Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde (final conclusions)
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:49:33AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: We should kill meta-kde and update meta-kde4 to some final layout. ... After leaving this issue sleep a couple of weeks, I am all for: kde-full (current kde4) kde-minimal kde-thirdparty And we can keep using kde-$MEANING for the metapackages. Since we have to go to NEW i will add already kde-thirdparty with RECOMMENDS in amarok, ktorrent, yakuake, rsibreak anything else? I do not know if we need kde-development, and what to put here. If you think it is worth it, anwser here why :D Another question: kde-full should provide kde ? We really need to move forward with the metapackages before people get very used to current ones... Ana -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde (final conclusions)
On Mié 22 Abr 2009 13:07:02 Ana Guerrero escribió: On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:49:33AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: We should kill meta-kde and update meta-kde4 to some final layout. ... After leaving this issue sleep a couple of weeks, I am all for: kde-full (current kde4) kde-minimal kde-thirdparty And we can keep using kde-$MEANING for the metapackages. +1 Since we have to go to NEW i will add already kde-thirdparty with RECOMMENDS in amarok, ktorrent, yakuake, rsibreak anything else? ¿konversation maybe? Another question: kde-full should provide kde ? IMHO, the metapackage kde should not exist. We really need to move forward with the metapackages before people get very used to current ones... I do also agree here. Reagrds, Lisandro. -- http://mx.grulic.org.ar/lurker/message/20081108.174208.4f42e55c.es.html Así se corrobora el software legal en Argentina Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
