[pkg-go] Bug#852959: Bug#852959: Bug#852959: prometheus FTBFS on armhf: github.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage/local fails

[Martín Ferrari]

Jeffrey,

On 29/01/17 21:09, Jeffrey Walton wrote:

> As a stopgap, you might consider adding a small swapfile and setting
> swapiness to a low value.

I am talking about buildds, and a package prevented from migrating to
testing because of this :)

> Nearly every ARM gadget I had was suffering OOM kills on two C++
> libraries that made heavy use of templates. The swapfile and
> swappiness avoided most of the build problems I was encountering.
> 
> The SD Cards are dirt cheap, so I don't care if they wear them out 15%
> faster than normal. Its an easier problem to solve than daily broken
> compiles.

Also, I think this might be more about addressable user space, because
it is not the OOM killer, but the go runtime that kills the tests.


-- 
Martín Ferrari (Tincho)

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#852959: Bug#852959: Bug#852959: prometheus FTBFS on armhf: github.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage/local fails

[Jeffrey Walton]

> Sadly, it turns out armhf fails to build due to one test taking a bit
> too much memory[1], and there is an RC bug open for that: #852959[2].
>
> So now I don't know what to do, except asking for removal of prometheus
> from armhf.

As a stopgap, you might consider adding a small swapfile and setting
swapiness to a low value.

Nearly every ARM gadget I had was suffering OOM kills on two C++
libraries that made heavy use of templates. The swapfile and
swappiness avoided most of the build problems I was encountering.

The SD Cards are dirt cheap, so I don't care if they wear them out 15%
faster than normal. Its an easier problem to solve than daily broken
compiles.

Jeff

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#852959: Bug#852959: Bug#852959: prometheus FTBFS on armhf: github.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage/local fails

[Martín Ferrari]

Hello ARM porters,

I am the maintainer for the prometheus suite, which is in testing. Last
week, just before the deadline I prepared and uploaded a new upstream
release (which I even tested in an armel porterbox to be sure).

Sadly, it turns out armhf fails to build due to one test taking a bit
too much memory[1], and there is an RC bug open for that: #852959[2].

So now I don't know what to do, except asking for removal of prometheus
from armhf.

Can the ARM porters help here?

I need to act fast, as we are very close to the freeze, otherwise I
would just file an arch removal bug.

Thanks a lot!


[1]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=prometheus=armhf
[2]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852959
-- 
Martín Ferrari (Tincho)

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Strange build failure on ppc64 only

[Michael Hudson-Doyle]

On 29 January 2017 at 03:25, Sascha Steinbiss  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have noticed that the ppc64 build for a Go package I co-maintain failed
> [1] with the following error message:
>
> […]
> go build github.com/google/stenographer/blockfile: no buildable Go source
> files in /<>/obj-powerpc64-linux-gnu/src/github
> .com/google/stenographer/blockfile
> […]
>
> while all other supported archs are unaffected and build fine [2]. Any
> ideas? I can reproduce the issue on pizzetti.debian.org.
> The only thing that struck me as out of the ordinary is that the package
> in question uses C components and the ppc64 build seems to be missing
> support for cgo. At least /usr/lib/go-1.7/pkg/linux_ppc64/runtime/cgo.a
> seems to be missing? (Maybe I’m way off here…)
>

I think you're right.


> If that is indeed the problem I’d be happy to remove ppc64 from the list
> of supported archs.
>

Sounds sensible to me. FWIW, I think the ppc64 port is basically dead
upstream, so if you don't care about it, I don't think anyone else will
very much...

Cheers,
mwh
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] docker-registry REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the docker-registry source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.4.1~ds1-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #841575: docker-registry: FTBFS: Test failures

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] consul REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the consul source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.6.4~dfsg-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #845148: consul FTBFS in stretch due to missing 
golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient-dev

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] golang-github-appc-docker2aci REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the golang-github-appc-docker2aci source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.14.0+dfsg-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #841575: docker-registry: FTBFS: Test failures
# in docker-registry

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] golang-github-docker-libnetwork REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the golang-github-docker-libnetwork source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.8~git20161019.0.66c8446-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 845148,846542,850951 in consul,etcd,runc

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] acbuild REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the acbuild source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.4.0+dfsg-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 841575,845729,849665 in 
docker-registry,golang-github-coreos-go-tspi,trousers

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] golang-github-docker-engine-api REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the golang-github-docker-engine-api source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.4.0-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 841575,850951 in docker-registry,runc

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] golang-github-docker-leadership REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the golang-github-docker-leadership source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.1.0-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 845148,846542 in consul,etcd

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] docker-libkv REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the docker-libkv source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.2.0-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 845148,846542 in consul,etcd

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] etcd REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the etcd source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.3.7+dfsg-5
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #846542: etcd: FTBFS in testing (undefined: 
grpc.SupportPackageIsVersion3)

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] golang-github-nebulouslabs-go-upnp_0.0~git20160920.0.73e8530-1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:golang-github-nebulouslabs-go-upnp-dev is NEW.
binary:golang-github-nebulouslabs-go-upnp-dev is NEW.
source:golang-github-nebulouslabs-go-upnp is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-github-nebulouslabs-go-upnp_0.0~git20160920.0.73e8530-1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

golang-github-nebulouslabs-go-upnp_0.0~git20160920.0.73e8530-1_amd64.changes 
uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  golang-github-nebulouslabs-go-upnp_0.0~git20160920.0.73e8530-1.dsc
  golang-github-nebulouslabs-go-upnp_0.0~git20160920.0.73e8530.orig.tar.xz
  golang-github-nebulouslabs-go-upnp_0.0~git20160920.0.73e8530-1.debian.tar.xz
  golang-github-nebulouslabs-go-upnp-dev_0.0~git20160920.0.73e8530-1_all.deb
  golang-github-nebulouslabs-go-upnp_0.0~git20160920.0.73e8530-1_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers