[Pharo-dev] is it possible to send data using form

2020-06-29 Thread shawon58
Hello
Normally i know data can be send from the form and can be display in the
result pan but i want to know is it possible to send some value like height
width from the form and save those data as a text file ? if any one have
idea about this please share with me.


Thanks for your kind help 



--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html



[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 9.0] Build #434: ScopeLevel-only-MethodScope

2020-06-29 Thread ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2
There is a new Pharo build available!
  
The status of the build #434 was: FAILURE.

The Pull Request #6734 was integrated: "ScopeLevel-only-MethodScope"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6734

Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/ScopeLevel
Build Url: 
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/Pharo9.0/434/


[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 9.0] Build #433: Dictionary-no-hasTempVector

2020-06-29 Thread ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2
There is a new Pharo build available!
  
The status of the build #433 was: FAILURE.

The Pull Request #6735 was integrated: "Dictionary-no-hasTempVector"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6735

Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/Dictionary
Build Url: 
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/Pharo9.0/433/


Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 7.0.5

2020-06-29 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
Thanks again, Esteban, it works well !

Travis CI picked up the latest version as well.

I got one project using Integer>>#byteAt: now, 
https://github.com/svenvc/NeoUniversalBinaryJSON , that cleanly builds on Pharo 
7, 8 and 9 using one code base: 
https://travis-ci.org/github/svenvc/NeoUniversalBinaryJSON

Cool.

I'll be moving my other projects using that method (MQTT, P3 and Zinc) in the 
coming days. 

Sven

> On 29 Jun 2020, at 11:07, Esteban Lorenzano  wrote:
> 
> yes
> 
> On lun., juin 29, 2020 at 11:05, Sven Van Caekenberghe  wrote:
>> And will I get that version using
>> 
>> $ curl get.pharo.org/64/70 | bash
>> 
>> and will that version be available in the Pharo Launcher as well ?
>> 
>> 
>>  On 29 Jun 2020, at 10:51, Esteban Lorenzano > > wrote:
>>  
>>  ok, in theory... you have Pharo 7.0.5 now, as final version.
>>  
>>  Esteban
>>  
>>  On lun., juin 29, 2020 at 09:11, Sven Van Caekenberghe <
>> s...@stfx.eu
>> > wrote:
>> 
>>  OK, thanks.
>>  
>>  
>>   On 29 Jun 2020, at 06:58, Esteban Lorenzano <
>> esteba...@netc.eu
>> 
>>  > wrote:
>>   
>>   Hi Sven, 
>>   
>>   In general, I would say Pharo 7 is not maintained anymore, but in this 
>> case I think we should have done this as last task before closing it.
>>   I will try to do a final release now (we'll see how it works, it should be 
>> an easy task but two years happened since P7 so... we will not know until we 
>> try ;) )
>>   
>>   Esteban
>>   
>>   On dim., juin 28, 2020 at 20:32, Sven Van Caekenberghe <
>>  
>> s...@stfx.eu
>> 
>>  > wrote:
>>  
>>   PING: I still did not yet get any answer.
>>   
>>   
>>On 17 May 2020, at 12:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe <
>>  
>> s...@stfx.eu
>> 
>>  
>>   > wrote:
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Is there any intention of officially releasing Pharo 7.0.5 ?
>>
>>There are 18 commits after 7.0.4
>>
>>
>>   
>>  
>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/compare/v7.0.4...Pharo7.0
>> 
>>  
>>   
>>
>>I need the following
>>
>>
>>   
>>  
>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5079
>> 
>>  
>>   
>>
>>which is one of the 18 commits
>>
>>Zinc HTTP Components is currently partially broken on Pharo 9 because 
>> #digitAt: was replaced by #byteAt: and #digitAt: is now removed.
>>
>>In order to fix this I could start using #byteAt: as far back as 7.0.5 
>> and add it myself for even older Pharo versions using my 
>> Zinc-Pharo-Forward-Compatibility package.
>>
>>What has to happen to make it possible to release 7.0.5 ? More testing ? 
>> Where is the artefact to test ?
>>
>>Thx,
>>
>>Sven
>>
>>   
>>   
>>   
>>   
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 




Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 7.0.5

2020-06-29 Thread Esteban Lorenzano

yes

On lun., juin 29, 2020 at 11:05, Sven Van Caekenberghe  
wrote:

And will I get that version using

$ curl get.pharo.org/64/70 | bash

and will that version be available in the Pharo Launcher as well ?

 On 29 Jun 2020, at 10:51, Esteban Lorenzano > wrote:


 ok, in theory... you have Pharo 7.0.5 now, as final version.

 Esteban

 On lun., juin 29, 2020 at 09:11, Sven Van Caekenberghe 
mailto:s...@stfx.eu>> wrote:

 OK, thanks.


  On 29 Jun 2020, at 06:58, Esteban Lorenzano 

 > wrote:

  Hi Sven,

  In general, I would say Pharo 7 is not maintained anymore, but in 
this case I think we should have done this as last task before 
closing it.
  I will try to do a final release now (we'll see how it works, it 
should be an easy task but two years happened since P7 so... we 
will not know until we try ;) )


  Esteban

  On dim., juin 28, 2020 at 20:32, Sven Van Caekenberghe <
 s...@stfx.eu 
 > wrote:

  PING: I still did not yet get any answer.


   On 17 May 2020, at 12:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe <
 s...@stfx.eu 

  > wrote:

   Hi,

   Is there any intention of officially releasing Pharo 7.0.5 ?

   There are 18 commits after 7.0.4



 



   I need the following



 



   which is one of the 18 commits

   Zinc HTTP Components is currently partially broken on Pharo 9 
because #digitAt: was replaced by #byteAt: and #digitAt: is now 
removed.


   In order to fix this I could start using #byteAt: as far back as 
7.0.5 and add it myself for even older Pharo versions using my 
Zinc-Pharo-Forward-Compatibility package.


   What has to happen to make it possible to release 7.0.5 ? More 
testing ? Where is the artefact to test ?


   Thx,

   Sven
















Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 7.0.5

2020-06-29 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
And will I get that version using

$ curl get.pharo.org/64/70 | bash

and will that version be available in the Pharo Launcher as well ?

> On 29 Jun 2020, at 10:51, Esteban Lorenzano  wrote:
> 
> ok, in theory... you have Pharo 7.0.5 now, as final version.
> 
> Esteban
> 
> On lun., juin 29, 2020 at 09:11, Sven Van Caekenberghe  wrote:
>> OK, thanks.
>> 
>> 
>>  On 29 Jun 2020, at 06:58, Esteban Lorenzano > > wrote:
>>  
>>  Hi Sven, 
>>  
>>  In general, I would say Pharo 7 is not maintained anymore, but in this case 
>> I think we should have done this as last task before closing it.
>>  I will try to do a final release now (we'll see how it works, it should be 
>> an easy task but two years happened since P7 so... we will not know until we 
>> try ;) )
>>  
>>  Esteban
>>  
>>  On dim., juin 28, 2020 at 20:32, Sven Van Caekenberghe <
>> s...@stfx.eu
>> > wrote:
>> 
>>  PING: I still did not yet get any answer.
>>  
>>  
>>   On 17 May 2020, at 12:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe <
>> s...@stfx.eu
>> 
>>  > wrote:
>>   
>>   Hi,
>>   
>>   Is there any intention of officially releasing Pharo 7.0.5 ?
>>   
>>   There are 18 commits after 7.0.4
>>   
>>   
>>  
>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/compare/v7.0.4...Pharo7.0
>> 
>>  
>>   
>>   I need the following
>>   
>>   
>>  
>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5079
>> 
>>  
>>   
>>   which is one of the 18 commits
>>   
>>   Zinc HTTP Components is currently partially broken on Pharo 9 because 
>> #digitAt: was replaced by #byteAt: and #digitAt: is now removed.
>>   
>>   In order to fix this I could start using #byteAt: as far back as 7.0.5 and 
>> add it myself for even older Pharo versions using my 
>> Zinc-Pharo-Forward-Compatibility package.
>>   
>>   What has to happen to make it possible to release 7.0.5 ? More testing ? 
>> Where is the artefact to test ?
>>   
>>   Thx,
>>   
>>   Sven
>>   
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 




[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0] Build #177: Backport-5072-MCClassTraitDefinition-should-take-category-into-account-for-equality

2020-06-29 Thread ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2
There is a new Pharo build available!
  
The status of the build #177 was: FAILURE.

The Pull Request #5075 was integrated: 
"Backport-5072-MCClassTraitDefinition-should-take-category-into-account-for-equality"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5075

Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/Backport
Build Url: 
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/Pharo7.0/177/


Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 7.0.5

2020-06-29 Thread Esteban Lorenzano

ok, in theory... you have Pharo 7.0.5 now, as final version.

Esteban

On lun., juin 29, 2020 at 09:11, Sven Van Caekenberghe  
wrote:

OK, thanks.

 On 29 Jun 2020, at 06:58, Esteban Lorenzano > wrote:


 Hi Sven,

 In general, I would say Pharo 7 is not maintained anymore, but in 
this case I think we should have done this as last task before 
closing it.
 I will try to do a final release now (we'll see how it works, it 
should be an easy task but two years happened since P7 so... we will 
not know until we try ;) )


 Esteban

 On dim., juin 28, 2020 at 20:32, Sven Van Caekenberghe 
mailto:s...@stfx.eu>> wrote:

 PING: I still did not yet get any answer.


  On 17 May 2020, at 12:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe 

 > wrote:

  Hi,

  Is there any intention of officially releasing Pharo 7.0.5 ?

  There are 18 commits after 7.0.4


 


  I need the following


 


  which is one of the 18 commits

  Zinc HTTP Components is currently partially broken on Pharo 9 
because #digitAt: was replaced by #byteAt: and #digitAt: is now 
removed.


  In order to fix this I could start using #byteAt: as far back as 
7.0.5 and add it myself for even older Pharo versions using my 
Zinc-Pharo-Forward-Compatibility package.


  What has to happen to make it possible to release 7.0.5 ? More 
testing ? Where is the artefact to test ?


  Thx,

  Sven












[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0] Build #176: Backport-5072-MCClassTraitDefinition-should-take-category-into-account-for-equality

2020-06-29 Thread ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2
There is a new Pharo build available!
  
The status of the build #176 was: FAILURE.

The Pull Request #5075 was integrated: 
"Backport-5072-MCClassTraitDefinition-should-take-category-into-account-for-equality"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5075

Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/Backport
Build Url: 
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/Pharo7.0/176/


Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 7.0.5

2020-06-29 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
OK, thanks.

> On 29 Jun 2020, at 06:58, Esteban Lorenzano  wrote:
> 
> Hi Sven, 
> 
> In general, I would say Pharo 7 is not maintained anymore, but in this case I 
> think we should have done this as last task before closing it.
> I will try to do a final release now (we'll see how it works, it should be an 
> easy task but two years happened since P7 so... we will not know until we try 
> ;) )
> 
> Esteban
> 
> On dim., juin 28, 2020 at 20:32, Sven Van Caekenberghe  wrote:
>> PING: I still did not yet get any answer.
>> 
>> 
>>  On 17 May 2020, at 12:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe > > wrote:
>>  
>>  Hi,
>>  
>>  Is there any intention of officially releasing Pharo 7.0.5 ?
>>  
>>  There are 18 commits after 7.0.4
>>  
>>  
>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/compare/v7.0.4...Pharo7.0
>> 
>>  
>>  I need the following
>>  
>>  
>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5079
>> 
>>  
>>  which is one of the 18 commits
>>  
>>  Zinc HTTP Components is currently partially broken on Pharo 9 because 
>> #digitAt: was replaced by #byteAt: and #digitAt: is now removed.
>>  
>>  In order to fix this I could start using #byteAt: as far back as 7.0.5 and 
>> add it myself for even older Pharo versions using my 
>> Zinc-Pharo-Forward-Compatibility package.
>>  
>>  What has to happen to make it possible to release 7.0.5 ? More testing ? 
>> Where is the artefact to test ?
>>  
>>  Thx,
>>  
>>  Sven
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 




[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 9.0] Build #432: Fix broken test after notebook fixes

2020-06-29 Thread ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2
There is a new Pharo build available!
  
The status of the build #432 was: FAILURE.

The Pull Request #6728 was integrated: "Fix broken test after notebook fixes"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6728

Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/calypsoTabsFix1
Build Url: 
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/Pharo9.0/432/