[Pkg-javascript-devel] Naming convention for jquery pluggins
Hi, I am currently working on packaging a few JS packages which are plugins for jquery. I've noticed that none of the JS plugins include a dot, however, the plugins I am packaging do have a dot in the name. So, should I use: libjs-jquery.quicksearch (to follow upstream naming) Or should I use: libjs-jquery-quicksearch (to follow a Debian standard) Please voice your opinion. I'm not even sure there's a standard here... Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] What JS compressor should I use?
Hi, To make sure we're using DFSG stuff, I'm compressing the JS scripts myself, instead of using pre-minified JS from upstream. Nothing fancy, I'm sure that's best practice everyone uses here. However, which compressor should I use? I need my packages to build in Wheezy, which is why I currently use yui-compressor (which is available there as well). Though there may be other (better) alternatives which I didn't spot. I perfectly know that the resulting JS file (after compressing with yui-compressor) isn't the best possible result. Note that using Node isn't one of the options I'm considering, because it's simply too big (though yui-compressor seems to depend on on java, which isn't great either). Anything in wheezy-backport would be acceptable too. Advice welcome! Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of libjs-jquery.quicksearch_2.0.4-1_amd64.changes
libjs-jquery.quicksearch_2.0.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libjs-jquery.quicksearch_2.0.4-1_all.deb libjs-jquery.quicksearch_2.0.4-1.dsc libjs-jquery.quicksearch_2.0.4.orig.tar.xz libjs-jquery.quicksearch_2.0.4-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] What JS compressor should I use?
Le dimanche 17 août 2014 à 15:29 +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit : Hi, To make sure we're using DFSG stuff, I'm compressing the JS scripts myself, instead of using pre-minified JS from upstream. Nothing fancy, I'm sure that's best practice everyone uses here. However, which compressor should I use? I need my packages to build in Wheezy, which is why I currently use yui-compressor (which is available there as well). Though there may be other (better) alternatives which I didn't spot. I perfectly know that the resulting JS file (after compressing with yui-compressor) isn't the best possible result. Note that using Node isn't one of the options I'm considering, because it's simply too big (though yui-compressor seems to depend on on java, which isn't great either). Anything in wheezy-backport would be acceptable too. could you explain what too big means, especially when compared to java which, by all means, is bigger ? Jérémy ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] libjs-jquery.quicksearch_2.0.4-1_amd64.changes is NEW
binary:libjs-jquery.quicksearch is NEW. source:libjs-jquery.quicksearch is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will recieve an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#758310: libuv-dev: Current debian libuv version makes NeoVim compilation fail
Package: libuv-dev Version: 0.10.28-1 Followup-For: Bug #758310 neovim should better check (maybe through pkg-config) which version of libuv it is building against. Debian is currently only shipping the stable branch 0.10, while from your report I seem to understand that neovim is instead using the 0.11 development branch. Please note that 0.11 is just a stabilizing branch for the forthcoming 0.12, and both are not API compatible with 0.10. As it involves a soname bump and a new packages through NEW, the experimental 0.11 will never be part debian. However, the 0.12 release is approaching [0] and there are plans to have both 0.10 and 0.12 versions shipped with jessie [1]. Cheers, Luca [0] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/libuv/dRmWltlIDXU [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/libuv/WgESkNMAhxc -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libuv-dev depends on: ii libuv0.10 0.10.25-1 libuv-dev recommends no packages. libuv-dev suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#754756: libuv: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64: test suite issues
Le dimanche 17 août 2014 à 12:45 +0200, Luca Bruno a écrit : Source: libuv Followup-For: Bug #754756 It looks like there are transient failures in the testsuite, which unfortunately aren't deterministic and I'm unable to reproduce on my VMs and porter-boxes. Checking build-history, the same package fails-then-builds on different machines without clear patterns. As kfreebsd support doesn't seem too mature and these are keeping behind also linux packages, I think we should either: * drop the kfreebsd packages and remove them from testing * ignore testsuite failures (only on kfreebsd?) Any comments? I suspect the problem isn't with libuv per se, rather with the tests themselves. Can you identify a list of the tests that occasionally fail on kfreebsd ? Some libuv/nodejs tests fail when the environment is slow/under high load... Jérémy. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#754756: Bug#754756: libuv: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64: test suite issues
Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org ha scritto: I suspect the problem isn't with libuv per se, rather with the tests themselves. Either that, or something more complex in the libc/kernel path. Can you identify a list of the tests that occasionally fail on kfreebsd ? Some culprits in the past have been: * poll_duplex * poll_unidirectional * hrtime * fs_event_watch_file_current_dir * ipc_listen_before_write * threadpool_cancel_work However it is difficult to see a pattern, as even between minor debian revisions the results are different. Some libuv/nodejs tests fail when the environment is slow/under high load... I would expect to see timeouts in those cases (as opposed to hard failures), but it could as well be the case. Also some quirkiness in the host-side of the builders, which are still running kernel 9.0. In all these cases, it may make sense to avoid failing on test-suite failure on !linux. Are you ok with that? Cheers, Luca -- .''`. | ~[ Luca BRUNO ~ (kaeso) ]~ : :' : | Email: lucab (AT) debian.org ~ Debian Developer `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 0x3BFB9FB3 ~ Free Software supporter `-| HAM-radio callsign: IZ1WGT ~ Networking sorcerer signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-ws_0.4.32-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 22:53:13 +0200 Source: node-ws Binary: node-ws Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.4.32-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Ximin Luo infini...@pwned.gg Description: node-ws- RFC-6455 WebSocket implementation module for Node.js Changes: node-ws (0.4.32-1) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Ximin Luo ] * New upstream release. . [ Jérémy Lal ] * Move to pkg-javascript * Add autopkgtest require test Checksums-Sha1: f344aaf2ffb09d3dfff8b2bce2f78c9c7563dbe9 2037 node-ws_0.4.32-1.dsc 96d3f5060406659fdd7862e9231f4748295c1467 56009 node-ws_0.4.32.orig.tar.gz 6578a53371b4ee928d456c691c4a722601b7ecbe 4652 node-ws_0.4.32-1.debian.tar.xz 60e946e4271e269fe93142d4a99078de51543df3 40072 node-ws_0.4.32-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 56f075eb7c16a46aa2cae10dd8c46c124c258a20878d4fee0978cdaad16cb9ca 2037 node-ws_0.4.32-1.dsc ba95d30d23d31068b144f45e49e4c97cb0c47e6e7b8de4685998f5ecf7cbcefc 56009 node-ws_0.4.32.orig.tar.gz 7559a8429e0fb6cd45e7158e79fb912fefbbd8152579cf4c82156eba90c9b816 4652 node-ws_0.4.32-1.debian.tar.xz 5a6bea532410aacee2e4700b23976156dd23e8936a9626200a3cadc4f9487124 40072 node-ws_0.4.32-1_amd64.deb Files: 45c7f5d95bc62be15f061bd79517cc22 40072 web extra node-ws_0.4.32-1_amd64.deb 9a0125448d9608f086ea3c67ff95a9ce 2037 web extra node-ws_0.4.32-1.dsc d5d98536ad69d1058b774f0559d97aea 56009 web extra node-ws_0.4.32.orig.tar.gz a1e9d61cb3f24a1dec6cac304d124e4d 4652 web extra node-ws_0.4.32-1.debian.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJT8RaAAAoJEGYRwF7dOfN0KyoP/RM9C+vRQzrxa9aoRXAthUm6 0eMLqpNo/ZJTCbMSYjgytGysG7fiX/F1u1XtaRRJFmT8/p++mdIPLQnwzLhSOga7 w2Rks87iFPasryJbHe7WNTkVaFeQDgGNxhIfZAj/AP6hV3Dcp0Y2jcHtSKkNXHZ4 WHMIzQd2NpIpy3s+rw/39rSd3CTKE4dEqm0944dgpE2gI7AHLIxzTpZCnnFkilw3 PX81JjvIl2XTKz+YDIGS55o8gwhf858MOtED95k5gc+VVJElMUm740OENhmcbB7n uEokUdNS+/fvfgajPa/X8w0cyI5MeyeM5aThlABBltV6OG62XixLpYum+oWFFuYm x72C4RW6UtAOZBf3eVnPSQA5qsltEhJPY2oimbcsKlhLvkfsGIcyXXhS1Ko/rSJ7 KgTQwtlxD6sKMiEZ34J1ZhM8NdVg6om52SOvCwkkT/Tm1ZA/jZDvV+sIYhhfwaCK mrXgVfuCvc1RMJKVFG6IJPFwtwjzpuGT7QgYWMPfEy1fZwFDiP6hRD4Jib9OQqcP zpqS4tF+dG5uwYlA2PGES9DSOCV1rJr87tBJRJn58NpHSJMCvA+rkpQNTLVFqSPC YVZuxtq9RQLimk9M1MFOYLDkDJGvLcHPjMOGOJeyLgQ4x+asbfMxXCArgd6wpZyK p8CCkNBDMThFY3gN4dkv =uHdr -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
