Re: [polymer-dev] Contributing To polymer

[Karl Tiedt]

Tomek,

It looks like AJ (@garlicnation) grabbed one of issues recently (12 days
ago), but seeing as there are quite a few issues and PR's here that are
close to or above a month I have reached out to Taylor about these and
about discussing a process to better address future issues and PRs in a
more efficient manner. Can't make any promises but, I'll see what comes of
it.


-Karl Tiedt

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Tomek W  wrote:

> Thanks Vladimir for starting this topic,
>
> Karl Could you poke someone for me as well? ;)
>
> Here is the small list of PRs I have made
>
> - Polymer: Set latest firefox addon for testing
>  PR https://github.com/Polymer/polymer/pull/3761
>  issue https://github.com/Polymer/polymer/issues/3760
>
> I feel it is needed, as Polymer is being tested on outdated version
>
> I have created an issue, signed the CLA, and believe that extremely simple
> one to review and merge.
>
> - WebComponentsJS: Execute onload callback for empty resources
>  PR https://github.com/webcomponents/webcomponentsjs/pull/536
>  issue https://github.com/webcomponents/webcomponentsjs/issues/535
>
> I feel it's needed as polyfill different than to spec and native browser
> CLA, issue and tests ar in place
>
> - PolymerElements/iron-component-page: master branch is hard-coded
>  Issue https://github.com/PolymerElements/iron-component-page/issues/101
>  PR https://github.com/PolymerElements/iron-component-page/pull/102
>
> There is also another issue that popped out that would be fixed by my PR
> https://github.com/PolymerElements/iron-component-page/issues/44
>
> I really try to respect contribution as much as I can
>
> As Vladimir, I would also appreciate some feedback.
>
> Thanks,
> Tomek Wytrębowicz
>
>
> W dniu poniedziałek, 11 lipca 2016 23:04:40 UTC+2 użytkownik Vladimir
> Iftodi napisał:
>>
>> Awesome.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> On 11 July 2016 at 22:33, Karl Tiedt  wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the additional information, I'll see if I can prod a couple
>>> people into responding, it does appear that you have done everything
>>> correct on your side regarding opening an issue and a PR. I can't look at
>>> the code right now (nor could I approve it) but, hopefully someone from the
>>> Polymer Team can get back to you soon via Github.
>>>
>>> -Karl Tiedt
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:01 PM,  wrote:
>>>
 Hello,

 Thank you for your reply.

 These are the two pull requests I have made, they allow to position the
 label on the left side of a checkbox/toggle-button.

 https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-checkbox/pull/126
 https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-toggle-button/pull/95

 As for your other question, they are PR that I felt were needed, but I
 have created an issue as that's what I understood must be done related to
 the contribution guide document.
 This feature is something I have a need for and googling gave me no
 clean answer for polymer yet there are some questions on stackoverflow on
 how to do this with other frameworks/widget libraries/etc.

 I have read the contribution guide and tried to respect it as much as I
 could. I have made an issue related to the pull request, even made tests.

 I would appreciate some feedback, currently I am completely unaware of
 the state of those pull requests. Are they deliberately ignored? Is the
 feature not needed? It doesn't respect the contribution guide/code
 style/variable naming/etc; Maybe it hasn't even been looked at yet, but
 still I would greatly appreciate some feedback, a comment stating the state
 it is in,  instead of just silence.

 Thank you

 On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 7:40:04 PM UTC+2, Karl Tiedt wrote:
>
> This isn't an uncommon problem with any Open Source project...
> however, your email really does nothing to help resolve your concerns... 
> If
> I were to look at only the information provided here in this email, I 
> would
> be forced to assume that your Pull Requests contain a similar lack of
> information and that *may* be why they have not received more visible
> attention. However, let us assume that is not the case and look a little
> closer, just at this email.
>
> If you are going to voice concern over a problem relating to two very
> specific things (your PRs in this case), you should provide context for
> those things so that your email has a snowball's chance in hell of
> eliciting a positive change. Currently what we (the community know) is
> equivalent to a bad bug report "It broke". However, if you provide the
> information related to those PRs, like do they address open bugs or were
> they just PR's you felt were needed? You'll get a lot farther when this
> information is readily available to those you are seeking to prod into
> action.
>
> -Karl Tiedt
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:06

Re: [polymer-dev] Contributing To polymer

[Tomek W]

Thanks Vladimir for starting this topic,

Karl Could you poke someone for me as well? ;)

Here is the small list of PRs I have made

- Polymer: Set latest firefox addon for testing 
 PR https://github.com/Polymer/polymer/pull/3761
 issue https://github.com/Polymer/polymer/issues/3760

I feel it is needed, as Polymer is being tested on outdated version

I have created an issue, signed the CLA, and believe that extremely simple 
one to review and merge.

- WebComponentsJS: Execute onload callback for empty resources 
 PR https://github.com/webcomponents/webcomponentsjs/pull/536
 issue https://github.com/webcomponents/webcomponentsjs/issues/535
 
I feel it's needed as polyfill different than to spec and native browser
CLA, issue and tests ar in place

- PolymerElements/iron-component-page: master branch is hard-coded
 Issue https://github.com/PolymerElements/iron-component-page/issues/101
 PR https://github.com/PolymerElements/iron-component-page/pull/102

There is also another issue that popped out that would be fixed by my PR 
https://github.com/PolymerElements/iron-component-page/issues/44 

I really try to respect contribution as much as I can

As Vladimir, I would also appreciate some feedback.

Thanks,
Tomek Wytrębowicz


W dniu poniedziałek, 11 lipca 2016 23:04:40 UTC+2 użytkownik Vladimir 
Iftodi napisał:
>
> Awesome.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> On 11 July 2016 at 22:33, Karl Tiedt > 
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the additional information, I'll see if I can prod a couple 
>> people into responding, it does appear that you have done everything 
>> correct on your side regarding opening an issue and a PR. I can't look at 
>> the code right now (nor could I approve it) but, hopefully someone from the 
>> Polymer Team can get back to you soon via Github.
>>
>> -Karl Tiedt
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:01 PM, > 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your reply.
>>>
>>> These are the two pull requests I have made, they allow to position the 
>>> label on the left side of a checkbox/toggle-button.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-checkbox/pull/126
>>> https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-toggle-button/pull/95
>>>
>>> As for your other question, they are PR that I felt were needed, but I 
>>> have created an issue as that's what I understood must be done related to 
>>> the contribution guide document.
>>> This feature is something I have a need for and googling gave me no 
>>> clean answer for polymer yet there are some questions on stackoverflow on 
>>> how to do this with other frameworks/widget libraries/etc.
>>>
>>> I have read the contribution guide and tried to respect it as much as I 
>>> could. I have made an issue related to the pull request, even made tests.
>>>
>>> I would appreciate some feedback, currently I am completely unaware of 
>>> the state of those pull requests. Are they deliberately ignored? Is the 
>>> feature not needed? It doesn't respect the contribution guide/code 
>>> style/variable naming/etc; Maybe it hasn't even been looked at yet, but 
>>> still I would greatly appreciate some feedback, a comment stating the state 
>>> it is in,  instead of just silence.
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 7:40:04 PM UTC+2, Karl Tiedt wrote:

 This isn't an uncommon problem with any Open Source project... however, 
 your email really does nothing to help resolve your concerns... If I were 
 to look at only the information provided here in this email, I would be 
 forced to assume that your Pull Requests contain a similar lack of 
 information and that *may* be why they have not received more visible 
 attention. However, let us assume that is not the case and look a little 
 closer, just at this email.

 If you are going to voice concern over a problem relating to two very 
 specific things (your PRs in this case), you should provide context for 
 those things so that your email has a snowball's chance in hell of 
 eliciting a positive change. Currently what we (the community know) is 
 equivalent to a bad bug report "It broke". However, if you provide the 
 information related to those PRs, like do they address open bugs or were 
 they just PR's you felt were needed? You'll get a lot farther when this 
 information is readily available to those you are seeking to prod into 
 action.

 -Karl Tiedt

 On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:06 AM,  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> It's been almost a month since I've opened 2 pull requests, they have 
> been completely ignored, I have not received a single comment related to 
> the state of my pull requests.
>
> I find this very discouraging and doubt many developers would want to 
> contribute to polymer if their respective pull requests/contributions are 
> treated in a similar manner.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
> --- 
>

Re: [polymer-dev] Contributing To polymer

[Vladimir Iftodi]

Awesome.

Thank you very much.

On 11 July 2016 at 22:33, Karl Tiedt  wrote:

> Thanks for the additional information, I'll see if I can prod a couple
> people into responding, it does appear that you have done everything
> correct on your side regarding opening an issue and a PR. I can't look at
> the code right now (nor could I approve it) but, hopefully someone from the
> Polymer Team can get back to you soon via Github.
>
> -Karl Tiedt
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:01 PM,  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thank you for your reply.
>>
>> These are the two pull requests I have made, they allow to position the
>> label on the left side of a checkbox/toggle-button.
>>
>> https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-checkbox/pull/126
>> https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-toggle-button/pull/95
>>
>> As for your other question, they are PR that I felt were needed, but I
>> have created an issue as that's what I understood must be done related to
>> the contribution guide document.
>> This feature is something I have a need for and googling gave me no clean
>> answer for polymer yet there are some questions on stackoverflow on how to
>> do this with other frameworks/widget libraries/etc.
>>
>> I have read the contribution guide and tried to respect it as much as I
>> could. I have made an issue related to the pull request, even made tests.
>>
>> I would appreciate some feedback, currently I am completely unaware of
>> the state of those pull requests. Are they deliberately ignored? Is the
>> feature not needed? It doesn't respect the contribution guide/code
>> style/variable naming/etc; Maybe it hasn't even been looked at yet, but
>> still I would greatly appreciate some feedback, a comment stating the state
>> it is in,  instead of just silence.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 7:40:04 PM UTC+2, Karl Tiedt wrote:
>>>
>>> This isn't an uncommon problem with any Open Source project... however,
>>> your email really does nothing to help resolve your concerns... If I were
>>> to look at only the information provided here in this email, I would be
>>> forced to assume that your Pull Requests contain a similar lack of
>>> information and that *may* be why they have not received more visible
>>> attention. However, let us assume that is not the case and look a little
>>> closer, just at this email.
>>>
>>> If you are going to voice concern over a problem relating to two very
>>> specific things (your PRs in this case), you should provide context for
>>> those things so that your email has a snowball's chance in hell of
>>> eliciting a positive change. Currently what we (the community know) is
>>> equivalent to a bad bug report "It broke". However, if you provide the
>>> information related to those PRs, like do they address open bugs or were
>>> they just PR's you felt were needed? You'll get a lot farther when this
>>> information is readily available to those you are seeking to prod into
>>> action.
>>>
>>> -Karl Tiedt
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:06 AM,  wrote:
>>>
 Hello,

 It's been almost a month since I've opened 2 pull requests, they have
 been completely ignored, I have not received a single comment related to
 the state of my pull requests.

 I find this very discouraging and doubt many developers would want to
 contribute to polymer if their respective pull requests/contributions are
 treated in a similar manner.

 Thank you.

 Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups "Polymer" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to polymer-dev...@googlegroups.com.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/940c3e70-c5e6-4277-9c42-29a12b62c8cd%40googlegroups.com
 
 .
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

>>>
>>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Polymer" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to polymer-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/39195246-ee65-4ad5-a0f1-7e3baed0dd9f%40googlegroups.com
>> 
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from thi

Re: [polymer-dev] Contributing To polymer

[Karl Tiedt]

Thanks for the additional information, I'll see if I can prod a couple
people into responding, it does appear that you have done everything
correct on your side regarding opening an issue and a PR. I can't look at
the code right now (nor could I approve it) but, hopefully someone from the
Polymer Team can get back to you soon via Github.

-Karl Tiedt

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:01 PM,  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> These are the two pull requests I have made, they allow to position the
> label on the left side of a checkbox/toggle-button.
>
> https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-checkbox/pull/126
> https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-toggle-button/pull/95
>
> As for your other question, they are PR that I felt were needed, but I
> have created an issue as that's what I understood must be done related to
> the contribution guide document.
> This feature is something I have a need for and googling gave me no clean
> answer for polymer yet there are some questions on stackoverflow on how to
> do this with other frameworks/widget libraries/etc.
>
> I have read the contribution guide and tried to respect it as much as I
> could. I have made an issue related to the pull request, even made tests.
>
> I would appreciate some feedback, currently I am completely unaware of the
> state of those pull requests. Are they deliberately ignored? Is the feature
> not needed? It doesn't respect the contribution guide/code style/variable
> naming/etc; Maybe it hasn't even been looked at yet, but still I would
> greatly appreciate some feedback, a comment stating the state it is in,
>  instead of just silence.
>
> Thank you
>
> On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 7:40:04 PM UTC+2, Karl Tiedt wrote:
>>
>> This isn't an uncommon problem with any Open Source project... however,
>> your email really does nothing to help resolve your concerns... If I were
>> to look at only the information provided here in this email, I would be
>> forced to assume that your Pull Requests contain a similar lack of
>> information and that *may* be why they have not received more visible
>> attention. However, let us assume that is not the case and look a little
>> closer, just at this email.
>>
>> If you are going to voice concern over a problem relating to two very
>> specific things (your PRs in this case), you should provide context for
>> those things so that your email has a snowball's chance in hell of
>> eliciting a positive change. Currently what we (the community know) is
>> equivalent to a bad bug report "It broke". However, if you provide the
>> information related to those PRs, like do they address open bugs or were
>> they just PR's you felt were needed? You'll get a lot farther when this
>> information is readily available to those you are seeking to prod into
>> action.
>>
>> -Karl Tiedt
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:06 AM,  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> It's been almost a month since I've opened 2 pull requests, they have
>>> been completely ignored, I have not received a single comment related to
>>> the state of my pull requests.
>>>
>>> I find this very discouraging and doubt many developers would want to
>>> contribute to polymer if their respective pull requests/contributions are
>>> treated in a similar manner.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Polymer" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to polymer-dev...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/940c3e70-c5e6-4277-9c42-29a12b62c8cd%40googlegroups.com
>>> 
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Polymer" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to polymer-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/39195246-ee65-4ad5-a0f1-7e3baed0dd9f%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to polymer-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev

Re: [polymer-dev] Contributing To polymer

[vladimir . iftodi]

Hello,

Thank you for your reply.

These are the two pull requests I have made, they allow to position the 
label on the left side of a checkbox/toggle-button.

https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-checkbox/pull/126
https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-toggle-button/pull/95

As for your other question, they are PR that I felt were needed, but I have 
created an issue as that's what I understood must be done related to the 
contribution guide document.
This feature is something I have a need for and googling gave me no clean 
answer for polymer yet there are some questions on stackoverflow on how to 
do this with other frameworks/widget libraries/etc.

I have read the contribution guide and tried to respect it as much as I 
could. I have made an issue related to the pull request, even made tests.

I would appreciate some feedback, currently I am completely unaware of the 
state of those pull requests. Are they deliberately ignored? Is the feature 
not needed? It doesn't respect the contribution guide/code style/variable 
naming/etc; Maybe it hasn't even been looked at yet, but still I would 
greatly appreciate some feedback, a comment stating the state it is in, 
 instead of just silence.

Thank you

On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 7:40:04 PM UTC+2, Karl Tiedt wrote:
>
> This isn't an uncommon problem with any Open Source project... however, 
> your email really does nothing to help resolve your concerns... If I were 
> to look at only the information provided here in this email, I would be 
> forced to assume that your Pull Requests contain a similar lack of 
> information and that *may* be why they have not received more visible 
> attention. However, let us assume that is not the case and look a little 
> closer, just at this email.
>
> If you are going to voice concern over a problem relating to two very 
> specific things (your PRs in this case), you should provide context for 
> those things so that your email has a snowball's chance in hell of 
> eliciting a positive change. Currently what we (the community know) is 
> equivalent to a bad bug report "It broke". However, if you provide the 
> information related to those PRs, like do they address open bugs or were 
> they just PR's you felt were needed? You'll get a lot farther when this 
> information is readily available to those you are seeking to prod into 
> action.
>
> -Karl Tiedt
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:06 AM, > 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It's been almost a month since I've opened 2 pull requests, they have 
>> been completely ignored, I have not received a single comment related to 
>> the state of my pull requests.
>>
>> I find this very discouraging and doubt many developers would want to 
>> contribute to polymer if their respective pull requests/contributions are 
>> treated in a similar manner.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Polymer" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to polymer-dev...@googlegroups.com .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/940c3e70-c5e6-4277-9c42-29a12b62c8cd%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> 
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to polymer-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/39195246-ee65-4ad5-a0f1-7e3baed0dd9f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [polymer-dev] Contributing To polymer

[Karl Tiedt]

This isn't an uncommon problem with any Open Source project... however,
your email really does nothing to help resolve your concerns... If I were
to look at only the information provided here in this email, I would be
forced to assume that your Pull Requests contain a similar lack of
information and that *may* be why they have not received more visible
attention. However, let us assume that is not the case and look a little
closer, just at this email.

If you are going to voice concern over a problem relating to two very
specific things (your PRs in this case), you should provide context for
those things so that your email has a snowball's chance in hell of
eliciting a positive change. Currently what we (the community know) is
equivalent to a bad bug report "It broke". However, if you provide the
information related to those PRs, like do they address open bugs or were
they just PR's you felt were needed? You'll get a lot farther when this
information is readily available to those you are seeking to prod into
action.

-Karl Tiedt

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:06 AM,  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> It's been almost a month since I've opened 2 pull requests, they have been
> completely ignored, I have not received a single comment related to the
> state of my pull requests.
>
> I find this very discouraging and doubt many developers would want to
> contribute to polymer if their respective pull requests/contributions are
> treated in a similar manner.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Polymer" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to polymer-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/940c3e70-c5e6-4277-9c42-29a12b62c8cd%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to polymer-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CADNgbTGUwZQPoxBmLGFSUHU_UjnNJVj4m4AcJWU%3DXyTBNfzzLw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[polymer-dev] Contributing To polymer

[vladimir . iftodi]

Hello,

It's been almost a month since I've opened 2 pull requests, they have been 
completely ignored, I have not received a single comment related to the 
state of my pull requests.

I find this very discouraging and doubt many developers would want to 
contribute to polymer if their respective pull requests/contributions are 
treated in a similar manner.

Thank you.

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to polymer-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/940c3e70-c5e6-4277-9c42-29a12b62c8cd%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.