Re: SPECS (AC-branch): kernel-vanilla.spec - fix for PPC failing when ...
Dnia sobota, 16 czerwca 2007, Marcin Król napisał: vanilla means unmodified. And you are changing that kernel. Doesn't matter if it's cosmetics or not. No matter if it's patch or sed. Yes. I know all that. By my previous mail I was trying to say: then it was never vanilla kernel as sed was used to modify makefile since the first revision. mv kernel-vanilla.spec kernel-millivanilli.spec on the CVS side? ;) -- Łukasz [DeeJay1] Jernaś ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: vim.spec - with python, ruby and tcl by default - rel 3 for...
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:20:07PM +0200, czarny wrote: Author: czarny Date: Tue Jun 5 15:20:07 2007 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: - with python, ruby and tcl by default IIRC this makes vim binary depend on python, ruby and tcl libraries. Is it worth its profits? -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: vim.spec - with python, ruby and tcl by default - rel 3 for...
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 05:41:19PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:20:07PM +0200, czarny wrote: Author: czarny Date: Tue Jun 5 15:20:07 2007 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: - with python, ruby and tcl by default IIRC this makes vim binary depend on python, ruby and tcl libraries. Is it worth its profits? imho it should be off by default. if one wants fat vim, then please create vim-enahnced/vim-fat/whatever packages. regards, wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: vim.spec - with python, ruby and tcl by default - rel 3 for...
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 09:45:54PM +0200, Cezary Krzyzanowski wrote:
Dnia 17-06-2007, N o godzinie 17:55 +0100, wrobell napisał(a):
imho it should be off by default. if one wants fat vim, then please create
vim-enahnced/vim-fat/whatever packages.
1. What is fat? perl is fat for me, python not and it was on by default
2. Vim static is the choice for slim solutions.
Just for the record:
$ rpm -q --qf '%-12{NAME}: %{SIZE}\n' perl-base python-libs ruby tcl vim-rt
perl-base : 2936355
python-libs : 1828755
ruby: 1094668
tcl : 4306684
vim-rt : 14952921
(assuming that libs packages suffice to run vim without complaints)
But the original question was: do particular language support overhead is
worth its benefits?
Are there already some packaged or custom vim addons which need all these
languages?
--
Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
NEW poldek 0.20070617.23 - please test
Hello, New poldek snap (0.20070617.23) was sent to Th builders. It has improvements in handling package colors and *tadam* multilib capabilities. Please test :) -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: NEW poldek 0.20070617.23 - please test
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 11:42:22PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: New poldek snap (0.20070617.23) was sent to Th builders. It has improvements in handling package colors and *tadam* multilib capabilities. Please test :) błąd: libxslt-1.1.21-1.athlon package color (0) is not equal to libxslt-1.1.21-1.athlon.rpm's one (1) błąd: libxslt-progs-1.1.21-1.athlon package color (0) is not equal to libxslt-progs-1.1.21-1.athlon.rpm's one (1) There were package coloring mismatches. Proceed? [y/N] wolf -- Bartek . Taudul : .: w o l f @ p l d - l i n u x . o r g.:. http://wolf.valkyrie.one.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: NEW poldek 0.20070617.23 - please test
2007/6/18, Bartosz Taudul [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 11:42:22PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: New poldek snap (0.20070617.23) was sent to Th builders. It has improvements in handling package colors and *tadam* multilib capabilities. Please test :) błąd: libxslt-1.1.21-1.athlon package color (0) is not equal to libxslt-1.1.21-1.athlon.rpm's one (1) błąd: libxslt-progs-1.1.21-1.athlon package color (0) is not equal to libxslt-progs-1.1.21-1.athlon.rpm's one (1) There were package coloring mismatches. Proceed? [y/N] touch /var/lib/rpm/Packages and re-run poldek. Regards -- Artur Frysiak ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
