from UTC?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] New timezones used in regression tests

2014-05-15 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
 On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 07:16:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 I agree, that seems an entirely gratuitous choice of zone.  It does
 seem like a good idea to test a zone that has a nonintegral offset
 from GMT, but we can get that from almost anywhere as long as we're
 testing a pre-1900 date.  There's no need to use any zones that aren't
 long-established and unlikely to change.

 If we want a nonintegral offset, why are we not using 'Asia/Calcutta',
 which is +5:30 from UTC?

I believe there's already one of those tests that considers a zone like
that.  No, I meant a really odd offset, like Paris' +0:09:21 before they
adopted standardized time.

regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] New timezones used in regression tests

2014-05-15 Thread David Fetter
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:55:26AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
 Christoph Berg wrote:
 
  Of course, Wikipedia has something to say about this:
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timekeeping_on_Mars
 
 Nice.
 
  I especially like MTC, Mars Time Coordinated. But whatever scheme gets
  chosen, it won't be a standard 24h day, so PostgreSQL has a whole lot
  of different problems to solve than to fix that little
  Mars/Mons_Olympus gem now... :)
 
 Maybe a new type, mars_timestamptz()?  Or perhaps the celestial body
 name should be part of the typmod for standard timestamptz ...?

The latter seems a good bit more extensible.

Conversions among the different timestamptzs might be problematic, as
we are currently assuming certain approximations about spacetime that
don't actually hold when we have time zones in significantly different
reference frames.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter da...@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter  XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] New timezones used in regression tests

2014-05-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:47:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
  On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 07:16:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
  I agree, that seems an entirely gratuitous choice of zone.  It does
  seem like a good idea to test a zone that has a nonintegral offset
  from GMT, but we can get that from almost anywhere as long as we're
  testing a pre-1900 date.  There's no need to use any zones that aren't
  long-established and unlikely to change.
 
  If we want a nonintegral offset, why are we not using 'Asia/Calcutta',
  which is +5:30 from UTC?
 
 I believe there's already one of those tests that considers a zone like
 that.  No, I meant a really odd offset, like Paris' +0:09:21 before they
 adopted standardized time.

Wow, OK, got it.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] New timezones used in regression tests

2014-05-13 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Robert Haas 2014-05-13 
ca+tgmobvo--rcsrz-u5fma0mo9xvprptwevsw78odceqjcm...@mail.gmail.com
 On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
  I'm quite unimpressed by the dependency on Mars/Mons_Olympus, too ... that
  might not fail *today*, but considering it's a real location, assuming it
  is not in the IANA database seems like a recipe for future failure.
  Maybe something like Nehwon/Lankhmar?  Or maybe we should not try to be
  cute but just test Foo/Bar.
 
 Personally, I think it would be *awesome* if our regression tests
 started failing due to the establishment of Mars/Mons_Olympus as a
 real time zone.

Of course, Wikipedia has something to say about this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timekeeping_on_Mars

I especially like MTC, Mars Time Coordinated. But whatever scheme gets
chosen, it won't be a standard 24h day, so PostgreSQL has a whole lot
of different problems to solve than to fix that little
Mars/Mons_Olympus gem now... :)

Christoph
-- 
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] New timezones used in regression tests

2014-05-13 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote:
 Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de writes:
  84df54b22e8035addc7108abd9ff6995e8c49264 introduced timestamp
  constructors. In the regression tests, various time zones are tested,
  including America/Metlakatla. Now, if you configure using
  --with-system-tzdata, you'll get an error if that zone isn't there.
  Unfortunately, this is what I'm getting now when trying to build beta1
  on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) with tzdata 2010i-1:
 
 I agree, that seems an entirely gratuitous choice of zone.

Well, it wasn't entirely gratuituous -- it had a very large offset from
UTC to one direction and made a sudden jump to the opposite direction in
1900.  Obviously I didn't notice the timezone had been created in 2011.
(I bet if this hadn't been tried in a platform with such an old tzdata,
this wouldn't have been noticed.  Don't Ubuntu update tzdata on their
LTS platforms!?)

 I'm quite unimpressed by the dependency on Mars/Mons_Olympus, too ... that
 might not fail *today*, but considering it's a real location, assuming it
 is not in the IANA database seems like a recipe for future failure.
 Maybe something like Nehwon/Lankhmar?  Or maybe we should not try to be
 cute but just test Foo/Bar.

I liked Mars/Mons_Olympus, but Nehwon/Lankhmar is good too.
/me adds more to his to-read list

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] New timezones used in regression tests

2014-05-13 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Christoph Berg wrote:

 Of course, Wikipedia has something to say about this:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timekeeping_on_Mars

Nice.

 I especially like MTC, Mars Time Coordinated. But whatever scheme gets
 chosen, it won't be a standard 24h day, so PostgreSQL has a whole lot
 of different problems to solve than to fix that little
 Mars/Mons_Olympus gem now... :)

Maybe a new type, mars_timestamptz()?  Or perhaps the celestial body
name should be part of the typmod for standard timestamptz ...?

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] New timezones used in regression tests

2014-05-13 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Alvaro Herrera 2014-05-13 20140513135526.gr6...@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
  I especially like MTC, Mars Time Coordinated. But whatever scheme gets
  chosen, it won't be a standard 24h day, so PostgreSQL has a whole lot
  of different problems to solve than to fix that little
  Mars/Mons_Olympus gem now... :)
 
 Maybe a new type, mars_timestamptz()?  Or perhaps the celestial body
 name should be part of the typmod for standard timestamptz ...?

Supporting other worlds would warrant bumping to PostgreSQL 10.0 :)

Christoph
-- 
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[HACKERS] New timezones used in regression tests

2014-05-12 Thread Christoph Berg
84df54b22e8035addc7108abd9ff6995e8c49264 introduced timestamp
constructors. In the regression tests, various time zones are tested,
including America/Metlakatla. Now, if you configure using
--with-system-tzdata, you'll get an error if that zone isn't there.
Unfortunately, this is what I'm getting now when trying to build beta1
on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) with tzdata 2010i-1:

  SELECT make_timestamptz(1866, 12, 10, 0, 0, 0, 'America/Metlakatla') AT TIME 
ZONE 'UTC';
! ERROR:  time zone America/Metlakatla not recognized

I can work around it by patching the regression tests, but it would be
nice if some other zone would be used that wasn't invented in 2011.

Christoph
-- 
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] New timezones used in regression tests

2014-05-12 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: To PostgreSQL Hackers 2014-05-12 20140512214025.ga31...@msgid.df7cb.de
 84df54b22e8035addc7108abd9ff6995e8c49264 introduced timestamp
 constructors. In the regression tests, various time zones are tested,
 including America/Metlakatla. Now, if you configure using
 --with-system-tzdata, you'll get an error if that zone isn't there.
 Unfortunately, this is what I'm getting now when trying to build beta1
 on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) with tzdata 2010i-1:
 
   SELECT make_timestamptz(1866, 12, 10, 0, 0, 0, 'America/Metlakatla') AT 
 TIME ZONE 'UTC';
 ! ERROR:  time zone America/Metlakatla not recognized
 
 I can work around it by patching the regression tests, but it would be
 nice if some other zone would be used that wasn't invented in 2011.

Fwiw, there is an updated tzdata version in lucid-updates
(2014a-0ubuntu0.10.04), which wasn't used in the pgapt build env until
now, hence the error. Still, the problem will remain on older systems,
and choosing a different time zone for this test seems easy to change.

Christoph
-- 
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] New timezones used in regression tests

2014-05-12 Thread Tom Lane
Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de writes:
 84df54b22e8035addc7108abd9ff6995e8c49264 introduced timestamp
 constructors. In the regression tests, various time zones are tested,
 including America/Metlakatla. Now, if you configure using
 --with-system-tzdata, you'll get an error if that zone isn't there.
 Unfortunately, this is what I'm getting now when trying to build beta1
 on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) with tzdata 2010i-1:

I agree, that seems an entirely gratuitous choice of zone.  It does
seem like a good idea to test a zone that has a nonintegral offset
from GMT, but we can get that from almost anywhere as long as we're
testing a pre-1900 date.  There's no need to use any zones that aren't
long-established and unlikely to change.

I'm quite unimpressed by the dependency on Mars/Mons_Olympus, too ... that
might not fail *today*, but considering it's a real location, assuming it
is not in the IANA database seems like a recipe for future failure.
Maybe something like Nehwon/Lankhmar?  Or maybe we should not try to be
cute but just test Foo/Bar.

regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] New timezones used in regression tests

2014-05-12 Thread Gavin Flower

On 13/05/14 11:16, Tom Lane wrote:

Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de writes:

84df54b22e8035addc7108abd9ff6995e8c49264 introduced timestamp
constructors. In the regression tests, various time zones are tested,
including America/Metlakatla. Now, if you configure using
--with-system-tzdata, you'll get an error if that zone isn't there.
Unfortunately, this is what I'm getting now when trying to build beta1
on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) with tzdata 2010i-1:

I agree, that seems an entirely gratuitous choice of zone.  It does
seem like a good idea to test a zone that has a nonintegral offset
from GMT, but we can get that from almost anywhere as long as we're
testing a pre-1900 date.  There's no need to use any zones that aren't
long-established and unlikely to change.

I'm quite unimpressed by the dependency on Mars/Mons_Olympus, too ... that
might not fail *today*, but considering it's a real location, assuming it
is not in the IANA database seems like a recipe for future failure.
Maybe something like Nehwon/Lankhmar?  Or maybe we should not try to be
cute but just test Foo/Bar.

regards, tom lane


You might like to consider the Chatham Islands, they are offset by 45 
minutes:

(GMT +12:45 / GMT +13:45)!

Cheers,
Gavin





--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] New timezones used in regression tests

2014-05-12 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
 I'm quite unimpressed by the dependency on Mars/Mons_Olympus, too ... that
 might not fail *today*, but considering it's a real location, assuming it
 is not in the IANA database seems like a recipe for future failure.
 Maybe something like Nehwon/Lankhmar?  Or maybe we should not try to be
 cute but just test Foo/Bar.

Personally, I think it would be *awesome* if our regression tests
started failing due to the establishment of Mars/Mons_Olympus as a
real time zone.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers