Re: [PERFORM] performance drop after upgrade (9.6 > 10)
On 2017-10-24 17:18, Justin Pryzby wrote: > You could (re)install PG96 alongside PG10 and run a copy of the DB (even from > your homedir, or on a difference server) and pg_dump |pg_restore the relevant > tables (just be sure to specify the alternate host/port/user/etc as needed for > the restore invocation). I considered that but it is far too expensive just for getting the old query plan. The database is more than 1 TB big and replaying it from a dump to another server took us several days, primarily due to the heavy use of materialized views that are calculated over all rows of some large tables. As long as there is no safe pg_downgrade --link I'd rather keep trying to improve query performance on the current version. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Re: [PERFORM] performance drop after upgrade (9.6 > 10)
Hi Pavel, *, you were right with ANALYZing the DB first. However, even after doing so, I frequently see Seq Scans where an index was used before. This usually cooccurs with parallelization and looked different before upgrading to 10. I can provide an example for 10 [1], but I cannot generate a query plan for 9.6 anymore. Any ideas what makes the new version more seqscanny? [1] https://explain.depesz.com/s/gXD3 -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Re: [PERFORM] performance drop after upgrade (9.6 > 10)
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Pavel Stehulewrote: > have you fresh statistics? After upgrade is necessary to run ANALYZE command Yes, that was missing indeed. I did ANALYZE but apparently on all databases but this one. I could have guessed that 1,098,956,679,131,935,754,413,282,631,696,252,928 is not a reasonable cost value. Thanks, Pavel. Best Johannes -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
[PERFORM] performance drop after upgrade (9.6 > 10)
Hi, I wrote a query that joins several tables usually returning less than 1000 rows, groups them and generates a JSON object of the result. In 9.6 is was a question of milliseconds for that query to return the requested data. Now, after upgrading to 10, the query never returns - at least it hasn't returned in the last hour. To see what happens, I requested the query plan [1]. It looks complex and shows a lot of parallelization. I don't have the query plan from 9.6, but I remember it being considerably simpler. Can anyone have a guess what altered the performance here so dramatically? Is there a way to disable new parallelization features just for this query to see if it makes any difference? Best Johannes [1] https://explain.depesz.com/s/xsPP -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance