[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-aproba_1.0.4-1_amd64.changes is NEW
binary:node-aproba is NEW. binary:node-aproba is NEW. source:node-aproba is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-aproba_1.0.4-1_amd64.changes
node-aproba_1.0.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-aproba_1.0.4-1.dsc node-aproba_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz node-aproba_1.0.4-1.debian.tar.xz node-aproba_1.0.4-1_all.deb node-aproba_1.0.4-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-aproba-1.0.4
On ശനി 07 ജനുവരി 2017 10:23 രാവിലെ, Tushar Agey wrote: >> 1. When you move this to alioth, rename the repo to node-aproba >> 2. Enable tests in debian/rules > I have enabled the tests in debian/rules >> 3. You should target it to experimental > Done >> 4. Even though you claim it is lintian clean, there is one warning left. >> W: node-aproba: description-too-long >> N: >> N:The first line of the "Description:" must not exceed 80 characters. >> N: > Done >> You should fix all warnings to say lintian clean. > Done! > The link to the repo:- > https://git.fosscommunity.in/tushar/aproba.git > Uploaded, thanks! Please add debian/1.0.4-1 tag to your repo. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-is-obj_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes is NEW
binary:node-is-obj is NEW. binary:node-is-obj is NEW. source:node-is-obj is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-is-obj_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes
node-is-obj_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-is-obj_1.0.1-1.dsc node-is-obj_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz node-is-obj_1.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz node-is-obj_1.0.1-1_all.deb node-is-obj_1.0.1-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-tweetnacl_0.14.5+dfsg-1_amd64.changes is NEW
binary:node-tweetnacl is NEW. binary:node-tweetnacl is NEW. source:node-tweetnacl is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-tweetnacl_0.14.5+dfsg-1_amd64.changes
node-tweetnacl_0.14.5+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-tweetnacl_0.14.5+dfsg-1.dsc node-tweetnacl_0.14.5+dfsg.orig.tar.xz node-tweetnacl_0.14.5+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz node-tweetnacl_0.14.5+dfsg-1_all.deb node-tweetnacl_0.14.5+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-json-schema_0.2.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On വ്യാഴം 12 ജനുവരി 2017 01:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > maintainer address bounces ... Its a typo, copying the correct address (from ITP). Aman, please fix your email address. You may have to fix your ~/.bashrc as well. > Thorsten > > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-is-obj_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, I have pushed the changes to https://git.fosscommunity.in/gauravjuvekar/node-is-obj.git I based the newer description on the node-isarray package in sid. Do I need to update the debian/1.0.1-1 tag in the repo to HEAD? -- Regards, Gaurav Juvekar signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-tweetnacl_0.14.5+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On വ്യാഴം 12 ജനുവരി 2017 03:30 രാവിലെ, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi, > > I assume that your Build-depends: of uglifyjs is just a type. > > Thanks! > Thorsten > I thought the same too, but it was built fine with sbuild. node-uglify provides uglifyjs. $ apt-cache show node-uglify Package: node-uglify Source: uglifyjs Version: 2.7.5-1 Installed-Size: 557 Maintainer: Debian Javascript MaintainersArchitecture: all Provides: uglifyjs Uploaded again. > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#850879: Bug#850879: datatables.js: Build uses static filenames in /tmp, does not catch errors
Sascha Steinbiss wrote... > Do you mean 'do not apply the patch as-is'? If so, can you elaborate > please? Of course I understand that it's better to have upstream come up > with their own solution, but that doesn't mean that your patch isn't > helpful ;) Replace "-1" with "850879" two times in the patch header since I didn't have that bit of information by the time of the writing. Claims I wrote my message to enforce a thorough review are completeley unsubstantiated. > I'm not really sure about the 'grep "_buildInclude('" > DataTables.js.build >&2' line in make.sh though -- is it really > required or just a debugging relic? But it worked! You're right, please drop that. Christoph signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] [bts-link] source package src:npm
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:npm # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #850322 (http://bugs.debian.org/850322) # Bug title: npm: CVE-2016-3956 # * https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/8380 # * remote status changed: (?) -> closed usertags 850322 + status-closed thanks -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#850879: Bug#850879: datatables.js: Build uses static filenames in /tmp, does not catch errors
Hi Christoph, thanks for your bug report. > the build process for the datatables.js package uses static filenames > in /tmp/, among them /tmp/closure_error.log which also does not get > removed. I see, you are absolutely right! There are definitely better ways to do this on shared systems such as buildd machines. > The much worse thing: The build does *not* catch that situation. Instead, > the package is happily built with zero-sized files. Ouch. > The patch attached adds the usage of a random temporary directory that > is cleaned up upon exit. Also the make.sh script now uses errexit. This > should catch all unexpected errors during execution. True. This looks like a much cleaner solution and is quite similar to how I write most of my my autopkgtest scripts. > According to diffoscope, the created binary packages are bitwise > identical. Sounds good, thanks for checking! I have forwarded the report to upstream and also mentioned your patch. > Christoph, do not apply as-is ^^ Do you mean 'do not apply the patch as-is'? If so, can you elaborate please? Of course I understand that it's better to have upstream come up with their own solution, but that doesn't mean that your patch isn't helpful ;) I'm not really sure about the 'grep "_buildInclude('" DataTables.js.build >&2' line in make.sh though -- is it really required or just a debugging relic? Cheers Sascha signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel