[Pkg-kde-extras] qt-gstreamer 1.2.0-2 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the qt-gstreamer source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.10.2-2.1 Current version: 1.2.0-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#786363: qapt: needs update for qt-gstreamer 1.2
Technically the binNMU worked. Selecting the relevant packages from gstreamer0.10-qapt Version: 1.3.0-2.1+b1 Depends: ... libqtglib-2.0-0 (= 0.10.1), libqtgstreamer-1.0-0 (= 0.10.1), The problem is the package name is still gstreamer0.10-qapt, which is confusing. We could rename it, but that would then trigger time in NEW. After talking it over with Lisandro, my feeling is we don't need qapt to be blocking the qtgstreamer transition, though we should have a lower priority bug to clean up the package name. (I'm not sure if that means this bug should be closed and a new one opened, or this one should be downgraded and stop blocking 760003.) What do you think? Diane ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Processed: Re: qapt: needs update for qt-gstreamer 1.2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: unblock 760003 by 786363 Bug #760003 [release.debian.org] transition: qt-gstreamer 760003 was blocked by: 786363 783674 786391 731121 760003 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 760003: 786363 severity 786363 normal Bug #786363 [src:qapt] qapt: needs update for qt-gstreamer 1.2 Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' retitle 786363 Binaries should not be named after the gstreamer version Bug #786363 [src:qapt] qapt: needs update for qt-gstreamer 1.2 Changed Bug title to 'Binaries should not be named after the gstreamer version' from 'qapt: needs update for qt-gstreamer 1.2' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 760003: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760003 786363: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786363 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#786363: qapt: needs update for qt-gstreamer 1.2
unblock 760003 by 786363 severity 786363 normal retitle 786363 Binaries should not be named after the gstreamer version thanks On Saturday 30 May 2015 12:10:14 Diane Trout wrote: [snip] (I'm not sure if that means this bug should be closed and a new one opened, or this one should be downgraded and stop blocking 760003.) Let's just remove the block and rename it accordingly. qapt maintainers: the binary packages produced by qapt do not expose the gstreamer API, so they should not be marked with the gstreamer version they where linked against (except if you at some point want to make two available versions of the gstreamer backend, which I hardly doubt). Moreover they are not public libraries but private ones, so they can be renamed accordingly (maybe even called plugin?) Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- UNIX is basically a simple operating system, but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity. Dennis Ritchie Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
