Re: [PERFORM] VERY slow queries at random

2007-06-08 Thread Kristo Kaiv


On 07.06.2007, at 22:42, Greg Smith wrote:


On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Gunther Mayer wrote:

wal checkpoint config is on pg defaults everywhere, all relevant  
config options are commented out. I'm no expert in wal stuff but I  
don't see how that could cause the problem?


Checkpoints are very resource intensive and can cause other  
processes (including your selects) to hang for a considerable  
period of time while they are processing.  With the default  
parameters, they can happen very frequently.  Normally  
checkpoint_segments and checkpoint_timeout are increased in order  
to keep this from happening.


This would normally be an issue only if you're writing a  
substantial amount of data to your tables.  If there are a lot of  
writes going on, you might get some improvement by adjusting those  
parameters upward; the defaults are pretty low.  Make sure you read  
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/wal-configuration.html  
first so you know what you're playing with, there are some recovery  
implications invoved.


I remember us having problems with 8.0 background writer, you might  
want to try turning it off. Not sure if it behaves as badly in 8.2.

increasing wal buffers might be a good idea also.

Kristo


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

   http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


Re: [PERFORM] VERY slow queries at random

2007-06-07 Thread Kristo Kaiv

could be that the checkpoints are done too seldom.
what is your wal checkpoint config?

Kristo
On 07.06.2007, at 0:27, Scott Marlowe wrote:


Gunther Mayer wrote:

Hi there,

We run a small ISP with a FreeBSD/freeradius/postgresql 8.2.4 backend
and 200+ users. Authentication happens via UAM/hotspot and I see a  
lot

of authorisation and accounting packets that are handled via PL/PGSQL
functions directly in the database.

Everything seems to work 100% except that a few times a day I see

Jun  6 10:41:31 caligula postgres[57347]: [4-1] radiususer: LOG:
duration: 19929.291 ms  statement: SELECT fn_accounting_start(...)

in my logs. I'm logging slow queries with  
log_min_duration_statement =
500 in my postgresql.conf. Sometimes another query runs equally  
slow or
even slower (I've seen 139 seconds!!!) a few minutes before or  
after as

well, but then everything is back to normal.

Even though I haven't yet indexed my data I know that the system is
performant because my largest table (the accounting one) only has  
5000+
rows, the entire database is only a few MB's and I have plenty of  
memory

(2GB), shared_buffers = 100MB and max_fsm_pages = 179200.  Also from
briefly enabling

log_parser_stats = on
log_planner_stats = on
log_executor_stats = on

I saw that most queries are 100% satisfied from cache so the disk
doesn't even get hit. Finally, the problem seems unrelated to load
because it happens at 4am just as likely as at peak traffic time.

What the heck could cause such erratic behaviour? I suspect some  
type of

resource problem but what and how could I dig deeper?


Maybe your hard drive is set to spin down after a certain period of  
idle, and since most all your data is coming from memory, then it  
might be that on the rare occasion when it needs to hit the drive  
it's not spun up anymore.


Maybe some other process is cranking up (cron jobs???) that are  
chewing up all your I/O bandwidth?


Hard to say.  Anything in the system logs that would give you a  
hint?  Try correlating them by the time of the slow pgsql queries.



---(end of  
broadcast)---

TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

   http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


Re: [PERFORM] VERY slow queries at random

2007-06-07 Thread Gunther Mayer

Andrew Sullivan wrote:

On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 09:20:54PM +0200, Gunther Mayer wrote:
  

What the heck could cause such erratic behaviour? I suspect some type of
resource problem but what and how could I dig deeper?



Is something (perhaps implicitly) locking the table?  That will cause
this.
  
There are a whole bunch of update queries that fire all the time but 
afaik none of them ever lock the entire table. To the best of my 
knowledge UPDATE ... WHERE ... only locks those rows that it actually 
operates on, in my case this is always a single row. No explicit locking 
is done anywhere, but perhaps you're right and it is a locking issue. 
Question is, how do I find out about locks at the time when I only get 
told about the slow query *after* it has completed and postgres has told 
me so by logging a slow query entry in my logs?


Gunther

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
  subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
  message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [PERFORM] VERY slow queries at random

2007-06-07 Thread Gunther Mayer

Scott Marlowe wrote:

Gunther Mayer wrote:

Hi there,

We run a small ISP with a FreeBSD/freeradius/postgresql 8.2.4 backend
and 200+ users. Authentication happens via UAM/hotspot and I see a lot
of authorisation and accounting packets that are handled via PL/PGSQL
functions directly in the database.

Everything seems to work 100% except that a few times a day I see

Jun  6 10:41:31 caligula postgres[57347]: [4-1] radiususer: LOG:
duration: 19929.291 ms  statement: SELECT fn_accounting_start(...)

in my logs. I'm logging slow queries with log_min_duration_statement =
500 in my postgresql.conf. Sometimes another query runs equally slow or
even slower (I've seen 139 seconds!!!) a few minutes before or after as
well, but then everything is back to normal.

Even though I haven't yet indexed my data I know that the system is
performant because my largest table (the accounting one) only has 5000+
rows, the entire database is only a few MB's and I have plenty of memory
(2GB), shared_buffers = 100MB and max_fsm_pages = 179200.  Also from
briefly enabling

log_parser_stats = on
log_planner_stats = on
log_executor_stats = on

I saw that most queries are 100% satisfied from cache so the disk
doesn't even get hit. Finally, the problem seems unrelated to load
because it happens at 4am just as likely as at peak traffic time.

What the heck could cause such erratic behaviour? I suspect some type of
resource problem but what and how could I dig deeper? 


Maybe your hard drive is set to spin down after a certain period of 
idle, and since most all your data is coming from memory, then it 
might be that on the rare occasion when it needs to hit the drive it's 
not spun up anymore.
I doubt that as a serious amount of logging is taking place on the box 
all the time which goes straight to disk. Also, no disk in the world 
would take more than a minute to spin up...
Maybe some other process is cranking up (cron jobs???) that are 
chewing up all your I/O bandwidth?
Hmm, I investigated that too but if that was the case the queries would 
run slow always at the same time of the day.
Hard to say.  Anything in the system logs that would give you a hint?  
Try correlating them by the time of the slow pgsql queries.
Nothing relevant in the system logs at the time of the slow query 
appearing. I have in the mean time tweaked syslog-ng.conf such that as 
soon as it detects a duration: greater than 500ms log message it 
spawns top and top -m io and redirects the output to file. At least in 
that way I can check what's keeping the system busy immediately *after* 
a slow query has occured. Of course now Murphy's law has it that since 
I've done that (30 hours ago) not a single slow query has fired, but 
hey, I'll look at the results once I have them.


On another note, autovacuum couldn't cause such issues, could it? I do 
have autovacuum enabled (autovacuum=on as well as 
stats_start_collector=on, stats_block_level = on and stats_row_level = 
on), is there any possibility that autovacuum is not as resource 
friendly as advertised?


Gunther

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

   http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


Re: [PERFORM] VERY slow queries at random

2007-06-07 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:22:47PM +0200, Gunther Mayer wrote:
 There are a whole bunch of update queries that fire all the time but 
 afaik none of them ever lock the entire table. To the best of my 
 knowledge UPDATE ... WHERE ... only locks those rows that it actually 
 operates on, in my case this is always a single row.

Well that shouldn't be biting you, then (you're not in SERIALIZABLE
mode, right?).  The other obvious bit would be checkpoint storms. 
What's your bgwriter config like?

 Question is, how do I find out about locks at the time when I only get 
 told about the slow query *after* it has completed and postgres has told 
 me so by logging a slow query entry in my logs?

You can't :(

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well. 
--Dennis Ritchie

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [PERFORM] VERY slow queries at random

2007-06-07 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Gunther Mayer wrote:

 On another note, autovacuum couldn't cause such issues, could it? I do 
 have autovacuum enabled (autovacuum=on as well as 
 stats_start_collector=on, stats_block_level = on and stats_row_level = 
 on), is there any possibility that autovacuum is not as resource 
 friendly as advertised?

Hmm.  I am not sure where did you read that but I don't think it has
ever been stated that autovacuum is resource friendly in the default
configuration (I, for one, have never tried, intended or wanted to state
that).  I suggest tuning the autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay parameters if
you want it to interfere less with your regular operation.

-- 
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [PERFORM] VERY slow queries at random

2007-06-07 Thread Greg Smith

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Gunther Mayer wrote:

wal checkpoint config is on pg defaults everywhere, all relevant config 
options are commented out. I'm no expert in wal stuff but I don't see how 
that could cause the problem?


Checkpoints are very resource intensive and can cause other processes 
(including your selects) to hang for a considerable period of time while 
they are processing.  With the default parameters, they can happen very 
frequently.  Normally checkpoint_segments and checkpoint_timeout are 
increased in order to keep this from happening.


This would normally be an issue only if you're writing a substantial 
amount of data to your tables.  If there are a lot of writes going on, you 
might get some improvement by adjusting those parameters upward; the 
defaults are pretty low.  Make sure you read 
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/wal-configuration.html first so 
you know what you're playing with, there are some recovery implications 
invoved.


--
* Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


[PERFORM] VERY slow queries at random

2007-06-06 Thread Gunther Mayer

Hi there,

We run a small ISP with a FreeBSD/freeradius/postgresql 8.2.4 backend
and 200+ users. Authentication happens via UAM/hotspot and I see a lot
of authorisation and accounting packets that are handled via PL/PGSQL
functions directly in the database.

Everything seems to work 100% except that a few times a day I see

Jun  6 10:41:31 caligula postgres[57347]: [4-1] radiususer: LOG:
duration: 19929.291 ms  statement: SELECT fn_accounting_start(...)

in my logs. I'm logging slow queries with log_min_duration_statement =
500 in my postgresql.conf. Sometimes another query runs equally slow or
even slower (I've seen 139 seconds!!!) a few minutes before or after as
well, but then everything is back to normal.

Even though I haven't yet indexed my data I know that the system is
performant because my largest table (the accounting one) only has 5000+
rows, the entire database is only a few MB's and I have plenty of memory
(2GB), shared_buffers = 100MB and max_fsm_pages = 179200.  Also from
briefly enabling

log_parser_stats = on
log_planner_stats = on
log_executor_stats = on

I saw that most queries are 100% satisfied from cache so the disk
doesn't even get hit. Finally, the problem seems unrelated to load
because it happens at 4am just as likely as at peak traffic time.

What the heck could cause such erratic behaviour? I suspect some type of
resource problem but what and how could I dig deeper?

Gunther


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [PERFORM] VERY slow queries at random

2007-06-06 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 09:20:54PM +0200, Gunther Mayer wrote:
 
 What the heck could cause such erratic behaviour? I suspect some type of
 resource problem but what and how could I dig deeper?

Is something (perhaps implicitly) locking the table?  That will cause
this.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The year's penultimate month is not in truth a good way of saying
November.
--H.W. Fowler

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [PERFORM] VERY slow queries at random

2007-06-06 Thread Scott Marlowe

Gunther Mayer wrote:

Hi there,

We run a small ISP with a FreeBSD/freeradius/postgresql 8.2.4 backend
and 200+ users. Authentication happens via UAM/hotspot and I see a lot
of authorisation and accounting packets that are handled via PL/PGSQL
functions directly in the database.

Everything seems to work 100% except that a few times a day I see

Jun  6 10:41:31 caligula postgres[57347]: [4-1] radiususer: LOG:
duration: 19929.291 ms  statement: SELECT fn_accounting_start(...)

in my logs. I'm logging slow queries with log_min_duration_statement =
500 in my postgresql.conf. Sometimes another query runs equally slow or
even slower (I've seen 139 seconds!!!) a few minutes before or after as
well, but then everything is back to normal.

Even though I haven't yet indexed my data I know that the system is
performant because my largest table (the accounting one) only has 5000+
rows, the entire database is only a few MB's and I have plenty of memory
(2GB), shared_buffers = 100MB and max_fsm_pages = 179200.  Also from
briefly enabling

log_parser_stats = on
log_planner_stats = on
log_executor_stats = on

I saw that most queries are 100% satisfied from cache so the disk
doesn't even get hit. Finally, the problem seems unrelated to load
because it happens at 4am just as likely as at peak traffic time.

What the heck could cause such erratic behaviour? I suspect some type of
resource problem but what and how could I dig deeper? 


Maybe your hard drive is set to spin down after a certain period of 
idle, and since most all your data is coming from memory, then it might 
be that on the rare occasion when it needs to hit the drive it's not 
spun up anymore.


Maybe some other process is cranking up (cron jobs???) that are chewing 
up all your I/O bandwidth?


Hard to say.  Anything in the system logs that would give you a hint?  
Try correlating them by the time of the slow pgsql queries.



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster