Bug#694694: jruby: CVE-2012-5370

2012-11-29 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: jruby
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

Hi,
please see the Red Hat bug for details:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-5370

Cheers,
Moritz

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#690204: Bug#537051: Add no-await trigger support and Breaks to fix ca-certificates-java breakage

2012-11-29 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi!

On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 13:18:37 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
 Control: tag -1 patch
 
 Please find the attached patches which fix this problem. I've tested
 them a bit, but please review them.
 
 ca-certificates (20121112+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload
   * Breaks ca-certificates-java (20121112+nmu1); partially fixing #537051.
   * Provide update-ca-certificates and update-ca-certificates-fresh
 triggers.
   * Call the triggers using no-await so that the configuration files from
 the newer version of ca-certificates-java are in places before the
 upgrade. Closes: #537051.


 diff --git a/debian/ca-certificates.triggers b/debian/ca-certificates.triggers
 new file mode 100644
 index 000..14dec6e
 --- /dev/null
 +++ b/debian/ca-certificates.triggers
 @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
 +interest-noawait update-ca-certificates
 +interest-noawait update-ca-certificates-fresh

As these are not supported by squeeze's dpkg, this can cause upgrade
problems (see below).

 +interest update-ca-certificates
 +interest update-ca-certificates-fresh

(OOC why the duplicates?)

 diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
 index 5ef776e..8f84573 100644
 --- a/debian/control
 +++ b/debian/control
 @@ -13,9 +13,11 @@ Vcs-Browser: 
 http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/ca-certificates.git
  
  Package: ca-certificates
  Architecture: all
 +Pre-Depends: dpkg (= 1.16.1)

This only guarantees that this dpkg version will be configured before
installing this package, but not that the currently running dpkg will
be that one version, so the upgrade from squeeze can still fail due to
parser errors for the unknown triggers directive.

 diff --git a/debian/postinst b/debian/postinst
 index 198c57e..9964e27 100644
 --- a/debian/postinst
 +++ b/debian/postinst
 @@ -142,12 +142,29 @@ EOF
   # fix bogus symlink to ca-certificates.crt on upgrades; see
   # Debian #643667; drop after wheezy
   if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt-nl 20111025; then
 - update-ca-certificates --fresh
 + dpkg-trigger --no-await update-ca-certificates-fresh
   else
 - update-ca-certificates
 + dpkg-trigger --no-await update-ca-certificates
   fi
  ;;

This is of course fine, though.

Thanks,
Guillem

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


[bts-link] source package commons-httpclient

2012-11-29 Thread bts-link-upstream
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package commons-httpclient
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

# remote status report for #692442 (http://bugs.debian.org/692442)
# Bug title: CVE-2012-5783: Insecure certificate validation
#  * http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1265
#  * remote status changed: (?) - Resolved
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) - Won-t-Fix
#  * closed upstream
tags 692442 + fixed-upstream
usertags 692442 + status-Resolved resolution-Won-t-Fix

thanks

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


[bts-link] source package axis

2012-11-29 Thread bts-link-upstream
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package axis
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

# remote status report for #692650 (http://bugs.debian.org/692650)
# Bug title: axis: CVE-2012-5784
#  * http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2883
#  * remote status changed: (?) - Open
usertags 692650 + status-Open

thanks

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Processed: [bts-link] source package commons-httpclient

2012-11-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 #
 # bts-link upstream status pull for source package commons-httpclient
 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
 #
 user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was 
bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org).
 # remote status report for #692442 (http://bugs.debian.org/692442)
 # Bug title: CVE-2012-5783: Insecure certificate validation
 #  * http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1265
 #  * remote status changed: (?) - Resolved
 #  * remote resolution changed: (?) - Won-t-Fix
 #  * closed upstream
 tags 692442 + fixed-upstream
Bug #692442 [commons-httpclient] CVE-2012-5783: Insecure certificate validation
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
 usertags 692442 + status-Resolved resolution-Won-t-Fix
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-Resolved resolution-Won-t-Fix.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
692442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692442
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#690204: Bug#537051: Add no-await trigger support and Breaks to fix ca-certificates-java breakage

2012-11-29 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
 On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 13:18:37 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
  diff --git a/debian/ca-certificates.triggers 
  b/debian/ca-certificates.triggers
  new file mode 100644
  index 000..14dec6e
  --- /dev/null
  +++ b/debian/ca-certificates.triggers
  @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
  +interest-noawait update-ca-certificates
  +interest-noawait update-ca-certificates-fresh
 
 As these are not supported by squeeze's dpkg, this can cause upgrade
 problems (see below).
 
  +interest update-ca-certificates
  +interest update-ca-certificates-fresh
 
 (OOC why the duplicates?)

They're not duplicated; it can handle both noawait and non-noawait
triggers.
 
  diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
  index 5ef776e..8f84573 100644
  --- a/debian/control
  +++ b/debian/control
  @@ -13,9 +13,11 @@ Vcs-Browser: 
  http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/ca-certificates.git
   
   Package: ca-certificates
   Architecture: all
  +Pre-Depends: dpkg (= 1.16.1)
 
 This only guarantees that this dpkg version will be configured before
 installing this package, but not that the currently running dpkg will
 be that one version, so the upgrade from squeeze can still fail due to
 parser errors for the unknown triggers directive.

I've actually tested this, and it hasn't been a problem. I suppose the
only way you could get it to be one is if you were manually using
dpkg. If that's really the case, then it basically means that no
package in wheezy can use the noawait triggers at all.

[Unfortunately, the triggers have to be noawait triggers so that the
Breaks: ca-certificates-java comes into effect before the trigger
fires.]


Don Armstrong

-- 
I have no use for before and after pictures.
I can't remember starting, and I'm never done.
 -- a softer world #221
http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=221

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#690204: Bug#537051: Add no-await trigger support and Breaks to fix ca-certificates-java breakage

2012-11-29 Thread Michael Shuler
On 11/29/2012 10:48 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
 I've actually tested this, and it hasn't been a problem. I suppose the
 only way you could get it to be one is if you were manually using
 dpkg. If that's really the case, then it basically means that no
 package in wheezy can use the noawait triggers at all.

Just for documentation, I've attached a log of my testing a straight
dist-upgrade, prior to the uploads to unstable.

-- 
Kind regards,
Michael




ca-certificates_squeeze-wheezy_dist-upgrade.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#690888: RFS: update to libautomaton-java to publish maven artifacts

2012-11-29 Thread tony mancill
On 10/27/2012 06:00 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
 Hi,
 
 please sponsor my update to libautomaton-java (src: automaton). I moved the 
 packaging to Git, authorized by the last uploader Michael Banck:
 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/automaton.git
 
 The package can be build from git with git-buildpackage. Please tell me if 
 you'd prefer a source package for sponsoring.
 
 Regards,
 
 Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro

Hello Thomas,

I'm looking into sponsoring this upload.  However, I have a question
about the package version in the changelog.  The changelog contains:

automaton (1.11-8+dfsg1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low

  * Install maven artifacts (Closes: #690888)
  * Update debhelper compat level to 9
  * Update standards-version to 3.9.3
  * Add myself (Thomas Koch) to uploaders
  * Packaging moved to Git
  * fix lintian warning
copyright-refers-to-deprecated-bsd-license-file

 -- Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro  Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:36:19 +0100

automaton (1.11-8-1) unstable; urgency=low
snip

I'm not clear on why the package version is -8+dfsg1-1 instead of -8-2.
 Did you end up repacking the .orig.tar.gz?  (And if so, I don't see any
evidence of it in the pristine-tar branch.)

Would it be okay to set the package version to 1.11-8-2 for the
sponsored upload?

Thank you,
tony



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.