On January 16, 2004 11:53 am, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Monday, January 12, 2004 13:45:45 -0800 Shankar K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We are considering to use NetApp filer for a highly
busy 24*7 postgres database and the reason we chose
I run a (not very busy) PG cluster on a NetAPP.
I run a very busy PG installation on one.
It seems to do just fine.
Ditto.
The issue is the speed of the network connection. In my case it's only
FastEthernet (100BaseTX). If it's very busy, you may need to look
at GigE.
With the price of GigE adapters I wouldn't consider anything else.
I have a huge database that takes about an hour to copy. The netApp snapshot
feature is very nice because I can get a moment in time image of the
database. Even though I can't run from the snapshot because it is read only
(*) and PG needs to write to files just to open the database, I can copy it
and get a runnable version of the DB. If I copy directly from the original I
can get many changes while copying and wind up with a copy that will not run.
(*): It would be nice if PG had a flag that allowed a database to be opened in
read only mode without touching anything in the directory.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED]|vex}.net | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/| and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082)(eNTP) | what's for dinner.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster