Bug#700256: [eclipse-jdt] confusing extended description

2013-02-10 Thread Filipus Klutiero

Package: eclipse-jdt
Version: 3.8.1-1
Severity: minor

The extended descriptions reads:

This package provides Java Development Tools, a complete and powerful 
Java IDE along with several editors, a refactoring engine, Ant and 
JUnit integration, a debugger, and many more features




First, it is not really clear what this means. It sounds like This 
package provides A, B along with C, D, E, F and many more features.

But we mean This package provides Java Development Tools, which is...

Second, JDT technically *is* not a Java IDE. It *provides* a Java IDE 
when installed with the Eclipse Platform.


Finally, it is redundant to qualify the Java IDE discussed as 
complete. Without a mention to the contrary, an IDE is assumed to be 
complete. If we think JDT provides unexpected features, these features 
should be mentioned instead.


I'd suggest the following as a starting point:

This package contains Java Development Tools. These provide a powerful 
Java IDE along with several editors, a refactoring engine, Ant and 
JUnit integration, a debugger, and many more features. 



__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#678459: [eclipse-jdt] missing determiner in extended description (debugger)

2012-06-21 Thread Filipus Klutiero

Package: eclipse-jdt
Version: 3.8.0~rc3-4
Severity: minor

The extended description ends with:
This package provides Java Development Tools, a complete and powerful 
Java IDE along with several editors, a refactoring engine, Ant and 
JUnit integration, debugger, and many more features.


A determiner is missing before debugger, presumably a.

By the way, the extended description of eclipse-platform-data needs to 
be synchronized with eclipse-platform's.





__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#664704: [eclipse-platform] eclipse not capitalized in extended description

2012-03-19 Thread Filipus Klutiero

Package: eclipse-platform
Version: 3.7.2-1
Severity: minor

The extended description contains:

This package provides the Eclipse Platform and is the base for all 
eclipse plug-ins, but it does not include any development plug-ins.


Eclipse is a proper noun and should be capitalized.

By the way, Eclipse plug-in has a very general sense which includes 
parts of the Eclipse Platform. In that sense, the above is incorrect. It 
would be nice to disambiguate. I suggest:


This package provides the Eclipse Platform and is the base for all 
Eclipse development plug-ins, but it does not include any.





__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#664708: [eclipse-rcp] incorrect syntax in extended description

2012-03-19 Thread Filipus Klutiero

Package: eclipse-rcp
Version: 3.7.2-1
Severity: minor

The extended description ends with:

This package includes Eclipse Rich Client Platform (RCP), which is the 
basis upon other Eclipse-based applications are built. 


There is something wrong in which is the basis upon other Eclipse-based 
applications are built. This should either read which is the basis 
other Eclipse-based applications are built upon or the basis upon 
which other Eclipse-based applications are built.


By the way, I do not think the RCP is an Eclipse application. I suggest:

This package includes the Eclipse Rich Client Platform (RCP), the basis 
upon which Eclipse RCP applications are built.




__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#655945: [eclipse] extended description implies PDE and JDK are not part of Eclipse SDK

2012-01-14 Thread Filipus Klutiero

Package: eclipse
Version: 3.7.1-1
Severity: minor

The extended description contains:
This package provides the whole Eclipse SDK, along with the Java 
Development Tools (JDT) and the Plugin Development Environment (PDE).


As explained in 
http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.7.1-201109091335/details.php, 
Eclipse SDK contains both JDT and PDE.




__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#655946: [eclipse-platform] Extended description contains misleading description of eclipse package

2012-01-14 Thread Filipus Klutiero

Package: eclipse-platform
Version: 3.7.1-1
Severity: normal

Eclipse is quite complex, and I think the package descriptions could 
make this complexity a little easier to get over. Here are a couple of 
issues in eclipse-platform's description.


The extended description contains:


This package provides only the Eclipse Platform. It does not include any
development plug-ins. These are available in different packages:

 * eclipse-jdt Java Development Tools
 * eclipse-pde Plug-in Development Tools
 * eclipse Complete development environment

This package is the base for all eclipse plug-ins.


The eclipse package does not contain the complete Eclipse development 
environment. It provides a Java development environment. I would say 
instead:



 * eclipse: Eclipse SDK, a Java development environment


However, the list is still misleading. It suggests that the eclipse 
package contains development plug-ins, but it does not, it only ensures 
these will be installed. In that sense, I'd probably just drop the 
eclipse entry. Also, please clarify that the list is non-exhaustive. 
Perhaps eclipse-cdt would be worth mentioning.


By the way, in the last sentence, eclipse should be capitalized.




__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#640868: [jxplorer] java not capitalized in extended description

2011-09-07 Thread Filipus Klutiero

Package: jxplorer
Version: 3.2.1+dfsg-5
Severity: minor

The extended description contains:


It should run on any java supporting operating system.
Java, the software platform, is a proper noun and should be capitalized 
(Java).




__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#568351: [libicu4j-java] unicode in short description

2010-02-03 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Package: libicu4j-java
Version: 4.0.1.1-1
Severity: minor

The short description reads:
Library for unicode support and internalisation

unicode should read Unicode. Unicode is a proper noun and should always be 
capitalized.



___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#407384: libswt3.2-gtk-jni: undeclared conflict with libswt-mozilla-gtk-3.2-jni

2007-01-17 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Package: libswt3.2-gtk-jni
Version: 3.2.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.6.4

libswt3.2-gtk-jni provides /usr/lib/jni/libswt-mozilla-gtk-3235.so, like
libswt-mozilla-gtk-3.2-jni which is already in testing.
libswt3.2-gtk-jni 3.2.1-4 and testing's libswt-mozilla-gtk-3.2-jni do
not conflict with each other.

This can be closed when properly fixed, or when swt-gtk 3.2.1-5, which
declares a conflict with libswt3.2-gtk-jni, reaches testing (assuming
that happens before Etch's release).


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers