Re: [PHP-DEV] Profiling PHP
Okay that's more like it, emalloc on top. That's what I would expect in the first place. And I guess Zeev is right that it doesn't really tell you anything expect from that PHP does its share of alloc/free, and then some. - Stig On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 23:06, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Well, zend_parse() is actually not always on top. I have run this thing longer now and it currently looks like this: (reverse order) 001bdcd0 293 0.42199 init_op 00156c08 306 0.440713smart_str_appendl_ex 0019b484 334 0.481039php_strlcpy 001db788 337 0.48536 _get_zval_ptr_ptr 0015f2b4 341 0.491121parse_iv2 001db198 347 0.499762zend_pzval_unlock_func 001cbf00 364 0.524246zend_hash_clean 0015ee18 392 0.564573var_push 001dbb88 396 0.570334zend_assign_to_variable 001c45d0 398 0.573214_zval_copy_ctor 001c3dfc 416 0.599139zend_ptr_stack_n_push 001bdaf0 432 0.622183destroy_op_array 001c3560 459 0.661069zend_str_tolower 0015701c 465 0.66971 smart_str_print_unsigned 001b9970 465 0.66971 zendlex 001b2440 467 0.672591_erealloc 001d45e4 473 0.681232zend_fetch_property_address 001c4970 497 0.715798_zval_ptr_dtor_wrapper 0015ef14 516 0.743162process_nested_data 001946c8 526 0.757565xbuf_format_converter 001b27fc 629 0.905909_estrndup 001db1fc 647 0.931834zend_clean_garbage 001cb9b8 686 0.988003zend_hash_rehash 001cc6cc 711 1.02401 zend_hash_copy 001c45c0 764 1.10034 zval_add_ref 001d398c 953 1.37255 zend_fetch_var_address 001ca5f8 975 1.40423 _zend_is_inconsistent 001cbda8 1046 1.50649 zend_hash_destroy 001c443c 1235 1.77869 _zval_dtor 001baf6c 1302 1.87519 _zval_ptr_dtor 001db270 1419 2.0437 _get_zval_ptr 0015dcb4 1464 2.10851 php_var_unserialize 001ccae0 2460 3.54298 zend_hash_find 001b3028 2917 4.20117 _mem_block_check 001d4ca0 3931 5.66157 execute 001ca85c 4438 6.39177 zend_hash_add_or_update 001a56bc 4597 6.62077 zendparse 001b21b8 4692 6.75759 _efree 001cdaf8 5458 7.86082 zend_inline_hash_func 001a9f4c 5501 7.92275 lex_scan 001b1ea4 6321 9.10374 _emalloc On 13 May 2002, Stig S. Bakken wrote: On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 17:53, Zeev Suraski wrote: The link you specified doesn't work (it's .net)... Nice touch on their part on having a page that doesn't render under IE :) Anyway, the important question is whether you're using it under Linux or some other OS. Under Linux, unless it has some kernel module, it's going to be horribly inaccurate. After finding this page, it does appear as if it's using a kernel module. Congrats to Linux for finally having a usable profiler! It's pretty consistent with the results I got using NuMega's profiler about a year ago (I don't remember the exact numbers, but the functions are more or less the same). Seeing that the single most time-consuming function is zend_parse, it would be interesting to see where the bottleneck moves when using ZendAccelerator or another caching product. Did you try that setup with NuMega's profiler? - Stig -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.2.1 release announcement
Hello, PHP 4.2.1 is released today, it's a bug fix release which addresses some serious bugs (and a lot of other little bugs) in 4.2.0. The full release announcement follows below: This bug fix release solves a few bugs found in PHP 4.2.0. PHP 4.2.1 includes the following fixes: * Fix for the MySQL extension not be able to connect to a MySQL server. * Fix for a crash in the COM extension when using an outproc server. * Fix for SID logic in the session extension. * Fixes for the mbstring extension, including SJIS directory name handling and mb_output_buffer(). * Fix for a bug in socket_select() that could cause unexpected behavior when using a statement like $w = $e = array($sock); * Almost full DOM compliance for the domxml extension, and fixes for several functions. * Safe_mode checks for show_source(), parse_ini_file() and rmdir(). For a full list of changes in PHP 4.2.1, see the NEWS file. (http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-4.php) Compatibility PHP 4.2.1 also has improved (but still experimental) support for Apache version 2. We do not recommend that you use this in a production environment, but feel free to test it and report bugs to the bug system. (http://bugs.php.net) External variables We would also like to attend you on a big change in PHP 4.2.0 concerning variable handling. External variables (from the environment, the HTTP request, cookies or the web server) are no longer registered in the global scope by default. The preferred method of accessing these external variables is by using the new Superglobal arrays, introduced in PHP 4.1.0. More information about this change: * PHP Manual: Predefined variables (http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.variables.predefined.php) * The PHP 4.1.0 release announcement (http://www.php.net/release_4_1_0.php) * Thomas Oertli's article on secure programming in PHP (http://www.zend.com/zend/art/art-oertli.php) regards, Derick -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Important: make test/run-tests.php broken?
Hi, seems nothing happened there yet. CVS HEAD has the same problem. Just deleting the CGI in ~/php4/php does the trick and runs the test suite properly. - Markus On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +, Wez Furlong wrote : Damn - sapi/cgi is being run and the http headers are confusing the test suite... --Wez. On 16/03/02, Wez Furlong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, Am I the only one that has every single test fail when running make test?? (I've tried with 2 separate working checkouts). It appears that the expected output and the actual output differ by a newline at the end... Can someone else verify, because my first suspcicion was my streams code, but I can't see anything wrong, and my other tree has the same problem (but no streams code). --Wez. -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc - I mean When in doubt, blame mcrypt is more often right than wrong :) Always right, never wrong :) - Two PHP developers who want to remain unnamed -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Creating extension module for PHP
Hi, I am a newcomer to PHP so I apologise in advance if my question seems trivial or has already been answered on this site before. I have been tasked with creating an HTML based interface for one of our products. We already have a mature API set used to configure the product in the form of a Shared Library on a Mac and a dll on Windows. Is there a means of creating an extension for PHP so that I may use these API calls within a PHP Script? I noticed that there are already a number of extensions available i.e. COM, XML, ODBC etc - can I not create my own extension? Not being a Mac programmer I am not quite sure how these extensions present themselves on the Mac (or even if they exist at all). Any help will be much appreciated. Regards, Simon Fogg. -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Re: Creating extension module for PHP
Simon Fogg wrote: Hi, I am a newcomer to PHP so I apologise in advance if my question seems trivial or has already been answered on this site before. I have been tasked with creating an HTML based interface for one of our products. We already have a mature API set used to configure the product in the form of a Shared Library on a Mac and a dll on Windows. Is there a means of creating an extension for PHP so that I may use these API calls within a PHP Script? I noticed that there are already a number of extensions available i.e. COM, XML, ODBC etc - can I not create my own extension? Aye, you download the PHP source code and create your extention in ext/ directory. More info here: http://se.php.net/manual/en/zend.php -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Important: make test/run-tests.php broken?
Btw, now (in HEAD) you can run pear run-tests in any directory with tests in it. No need for a makefile. - Stig On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 13:05, Markus Fischer wrote: Hi, seems nothing happened there yet. CVS HEAD has the same problem. Just deleting the CGI in ~/php4/php does the trick and runs the test suite properly. - Markus On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +, Wez Furlong wrote : Damn - sapi/cgi is being run and the http headers are confusing the test suite... --Wez. On 16/03/02, Wez Furlong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, Am I the only one that has every single test fail when running make test?? (I've tried with 2 separate working checkouts). It appears that the expected output and the actual output differ by a newline at the end... Can someone else verify, because my first suspcicion was my streams code, but I can't see anything wrong, and my other tree has the same problem (but no streams code). --Wez. -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc - I mean When in doubt, blame mcrypt is more often right than wrong :) Always right, never wrong :) - Two PHP developers who want to remain unnamed -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Re: Creating extension module for PHP
Thanks Martin, I will have a look. One other question is to do with the Mac OSX platform. I noticed that extension modules are compiled down to dll's - what form do they take on the Mac platform, or can they even be created? I seem to remember reading that these modules can be created for UNIX based systems - am I right? Simon. Martin Wickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Simon Fogg wrote: Hi, I am a newcomer to PHP so I apologise in advance if my question seems trivial or has already been answered on this site before. I have been tasked with creating an HTML based interface for one of our products. We already have a mature API set used to configure the product in the form of a Shared Library on a Mac and a dll on Windows. Is there a means of creating an extension for PHP so that I may use these API calls within a PHP Script? I noticed that there are already a number of extensions available i.e. COM, XML, ODBC etc - can I not create my own extension? Aye, you download the PHP source code and create your extention in ext/ directory. More info here: http://se.php.net/manual/en/zend.php -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Probably a simple answer...
zval containers that are of string type don't seem to hold a null terminating character, but rather directly store the length of the string - I note this because of how the ZVAL_STRING macro works... My question then is what is the best way to compare two strings in a zval? I would imagine a macro or function would already exist, and I'm quite sure that the following simple invocation is asking for trouble: strcmp( Z_STRVAL_P( target1 ), Z_STRVAL_P( target2 ) ) == 0 Thanks for any information. Cheers, Rob. -- .-. | Robert Cummings | :-`. | Webdeployer - Chief PHP and Java Programmer | :--: | Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone : (613) 731-4046 x.109 | :--: | Website : http://www.webmotion.com | | Fax : (613) 260-9545 | `--' -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Probably a simple answer...
Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null termiated and have the length stored. But zend does provied this api function zend_binary_zval_strcmp(zval *, zval*); - Brad --- Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: zval containers that are of string type don't seem to hold a null terminating character, but rather directly store the length of the string - I note this because of how the ZVAL_STRING macro works... My question then is what is the best way to compare two strings in a zval? I would imagine a macro or function would already exist, and I'm quite sure that the following simple invocation is asking for trouble: strcmp( Z_STRVAL_P( target1 ), Z_STRVAL_P( target2 ) ) == 0 Thanks for any information. Cheers, Rob. -- .-. | Robert Cummings | :-`. | Webdeployer - Chief PHP and Java Programmer | :--: | Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone : (613) 731-4046 x.109 | :--: | Website : http://www.webmotion.com | | Fax : (613) 260-9545 | `--' -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Probably a simple answer...
brad lafountain wrote: Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null termiated and have the length stored. You would think so, but on further thought, if that were the case you wouldn't be able to store compressed data from gzip in a string because the null bytes everywhere would interfere. Also, as I said, ZVAL_STRING suggests that this is so... since when you use it to set a zval container to a string it saves the length as strlen( passedString ), rather than strlen( passedString ) + 1, also the memcpy then uses this length to copy the string if you set the copy flag to true. Cheers, Rob. But zend does provied this api function zend_binary_zval_strcmp(zval *, zval*); - Brad --- Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: zval containers that are of string type don't seem to hold a null terminating character, but rather directly store the length of the string - I note this because of how the ZVAL_STRING macro works... My question then is what is the best way to compare two strings in a zval? I would imagine a macro or function would already exist, and I'm quite sure that the following simple invocation is asking for trouble: strcmp( Z_STRVAL_P( target1 ), Z_STRVAL_P( target2 ) ) == 0 Thanks for any information. Cheers, Rob. -- .-. | Robert Cummings | :-`. | Webdeployer - Chief PHP and Java Programmer | :--: | Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone : (613) 731-4046 x.109 | :--: | Website : http://www.webmotion.com | | Fax : (613) 260-9545 | `--' -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- .-. | Robert Cummings | :-`. | Webdeployer - Chief PHP and Java Programmer | :--: | Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone : (613) 731-4046 x.109 | :--: | Website : http://www.webmotion.com | | Fax : (613) 260-9545 | `--' -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Probably a simple answer...
brad lafountain wrote: Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null termiated and have the length stored. But zend does provied this api function zend_binary_zval_strcmp(zval *, zval*); Oh and I almost forgot... THANKS... this appears to be exactly what I was looking for :) Cheers, Rob. -- .-. | Robert Cummings | :-`. | Webdeployer - Chief PHP and Java Programmer | :--: | Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone : (613) 731-4046 x.109 | :--: | Website : http://www.webmotion.com | | Fax : (613) 260-9545 | `--' -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Probably a simple answer...
zval strings must be NULL terminated, even if they contain binary data. The str.val.len property represents the length of the string w/o the terminating NULL. Zeev At 16:39 14/05/2002, Robert Cummings wrote: brad lafountain wrote: Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null termiated and have the length stored. You would think so, but on further thought, if that were the case you wouldn't be able to store compressed data from gzip in a string because the null bytes everywhere would interfere. Also, as I said, ZVAL_STRING suggests that this is so... since when you use it to set a zval container to a string it saves the length as strlen( passedString ), rather than strlen( passedString ) + 1, also the memcpy then uses this length to copy the string if you set the copy flag to true. Cheers, Rob. But zend does provied this api function zend_binary_zval_strcmp(zval *, zval*); - Brad --- Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: zval containers that are of string type don't seem to hold a null terminating character, but rather directly store the length of the string - I note this because of how the ZVAL_STRING macro works... My question then is what is the best way to compare two strings in a zval? I would imagine a macro or function would already exist, and I'm quite sure that the following simple invocation is asking for trouble: strcmp( Z_STRVAL_P( target1 ), Z_STRVAL_P( target2 ) ) == 0 Thanks for any information. Cheers, Rob. -- .-. | Robert Cummings | :-`. | Webdeployer - Chief PHP and Java Programmer | :--: | Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone : (613) 731-4046 x.109 | :--: | Website : http://www.webmotion.com | | Fax : (613) 260-9545 | `--' -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- .-. | Robert Cummings | :-`. | Webdeployer - Chief PHP and Java Programmer | :--: | Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone : (613) 731-4046 x.109 | :--: | Website : http://www.webmotion.com | | Fax : (613) 260-9545 | `--' -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Probably a simple answer...
Robert Cummings wrote: brad lafountain wrote: Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null termiated and have the length stored. You would think so, but on further thought, if that were the case you wouldn't be able to store compressed data from gzip in a string because the null bytes everywhere would interfere. Also, as I said, ZVAL_STRING suggests that this is so... since when you use it to set a zval container to a string it saves the length as strlen( passedString ), rather than strlen( passedString ) + 1, also the memcpy then uses this length ^^ I just took another look at ZVAL_STRING and it uses estrndup and not memcpy... maybe I'm losing my mind :) Cheers, Rob. -- .-. | Robert Cummings | :-`. | Webdeployer - Chief PHP and Java Programmer | :--: | Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone : (613) 731-4046 x.109 | :--: | Website : http://www.webmotion.com | | Fax : (613) 260-9545 | `--' -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Probably a simple answer...
I believe you hijacked my thread - The original subject was: 'Creating extension module for PHP'! Brad Lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null termiated and have the length stored. But zend does provied this api function zend_binary_zval_strcmp(zval *, zval*); - Brad --- Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: zval containers that are of string type don't seem to hold a null terminating character, but rather directly store the length of the string - I note this because of how the ZVAL_STRING macro works... My question then is what is the best way to compare two strings in a zval? I would imagine a macro or function would already exist, and I'm quite sure that the following simple invocation is asking for trouble: strcmp( Z_STRVAL_P( target1 ), Z_STRVAL_P( target2 ) ) == 0 Thanks for any information. Cheers, Rob. -- .-. | Robert Cummings | :-`. | Webdeployer - Chief PHP and Java Programmer | :--: | Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone : (613) 731-4046 x.109 | :--: | Website : http://www.webmotion.com | | Fax : (613) 260-9545 | `--' -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Probably a simple answer...
Simon Fogg wrote: I believe you hijacked my thread - The original subject was: 'Creating extension module for PHP'! I was asking about specific information about specific functionality, your thread asks about how to write an extension... I already know how and have done so, I'd just like to know more about what I'm doing and since there isn't much in the way of docs for doing so, then sometimes I need to clear things up here. I apologize if it appears I hijacked your thread.. Cheers, Rob. -- .-. | Robert Cummings | :-`. | Webdeployer - Chief PHP and Java Programmer | :--: | Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone : (613) 731-4046 x.109 | :--: | Website : http://www.webmotion.com | | Fax : (613) 260-9545 | `--' -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Bug #14407: Win32 SendMail function doesn't use From: in SMTP MAIL FROM command
Diff against current HEAD for patch for bug #14407. This allows the
return path to automatically be set to the from address for Win32
sendmail.
Michael Sisolak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com
--- sendmail.c Tue May 14 10:07:40 2002
+++ sendmail.c.new Tue May 14 10:22:13 2002
@@ -125,11 +125,26 @@
strcpy(MailHost, host);
}
- if (INI_STR(sendmail_from)){
- RPath = estrdup(INI_STR(sendmail_from));
+ /* use from address as return path (if specified in headers) */
+ if (headers strstr(headers, From:)) {
+ char *pos;
+ pos = strstr(headers, From:) + 5;
+ while (pos (*pos == ' '))
+ pos++;
+
+ if (pos strlen(pos)) {
+ RPath = estrdup(pos);
+ RPath[strcspn(RPath, \r\n)] = '\x0';
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!RPath) {
+ if (INI_STR(sendmail_from)) {
+ RPath = estrdup(INI_STR(sendmail_from));
} else {
*error = W32_SM_SENDMAIL_FROM_NOT_SET;
return FAILURE;
+ }
}
/* attempt to connect with mail host */
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Probably a simple answer...
That's o.k.- I'm just grouchy. There seems to be so much information to wade through to find out what you need to know. Since we are on the subject though, and you have already done this sort of thing before, can you tell me whether extensions are supported on MacOSX. My Mac colleague is off sick today and since I am looking at finding a fairly X-Plaform solution to our problem, I thought it would be beneficial if I could find out whether the same solution could be used on a Mac. Cheers. Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Simon Fogg wrote: I believe you hijacked my thread - The original subject was: 'Creating extension module for PHP'! I was asking about specific information about specific functionality, your thread asks about how to write an extension... I already know how and have done so, I'd just like to know more about what I'm doing and since there isn't much in the way of docs for doing so, then sometimes I need to clear things up here. I apologize if it appears I hijacked your thread.. Cheers, Rob. -- .-. | Robert Cummings | :-`. | Webdeployer - Chief PHP and Java Programmer | :--: | Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone : (613) 731-4046 x.109 | :--: | Website : http://www.webmotion.com | | Fax : (613) 260-9545 | `--' -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] [mfischer@guru.josefine.at: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /win32 sendmail.c sendmail.h]
Hi,
This changes I did fix a nasty crash when using 'Cc' in the
header parameter to mail() when not being terminated with
\r\n. Despite the win32 sendmail code being buggy as hell,
I'ld like some feedback of testers (ok, I'm not sure if I
really want this :-), anyway
- Markus
--
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc
-
I mean When in doubt, blame mcrypt is more often right than wrong :)
Always right, never wrong :)
- Two PHP developers who want to remain unnamed
---BeginMessage---
mfischerTue May 14 09:52:19 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/php4/win32 sendmail.c sendmail.h
Log:
- Fix win32 sendmail bug with Cc: in custom header not terminated with \r\n
- Fix some obvious errors returned by the module, little cleanup.
Index: php4/win32/sendmail.c
diff -u php4/win32/sendmail.c:1.24 php4/win32/sendmail.c:1.25
--- php4/win32/sendmail.c:1.24 Thu Dec 20 13:06:13 2001
+++ php4/win32/sendmail.c Tue May 14 09:52:17 2002
-18,7 +18,7
*
*/
-/* $Id: sendmail.c,v 1.24 2001/12/20 18:06:13 fmk Exp $ */
+/* $Id: sendmail.c,v 1.25 2002/05/14 13:52:17 mfischer Exp $ */
#include php.h /*php specific */
#include stdio.h
-69,26 +69,27
/* Error messages */
static char *ErrorMessages[] =
{
- {Success},
- {Bad arguments from form},
+ {Success}, /* 0 */
+ {Bad arguments from form}, /* 1 */
{Unable to open temporary mailfile for read},
{Failed to Start Sockets},
{Failed to Resolve Host},
- {Failed to obtain socket handle},
- {Failed to Connect},
+ {Failed to obtain socket handle}, /* 5 */
+ {Failed to connect to mailserver, verify your \SMTP\ setting in php.ini},
{Failed to Send},
{Failed to Receive},
{Server Error},
- {Failed to resolve the host IP name},
+ {Failed to resolve the host IP name}, /* 10 */
{Out of memory},
{Unknown error},
{Bad Message Contents},
{Bad Message Subject},
- {Bad Message destination},
+ {Bad Message destination}, /* 15 */
{Bad Message Return Path},
{Bad Mail Host},
{Bad Message File},
- {PHP Internal error: php.ini sendmail from variable not set!}
+ {\sendmail_from\ NOT set in php.ini},
+ {Mailserver rejected our \sendmail_from\ setting} /* 20 */
};
-126,8 +127,9
if (INI_STR(sendmail_from)){
RPath = estrdup(INI_STR(sendmail_from));
- } else {
- return 19;
+ } else {
+ *error = W32_SM_SENDMAIL_FROM_NOT_SET;
+ return FAILURE;
}
/* attempt to connect with mail host */
-178,11 +180,12
//***/
char *GetSMErrorText(int index)
{
-
- if ((index MAX_ERROR_INDEX) || (index MIN_ERROR_INDEX))
- return (ErrorMessages[UNKNOWN_ERROR]);
- else
- return (ErrorMessages[index]);
+
+ if (MIN_ERROR_INDEX = index index MAX_ERROR_INDEX) {
+ return (ErrorMessages[index]);
+ } else {
+ return (ErrorMessages[UNKNOWN_ERROR]);
+ }
}
-235,7 +238,7
if ((res = Post(Buffer)) != SUCCESS)
return (res);
if ((res = Ack()) != SUCCESS)
- return (res);
+ return W32_SM_SENDMAIL_FROM_MALFORMED;
tempMailTo = estrdup(mailTo);
-255,8 +258,11
/* Send mail to all Cc rcpt's */
efree(tempMailTo);
if (headers (pos1 = strstr(headers, Cc:))) {
- pos2 = strstr(pos1, \r\n);
- tempMailTo = estrndup(pos1, pos2-pos1);
+ if (NULL == (pos2 = strstr(pos1, \r\n))) {
+ tempMailTo = estrndup(pos1, strlen(pos1));
+ } else {
+ tempMailTo = estrndup(pos1, pos2-pos1);
+ }
token = strtok(tempMailTo, ,);
while(token != NULL)
Index: php4/win32/sendmail.h
diff -u php4/win32/sendmail.h:1.3 php4/win32/sendmail.h:1.4
--- php4/win32/sendmail.h:1.3 Tue Dec 4 13:47:07 2001
+++ php4/win32/sendmail.h Tue May 14 09:52:18 2002
-4,29 +4,31
#define HOST_NAME_LEN 256
#define MAX_APPNAME_LENGHT 100
-#define MAX_ERROR_INDEX 17
-#define MIN_ERROR_INDEX 0
-#define MAIL_BUFFER_SIZE (1024*4)/* 4k buffer */
+#define MAIL_BUFFER_SIZE (1024*4)/* 4k buffer */
/* Return values */
-#defineSUCCESS 0
-#defineFAILED_TO_PARSE_ARGUMENTS 1
-#defineFAILED_TO_OPEN_MAILFILE 2
-#defineFAILED_TO_START_SOCKETS 3
-#defineFAILED_TO_RESOLVE_HOST 4
-#define
Re: [PHP-DEV] Probably a simple answer...
Simon Fogg wrote: That's o.k.- I'm just grouchy. There seems to be so much information to wade through to find out what you need to know. Since we are on the subject though, and you have already done this sort of thing before, can you tell me whether extensions are supported on MacOSX. My Mac colleague is off sick today and since I am looking at finding a fairly X-Plaform solution to our problem, I thought it would be beneficial if I could find out whether the same solution could be used on a Mac. I don't see why not provided you are able to compile PHP. As long as you can compile PHP your extension should compile into a Mac native binary. All you should need to do is create wrapper functions around your current library to make them accessible via PHP in your extension. If you're like me you will compile this directly into the PHP binary itself, and then I don't think you will need any other binaries. Alternatively, since you are comparing this to window's DLLs I think you can compile as a shared library, but I don't know much about that route and wouldn't advise it since as far as I know it runs like CGI. Cheers, Rob. -- .-. | Robert Cummings | :-`. | Webdeployer - Chief PHP and Java Programmer | :--: | Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone : (613) 731-4046 x.109 | :--: | Website : http://www.webmotion.com | | Fax : (613) 260-9545 | `--' -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Probably a simple answer...
--- Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Cummings wrote: brad lafountain wrote: Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null termiated and have the length stored. You would think so, but on further thought, if that were the case you wouldn't be able to store compressed data from gzip in a string because the null bytes everywhere would interfere. Also, as I said, ZVAL_STRING suggests that this is so... since when you use it to set a zval container to a string it saves the length as strlen( passedString ), rather than strlen( passedString ) + 1, also the memcpy then uses this length ^^ I just took another look at ZVAL_STRING and it uses estrndup and not memcpy... maybe I'm losing my mind :) well ZVAL_STRING should be fine for non binary strings.. but if you have binary string you can use ZVAL_STRINGL(s,l,d) - Brad Cheers, Rob. -- .-. | Robert Cummings | :-`. | Webdeployer - Chief PHP and Java Programmer | :--: | Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone : (613) 731-4046 x.109 | :--: | Website : http://www.webmotion.com | | Fax : (613) 260-9545 | `--' -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Re: Bug #17184: Interbase 5.1.1.682 compilation
Hi, Some functions added in interbase module raise compiler error. these functions require IB 6 or later cause they work together with the new IB6 API. It seems as in the code there is no control on the IB version installed, and the compiler is always looking for new Api . People who are using an IB version 6 can't compile the source ... This can be fix in CVS ... but what about release? -Daniela - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: php.bugs To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 5:48 PM Subject: Bug #17184: Interbase 5.1.1.682 compilation From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Operating system: Linux 2.4.7-10 PHP version: 4.2.0 PHP Bug Type: Compile Failure Bug description: Interbase 5.1.1.682 compilation Get error on make when trying to compile with '--with-interbase=/usr/interbase'. Worked fine with php-4.1.2 I get the following error : gcc -I. -I/usr/local/php/ext/interbase -I/usr/local/php/main -I/usr/local/php -I/usr/local/apache_1.3.22/src/include -I/usr/local/apache_1.3.22/src/os/unix -I/usr/local/php/Zend -I/usr/local/openssl/include -I/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/imap -I/usr/interbase/include -I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/local/php/ext/xml/expat -I/usr/local/php/TSRM -g -O2 -c interbase.c touch interbase.lo interbase.c: In function `_php_ibase_user': interbase.c:2977: `isc_action_svc_add_user' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:2977: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once interbase.c:2977: for each function it appears in.) interbase.c:2978: `isc_action_svc_modify_user' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:2985: `isc_action_svc_delete_user' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:2980: warning: unreachable code at beginning of switch statement interbase.c:3041: `isc_spb_version' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:3042: `isc_spb_current_version' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:3068: `isc_spb_sec_username' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:3074: `isc_spb_sec_password' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:3081: `isc_spb_sec_firstname' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:3088: `isc_spb_sec_middlename' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:3095: `isc_spb_sec_lastname' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c: In function `zif_ibase_add_user': interbase.c:3123: `isc_action_svc_add_user' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c: In function `zif_ibase_modify_user': interbase.c:3132: `isc_action_svc_modify_user' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c: In function `zif_ibase_delete_user': interbase.c:3140: `isc_action_svc_delete_user' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [interbase.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/php-4.2.0/ext/interbase' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/php-4.2.0/ext/interbase' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/php-4.2.0/ext' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Thx Per Mårtensson -- Edit bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=17184edit=1 -- Fixed in CVS:http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=fixedcvs Fixed in release:http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=alreadyfixed Need backtrace: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=needtrace Try newer version: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=oldversion Not developer issue: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=support Expected behavior: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=notwrong Not enough info: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=notenoughinfo Submitted twice: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=submittedtwice register_globals:http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=globals -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Bug #14407: Win32 SendMail function doesn't use From: in SMTP MAIL FROM command
Hi,
thanks for your quick repsonse. I've applied your patch with
a few changes.
- Markus
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:27:39AM -0700, Michael Sisolak wrote :
Diff against current HEAD for patch for bug #14407. This allows the
return path to automatically be set to the from address for Win32
sendmail.
Michael Sisolak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com
Content-Description: sendmail.c.diff
--- sendmail.cTue May 14 10:07:40 2002
+++ sendmail.c.newTue May 14 10:22:13 2002
@@ -125,11 +125,26 @@
strcpy(MailHost, host);
}
- if (INI_STR(sendmail_from)){
- RPath = estrdup(INI_STR(sendmail_from));
+ /* use from address as return path (if specified in headers) */
+ if (headers strstr(headers, From:)) {
+ char *pos;
+ pos = strstr(headers, From:) + 5;
+ while (pos (*pos == ' '))
+ pos++;
+
+ if (pos strlen(pos)) {
+ RPath = estrdup(pos);
+ RPath[strcspn(RPath, \r\n)] = '\x0';
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!RPath) {
+ if (INI_STR(sendmail_from)) {
+ RPath = estrdup(INI_STR(sendmail_from));
} else {
*error = W32_SM_SENDMAIL_FROM_NOT_SET;
return FAILURE;
+ }
}
/* attempt to connect with mail host */
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc
-
I mean When in doubt, blame mcrypt is more often right than wrong :)
Always right, never wrong :)
- Two PHP developers who want to remain unnamed
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Bug #17184: Interbase 5.1.1.682 compilation
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Daniela Mariaschi wrote: Hi, Some functions added in interbase module raise compiler error. these functions require IB 6 or later cause they work together with the new IB6 API. It seems as in the code there is no control on the IB version installed, and the compiler is always looking for new Api . People who are using an IB version 6 can't compile the source ... This can be fix in CVS ... but what about release? We can't fix a release once it's released. But you can provide a patch to users if you want. And you might alsao want to merge it into the branch for inclusion in a possible 4.2.2. Derick - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: php.bugs To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 5:48 PM Subject: Bug #17184: Interbase 5.1.1.682 compilation From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Operating system: Linux 2.4.7-10 PHP version: 4.2.0 PHP Bug Type: Compile Failure Bug description: Interbase 5.1.1.682 compilation Get error on make when trying to compile with '--with-interbase=/usr/interbase'. Worked fine with php-4.1.2 I get the following error : gcc -I. -I/usr/local/php/ext/interbase -I/usr/local/php/main -I/usr/local/php -I/usr/local/apache_1.3.22/src/include -I/usr/local/apache_1.3.22/src/os/unix -I/usr/local/php/Zend -I/usr/local/openssl/include -I/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/imap -I/usr/interbase/include -I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/local/php/ext/xml/expat -I/usr/local/php/TSRM -g -O2 -c interbase.c touch interbase.lo interbase.c: In function `_php_ibase_user': interbase.c:2977: `isc_action_svc_add_user' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:2977: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once interbase.c:2977: for each function it appears in.) interbase.c:2978: `isc_action_svc_modify_user' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:2985: `isc_action_svc_delete_user' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:2980: warning: unreachable code at beginning of switch statement interbase.c:3041: `isc_spb_version' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:3042: `isc_spb_current_version' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:3068: `isc_spb_sec_username' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:3074: `isc_spb_sec_password' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:3081: `isc_spb_sec_firstname' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:3088: `isc_spb_sec_middlename' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c:3095: `isc_spb_sec_lastname' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c: In function `zif_ibase_add_user': interbase.c:3123: `isc_action_svc_add_user' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c: In function `zif_ibase_modify_user': interbase.c:3132: `isc_action_svc_modify_user' undeclared (first use in this function) interbase.c: In function `zif_ibase_delete_user': interbase.c:3140: `isc_action_svc_delete_user' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [interbase.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/php-4.2.0/ext/interbase' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/php-4.2.0/ext/interbase' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/php-4.2.0/ext' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Thx Per Mårtensson -- Edit bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=17184edit=1 -- Fixed in CVS:http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=fixedcvs Fixed in release:http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=alreadyfixed Need backtrace: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=needtrace Try newer version: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=oldversion Not developer issue: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=support Expected behavior: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=notwrong Not enough info: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=notenoughinfo Submitted twice: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=submittedtwice register_globals:http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=17184r=globals -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php --- Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist Frequent ranting: http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/ --- PHP: Scripting the Web - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All your branches are belong to me! SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net --- -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Exposing zend_execute_data
Attached is a patch that exposes zend_execute_data in the executor globals, this
data is useful for lowerlevel access to the Zend scripting engine, especially when
accessing data directly out of the OP structures.
-Sterling
Index: zend_execute.c
===
RCS file: /repository/Zend/zend_execute.c,v
retrieving revision 1.295
diff -u -r1.295 zend_execute.c
--- zend_execute.c 4 May 2002 17:29:01 - 1.295
+++ zend_execute.c 14 May 2002 16:00:21 -
@@ -990,24 +990,13 @@
EX(opline)++; \
continue;
-typedef struct _object_info {
- zval *ptr;
-} object_info;
-
-typedef struct _zend_execute_data {
- zend_op *opline;
- zend_function_state function_state;
- zend_function *fbc; /* Function Being Called */
- object_info object;
- temp_variable *Ts;
- zend_bool original_in_execution;
-} zend_execute_data;
-
#define EX(element) execute_data.element
ZEND_API void execute(zend_op_array *op_array TSRMLS_DC)
{
zend_execute_data execute_data;
+
+ EG(execute_data_ptr) = execute_data;
/* Initialize execute_data */
EX(fbc) = NULL;
Index: zend_execute.h
===
RCS file: /repository/Zend/zend_execute.h,v
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -r1.42 zend_execute.h
--- zend_execute.h 6 Jan 2002 15:21:09 - 1.42
+++ zend_execute.h 14 May 2002 16:00:21 -
@@ -25,28 +25,7 @@
#include zend_hash.h
#include zend_variables.h
#include zend_operators.h
-
-typedef union _temp_variable {
- zval tmp_var;
- struct {
- zval **ptr_ptr;
- zval *ptr;
- } var;
- struct {
- zval tmp_var; /* a dummy */
-
- union {
- struct {
- zval *str;
- int offset;
- } str_offset;
- zend_property_reference overloaded_element;
- } data;
-
- unsigned char type;
- } EA;
-} temp_variable;
-
+#include zend_execute_globals.h
ZEND_API extern void (*zend_execute)(zend_op_array *op_array TSRMLS_DC);
Index: zend_globals.h
===
RCS file: /repository/Zend/zend_globals.h,v
retrieving revision 1.83
diff -u -r1.83 zend_globals.h
--- zend_globals.h 8 May 2002 12:29:51 - 1.83
+++ zend_globals.h 14 May 2002 16:00:21 -
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include zend_hash.h
#include zend_llist.h
#include zend_fast_cache.h
+#include zend_execute_globals.h
#ifdef ZEND_MULTIBYTE
#include zend_multibyte.h
@@ -151,6 +152,8 @@
zend_op **opline_ptr;
+zend_execute_data *execute_data_ptr;
+
HashTable *active_symbol_table;
HashTable symbol_table; /* main symbol table */
/*
+--+
| Zend Engine |
+--+
| Copyright (c) 1998-2002 Zend Technologies Ltd. (http://www.zend.com) |
+--+
| This source file is subject to version 2.00 of the Zend license, |
| that is bundled with this package in the file LICENSE, and is|
| available at through the world-wide-web at |
| http://www.zend.com/license/2_00.txt.|
| If you did not receive a copy of the Zend license and are unable to |
| obtain it through the world-wide-web, please send a note to |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] so we can mail you a copy immediately. |
+--+
| Authors: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
+--+
*/
#ifndef ZEND_EXECUTE_GLOBALS_H
#define ZEND_EXECUTE_GLOBALS_H
#include zend_compile.h
#include zend_hash.h
#include zend_variables.h
#include zend_operators.h
typedef union _temp_variable {
zval tmp_var;
struct {
zval **ptr_ptr;
zval *ptr;
} var;
struct {
zval tmp_var; /* a dummy */
union {
struct {
zval *str;
int offset;
} str_offset;
zend_property_reference overloaded_element;
} data;
unsigned char type;
} EA;
} temp_variable;
typedef struct _object_info {
[PHP-DEV] OS X Support
What's the current status of OS X support? I understand that 4.3 will be the first release to officially support OS X but how much of the work is complete in current CVS? I grabbed the latest yesterday and compiled it -- still had my issues creating files and directories (Where I would get permission denied errors even though the perms were 777 and the entire directory was owned by the webserver user/group).. I ran into this problem using Smarty and evidently a lot of people have had it with 4.2.. I also couldn¹t get mcrypt to work in 4.3-dev -- unable to open encryption module for everything I tried (this worked fine in 4.2). I have libmcrypt 2.5.0 installed, which appears to be the latest available... I would roll back to 4.1 but I can't get it to compile on this box and the only OSX build I've found doesn't have working mcrypt support and I kind of have to have it :-) Thanks to all!!! -Mitch -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] bug not solved since June 2001
hey, i've come across a bug these past few days in regexps, i've been getting mad about this. I looked around in the Bug Database and i found it : http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=11461 it's from 4.0.6, dated almost a year and still hasn't been corrected and is not even assigned Any ideas why this has been put off ? It still 'works' on php 4.2.0RC4, haven't tried further.. Thanks for any insight as to why this hasn't been solved yet. Later -- Chand 640K ought to be enough for anybody. Bill Gates, 1981 -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] bug not solved since June 2001
It's not a bug. The regex is simply wrong. The ereg() functions are POSIX 1003.2 compliant. Read this: A bracket expression is a list of characters enclosed in `[]'. It normally matches any single character from the list (but see below). If the list begins with `^', it matches any single character (but see below) not from the rest of the list. If two characters in the list are sepa rated by `-', this is shorthand for the full range of characters between those two (inclusive) in the collating sequence, e.g. `[0-9]' in ASCII matches any decimal digit. It is illegal- for two ranges to share an endpoint, e.g. `a-c-e'. Ranges are very collating-sequence-dependent, and portable programs should avoid relying on them. To include a literal `]' in the list, make it the first character (following a possible `^'). To include a lit eral `-', make it the first or last character, or the sec ond endpoint of a range. To use a literal `-' as the first endpoint of a range, enclose it in `[.' and `.]' to make it a collating element (see below). With the excep tion of these and some combinations using `[' (see next paragraphs), all other special characters, including `\', lose their special significance within a bracket expres sion. Nowhere does it say that \- is a valid way to get a literal - inside a bracketed expression. -Rasmus On Tue, 14 May 2002, Chand wrote: hey, i've come across a bug these past few days in regexps, i've been getting mad about this. I looked around in the Bug Database and i found it : http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=11461 it's from 4.0.6, dated almost a year and still hasn't been corrected and is not even assigned Any ideas why this has been put off ? It still 'works' on php 4.2.0RC4, haven't tried further.. Thanks for any insight as to why this hasn't been solved yet. Later -- Chand 640K ought to be enough for anybody. Bill Gates, 1981 -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] bug not solved since June 2001
On Tue, 14 May 2002 09:28:54 -0700 (PDT) Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok thanks. I wasn't sure of myself and since the bug wasn't closed i thought that maybe it had slipped your QA Team. You should close it at least so that people don't get confused on it. Thanks a lot. It's not a bug. The regex is simply wrong. The ereg() functions are POSIX 1003.2 compliant. Read this: A bracket expression is a list of characters enclosed in `[]'. It normally matches any single character from the list (but see below). If the list begins with `^', it matches any single character (but see below) not from the -- Chand 640K ought to be enough for anybody. Bill Gates, 1981 -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] OS X Support
Hello Mitch! What's the current status of OS X support? I understand that 4.3 will be the first release to officially support OS X but how much of the work is complete in current CVS? PHP 4.3 has had a large number of strides made towards Darwin support. Marko was able to get things like the build system to work on it for APXS builds. He and I then were able to implement a native dl() system for Darwin. There is slow work being done to continue to support Darwin, but don't expect it too fast. So far Marko is working on it more than I am, and I'm only working on it as things pop-up that annoy me (like ODBC). I grabbed the latest yesterday and compiled it -- still had my issues creating files and directories (Where I would get permission denied errors even though the perms were 777 and the entire directory was owned by the webserver user/group).. I ran into this problem using Smarty and evidently a lot of people have had it with 4.2.. I also couldn¹t get mcrypt to work in 4.3-dev -- unable to open encryption module for everything I tried (this worked fine in 4.2). I have libmcrypt 2.5.0 installed, which appears to be the latest available... Unfortunately I'm not familiar with Smarty so I can't comment on what that is. But if you're having bugs with creating files and directories, you might do well to submit a bug on these things. I haven't tested this stuff in a few days/weeks, but at last check I didn't have any problems with it. As far as mcrypt is concerned, I've not delt with it. So any comments I make on it would be guessing at best. From the sound of message though, it sounds like the DLYD system can't find the bundle. Try setting the DLYD_LIBRARY_PATH to include the path to your mycrpt installation, and see if that works. Remember to do this for the user the webserver is running as not yourself (unless you're running a CGI/CLI version). If this works, let us know so we can remove this problem before 4.3 goes to RC. I would roll back to 4.1 but I can't get it to compile on this box and the only OSX build I've found doesn't have working mcrypt support and I kind of have to have it :-) If you wish to rollback to 4.1 you can find some nice hackish directions from the people at entropy.ch (URL in the documentation for building on MacOSX). --- Dan KalowskyThe record shows, I took the blows. http://www.deadmime.org/~dankAnd did it my way. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - My Way, Frank Sinatra [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] Timeline for Apache 2 fulluse?
Hello, these versions of libmcrypt should work fine, you have some stray headers on your system I think. Derick On Tue, 14 May 2002, Rodolfo Gonzalez wrote: On Tue, 14 May 2002, Richard Archer wrote: Aah, but by the same logic, if Apache 2.0 with PHP4 can provide the users with a faster, more stable service, it's bad *not* to use it. It's bad if the beasts are experimental. Now, I guess this is for the devel list: libmcrypt4-2.4.19-1mdk libmcrypt4-devel-2.4.19-1mdk mcrypt-2.5.10-1mdk -- begin -- mcrypt.c: In function `zm_startup_mcrypt': mcrypt.c:272: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:273: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:274: `MCRYPT_BLOWFISH_128' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:274: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once mcrypt.c:274: for each function it appears in.) mcrypt.c:275: `MCRYPT_BLOWFISH_192' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:276: `MCRYPT_BLOWFISH_256' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:277: `MCRYPT_BLOWFISH_448' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:278: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:279: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:280: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:281: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:282: `MCRYPT_IDEA' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:283: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:284: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:285: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:286: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:287: `MCRYPT_RC2_128' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:288: `MCRYPT_RC2_256' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:289: `MCRYPT_RC2_1024' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:290: `MCRYPT_RC4' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:291: `MCRYPT_RC6_128' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:292: `MCRYPT_RC6_192' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:293: `MCRYPT_RC6_256' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:294: `MCRYPT_SAFER_64' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:295: `MCRYPT_SAFER_128' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:296: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:297: `MCRYPT_SERPENT_128' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:298: `MCRYPT_SERPENT_192' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:299: `MCRYPT_SERPENT_256' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:300: `MCRYPT_TWOFISH_128' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:301: `MCRYPT_TWOFISH_192' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:302: `MCRYPT_TWOFISH_256' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:303: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c: In function `zif_mcrypt_get_cipher_name': mcrypt.c:1497: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast make[3]: *** [mcrypt.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Saliendo directorio `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/php-4.2.1/ext/mcrypt' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Saliendo directorio `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/php-4.2.1/ext/mcrypt' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Saliendo directorio `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/php-4.2.1/ext' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.95528 (%build) -- end -- Apache 2.0.35, PHP 4.2.1 Regards. -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php --- Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist Frequent ranting: http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/ --- PHP: Scripting the Web - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All your branches are belong to me! SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net --- -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] Timeline for Apache 2 fulluse?
On Tue, 14 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: these versions of libmcrypt should work fine, you have some stray headers on your system I think. Hmm, that's strange, in fact in my mcrypt.h there are no such definitions, but it's the RPM from Mdk (maybe it's broken). Thanks. -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] Timeline for Apache 2 fulluse?
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Rodolfo Gonzalez wrote: On Tue, 14 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: these versions of libmcrypt should work fine, you have some stray headers on your system I think. Hmm, that's strange, in fact in my mcrypt.h there are no such definitions, but it's the RPM from Mdk (maybe it's broken). I'm quite sure it is, as I tested a lot with this version of libmcrypt. Your best shot at this is compiling the library from source youurself. regards, Derick --- Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist Frequent ranting: http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/ --- PHP: Scripting the Web - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All your branches are belong to me! SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net --- -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Safe Mode
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: PHP being a web server scripting language is a unique case, for example consider that once apache 2.0 becomes stable, safe_mode will become obsolete, on the other hand the situation described here will become quite deadly if some sort of threaded mode is used. So FD limit would because quite useful. Actually, I see no signs that a stable Apache 2.0 will make the problem go away. I don't see the perchild mpm becoming stable in 2.0. Hopefully in 2.1 but I am not holding my breath on that one either. The normal worker mpm that most people use with Apache 2.0 doesn't fix the issue at all. I see, so intead of contributing to apache project you're developing php's safe mode? a useful solution that is... The rest of your post is about as misinformed as the first part. Well, that's certainly a good way to argue. I'm not quite sure what was misinformed, it would be helpful if you were to lower yourself to my standards and explain. -Rasmus -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls
I could not help but notice that all DOM XML calls use an underscore-based convention: i.e. $mynode-append_child($achild); I am no language lawyer but if you read the DOM Core documentation (http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/core.html) it suggests a case-based (no underscore) convention: i.e. $mynode-appendChild($achild); Also, every DOM compliant library that I've looked at uses this same convention. Will the case-based convention be used in PHP 4.3.0? If not then it should be considered as it seems to be a violation of the DOM. Warm regards, Brent __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls
Hello, can you file a change/feature request for this @ bugs.php.net ? Derick On Tue, 14 May 2002, Brent R. Matzelle wrote: I could not help but notice that all DOM XML calls use an underscore-based convention: i.e. $mynode-append_child($achild); I am no language lawyer but if you read the DOM Core documentation (http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/core.html) it suggests a case-based (no underscore) convention: i.e. $mynode-appendChild($achild); Also, every DOM compliant library that I've looked at uses this same convention. Will the case-based convention be used in PHP 4.3.0? If not then it should be considered as it seems to be a violation of the DOM. Warm regards, Brent __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php --- Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist Frequent ranting: http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/ --- PHP: Scripting the Web - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All your branches are belong to me! SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net --- -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls
Hi, not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago afaik). - Markus On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 12:49:50PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote : I could not help but notice that all DOM XML calls use an underscore-based convention: i.e. $mynode-append_child($achild); I am no language lawyer but if you read the DOM Core documentation (http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/core.html) it suggests a case-based (no underscore) convention: i.e. $mynode-appendChild($achild); Also, every DOM compliant library that I've looked at uses this same convention. Will the case-based convention be used in PHP 4.3.0? If not then it should be considered as it seems to be a violation of the DOM. Warm regards, Brent __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc - I mean When in doubt, blame mcrypt is more often right than wrong :) Always right, never wrong :) - Two PHP developers who want to remain unnamed -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls
--- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago afaik). I realize that this is a PHP convention, but I do not think that it is up to PHP developers to change published coding standards. How are users of different programming languages expected to convert? 'Replace all' is not an acceptable answer. Brent __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Brent R. Matzelle wrote: --- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago afaik). I realize that this is a PHP convention, but I do not think that it is up to PHP developers to change published coding standards. How are users of different programming languages expected to convert? 'Replace all' is not an acceptable answer. The same is true for keeping the function names in PHP consistent. It's a choice, and IMO we made the correct choice. Derick --- Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist Frequent ranting: http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/ --- PHP: Scripting the Web - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All your branches are belong to me! SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net --- -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Suggested fix for #16458: header() does not replace headers but always produces duplicates
Bug #16458 reports that the header() command does not correctly use the
replace parameter (i.e., a header of the same name should be replaced
if this parameter is true). The problem is that the standard
sapi_add_header_ex function assumes that the sapi being used with deal
with any header replacements. For Apache that works fine as the Apache
sapi correctly used the replace parameter. The IIS sapi, however,
defaults to the standard funtionality in sapi_add_header_ex (as does
the CGI). The default handler just calls zend_llist_add_element to add
the header to the header list thus appending even if replace was
requested.
Attached is a suggested patch that first removes the header from the
list if it already exists if we are in replace mode. This works for
the Win32 IIS and CGI builds, but I don't have a way to test any
possible interaction this might have with the other sapi modules (or
under GCC).
Michael Sisolak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com
--- sapi.c Tue May 14 16:11:31 2002
+++ sapi.c.new Tue May 14 16:29:23 2002
@@ -385,6 +385,11 @@
return code;
}
+static int sapi_find_matching_header(void *element1, void *element2)
+{
+ return strnicmp(((sapi_header_struct*)element1)-header, (char*)element2,
+strlen((char*)element2)) == 0;
+}
+
/* This function expects a *duplicated* string, that was previously emalloc()'d.
* Pointers sent to this functions will be automatically freed by the framework.
*/
@@ -551,6 +556,19 @@
zend_llist_clean(SG(sapi_headers).headers);
}
if (retval SAPI_HEADER_ADD) {
+ /* in replace mode first remove the header if it already exists in the
+headers llist */
+ if (replace) {
+ colon_offset = strchr(header_line, ':');
+ if (colon_offset) {
+ char sav;
+ colon_offset++;
+ sav = *colon_offset;
+ *colon_offset = 0;
+ zend_llist_del_element(SG(sapi_headers).headers,
+header_line, (int(*)(void*, void*))sapi_find_matching_header);
+ *colon_offset = sav;
+ }
+ }
+
zend_llist_add_element(SG(sapi_headers).headers, (void *)
sapi_header);
}
if (free_header) {
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls
Hi, btw, not my personal opinion :) I just wanted to let you know this was discussed so you can search the archives for it. Btw, first you said 'w3c convention' now it's a standard? anyway - Markus On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:27:40PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote : --- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago afaik). I realize that this is a PHP convention, but I do not think that it is up to PHP developers to change published coding standards. How are users of different programming languages expected to convert? 'Replace all' is not an acceptable answer. Brent __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc - I mean When in doubt, blame mcrypt is more often right than wrong :) Always right, never wrong :) - Two PHP developers who want to remain unnamed -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls
Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and so we don't get shunned on by people like that. - Brad --- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, btw, not my personal opinion :) I just wanted to let you know this was discussed so you can search the archives for it. Btw, first you said 'w3c convention' now it's a standard? anyway - Markus On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:27:40PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote : --- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago afaik). I realize that this is a PHP convention, but I do not think that it is up to PHP developers to change published coding standards. How are users of different programming languages expected to convert? 'Replace all' is not an acceptable answer. Brent __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc - I mean When in doubt, blame mcrypt is more often right than wrong :) Always right, never wrong :) - Two PHP developers who want to remain unnamed -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls
--- brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and so we don't get shunned on by people like that. That would fit the bill nicely. Brent __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls
Hi, I fail to see the advante. Is it only that 'it looks like what the w3c recommends' and 'so users already used to the api have it easier' or did I miss something else? - Markus On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:47:22PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote : --- brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and so we don't get shunned on by people like that. That would fit the bill nicely. Brent __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc - I mean When in doubt, blame mcrypt is more often right than wrong :) Always right, never wrong :) - Two PHP developers who want to remain unnamed -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls
--- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, btw, not my personal opinion :) I just wanted to let you know this was discussed so you can search the archives for it. Understood ;) Btw, first you said 'w3c convention' now it's a standard? anyway Again, I'm no language lawyer, it is officially the W3C Document Object Model Level 3 Core specification. Brent __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls
Yeah thats pretty much it. It does make it eaiser for people using dom in another lanugage to pick it up in php if it did conform to the standard. Expecially how we are trying to conform the functions to begin with. Instead of having append_child... why not add_child.. - We started conforming to the standard why not go the whole way. - And with alias we can have the php standard and the w3c standard. - Brad --- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I fail to see the advante. Is it only that 'it looks like what the w3c recommends' and 'so users already used to the api have it easier' or did I miss something else? - Markus On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:47:22PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote : --- brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and so we don't get shunned on by people like that. That would fit the bill nicely. Brent __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc - I mean When in doubt, blame mcrypt is more often right than wrong :) Always right, never wrong :) - Two PHP developers who want to remain unnamed -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls
Hi Yeah thats pretty much it. It does make it eaiser for people using dom in another lanugage to pick it up in php if it did conform to the standard. Expecially how we are trying to conform the functions to begin with. Instead of having append_child... why not add_child.. 'cause appendChild, resp. append_child is the the w3c standard ... - We started conforming to the standard why not go the whole way. - 'cause, as said before, it's the php way to seperate words. And i would much apreciate, if this would be everywhere the same (isset and is_null as a wonderfull example...) And with alias we can have the php standard and the w3c standard. i don't see a reason for that. it's not that complicated to change appendChild to append_child in your code. you have to change your code anyway. and since PHP is not case-sensitive functionname wise, you will get funny stuff (see ext/gd in all the tutorials, if php is ever going case sensitiv (is it?), then all those examples are in big trouble :) ) I'm certainly against introducing the non-underscore api-stuff. and BTW, i didn't found anything on w3.org, which says method names have to be studly caps (but i just had a quick look). The php-api is more or less clear in that way, that where w3c suggest an uppercase letter, php makes an underscore. Therefore it's not that hard to switch between different languages. ok. i repeat more or less what others said... chregu - Brad --- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I fail to see the advante. Is it only that 'it looks like what the w3c recommends' and 'so users already used to the api have it easier' or did I miss something else? - Markus On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:47:22PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote : --- brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and so we don't get shunned on by people like that. That would fit the bill nicely. Brent __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc - I mean When in doubt, blame mcrypt is more often right than wrong :) Always right, never wrong :) - Two PHP developers who want to remain unnamed -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- nam...christian stockeradr...bremgartnerstr. 66, ch-8003 zurich pho...+41 1 451 6021 www...http://phant.ch/chregu mob...+41 76 561 8860 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wor...+41 1 240 5670 gpg...0x5CE1DECB -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: floripa
Translation of the PEAR Documentation (http://pear.php.net/manual) to Brazilian Portuguese language (pt_BR). I will commit to peardoc repository. Alexander Merz [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me to request for a cvs account, so I can commit translated files by myself. -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] DOM XML uses non-DOM compliant calls
--- Christian Stocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Yeah thats pretty much it. It does make it eaiser for people using dom in another lanugage to pick it up in php if it did conform to the standard. Expecially how we are trying to conform the functions to begin with. Instead of having append_child... why not add_child.. 'cause appendChild, resp. append_child is the the w3c standard ... Yeah i was saying we are sticking to the standard for function names why not keep the naming convention too. - We started conforming to the standard why not go the whole way. - 'cause, as said before, it's the php way to seperate words. And i would much apreciate, if this would be everywhere the same (isset and is_null as a wonderfull example...) And with alias we can have the php standard and the w3c standard. i don't see a reason for that. it's not that complicated to change appendChild to append_child in your code. you have to change your code anyway. and since PHP is not case-sensitive functionname wise, you will get funny stuff (see ext/gd in all the tutorials, if php is ever going case sensitiv (is it?), then all those examples are in big trouble :) ) Not if they use the right case... appendChild vs appendchild the if one day php goes casesensitve then you will be all set. I'm certainly against introducing the non-underscore api-stuff. and BTW, i didn't found anything on w3.org, which says method names have to be studly caps (but i just had a quick look). The php-api is more or less clear in that way, that where w3c suggest an uppercase letter, php makes an underscore. Therefore it's not that hard to switch between different languages. Its not a hard switch at all but it still IS a switch. Why force a switch when you don't have to. ok. i repeat more or less what others said... I still don't see a good arugment agains adding alias. I see it as saving us from the comments like its not w3c standard. People would look down on the extension becuase it doesn't conform. If you only arugment is because its not a php standard. I see that as a weak argument. I really don't understand you guys went thru that extension and made it dom compliant (functionality wise) and you just won't go one step further and make alias so the naming convension is standard too. I personally like _'s too but i still think that adding aliases doesn't hurt anything. - Brad chregu - Brad --- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I fail to see the advante. Is it only that 'it looks like what the w3c recommends' and 'so users already used to the api have it easier' or did I miss something else? - Markus On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:47:22PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote : --- brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and so we don't get shunned on by people like that. That would fit the bill nicely. Brent __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc - I mean When in doubt, blame mcrypt is more often right than wrong :) Always right, never wrong :) - Two PHP developers who want to remain unnamed -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- nam...christian stockeradr...bremgartnerstr. 66, ch-8003 zurich pho...+41 1 451 6021 www...http://phant.ch/chregu mob...+41 76 561 8860 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wor...+41 1 240 5670 gpg...0x5CE1DECB __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Samba Bindings?
Hi there, I'm new to the dev list,... I dropped an email to Andrei and he suggested I post here so, here goes... I'm currently developing a set of functions at work for performing samba related operations. They act as a frontend to smbtools and parse the text output by these CLI apps. I'd like to offer these for inclusion with the php project and was wondering how I'd go about it? (If indeed anyone is interested in the functions.) I'm prepared to put work into them to make sure they are secure, comply by documentation standards and all of that sort of thing. So where do I go from here? cheers, -- Lachlan Mulcahy --- Web Developer, Pico-Pay Team -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] Timeline for Apache 2 full use?
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Richard Archer wrote: Aah, but by the same logic, if Apache 2.0 with PHP4 can provide the users with a faster, more stable service, it's bad *not* to use it. It's bad if the beasts are experimental. Now, I guess this is for the devel list: libmcrypt4-2.4.19-1mdk libmcrypt4-devel-2.4.19-1mdk mcrypt-2.5.10-1mdk -- begin -- mcrypt.c: In function `zm_startup_mcrypt': mcrypt.c:272: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:273: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:274: `MCRYPT_BLOWFISH_128' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:274: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once mcrypt.c:274: for each function it appears in.) mcrypt.c:275: `MCRYPT_BLOWFISH_192' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:276: `MCRYPT_BLOWFISH_256' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:277: `MCRYPT_BLOWFISH_448' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:278: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:279: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:280: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:281: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:282: `MCRYPT_IDEA' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:283: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:284: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:285: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:286: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:287: `MCRYPT_RC2_128' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:288: `MCRYPT_RC2_256' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:289: `MCRYPT_RC2_1024' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:290: `MCRYPT_RC4' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:291: `MCRYPT_RC6_128' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:292: `MCRYPT_RC6_192' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:293: `MCRYPT_RC6_256' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:294: `MCRYPT_SAFER_64' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:295: `MCRYPT_SAFER_128' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:296: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c:297: `MCRYPT_SERPENT_128' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:298: `MCRYPT_SERPENT_192' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:299: `MCRYPT_SERPENT_256' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:300: `MCRYPT_TWOFISH_128' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:301: `MCRYPT_TWOFISH_192' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:302: `MCRYPT_TWOFISH_256' undeclared (first use in this function) mcrypt.c:303: warning: passing arg 3 of `zend_register_long_constant' makes integer from pointer without a cast mcrypt.c: In function `zif_mcrypt_get_cipher_name': mcrypt.c:1497: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast make[3]: *** [mcrypt.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Saliendo directorio `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/php-4.2.1/ext/mcrypt' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Saliendo directorio `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/php-4.2.1/ext/mcrypt' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Saliendo directorio `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/php-4.2.1/ext' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.95528 (%build) -- end -- Apache 2.0.35, PHP 4.2.1 Regards. -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: willylee
develop a php application -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
