[PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] Which versions of Apache will PHP 5.3.6 work with??
Hi, I am in a big problem, My manager gave a task, He want a PHP scrip which will check if the remote machines are Powered on and are running. He want this to be done using eclipse. He also want a log in a HTML or text file that which remote machine is running and which remote machine is down/powered off for each machine Can you help me. Thanks in advance , Santosh Gunat
[PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] Which versions of Apache will PHP 5.3.6 work with??
I had allways used PHP as an Apache module up intil now. They seem incompatible. I reinstalled PHP as a CGI binary. PHP inserts the following: #BEGIN PHP INSTALLER EDITS - REMOVE ONLY ON UNINSTALL ScriptAlias /php/ C:/Program Files/PHP536/ Action application/x-httpd-php C:/Program Files/PHP536/php-cgi.exe #END PHP INSTALLER EDITS - REMOVE ONLY ON UNINSTALL Apache will start now but when I try to run any PHP scripts, Apache trys to add /Program Files to the physical path; I get the page not found error and the following in the log file: File does not exist: C:/WEBSITE/docs/Program Files What is wrong?? Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote in message news:AANLkTi=mAdEfjXtDYAoY2gh=5jXxO-ZA1E=bxm+an...@mail.gmail.com... On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote: There used to be a VC6 binary release for PHP v5.3.3 at windows.php.net but I don't see a VC6 build for v5.3 now. Any way, since you're using using Windows, why not just run it as FastCGI? It runs fine on Win2003 (x86), Win7 x64, Win08 (x86 x64), and Win08r2. Apache module works just fine and is in many situations much faster than fcgi. I've never tested the difference for performance. If that's the case, any particular reason to stop support ISAPI for IIS then? or is FastCGI faster than ISAPI for IIS? Prior to upgrading to PHP v5.3 and Windows 64bit, I had faster initial response time from ISAPI. Now with FastCGI, the initial response takes longer. As for performance difference through repeated requests, I don't notice the difference between ISAPI v5.2 and FastCGI v5.3. Are using a specific Apache module that's why you need to use httpd? If so, you could use the (non official) Apache Lounge's binary. There are no official builds of Apache, but convenience builds. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org I've meant official in the sense that one could download from the official/mirror site. Thus it's more trust worthy, in terms of non malicious code. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] Which versions of Apache will PHP 5.3.6 work with??
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote: I've never tested the difference for performance. If that's the case, any particular reason to stop support ISAPI for IIS then? or is FastCGI faster than ISAPI for IIS? It is faster, however the ISAPI was not maintained and has issues. But what is the relation with Apache? I've meant official in the sense that one could download from the official/mirror site. Thus it's more trust worthy, in terms of non malicious code. The developers at apachelounge.com work with th Apache project. We would not recommend to use it if we do not trust this project. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Which versions of Apache will PHP 5.3.6 work with??
Help!! I am in a Windows environment (XP SP3 for development and Server 2003 for production. I have to upgrade to PHP 5.3.6. It does not appear to work with either Apache 2.2.11 or the new 2.2.17 from Apache Lounge. Apache will run by itself but when PHP is installed, it adds: #BEGIN PHP INSTALLER EDITS - REMOVE ONLY ON UNINSTALL PHPIniDir C:\Program Files\PHP536\ LoadModule php5_module C:\Program Files\PHP536\php5apache2_2.dll #END PHP INSTALLER EDITS - REMOVE ONLY ON UNINSTALL Restarting Apache causes the following: httpd.exe - Application Error : The instruction at 0x0096c1bf referenced memory at 0x100058a8. The memory could not be written. Thanks in advance, Curtis -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Which versions of Apache will PHP 5.3.6 work with??
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Curtis Tammany curtis.tamm...@urs.com wrote: Help!! I am in a Windows environment (XP SP3 for development and Server 2003 for production. I have to upgrade to PHP 5.3.6. It does not appear to work with either Apache 2.2.11 or the new 2.2.17 from Apache Lounge. Apache will run by itself but when PHP is installed, it adds: #BEGIN PHP INSTALLER EDITS - REMOVE ONLY ON UNINSTALL PHPIniDir C:\Program Files\PHP536\ LoadModule php5_module C:\Program Files\PHP536\php5apache2_2.dll #END PHP INSTALLER EDITS - REMOVE ONLY ON UNINSTALL Restarting Apache causes the following: httpd.exe - Application Error : The instruction at 0x0096c1bf referenced memory at 0x100058a8. The memory could not be written. Thanks in advance, Curtis Curtis, IIRC, you can't run VC9 (Visual Studio 2008) binary with VC6 binary smoothly, which I believe where you got the official binary distributions, PHP and httpd, respectively. Here's the info from [1]. There used to be a VC6 binary release for PHP v5.3.3 at windows.php.net but I don't see a VC6 build for v5.3 now. Any way, since you're using using Windows, why not just run it as FastCGI? It runs fine on Win2003 (x86), Win7 x64, Win08 (x86 x64), and Win08r2. Are using a specific Apache module that's why you need to use httpd? If so, you could use the (non official) Apache Lounge's binary. The windows binary is build with original sources from ASF ( http://httpd.apache.org ) and contains the latest patches. It is build with the latest Windows® Platform SDK and Visual Studio C++ 2008 aka VC9, which have improvements in areas like Performance, MemoryManagement and Stability over the .msi binary from the ASF site which is build with VC6. LoadRunner (Load Testing Software Suite) shows that there are improvements in performance using Apache built with VC 2008. That performance gain can be affected by numerous factors (use of scripting language such as Perl, PHP, Python, etc…as well as the actual scripts themselves). LoadRunner testing does show a marked improvement for Apache compiled under VC 2008 in stability under rigorous condition. Minimum system required: Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008, Windows XPSP3 and Windows Server 2003 R2. Regards, Tommy [1] http://www.apachelounge.com/download/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Which versions of Apache will PHP 5.3.6 work with??
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Curtis Tammany curtis.tamm...@urs.com wrote: Help!! I am in a Windows environment (XP SP3 for development and Server 2003 for production. I have to upgrade to PHP 5.3.6. It does not appear to work with either Apache 2.2.11 or the new 2.2.17 from Apache Lounge. Apache will run by itself but when PHP is installed, it adds: #BEGIN PHP INSTALLER EDITS - REMOVE ONLY ON UNINSTALL PHPIniDir C:\Program Files\PHP536\ LoadModule php5_module C:\Program Files\PHP536\php5apache2_2.dll #END PHP INSTALLER EDITS - REMOVE ONLY ON UNINSTALL Restarting Apache causes the following: httpd.exe - Application Error : The instruction at 0x0096c1bf referenced memory at 0x100058a8. The memory could not be written. Thanks in advance, Curtis Curtis, IIRC, you can't run VC9 (Visual Studio 2008) binary with VC6 binary smoothly, which I believe where you got the official binary distributions, PHP and httpd, respectively. Here's the info from [1]. There used to be a VC6 binary release for PHP v5.3.3 at windows.php.net but I don't see a VC6 build for v5.3 now. Any way, since you're using using Windows, why not just run it as FastCGI? It runs fine on Win2003 (x86), Win7 x64, Win08 (x86 x64), and Win08r2. Are using a specific Apache module that's why you need to use httpd? If so, you could use the (non official) Apache Lounge's binary. The windows binary is build with original sources from ASF ( http://httpd.apache.org ) and contains the latest patches. It is build with the latest Windows® Platform SDK and Visual Studio C++ 2008 aka VC9, which have improvements in areas like Performance, MemoryManagement and Stability over the .msi binary from the ASF site which is build with VC6. LoadRunner (Load Testing Software Suite) shows that there are improvements in performance using Apache built with VC 2008. That performance gain can be affected by numerous factors (use of scripting language such as Perl, PHP, Python, etc…as well as the actual scripts themselves). LoadRunner testing does show a marked improvement for Apache compiled under VC 2008 in stability under rigorous condition. Minimum system required: Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008, Windows XPSP3 and Windows Server 2003 R2. Regards, Tommy [1] http://www.apachelounge.com/download/ argh.. didn't read it well . I was typing it while on the phone :))... Anyway, if you don't need to use any Apache module, then go with FastCGI. Goodluck! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] Which versions of Apache will PHP 5.3.6 work with??
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote: There used to be a VC6 binary release for PHP v5.3.3 at windows.php.net but I don't see a VC6 build for v5.3 now. Any way, since you're using using Windows, why not just run it as FastCGI? It runs fine on Win2003 (x86), Win7 x64, Win08 (x86 x64), and Win08r2. Apache module works just fine and is in many situations much faster than fcgi. Are using a specific Apache module that's why you need to use httpd? If so, you could use the (non official) Apache Lounge's binary. There are no official builds of Apache, but convenience builds. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] Which versions of Apache will PHP 5.3.6 work with??
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote: There used to be a VC6 binary release for PHP v5.3.3 at windows.php.net but I don't see a VC6 build for v5.3 now. Any way, since you're using using Windows, why not just run it as FastCGI? It runs fine on Win2003 (x86), Win7 x64, Win08 (x86 x64), and Win08r2. Apache module works just fine and is in many situations much faster than fcgi. I've never tested the difference for performance. If that's the case, any particular reason to stop support ISAPI for IIS then? or is FastCGI faster than ISAPI for IIS? Prior to upgrading to PHP v5.3 and Windows 64bit, I had faster initial response time from ISAPI. Now with FastCGI, the initial response takes longer. As for performance difference through repeated requests, I don't notice the difference between ISAPI v5.2 and FastCGI v5.3. Are using a specific Apache module that's why you need to use httpd? If so, you could use the (non official) Apache Lounge's binary. There are no official builds of Apache, but convenience builds. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org I've meant official in the sense that one could download from the official/mirror site. Thus it's more trust worthy, in terms of non malicious code. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] Which versions of Apache will PHP 5.3.6 work with??
Try third binary instead of official one. Best regards, Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**) 2011/3/26 Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote: There used to be a VC6 binary release for PHP v5.3.3 at windows.php.net but I don't see a VC6 build for v5.3 now. Any way, since you're using using Windows, why not just run it as FastCGI? It runs fine on Win2003 (x86), Win7 x64, Win08 (x86 x64), and Win08r2. Apache module works just fine and is in many situations much faster than fcgi. I've never tested the difference for performance. If that's the case, any particular reason to stop support ISAPI for IIS then? or is FastCGI faster than ISAPI for IIS? Prior to upgrading to PHP v5.3 and Windows 64bit, I had faster initial response time from ISAPI. Now with FastCGI, the initial response takes longer. As for performance difference through repeated requests, I don't notice the difference between ISAPI v5.2 and FastCGI v5.3. Are using a specific Apache module that's why you need to use httpd? If so, you could use the (non official) Apache Lounge's binary. There are no official builds of Apache, but convenience builds. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org I've meant official in the sense that one could download from the official/mirror site. Thus it's more trust worthy, in terms of non malicious code. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
