RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Altoids are a 'curiously strong' brand of mints. They come in little tins. -Original Message- From: callum moffat [mailto:callum...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 4:02 AM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) sorry i meant what are altoids never heard of them in scotland/uk callum moffat __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
pinhole-discussion@p at ??? schrieb am 12.12.02 06:20:28: > Great discussions! It improves us all as artists. > > Only 13 shopping days to Christmas..buy art! > Happy Holidays to All on the list! > > ~Chuck Flagg~ yes Chuck, so it is. But also 13 shopping days to send pinhole postcards to the members from the list on www.rahji.com/noindex/pinholexmas.php3?random=49 I will start mailing today. Also from me: Happy Holidays to All! Ingo __ Die Kommunikationszentrale ist da! Nie wieder E-Mail-Chaos! Verwalten Sie alle Ihre E-Mail Adressen unter: http://freemail.web.de/features/?mc=021123
RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
cary wrote: "Funny, but if you pick one group or the other, some members of each side get completely engrossed in the technical aspects. Its Ideal Pinhole Diameter to Film Plane Ratios vs. CCD Sensitivity Ranges." "Now that I've alienated everyone on the list, let me just say this: As I have grown as a photographer and artist, I have come to the mindset that whatever the technique, whatever the medium, if the artist has honestly expressed themselves then the result is a success." I'm happy to see these discussions taking place here, and I look forward to reading more." ***From James Kellar's email to "wow" at the flurry of replies; to Cary's and others; I have enjoyed this list and the vast knowledge, the sharing, and all the creativity of those on it. I miss when the list is silent and am very busy right now reading them all. I especially relate to Cary's second paragraph above as to some of my own feelings about my own pinhole work. Great discussions! It improves us all as artists. Only 13 shopping days to Christmas..buy art! Happy Holidays to All on the list! ~Chuck Flagg~
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Actually, everything behind the pinhole gets the same amount of focus. Therefore, if there is dust on the filter, the dust will be in focus regatdless of which side of the pinhile the filter is on. However, once the filter is clean, it is much easier to keep it clean if it is inside the camera. Another list member advocated holding the filter in front of the pinhole and moving it constsantly diring the exposure. This keeps any dust or imprefections from being recorded on the film. Mike Vande Bunt Andy Schmitt wrote: good instinct since everything in front gets focus...including any little dusties on the filter. andy -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of callum moffat Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:52 AM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) ive just bought a cheap hoya red 25 filter for b/w work and maybe some infra red question in front or behind the pinhole... and does it matter? my instinct says behind whatya think?
RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Andy Schmitt wrote: > good instinct since everything in front gets focus...including any little > dusties on the filter. > andy Dusties have no problem getting projected onto the film when the filter is behind the pinhole- I know this from painful personal experience! Moral- Take pains to clean any dust fragments from your filter before every shot, and, if your filter is inside your camera, make sure that the inside of your camera squeaky clean, or else as soon as you close your camera, dust will hop on your filter like fleas on a dog!
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
It really should not matter which side of the pinhole you place the filter. I guess you would have to weigh ease of removal to the possibility of lens flair and decide which fits the way you work. -Bill From: callum moffat Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:51:43 -0700 (PDT) ive just bought a cheap hoya red 25 filter for b/w work and maybe some infra red question in front or behind the pinhole... and does it matter? my instinct says behind whatya think? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
good instinct since everything in front gets focus...including any little dusties on the filter. andy -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of callum moffat Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:52 AM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) ive just bought a cheap hoya red 25 filter for b/w work and maybe some infra red question in front or behind the pinhole... and does it matter? my instinct says behind whatya think? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Thanks again Omar. I agree, making an integral film camera into pinhole is a great accomplishment. I have not been successful so far, but my first attempt was with a one-step camera that I forgot to test with the lens still on to see if it even worked. I don't think it did! I am now going to start over, using a known good camera! Thanks, -Dan -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Omar Alvarez Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:21 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) Thanks Dan for the positive input, The camera uses standard 600 film, which at least for now, can still be purchased anywhere. I have a few SX-70 film cameras, but cannot always find the film. In regards to the Modified Polaroid Impulse camera, the pinhole was originally smaller, but the images were dark. I had already glued on the pinhole brass shim to the camera, and was about to give up. I was thinking about all these f-stops and and other pinhole calculations, when suddenly my wife said, ...why don't you just make the hole bigger! So I took the sewing needle (what size I don't know..) and just inserted it into the pinhole and ever so slighty enlarged the hole. I know, this is not scientific, lacks mathematical formulas, etc. but it worked. I consider pinhole photography to be art. If I wanted to be like Ansel Adams I would not be using a $3 camera and a homemade pinhole. Just the fact that an integral film camera worked for pinhole at all was a great accomplishment. I do own "real" Polaroid peel-apart film cameras that have glass lenses and "real" shutters, but the images I obtain do not produce the unpredictable results that I can get with a home made camera. Recently I purchased a Zero Image 6x9 from Zernicke Au. It is beautiful and I hope to see what I can do with it. If I can be of any help to anyone trying to modify a One-Step type camera into a pinhole, please email me, I will be glad to help. Please see my Agfa Clack page: http://www.geocities.com/omar5193/clack.html my Pentacon Six TL page: http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Suite/1755/pentacon001.html Good Luck and Regards, Omar Alvarez From: "Dan Gerber" To: Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid Impulse Integral Film Pinhole Camera Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? List-Post: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:26:36 -0500 Omar, Nice work! You have inspired me to start tinkering with some of my one-step cameras again. Are you using 600 film? Do you know what size sewing needle you used for the pinhole? Thanks, and keep the images coming! -Dan -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Omar Alvarez Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 6:40 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid Impulse Integral Film Pinhole Camera Hi Pinholers, I am new to the discussion group, and although I have been taking pinhole photographs with a Nikkormat and Pinhole Body Cap for about 2 years now, I have recently built an integral film polaroid pinhole camera. You can see a couple of images of it: http://www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=omar_cam era001.jpg http://www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=omar_cam era002.jpg I made my own home brew pinhole with a sewing needle, a pin vise, and some brass shims from my local art/crafts store. It took some experimentation but I was finally able to totally black out the electronic light sensor to keep the camera's original shutter mechanism open as long as possible. Since I have a home made pinhole, I don't know what f-stop I am working with, but, as long as I am getting an image on the film I guess it doesn't really matter. The Polaroid Impulse which I obtained used for $3 is really easy to take apart with destroying the camera. I simply replaced the Polaroid plastic lens with a circular brass pinhole shim and glued it on with black silicon adhesive/sealant. .. Lightning flashes,.. Sparks shower,.. In one blink of your eyes,.. You have missed seeing. .. Free, BeOS-friendly email accounts: http://BeMail.org/ BeOS News and Community: http://www.BeGroovy.com/ - Express yourself with a super cool email address from BigMailBox.com. Hundreds of choices. It's free! http://www.bigmailbox.com
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
"Time Zero" IS SX-70 film. Polaroid changed the name in the late 70's (or so) when they changed the formulation so that it processed faster. It has been the name for SX-70 film for the last couple of decades. It is hard to find because few stores carry it. Polaroid still lists it on their web site, so it is probably still being manufactured. Most of the large mail-order photo supply places have it. Mike Vande Bunt dalf...@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 4/23/02 8:23:26 PM Central Daylight Time, oma...@bemail.org writes: I have a few SX-70 film cameras, but cannot always find the film. I cant exactly recall the name, but... you can find film for SX-70's I know, because I bought several packs in Walgreens store , I wanna say TIME ZERO or something, I was apprehensive at first, but bought one pack, and was amazed , it fit right in the slot, and away I went . If you're looking for EXACTLY SX-70 film and expect it to say so on the package, I suspect you wont find any, I didnt, but on closer inspection found it by another name , still made by Polaroid you have to read the fine print :-) ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ .
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
In a message dated 4/23/02 8:23:26 PM Central Daylight Time, oma...@bemail.org writes: > I have a few SX-70 film cameras, but cannot always find the film. I cant exactly recall the name, but... you can find film for SX-70's I know, because I bought several packs in Walgreens store , I wanna say TIME ZERO or something, I was apprehensive at first, but bought one pack, and was amazed , it fit right in the slot, and away I went . If you're looking for EXACTLY SX-70 film and expect it to say so on the package, I suspect you wont find any, I didnt, but on closer inspection found it by another name , still made by Polaroid you have to read the fine print :-)
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 15:44:42 +0200, thomas.kellner.photogra...@t-online.de (Thomas Kellner) wrote: >Hey everybody, >my webpage is online for a while with an extra section pinhole. (PCusers ) The URL would be a valuable help for a visit ;-) Dieter -- Dieters Lochkamera Seite: http://www.die-lochkamera.de/ drf-Süd-Homepage: http://www.drf-sued.de/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
On Sunday, April 7, 2002, at 08:44 AM, Thomas Kellner wrote: Hey everybody, my webpage is online for a while with an extra section pinhole. (PCusers ) Best regards from Germany - Original Message - From: Sarah Heidt To: Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 3:16 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] help with indoor exposures needed I have been fairly happy with my results when taking pinhole pictures outdoors but I am not sure how to figure out the exposure for indoor shots. I know this is a really novice question, but sould someone help? The last picture I tried indoors came out totally overexposed. I was using TMax 100 film and I exposed for 1 minute which I thought might not be long enough, but it was too long. Sarah Heidt _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Thomas, What's the URL? james On Sunday, April 7, 2002, at 08:44 AM, Thomas Kellner wrote: Hey everybody, my webpage is online for a while with an extra section pinhole. (PCusers ) Best regards from Germany
RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Do you have any photos of your conversions or suggestions. I have a big shot available to "operate on"! Thnaks for any help, ~Chuck Flagg~ -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of che lawrence Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 7:50 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) my favorites right now are a converted polaroid bigshot and a polaroid 110a- they both take packfilm. the bigshot is a portrait camera, it's great for close-ups. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
> If you want to try saving a bit on film try the Bergger and Forte brands. > Both make a good 8X10 film. I think Bergger has larger sizes available as > well. > > Gord Also, places like Freestyle Sales and Photo Warehouse have less expensive films.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
When the notch is in the upper right corner the emulsion is toward you. - Original Message - From: "pete eckert" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 7:10 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) > I made a 8 x 10 camera to take glass plates. It was intended to have liquid > light painted on the plates so I could play with drawing with the emulsion. > It's the rainy season here in Northern California. so the camera is much to > slow four what I intended to do with it. I only found this out after > reading some of the recent posts concerning paper exposure speeds. Thanks, > saved me some bucks. > > To make a long story a bit shorter, I now want to put sheet film in it. The > stuff is expensive. I tried taking a few test shots to get the exposure > down. My problem is, (besides being totally blind), I can't tell what side > the emulsion is on. Paper has more tooth on the paper side than the > emulsion side. the film feels the same on both sides. I tried both sides > and my wife said both negatives had images. I noticed some notches on the > film. Can I use them to orient the film? > > > If you are wondering I had intended to use the glass plates to take shots > of a nearby steam train as it stops at a station . I wanted to take them in > the rain, so the camera is so robust it looks like it was made in a tractor > factory. The train isn't running during the rainy season I just found out. > I don't want a little rain to slow me down so I still want to give my > camera a dunking. > > the guide dog didn't like the steam train anyway , > > Pete > > > ___ > Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.???/discussion/ >
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
- Original Message - From: "Kosinski Family" > all this left right up down is a little dyslexic, especially if you can't > see, I suggest to you that blind persons are probably better at this "dyslexic" matters than people with good eye sight. Besides, whether you are able or not to see, when loading film (ortho film under safelight excluded) everybody is "blind", after all, we have to do it under total darkness. > so here is a tactile way to identify the emulsion side... the emulsion > side will absorb moisture so just hold your finger on it for several seconds > and it will feel sticky... this goes for paper, too You may be right, but why (IMO) ruin a sheet of film by planting your fingerprint on it. As someone already pointed it out, the notches are there to ID the film type and to tell you which is the emulsion side of it. Use the notches. Guillermo
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
FYI If you want to try saving a bit on film try the Bergger and Forte brands. Both make a good 8X10 film. I think Bergger has larger sizes available as well. Gord On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, pete eckert wrote: > I made a 8 x 10 camera to take glass plates. It was intended to have liquid > light painted on the plates so I could play with drawing with the emulsion. > It's the rainy season here in Northern California. so the camera is much to > slow four what I intended to do with it. I only found this out after > reading some of the recent posts concerning paper exposure speeds. Thanks, > saved me some bucks. > > To make a long story a bit shorter, I now want to put sheet film in it. The > stuff is expensive. I tried taking a few test shots to get the exposure > down. My problem is, (besides being totally blind), I can't tell what side > the emulsion is on. Paper has more tooth on the paper side than the > emulsion side. the film feels the same on both sides. I tried both sides > and my wife said both negatives had images. I noticed some notches on the > film. Can I use them to orient the film? > Pete - Gordon J. Holtslander Dept. of Biology hol...@duke.usask.ca112 Science Place http://duke.usask.ca/~holtsgUniversity of Saskatchewan Tel (306) 966-4433 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Fax (306) 966-4461 Canada S7N 5E2 -
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
all this left right up down is a little dyslexic, especially if you can't see, so here is a tactile way to identify the emulsion side... the emulsion side will absorb moisture so just hold your finger on it for several seconds and it will feel sticky... this goes for paper, too at hartwick college, where i teach, the students raise guide dogs and they are often seen in great photos... i am wondering if & how your dog helps you out in the practice of photography? for example, do you think a dog can be of any assistance in letting you know when there is something interesting to shoot or when the right time is to make an exposure? haw about training the dog to use a point & shoot camera? jim k - Original Message - From: "pete eckert" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:10 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) > I made a 8 x 10 camera to take glass plates. It was intended to have liquid > light painted on the plates so I could play with drawing with the emulsion. > It's the rainy season here in Northern California. so the camera is much to > slow four what I intended to do with it. I only found this out after > reading some of the recent posts concerning paper exposure speeds. Thanks, > saved me some bucks. > > To make a long story a bit shorter, I now want to put sheet film in it. The > stuff is expensive. I tried taking a few test shots to get the exposure > down. My problem is, (besides being totally blind), I can't tell what side > the emulsion is on. Paper has more tooth on the paper side than the > emulsion side. the film feels the same on both sides. I tried both sides > and my wife said both negatives had images. I noticed some notches on the > film. Can I use them to orient the film? > > > If you are wondering I had intended to use the glass plates to take shots > of a nearby steam train as it stops at a station . I wanted to take them in > the rain, so the camera is so robust it looks like it was made in a tractor > factory. The train isn't running during the rainy season I just found out. > I don't want a little rain to slow me down so I still want to give my > camera a dunking. > > the guide dog didn't like the steam train anyway , > > Pete > > > ___ > Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.???/discussion/ >
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
The notches serve two purposes, film identification and film orientation. With the film held vertically (8" across the top, 10" down the sides) and the notches along the top edge nearer to the right side, the emulsion is facing you. Dick Gifford Pete eckert wrote: (snip) > ...I noticed some notches on the > film. Can I use them to orient the film?... >
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
pete eckert wrote: > >-- snip --> > My problem is, (besides being totally blind), I can't tell what side > the emulsion is on. Paper has more tooth on the paper side than the > emulsion side. the film feels the same on both sides. I tried both sides > and my wife said both negatives had images. I noticed some notches on the > film. Can I use them to orient the film? > When the notches are on the upper right corner the emulsion is facing you. Bob Russman
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Natalie Nadozirny wrote: > Is peeling apart an exposed and developed Polaroid 600 film safe? Hi Natalie. I have been using Polaroid products for years and almost exclusively do Polaroid Transfers. I have not had any problems what-so-ever with the caustic paste used in their process. This is not to undermine any of the potential hazards that may exist, i.e. getting the paste in your eyes, etc. I always have a wet wash cloth in my working area in case I get some of the paste on my hands or work surface. If you happen to have extra sensitive skin, gloves may be needed; though I don't use them. If you follow Polaroid's directions for handling their product, you shouldn't have any problems. Have fun. Bill- Natalie Nadozirny wrote: > Is peeling apart an exposed and developed Polaroid 600 film safe? > ___ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Natalie Nadozirny wrote: > I've ben reading this list for a while, and enjoy it very much. Maybe > someone can answer my most recent film question. Is peeling apart an > exposed and developed Polaroid 600 film safe? > > Natalie, 26, Baltimore, MD, part-time wedding photographer, pinhead I have been told that the chemical in this pod is mildly caustic. Our old hands have thick skin so rarely to we have any problems. The problems occur if we touch or scratch or probe other areas of our body which don't have think skin. Think about how many times in a day that you rub your eyes. This transfers those chemicals to those sensitive areas. I always instruct my students to use gloves or wash there hands after tearing the print off. "Wet One" or some other wet wipe is good to keep in your photo kit. These are college age kids that Im instructing, I would think you would have to be a lot more careful with younger children. Chris Peregoy, 43, Baltimore, MD, full-time pinhole geek -- Chris Peregoy | http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~peregoy | http://imda.umbc.edu/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
if it's in the MSDS it's very real jim k - Original Message - From: "Natalie Nadozirny" To: Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 5:19 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) > I've ben reading this list for a while, and enjoy it very much. Maybe > someone can answer my most recent film question. Is peeling apart an > exposed and developed Polaroid 600 film safe? My friend, who is a high > school art teacher, has done and will do projects with her classes in which > they cut and peel apart the film from the base. I have a degree in > photography, and all my profs always taught us that Polaroid emulsion is not > the safest chemistry to be touching bare handed. I always use caution and > gloves when handling and peeling apart Polaroid films, or transferring > emulsions. My friend insists Polaroid emulsion is safe and fun. I have > written Polaroid and not received a response yet. I have read their MSDS's > which say the chemistry can cause skin burns. My friend still doesn't > believe me. Any suggestions/advice? > > Natalie, 26, Baltimore, MD, part-time wedding photographer, pinhead > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > > ___ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.???/discussion/ >
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Hi: I use Dave Soemarko's LC-1 low contrast developed with my ortho (CGP) negs. Its a simple developer one can mix themselves. See: http://hometown.aol.com/fotodave/Articles/LC-1.html This developer is mixed in two parts to control contrast. You can get very precise contrast control with it. See http://cyano.usask.ca/pinhole for some examples (all the negs for the cyanotype negs were developed in LC-1) Gord On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 skippyjo...@att.net wrote: > Hey guys, > > I'm back in the game. After not doing photography > in half a decade I've started pinholing again. I'm > using a cream of wheat camera with 4 x 5, B+W kodalith > ortho film. Don't use kodalith developer unless you > want an extremely high contrast negatve. I used ektaflo > developer diluted 1:1 after mixing a stock solution(1:9). > I'll post something soon. Just putting the info out > there in case someone needs it. BTW, I found the color > negatve discussion really helpful. Thanks > > Skippy > > > ___ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.???/discussion/ > - Gordon J. Holtslander Dept. of Biology hol...@duke.usask.ca112 Science Place http://duke.usask.ca/~holtsgUniversity of Saskatchewan Tel (306) 966-4433 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Fax (306) 966-4461 Canada S7N 5E2 -
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
- Original Message - From: To: Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 8:34 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) > Hey guys, > > I'm back in the game. After not doing photography > in half a decade I've started pinholing again. > I'll post something soon. Please do post them. Guillermo
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
--- skippyjo...@att.net wrote: > Hello Group, > > I have recently rediscoverd pinhole photography > after eight years of not doing it. I have some old > notes from school but I find that they are not > complete. > This is why I now ask if anyone in the group uses > Kodalith Ortho 4 x 5 film as I used to. The suggested > developer (ektaflo) is very scarce and expensive. Has > anyone used Dektol or T-max developers with this film? > I'm curious what film and chemistry combinations do you > use? I use Arista Halftone film on occasion and develop with dilute Dektol. The dilution is in the 1+10 to 1+20 range, depending upon the subject matter. Cheers - george = Handmade Photographic Images http://members.home.net/hmpi/ __ Do You Yahoo!? Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more. http://buzz.yahoo.com/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
I would like to try ...motion picture pinhole photography I have a three turret Bell & Howell 16mm motion picture camera. I can remove the lenses and possibly mount a pinhole. I know someone who has, they had to push their film-stock many stops bc (I think) they were shooting at 24FPS & recording sound (standard sound/projection speed) If you do shoot at your lowest frame rate (on, I guess, your Filmo?) that will be 8FPS or translated into shutter speed=about 1/15 second You may still have to push the film-stock. Good luck! -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Edwin Gendron Virginia Tech Residential and Dining Programs Graphics 43 Owens Hall (0223) Blacksburg, Va. 24061 (540)231-5398 egend...@vt.edu
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
I guess you didn't make it to the Why Pinhole show in Rochester NY. Thomas Comerford had two 16 mm films. After his showing he said he had to "hand crank" the film at a slower speed to give the pushed film stock enough exposure time to record. I think he said he estimates that it was shooting at 4 frames per second. photoe...@aol.com wrote: > You mention in your e-mail you are looking for examples of lensless images > from both still and motion picture. Do you have any examples of pinhole > photography with a motion picture camera? > > Does anybody out there reading this e-mail know anything about motion picture > pinhole photography? I would like to try it. > > I have a three turret Bell & Howell 16mm motion picture camera. I can remove > the lenses and possibly mount a pinhole. > > I would like to hear from anyone who has experimented with pinhole images > with motion picture. > > Mr. Lonnie Paulson > photoe...@aol.com > > ___ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.p at ???/discussion/ -- Chris Peregoy | http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~peregoy | http://imda.umbc.edu/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
You mention in your e-mail you are looking for examples of lensless images from both still and motion picture. Do you have any examples of pinhole photography with a motion picture camera? Does anybody out there reading this e-mail know anything about motion picture pinhole photography? I would like to try it. I have a three turret Bell & Howell 16mm motion picture camera. I can remove the lenses and possibly mount a pinhole. I would like to hear from anyone who has experimented with pinhole images with motion picture. Mr. Lonnie Paulson photoe...@aol.com
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
In a message dated 4/6/01 4:54:22 PM, pen...@home.com writes: << Another of the "lensless" processes is ZonePlate imaging. >> and cliche verre. leezy
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
- Original Message - From: > to find other work to present, either pinhole, photogram, or > some other lensless process we may be, as of yet, unfamilar > with. Another of the "lensless" processes is ZonePlate imaging. Guillermo
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Natalie, We'll need more information. What is the f-stop of you camera? or at least the focal length? What is the ISO speed of the film you're using. What kind of lighting conditions you want to shoot under. Cheers, Guy Natalie Nadozirny wrote: > Hi.I am experimenting with a new pinhole camera and polaroid film. > Can anyone give me some information on exposure times using Polaroid 4 > x 5 sheet film, specifically Type 59?Thanks for your help.Natalie
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
You can get pdf data sheets for all the 4x5 films at: http://instantphoto.polaroid.com/service/filmdatasheets/4_5/index.html There's also more info in their product catalog at: http://www.polaroidwork.com/home/LLframeset.jsp?body=/form/search.jsp Sorry I can't be more help, I'm using T55 and T52, haven't played with T59 yet. The data sheets have the reciprocity failure timings. Pam > Natalie Nadozirny wrote: > > Hi. > I am experimenting with a new pinhole camera and polaroid film. Can > anyone give me some information on exposure times using Polaroid 4 x > 5 sheet film, specifically Type 59? > Thanks for your help. > Natalie -- Pamela G. Niedermayer Pinehill Softworks Inc. 600 W. 28th St., Suite 103 Austin, TX 78705 512-236-1677 http://www.pinehill.com
RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Please read the bottom of the email for instructions on removing yourself. |-Original Message- |From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? |[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Cathy Marzola |Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 9:15 AM |To: Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? |Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) | | |Please take me off the list I don't want anymore emails | | |___ |Pinhole-Discussion mailing list |Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? |unsubscribe or change your account at |http://www.p at ???/discussion/
RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
hey there See the difference between your email & mine? Mine looks like a crummy typewriter... The difference is a lot of superfluous stuff sent with the message that can confuse some readers that can't handle it. What Email program are you using? -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of che lawrence Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 11:32 AM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) plain text? html text? i've only had my computer for 1 month, i just type reply and send. the text looks plain when i type it. Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.p at ???/discussion/
RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
Reply to: RE: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) Try looking up http://users.cyberbeach.net/~dbardell/pinhole.html - especially the curved film plane cameras. The curved film plane will probably be essential for a panoramic camera. Peter On 1/31/2001, andreas duscha wrote: hi,I have problem and hope that someone out therecan help me to solve it.I am looking for a construction plan for a panoramapinhole camera,which is working with a negativefilm,but on a r oll that there is the possibility to make more than one picture.thanks for your help.andreas _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. --- Peter J. Popp W: (303) 497-5181 Research AssociateH: (303) 691-1632 NOAA Aeronomy Laboratory F: (303) 497-5373 325 Broadway, R/AL6 pp...@al.noaa.gov Boulder, CO 80305 ---
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
rockland colloid 302 Piermont ave Piermont NY 10968 www.rockaloid.com 914 - 359-5559 James > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? > Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:57:17 -0500 > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) > > hi, i'm not sure how to contact rockland directly but freestyle camera in > l.a. sells the kit for 24.95 800.292.6137 item no. 183-2016 > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > ___ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.p at ???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
In a message dated 1/1/01 9:54:42 AM Pacific Standard Time, elenab...@aol.com writes: > hey harry! Im so impressed with your work. Do you think you could guide me > with my pinhole work. I have never done this sort of thing. I have a > cannon > camera and took off the lens. I put the cap on the front and poked a pin > through it to make a hole. Now what do i do? What kind of canon? I made a body cap for my eos elan IIe and i can actually use the built in meter ;) Do you have a hand held light meter? thanx for your compliments BTW :) Harry http://www.figurefoto.com/";>Figurefoto.com
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
In a message dated 12/31/00 3:18:17 PM Pacific Standard Time, figuref...@aol.com writes: > http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/panphcem.jpg > hey harry! Im so impressed with your work. Do you think you could guide me with my pinhole work. I have never done this sort of thing. I have a cannon camera and took off the lens. I put the cap on the front and poked a pin through it to make a hole. Now what do i do?
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
jmwo...@att.net wrote: > > I understand a few folk are limited by speed and or > browser issues that will over time improve, but why be > regressive? Should a teacher hold a class back and teach > down to a very few students and ignore the stronger > capabillities of the majority of their students? > This is not really a vaild (or fair) comparisson. There ARE simple ways to share images qith members of the discussion list and we have been using these methods for a long time. I would like to continue to be a member of the list, but I will not be able to do that if ten or twenty inages are sent to the list per day (which could happen). Mike Vande Bunt
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
- Original Message - From: "leeshawn renee navarro" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 10:35 PM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) > remove me Do it yourself, just follow instructions at the end of each message (this on for instance). Guillermo
Re: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
remove me From: "Gioacchino A. Pagliuca" Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? To: Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:04:32 +0200 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
