php-general Digest 10 May 2010 10:39:40 -0000 Issue 6736
php-general Digest 10 May 2010 10:39:40 - Issue 6736 Topics (messages 305026 through 305032): __call and recursion 305026 by: Daniel Kolbo 305027 by: Peter Lind 305028 by: Nathan Nobbe 305029 by: Peter Lind Re: PHP Encoder like IonCube 305030 by: donald sullivan 305031 by: shiplu PHP Application Structre 305032 by: Alex Major Administrivia: To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: php-general-digest-subscr...@lists.php.net To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: php-general-digest-unsubscr...@lists.php.net To post to the list, e-mail: php-gene...@lists.php.net -- ---BeginMessage--- Hello, I've defined a __call() method inside a class. Within the __call() method (after testing that the method exists and is callable I am using: call_user_func_array(array($this,$method), $args); However, this seems to be an infinite loop (and is crashing my test apache server). How, could I still use the __call() method and avoid an infinite loop of calling? Thanks, dK ` ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 9 May 2010 23:21, Daniel Kolbo kolb0...@umn.edu wrote: Hello, I've defined a __call() method inside a class. Within the __call() method (after testing that the method exists and is callable I am using: call_user_func_array(array($this,$method), $args); However, this seems to be an infinite loop (and is crashing my test apache server). How, could I still use the __call() method and avoid an infinite loop of calling? Assuming that your __call() method was reached because no $method was defined, using call_user_func_array() to call $method on the same object is going to result in ... your __call() method getting called again. You need to map the $method to whichever class methods you *actually* want to call, instead of blindly trying to reissue the call. Regards Peter -- hype WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fake51 BeWelcome: Fake51 Couchsurfing: Fake51 /hype ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 May 2010 23:21, Daniel Kolbo kolb0...@umn.edu wrote: Hello, I've defined a __call() method inside a class. Within the __call() method (after testing that the method exists and is callable I am using: call_user_func_array(array($this,$method), $args); However, this seems to be an infinite loop (and is crashing my test apache server). How, could I still use the __call() method and avoid an infinite loop of calling? Assuming that your __call() method was reached because no $method was defined, using call_user_func_array() to call $method on the same object is going to result in ... your __call() method getting called again. You need to map the $method to whichever class methods you *actually* want to call, instead of blindly trying to reissue the call. according to op it sounds like hes not blindly reissuing the call, (after testing that the method exists and is callable I am using: anyways, Daniel, your code seems sound, hard to say where the recursion is coming from. why not just dump the methods youre trying to invoke via var_dump() or error_log() etc? eg .. var_dump($method); call_user_func_array(array($this,$method), $args); -nathan ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 9 May 2010 23:56, Nathan Nobbe quickshif...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 May 2010 23:21, Daniel Kolbo kolb0...@umn.edu wrote: Hello, I've defined a __call() method inside a class. Within the __call() method (after testing that the method exists and is callable I am using: call_user_func_array(array($this,$method), $args); However, this seems to be an infinite loop (and is crashing my test apache server). How, could I still use the __call() method and avoid an infinite loop of calling? Assuming that your __call() method was reached because no $method was defined, using call_user_func_array() to call $method on the same object is going to result in ... your __call() method getting called again. You need to map the $method to whichever class methods you *actually* want to call, instead of blindly trying to reissue the call. according to op it sounds like hes not blindly reissuing the call, (after testing that the method exists and is callable I am using: Good point that, misread. Would be good to see the code checking availability of the method, to get some idea of the error. Regards Peter -- hype WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fake51 BeWelcome: Fake51 Couchsurfing: Fake51 /hype ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- bcompiler is available, but with the correct tools data can still be extracted.
Re: [PHP] PHP Encoder like IonCube
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, donald sullivan don...@nixspot.com wrote: bcompiler is available, but with the correct tools data can still be extracted. http://php.net/manual/en/book.bcompiler.php Its not a problem if data can still be extracted. But I guess exact data can not be extracted. If thats the case its okay. Sometimes an obfuscated code is enough to protect it. As far I remember I heard somewhere it can be achieved by e-accelerator somehow. How is it possible? Shiplu Mokadd.im My talks, http://talk.cmyweb.net Follow me, http://twitter.com/shiplu SUST Programmers, http://groups.google.com/group/p2psust Innovation distinguishes bet ... ... (ask Steve Jobs the rest) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] PHP Application Structre
Greetings all, This question basically surrounds how you structure your PHP applications, whether it changes depending on what you're doing and which you'd favour. I have a feeling it'll come down to a question of personal taste, but on the off-chance there's a best practice I'll ask anyways. From what I've seen and used, there seem to be three distinct ways of going about it. 1) Using a 'core' class which has a request handler in it. All pages in the site are accessed through that one page, e.g. http://www.somesite.com/index.php?page=ViewUser http://www.somesite.com/index.php?page=ViewProduct This is one that I've personally used most after becoming familiar with a bulletin board system several years ago. It means that pages are easily created as all the template/session/database handling is done by the central class. 2) Using SE friendly URL's like: http://www.somesite.com/products/22012/cool-game/ http://www.somesite.com/products/22013/other-game/ This approach seems to be becoming more common on the sites I frequent, however by accounts I've read it seems to be more intensive on apache as it requires a mod-rewrite function. 3) Using different PHP files for each page: http://www.somesite.com/viewproduct.php?product= http://www.somesite.com/viewuser.php?user=... This would appear to be the least developer friendly option? Hopefully someone can shed some insight into which is the recommended approach and why. I've been building bigger and bigger sites so having a solid foundation is becoming more and more important. Thanks for any help/feedback, I hope I've been clear. Alex.
RE: [PHP] PHP Application Structre
-Original Message- From: Alex Major [mailto:p...@allydm.co.uk] Sent: 10 May 2010 12:39 PM From what I've seen and used, there seem to be three distinct ways of going about it. 1) Using a 'core' class which has a request handler in it. All pages in the site are accessed through that one page, e.g. http://www.somesite.com/index.php?page=ViewUser http://www.somesite.com/index.php?page=ViewProduct This is one that I've personally used most after becoming familiar with a bulletin board system several years ago. It means that pages are easily created as all the template/session/database handling is done by the central class. 2) Using SE friendly URL's like: http://www.somesite.com/products/22012/cool-game/ http://www.somesite.com/products/22013/other-game/ This approach seems to be becoming more common on the sites I frequent, however by accounts I've read it seems to be more intensive on apache as it requires a mod-rewrite function. 3) Using different PHP files for each page: http://www.somesite.com/viewproduct.php?product= http://www.somesite.com/viewuser.php?user=... This would appear to be the least developer friendly option? Alex. = The second option doesn't really belong here, because you could go for option 1 or option 3, and then decide whether to hide your implementation behind a mod-rewrite. Option 2 would rather be part of a separate question what is the cost/benefit of using mod-rewrite. Cheers Arno -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] PHP Encoder like IonCube
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:42 +0600, shiplu wrote: On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, donald sullivan don...@nixspot.com wrote: bcompiler is available, but with the correct tools data can still be extracted. http://php.net/manual/en/book.bcompiler.php Its not a problem if data can still be extracted. But I guess exact data can not be extracted. If thats the case its okay. Sometimes an obfuscated code is enough to protect it. As far I remember I heard somewhere it can be achieved by e-accelerator somehow. How is it possible? Shiplu Mokadd.im My talks, http://talk.cmyweb.net Follow me, http://twitter.com/shiplu SUST Programmers, http://groups.google.com/group/p2psust Innovation distinguishes bet ... ... (ask Steve Jobs the rest) I have to ask, why do you want to do that? Wouldn't it be easier to offer your application as a system that only you host. That way, the end-user never gets to see your PHP code. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Re: [PHP] PHP Encoder like IonCube
On 10 May 2010 13:25, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote: On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:42 +0600, shiplu wrote: On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, donald sullivan don...@nixspot.com wrote: bcompiler is available, but with the correct tools data can still be extracted. http://php.net/manual/en/book.bcompiler.php Its not a problem if data can still be extracted. But I guess exact data can not be extracted. If thats the case its okay. Sometimes an obfuscated code is enough to protect it. As far I remember I heard somewhere it can be achieved by e-accelerator somehow. How is it possible? Shiplu Mokadd.im My talks, http://talk.cmyweb.net Follow me, http://twitter.com/shiplu SUST Programmers, http://groups.google.com/group/p2psust Innovation distinguishes bet ... ... (ask Steve Jobs the rest) I have to ask, why do you want to do that? Wouldn't it be easier to offer your application as a system that only you host. That way, the end-user never gets to see your PHP code. Not to mention: if it runs, it can be broken. Regards Peter -- hype WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fake51 BeWelcome: Fake51 Couchsurfing: Fake51 /hype -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: PHP Encoder like IonCube
Hello Ashley, My application will not be accessible through Internet. Users will use it through internal network. And internet is strictly prohibited there. Thats the reason why i'm lookin for such solution. On 5/10/10, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote: On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:42 +0600, shiplu wrote: On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, donald sullivan don...@nixspot.com wrote: bcompiler is available, but with the correct tools data can still be extracted. http://php.net/manual/en/book.bcompiler.php Its not a problem if data can still be extracted. But I guess exact data can not be extracted. If thats the case its okay. Sometimes an obfuscated code is enough to protect it. As far I remember I heard somewhere it can be achieved by e-accelerator somehow. How is it possible? Shiplu Mokadd.im My talks, http://talk.cmyweb.net Follow me, http://twitter.com/shiplu SUST Programmers, http://groups.google.com/group/p2psust Innovation distinguishes bet ... ... (ask Steve Jobs the rest) I have to ask, why do you want to do that? Wouldn't it be easier to offer your application as a system that only you host. That way, the end-user never gets to see your PHP code. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk -- Sent from my mobile device Shiplu Mokadd.im My talks, http://talk.cmyweb.net Follow me, http://twitter.com/shiplu SUST Programmers, http://groups.google.com/group/p2psust Innovation distinguishes bet ... ... (ask Steve Jobs the rest) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] PHP Encoder like IonCube
On May 10, 2010, at 7:36 AM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 May 2010 13:25, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote: On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:42 +0600, shiplu wrote: On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, donald sullivan don...@nixspot.com wrote: bcompiler is available, but with the correct tools data can still be extracted. http://php.net/manual/en/book.bcompiler.php Its not a problem if data can still be extracted. But I guess exact data can not be extracted. If thats the case its okay. Sometimes an obfuscated code is enough to protect it. As far I remember I heard somewhere it can be achieved by e- accelerator somehow. How is it possible? Shiplu Mokadd.im My talks, http://talk.cmyweb.net Follow me, http://twitter.com/shiplu SUST Programmers, http://groups.google.com/group/p2psust Innovation distinguishes bet ... ... (ask Steve Jobs the rest) I have to ask, why do you want to do that? Wouldn't it be easier to offer your application as a system that only you host. That way, the end-user never gets to see your PHP code. Not to mention: if it runs, it can be broken. Regards Peter -- hype WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fake51 BeWelcome: Fake51 Couchsurfing: Fake51 /hype -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php Not to mention that is what contracts are for. Bastien Sent from my iPod -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] PHP Application Structre
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 13:15 +0200, Arno Kuhl wrote: -Original Message- From: Alex Major [mailto:p...@allydm.co.uk] Sent: 10 May 2010 12:39 PM From what I've seen and used, there seem to be three distinct ways of going about it. 1) Using a 'core' class which has a request handler in it. All pages in the site are accessed through that one page, e.g. http://www.somesite.com/index.php?page=ViewUser http://www.somesite.com/index.php?page=ViewProduct This is one that I've personally used most after becoming familiar with a bulletin board system several years ago. It means that pages are easily created as all the template/session/database handling is done by the central class. 2) Using SE friendly URL's like: http://www.somesite.com/products/22012/cool-game/ http://www.somesite.com/products/22013/other-game/ This approach seems to be becoming more common on the sites I frequent, however by accounts I've read it seems to be more intensive on apache as it requires a mod-rewrite function. 3) Using different PHP files for each page: http://www.somesite.com/viewproduct.php?product= http://www.somesite.com/viewuser.php?user=... This would appear to be the least developer friendly option? Alex. = The second option doesn't really belong here, because you could go for option 1 or option 3, and then decide whether to hide your implementation behind a mod-rewrite. Option 2 would rather be part of a separate question what is the cost/benefit of using mod-rewrite. Cheers Arno Personally, I go with option 3 (as Arno said, option 2 isn't really an alternative option, it's something you can use with either 1 or 3) Consider a basic website with a small shopping cart and a blog. It would seem crazy to have all the logic needed for the blog and the cart being pulled in by PHP everytime you just needed to display a contact page. Far easier to keep everything a bit more modular. That way, if you need to update something, you update only a small part of the site rather than some huge core file. But, if your needs are even more simple, say it's just a very small brochure website you have, then running everything through a single index.php might not be such a bad idea. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
[PHP] Re: PHP Encoder like IonCube
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 17:51 +0600, shiplu wrote: Hello Ashley, My application will not be accessible through Internet. Users will use it through internal network. And internet is strictly prohibited there. Thats the reason why i'm lookin for such solution. On 5/10/10, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote: On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:42 +0600, shiplu wrote: On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, donald sullivan don...@nixspot.com wrote: bcompiler is available, but with the correct tools data can still be extracted. http://php.net/manual/en/book.bcompiler.php Its not a problem if data can still be extracted. But I guess exact data can not be extracted. If thats the case its okay. Sometimes an obfuscated code is enough to protect it. As far I remember I heard somewhere it can be achieved by e-accelerator somehow. How is it possible? Shiplu Mokadd.im My talks, http://talk.cmyweb.net Follow me, http://twitter.com/shiplu SUST Programmers, http://groups.google.com/group/p2psust Innovation distinguishes bet ... ... (ask Steve Jobs the rest) I have to ask, why do you want to do that? Wouldn't it be easier to offer your application as a system that only you host. That way, the end-user never gets to see your PHP code. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk Maybe you need a binary compiler then? This would limit your system to one type of OS though. For example, if you compiled it for 64-bit Windows, then you couldn't use it on a 32-bit server. Essentially you'd need to compile different versions for each architecture that you want to support. Would you compile it for Mac and Linux too (not forgetting the 32/64-bit issue there too) If a binary compile is what you're looking for then there was a thread a while back about the compiler that Facebook released which might be of some use? Ps, please try not to top post on the list. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Re: [PHP] PHP Application Structre
On 10 May 2010 13:58, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote: On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 13:15 +0200, Arno Kuhl wrote: -Original Message- From: Alex Major [mailto:p...@allydm.co.uk] Sent: 10 May 2010 12:39 PM From what I've seen and used, there seem to be three distinct ways of going about it. 1) Using a 'core' class which has a request handler in it. All pages in the site are accessed through that one page, e.g. http://www.somesite.com/index.php?page=ViewUser http://www.somesite.com/index.php?page=ViewProduct This is one that I've personally used most after becoming familiar with a bulletin board system several years ago. It means that pages are easily created as all the template/session/database handling is done by the central class. 2) Using SE friendly URL's like: http://www.somesite.com/products/22012/cool-game/ http://www.somesite.com/products/22013/other-game/ This approach seems to be becoming more common on the sites I frequent, however by accounts I've read it seems to be more intensive on apache as it requires a mod-rewrite function. 3) Using different PHP files for each page: http://www.somesite.com/viewproduct.php?product= http://www.somesite.com/viewuser.php?user=... This would appear to be the least developer friendly option? Alex. = The second option doesn't really belong here, because you could go for option 1 or option 3, and then decide whether to hide your implementation behind a mod-rewrite. Option 2 would rather be part of a separate question what is the cost/benefit of using mod-rewrite. Cheers Arno Personally, I go with option 3 (as Arno said, option 2 isn't really an alternative option, it's something you can use with either 1 or 3) Consider a basic website with a small shopping cart and a blog. It would seem crazy to have all the logic needed for the blog and the cart being pulled in by PHP everytime you just needed to display a contact page. Far easier to keep everything a bit more modular. That way, if you need to update something, you update only a small part of the site rather than some huge core file. But, if your needs are even more simple, say it's just a very small brochure website you have, then running everything through a single index.php might not be such a bad idea. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk Option 1 with option 2 as a sidedish. Option 3 is a nightmare in my experience - a proper MVC approach is much better to work, maintain and assure the security of. Regards Peter -- hype WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fake51 BeWelcome: Fake51 Couchsurfing: Fake51 /hype -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] PHP Application Structre
_ From: Ashley Sheridan [mailto:a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk] Sent: 10 May 2010 01:58 PM To: a...@dotcontent.net Cc: 'Alex Major'; 'php-general General List' Subject: RE: [PHP] PHP Application Structre On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 13:15 +0200, Arno Kuhl wrote: -Original Message- From: Alex Major [mailto:p...@allydm.co.uk] Sent: 10 May 2010 12:39 PM From what I've seen and used, there seem to be three distinct ways of going about it. 1) Using a 'core' class which has a request handler in it. All pages in the site are accessed through that one page, e.g. http://www.somesite.com/index.php?page=ViewUser http://www.somesite.com/index.php?page=ViewProduct This is one that I've personally used most after becoming familiar with a bulletin board system several years ago. It means that pages are easily created as all the template/session/database handling is done by the central class. 2) Using SE friendly URL's like: http://www.somesite.com/products/22012/cool-game/ http://www.somesite.com/products/22013/other-game/ This approach seems to be becoming more common on the sites I frequent, however by accounts I've read it seems to be more intensive on apache as it requires a mod-rewrite function. 3) Using different PHP files for each page: http://www.somesite.com/viewproduct.php?product= http://www.somesite.com/viewuser.php?user=... This would appear to be the least developer friendly option? Alex. = The second option doesn't really belong here, because you could go for option 1 or option 3, and then decide whether to hide your implementation behind a mod-rewrite. Option 2 would rather be part of a separate question what is the cost/benefit of using mod-rewrite. Cheers Arno Personally, I go with option 3 (as Arno said, option 2 isn't really an alternative option, it's something you can use with either 1 or 3) Consider a basic website with a small shopping cart and a blog. It would seem crazy to have all the logic needed for the blog and the cart being pulled in by PHP everytime you just needed to display a contact page. Far easier to keep everything a bit more modular. That way, if you need to update something, you update only a small part of the site rather than some huge core file. But, if your needs are even more simple, say it's just a very small brochure website you have, then running everything through a single index.php might not be such a bad idea. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk == There are many approaches to this, and I think your final design will largely be determined by what you want to do, and your own skill and experience. If you want to initialise your application, check input and load all your base api functions before calling the specific script (function) to handle the query, then maybe you can consider using a single entry point for your application. It can simplify your design and maintenance, and there are ways to ensure that access to your scripts have been initialised via the single entry point. Careful design can allow you to add new modules/scripts/whatever without having to update your single entry point each time (look at some open-source apps for examples). It also allows you to move your entire application to some place outside the document root and leave only the entry script open to the public, which can add a bit of extra security to your application. Personally I use two entry-points, one for admin and one for everything else. Then besides graphics, flash and javascript, everything else is put someplace outside the document root. The reason I settled on that approach was because the admin script can handle all the slow heavy security-checking stuff and loading additional admin api's, while the general script can be small, fast and lightweight, but won't allow any access to the admin functions. Neither script needs to be updated when adding to or changing the main application. Cheers Arno
Re: [PHP] xpath help
On 5/9/10, Peter Lind wrote: On 9 May 2010 10:31, Gary wrote: If I have a document containing, say: html ... How do I get at bar2? I tried everything, based on an xpath from Firebug (Firefox plugin), but kept getting NULL. try //table//font - that should give you all the font elements in table elements. Given your layout, you're then looking for $list-item(3) I found out what my problem was. Something, somewhere - the plugin, Firefox itself, something - decided to help me by inserting TBODY elements into the xpath which just plain did not exist in the original HTML. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] How to get input from socket client
From: Ryan Sun Stream and networking programming seems like a rock on the way to ZCE for most people, so I'm learning some socket examples before I sit in the room for exam. Here is the script for server snip serverclient hangs after output and time out later. Can any1 point out whats the reason and the more correct way to get socket client input in socket server? I have not done any socket programs in PHP, but I have in Assembler, C and Perl. First, I don't think feof() will do what you think it does. I wouldn't expect it to show up until after the other end has actually closed the connection. The other problem has to do with thinking an fread() will always give you everything you sent in an fwrite(). TCP is a stream protocol, there are no guarantees about delivering a complete message in one read, or that two writes won't be read together. It only guarantees that all octets will eventually be delivered in the same order they were sent, or you will get an error. The buffering is completely hidden and outside of your control. If you want writes to be atomic, you want UDP, but then you lose the guarantee of delivery. If you want to enforce a structure on the data in that stream, it is your application's responsibility to reconstruct that data at the receiver. One other detail that may or may not make a difference. TCP actually defines two independent pipes, one in each direction. Many Unix applications create two processes to service a socket, one to send, the other to receive. Only occasionally does a protocol require alternating messages similar to a conversation or ping-pong match. Bob McConnell -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] PHP Image Host - Sending HTTP Headers Twice?
I have a php script which serves an image. It's very simple:
header('Content-Type: image/' . $ImageData['content_type']);
readfile($File);
When viewing the script with the Firefox Extension: LiveHTTPHeaders,
it gives the following output for a SINGLE request:
--
https://domain.tld/img.php?i=260
GET /img.php?i=260 HTTP/1.1
Host: domain.tld
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: UTF-8,*
Keep-Alive: 115
Connection: keep-alive
Cookie: session=blahblah
Cache-Control: max-age=0
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 20:17:09 GMT
Content-Type: image/jpeg
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Connection: keep-alive
--
https://domain.tld/img.php?i=260
GET /img.php?i=260 HTTP/1.1
Host: domain.tld
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: UTF-8,*
Keep-Alive: 115
Connection: keep-alive
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 20:17:10 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Encoding: gzip
--
As you can see, the browser is requesting the image twice, and PHP is
sending two different Content-Type headers. Why is this?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] simplexml choking on apparently valid XML - Solved
I was able to resolve this by changing the XML file encoding from UTF-8 to ISO-8859-1. Works like a charm now, with the XML-encoded characters. Thanks to all who offered their help. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Application Structre
On Monday 10 May 2010 13:04:36 richard gray wrote: On 10/05/2010 18:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote: It makes sense sometimes to have different files for different sections of a website. For example, blog.php, gallery.php, cart.php could deal with the blog, gallery and shopping cart sections for an artists website. Yes, it could all be achieved with one script handling everything, but sometimes when the areas of the site differ greatly, it results in a lot of extra code to deal with pulling in the right template and content parts. I've always favoured only including the code a page needs rather than a huge amount of stuff that it doesn't. this isn't necessarily true - the architecture I've developed uses a single dispatch script (works fine with the mod rewrite option 2 scenario as well) - this script does general checks/security/filters etc then simply determines what page/function the user wants from the request ($_GET/$_POST parameter) and passes control to the specific handler via including the relevant controller module. The controller module is responsible for which template is required and loads up specific classes needed to process the request etc so each module just loads its own stuff and nothing else so there's no overhead. This method also has a small extra benefit that the web server document root just has a very simple 2 liner script instead a myriad of php scripts... if the webserver is misconfigured then someone who sees the source code doesn't get to see much.. This thread makes me wonder if using Smarty is smart. Does anyone here use a templeting system such as smarty or am I the only one? -- Blessings, David M. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] regexp questions
Hi, I've recently changed from php 5.1 to 5.3.2 and I'm havong problems with preg_match, because the same regular expressions used in php 5.1 are not matching anything in 5.3.2. There are any significant changes that I should know? I've been searching but I haven't found anything. Thanks. I.Lopez. _ Recibe en tu HOTMAIL los emails de TODAS tus CUENTAS. + info http://www.vivelive.com/hotmail-la-gente-de-hoy/index.html?multiaccount
Re: [PHP] regexp questions
For example, the following regex doesn't work.
return (bool) preg_match('/^[\pL\pN\pZ\p{Pc}\p{Pd}\p{Po}]++$/uD',
(string) $str);
Shiplu Mokadd.im
My talks, http://talk.cmyweb.net
Follow me, http://twitter.com/shiplu
SUST Programmers, http://groups.google.com/group/p2psust
Innovation distinguishes bet ... ... (ask Steve Jobs the rest
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] php path and relink
Hi, I have a shell account with limited access. The php cli version installated is 4.4.6. But the server have also the php 5.2.6. I checked the php version and i got this: $ php -v PHP 4.4.9 (cli) (built: Sep 17 2008 11:04:03) . But i want that the php command be a link to the php5. How can i re-link this php command to the path /usr/local/php5/bin/php ? I tried include this path in the PATH variable env but didn't worked. Some idea? Thanks Augusto Morais.
RE: [PHP] regexp questions
Is there any place where to read the changelog or something?
Thanks.
For example, the following regex doesn't work.
return (bool) preg_match('/^[\pL\pN\pZ\p{Pc}\p{Pd}\p{Po}]++$/uD',
(string) $str);
Shiplu Mokadd.im
_
Disfruta de Messenger y Hotmail en tu BlackBerry ¡Hazlo ya!
http://serviciosmoviles.es.msn.com/messenger/blackberry.aspx
Re: [PHP] php path and relink
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 21:23 -0300, Augusto Flavio wrote: Hi, I have a shell account with limited access. The php cli version installated is 4.4.6. But the server have also the php 5.2.6. I checked the php version and i got this: $ php -v PHP 4.4.9 (cli) (built: Sep 17 2008 11:04:03) . But i want that the php command be a link to the php5. How can i re-link this php command to the path /usr/local/php5/bin/php ? I tried include this path in the PATH variable env but didn't worked. Some idea? Thanks Augusto Morais. How are you calling the script to be executed by PHP? Can't you add the path to the version of PHP you want to use there? Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
