libgeo-shapelib-perl_0.22-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Francesco, please take care of the lintian E: and W:. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
postgis_2.3.0+dfsg-2_source.changes REJECTED
as requested by email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: mapproxy_1.9.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, great, thanks a lot for your dedication. Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
mapproxy_1.9.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Such text doesn't seem to be compatible with DFSG: mapproxy-1.9.0/mapproxy/test/system/fixture/util_wms_capabilities111.xml: This service is intended for private and evaluation use only. The data is licensed as Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/) mapproxy-1.9.0/mapproxy/test/system/fixture/util_wms_capabilities130.xml: This service is intended for private and evaluation use only. The data is li censed as Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/) As this might only be a test, the CC BY SA 2.0 of this file and many others (especially yaml files) do not fit into the DFSG world, so please remove them from the source tarball.. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
saga_2.3.0+dfsg-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Upstream is mixing GPL-2 with GPL-3+ code: src/modules/imagery/imagery_classification/cluster_isodata.cpp According to the compatibility matrix in http://gplv3.fsf.org/dd3-faq this is not allowed. So maybe you can ask upstream to relicense some stuff ... Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
pdal_1.2.0-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, please mention the "Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License" of PDAL-1.2.0-src\doc\tutorial\pcl_spec.rst in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
postgis_2.2.1+dfsg-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED
newer version has been accepted === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Comments regarding postgis-java_2.1.7.1-1~exp1_amd64.changes
Hi Bas, I marked the package for accept, but you should tell upstream that they should update their file headers with the correct LGPL2.1+ template. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
rasterio_0.27.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Johan, please add the missing license of rasterio-0.27.0/rasterio/rasterfill.cpp to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
python-stetl_1.0.8+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, please add the missing license of Stetl-1.0.8/stetl/utils/apachelog.py to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Comments regarding libcitygml_2.0-1~exp1_amd64.changes
Hi Bas, your package seems to Depend: on libgdal.so.1-1.11.2, which is not available. Do you want to upload it? Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
protozero_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
same reason as other version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
protozero_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, please add the Boost license of protozero-1.1.0/test/include/catch.hpp to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Comments regarding libosmium_2.1.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi Bas, I marked your package for accept, but you might want to add an entry for test/include/win_mkstemp.hpp to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
netcdf-fortran_4.4.2-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, please mention the Apache 2 license of some Fortran files in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Comments regarding gmt-gshhg_2.3.4-1_amd64.changes
Hi Bas, I mark this package for accept now, but please add some references to the original database (as you already wrote per email). Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Comments regarding gmt-dcw_1.1.1-1_amd64.changes
same as in the other gmt-package. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
librasterlite2_1.0.0~rc0-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing licenses of: test/fnmatch4win.h test/fnmatch_impl4win.h some test/*.svg to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Comments regarding gmt-gshhg_2.3.4-1_amd64.changes
Hi Bas, somewhere I read that these datasets are built from other sources. Could you provide theses sources as well in the package? Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
fiona_1.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of docs/manual.rst to your debian/copyright Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
qgis_2.8.1+dfsg-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED
package with ElvenSword stuff === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
qgis_2.8.1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, unfortunately I have to reject your package. In your debian/copyright you have the following entry: Files: src/core/pal/* Copyright: 2008, Maxence Laurent, MIS-TIC, HEIG-VD License: GPL-3+ (strictly speaking this is not true as costcalculator.cpp and costcalculator.h are GPL-2+) you also have: Files: src/plugins/dxf2shp_converter/getInsertions.h Copyright: Christopher Michaelis License: GPL-2 Files: src/plugins/dxf2shp_converter/getInsertions.cpp Copyright: Christopher Michaelis License: GPL-2+ The second license header of getInsertions.cpp states it is GPLv2 only, so the whole thing seems to be licensed under GPLv2. Unfortunately you can not mix GPLv2 and GPLv3 software. Further you have Files: src/plugins/dxf2shp_converter/dxflib/src/* Copyright: 2001-2003, RibbonSoft 2001, Robert J. Campbell Jr License: GPL-2 or dxflib-Commercial-License which doesn't fit either. License: ElvenSword says: * Do not Rip/Merge with other artists work. Example: All in one gradients by Merger/Ripper Nickname) for download/sell This is non-free and aren't you doing this with all the other stuff in resources/cpt-city-qgis-min/*? So I am afraid, there needs to be a new revision of this software. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
qgis_2.6.1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED
... same reason as for last version. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
qgis_2.6.0-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED
... same reason as for last version. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
python-osmapi_0.5.0-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing ODBL 1.0 for some files in tests/* to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
python-geojson_1.0.9-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. You seem to have lots of superfluous files in your debian directory. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
mgrs_0.0~20131209-80d5465-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add all license information (from readme.md) to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
pycsw_1.10.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. One result of the discussion about tinyows was that OGC schemas don't fall under the Software Notice but the Document Notice. This makes them non-free (no modification) and tinyows had to move to non-free. I am afraid that pycsw has to do this as well. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
otb_4.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas and Paolo, within 10 seconds I found files under LGPL, Boost, Apache, maybe BSD. So this package won't appear either in unstable or in experimental ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
laszip_2.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
bad license used by upstream === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Comments regarding laszip_2.2.0-1_amd64.changes
Dear Maintainer, some files contain the following remark: // Permission to copy and redistribute this code is hereby granted, provided - // that this warning and copyright notices are not removed or altered. - This does not allow modification. Can you please explain why this code can be licensed under LGPL? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#746955: it is not possible to build a serial version anymore
Package: libhdf5-dev Version: 1.8.12+docs-1.1 Severity: important User: alteh...@debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, some time ago there was a package libhdf5-serial-dev that I could use to build a serial version of package meep. Nowadays this package was replaced by libhdf5-dev and the description still says: This package contains development files for serial platforms. Unfortunately there are these lines in /usr/include/H5pubconf.h /* Define if we have parallel support */ #define H5_HAVE_PARALLEL 1 which result in an error in /usr/include/H5public.h #ifdef H5_HAVE_PARALLEL # define MPICH_SKIP_MPICXX 1 # define OMPI_SKIP_MPICXX 1 # include mpi.h #ifndef MPI_FILE_NULL /*MPIO may be defined in mpi.h already */ # include mpio.h #endif #endif as there is no mpi.h available in a serial environment. So is this a bug or a feature and serial versions are no longer supported? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#746955: it is not possible to build a serial version anymore
Could you double check? Oh. libhdf5-serial-dev and libhdf5-mpi-dev were installed simultaneously. Is there some Conflict: missing? After installing libhdf5-dev everything was fine. Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#743489: license issues
Package: postgis Version: 2.1.2-1 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing licenses of: postgis-2.1.2\doc\xsl\* postgis-2.1.2\java\* (LGPL, BSD) postgis-2.1.2\liblwgeom\stringbuffer.* postgis-2.1.2\loader\* to debian/copyright. The link in the license of postgis-2.1.2\extras\ogc_test_suite\* does not work anymore. Please also add the license that your organization has signed to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#742039: missing license in debian/copyright
Package: shapelib Version: 1.3.0-1 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing licenses of: shapelib-1.3.0\contrib\* (Expat+LGPL, Expat, GPL2+, PD) shapelib-1.3.0\* (dual license Expat+LGPL) to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#741599: missing license in debian/copyright
Package: geographiclib Version: 1.34-1 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing expat license of dozens of files to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#737004: missing license in debian/copyright
Package: libepsilon Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing license of epsilon-0.9.2/lib/msvc/inttypes.h epsilon-0.9.2/lib/msvc/stdint.h to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: tinyows_1.1.0-3_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, On Sat, 4 Jan 2014, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: To my best understanding only the OGC Standards documents fall under the OGC Document Notice. http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/document Schemas and software are covered by the OGC Software Notice. http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/software Ok, the first paragraph of the Software Notice says: By obtaining, using and/or copying this work, you (the licensee) agree that you have read, understood, and will comply with the following terms and conditions. So in my understanding the enduser has to accept the conditions of this notice before he gets the work (By obtaining (...) this work you agree that you have read, (...) and will comply (...)). I guess this is not possible with Debians package management. At least he needs to comply when he uses it. I haven't looked that deeply at your package, but does it tell the user about this? 5.10 Is a schema or document definition (DTD) covered by the document or software terms? Schemas (and DTDs) are frequently part of our specifications and seemingly fall under the document copyright terms [2]. However, as long as you do not use the same formal namespace or public identifier to identify that modified OGC schema/DTD (which might confuse applications), you may treat the schema/DTD under the software terms. [3] This means that you are permitted to make a derivative or modified OGC schema/DTD, but even under the software terms [3] you are obligated to include/retain the OGC copyright notice. We further appreciate a couple sentences regarding who made the modifications, when, and what changes were made in the original DTD -- a common software documentation practice. We expect to revisit this topic as metadata schemas become an increasingly important part of OGC specifications and as the metadata schema definition capabilities of XML and other XML technologies advance. http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/legalfaq#DTD Ok, if this entry of the FAQ is really part of the license, I see another problem. The first sentence says that schemas are covered by the Document Notice (= no modifications allowed = non-free). Only if you use a different namespace, you may apply the Software Notice and do modifications. I think this is against DFSG#3 and not covered by the compromise in DFSG#4. The WFS tests are not explicitly mentioned as falling under the OGC Software Notice. So it can be argued that because they are conformance tests for the OGC Standards that OGC doesn't allow their modification. On the other hand the conformance tests are intended to be included in OGC compliant open source software, which is the reason for the more liberal OGC Software Notice. We could speculate about this, but I think a clear statement from OGC is needed here. Do you consider the OGC Sofware Notice used in this change to comply with the DFSG? I would say no, but the opinion of other ftpmasters is very welcome :-). Thorsten ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
tinyows_1.1.0-3_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. I am afraid that files under the OGC license are not allowed to enter main. Especially the paragraph: No right to create modifications or derivatives of OGC documents is granted pursuant to this license. However, if additional requirements (documented in the Copyright FAQ) are satisfied, the right to create modifications or derivatives is sometimes granted by the OGC to individuals complying with those requirements. does not comply with DFSG. So maybe you can move all OGC files to a non-free package? (Of course no package in main may depend on it ...) Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#525176: Bad path to colormap directory
Package: h5utils
Version: 1.10-7.1
When I invoke h5topng, I got the following error:
$ h5topng simple-eps-00.00.h5
Could not find colormap gray
When I do it with strace, I get the following output:
(...)
getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK, {rlim_cur=8192*1024, rlim_max=RLIM_INFINITY}) = 0
uname({sys=Linux, node=sid-vm, ...}) = 0
brk(0) = 0x9b23000
brk(0x9b44000) = 0x9b44000
open(${prefix}/share/h5utils/colormaps/gray, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(gray, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
write(2, Could not find colormap \gray\\n, 31Could not find colormap
gray) = 31
exit_group(1) = ?
So the first open() call looks a bit wrong ...
Thorsten
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
