Re: Minimal home install

2015-02-19 Thread andreas
Hi LawrenceSo what would a minimum deployment install, i.e., I just want to have a running repl with code loaded and able to receive commands/data/code on, say, a remote machine?Just download the tgz from http://software-lab.de/down.html and follow the install instructions http://software-lab.de/INSTALL I'm interested in picolisp partly because I would find it fascinating to deploy picolisp on very tiny devices.PicoLisp is definitely suited for this. If the standard edition is too large for your needs, you could check out MiniPicoLisp (also mentioned on the download page).Regards,Andreas- Original Message - From: Lawrence Bottorff [mailto:borg...@gmail.com] To: picolisp@software-lab.de Sent: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:49:34 -0500 Subject: 
Yes, ssh, non-root.

So what would a minimum deployment install, i.e., I just want to have a running repl with code loaded and able to receive commands/data/code on, say, a remote machine? I'm interested in picolisp partly because I would find it fascinating to deploy picolisp on very tiny devices.


On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hi Lawrence,   I've got a shell account with an ISP and I'd like to run picolisp locally  in home.  I assume that you can 'ssh' to that machine, and then have a normal, non-root access, right?Is that just a regular local install . . . or can I just move a  minimal set of picolisp file structure over? I'd like to develop on this  If you don't have root access and cannot install a global PicoLisp from a distribution, I would say that you simply install locally. Fetch and unpack the latest version:   $ wget software-lab.de/picoLisp.tgz  $ tar xfz picoLisp.tgz  $ cd picoLisp  Now it depends whether this is a 32-bit or a 64-bit machine. Please check the INSTALL file for details.shell account. BTW, what's the difference between a "deployment" of  picolisp (i.e. simply run a picolisp repl) and a normal development  environment? I'm guessing not much?  Right. I would say it is the same. You just need to add your application's sources.  ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe 





Re: Minimal home install

2015-02-19 Thread Alexander Burger
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 01:49:34PM -0500, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
 Yes, ssh, non-root.
 
 So what  would a minimum deployment install, i.e., I just want to have a
 running repl with code loaded and able to receive commands/data/code  on,
 say, a remote machine? I'm interested in picolisp partly because I would
 find it fascinating to deploy picolisp on very tiny devices.

I would recommend MiniPicoLisp on small devices. I would suggest you
fetch and compile software-lab.de/miniPicoLisp.tgz, and play around a
little.

♪♫ Alex
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe


Re: Minimal home install

2015-02-18 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Lawrence,

 I've got a shell account with an ISP and I'd like to run picolisp locally
 in home.

I assume that you can 'ssh' to that machine, and then have a normal,
non-root access, right?


 Is that just a regular local install . . . or can I just move a
 minimal set of picolisp file structure over? I'd like to develop on this

If you don't have root access and cannot install a global PicoLisp from
a distribution, I would say that you simply install locally. Fetch and
unpack the latest version:

   $ wget software-lab.de/picoLisp.tgz
   $ tar xfz picoLisp.tgz
   $ cd picoLisp

Now it depends whether this is a 32-bit or a 64-bit machine. Please
check the INSTALL file for details.


 shell account. BTW, what's the difference between a deployment of
 picolisp (i.e. simply run a picolisp repl) and a normal development
 environment? I'm guessing not much?

Right. I would say it is the same. You just need to add your
application's sources.

♪♫ Alex
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe


Re: Minimal home install

2015-02-18 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
Yes, ssh, non-root.

So what  would a minimum deployment install, i.e., I just want to have a
running repl with code loaded and able to receive commands/data/code  on,
say, a remote machine? I'm interested in picolisp partly because I would
find it fascinating to deploy picolisp on very tiny devices.

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de
wrote:

 Hi Lawrence,

  I've got a shell account with an ISP and I'd like to run picolisp locally
  in home.

 I assume that you can 'ssh' to that machine, and then have a normal,
 non-root access, right?


  Is that just a regular local install . . . or can I just move a
  minimal set of picolisp file structure over? I'd like to develop on this

 If you don't have root access and cannot install a global PicoLisp from
 a distribution, I would say that you simply install locally. Fetch and
 unpack the latest version:

$ wget software-lab.de/picoLisp.tgz
$ tar xfz picoLisp.tgz
$ cd picoLisp

 Now it depends whether this is a 32-bit or a 64-bit machine. Please
 check the INSTALL file for details.


  shell account. BTW, what's the difference between a deployment of
  picolisp (i.e. simply run a picolisp repl) and a normal development
  environment? I'm guessing not much?

 Right. I would say it is the same. You just need to add your
 application's sources.

 ♪♫ Alex
 --
 UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe