Re: [OT] loading Javascript from CDN (was: [NEW] www/dojo)

2010-12-14 Thread Federico G. Schwindt
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:43:45PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
 On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:47:26PM +0200, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
  Marc Espie wrote:
   On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 06:20:51PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
To be honest, i doubt a js framework has its place in the portstree.
Usually you just unzip stuff directly in www dirs..
  
   There's precedent for that. I don't see why not, especially if we can
   share stuff.
  
  To share stuff like that nowadays people use CDNs.
  
  http://code.google.com/apis/libraries/devguide.html#dojo
 
 There are some disadvantages to that, e.g. a connection to an extra
 domain and reliance on Google. It's not *always* the best solution.

  actually using a separate domain might be an advantange in some cases.

  f.-



Re: [OT] loading Javascript from CDN (was: [NEW] www/dojo)

2010-12-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010/12/14 18:05, Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
 On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:43:45PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
  On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:47:26PM +0200, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
   Marc Espie wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 06:20:51PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
 To be honest, i doubt a js framework has its place in the portstree.
 Usually you just unzip stuff directly in www dirs..
   
There's precedent for that. I don't see why not, especially if we can
share stuff.
   
   To share stuff like that nowadays people use CDNs.
   
   http://code.google.com/apis/libraries/devguide.html#dojo
  
  There are some disadvantages to that, e.g. a connection to an extra
  domain and reliance on Google. It's not *always* the best solution.
 
   actually using a separate domain might be an advantange in some cases.

absolutely; especially if your main domain is using cookies or
something else which breaks HTTP caching.



Re: [NEW] www/dojo

2010-12-06 Thread Alexey Suslikov
Marc Espie wrote:

 On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 06:20:51PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
  On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 01:24:14PM +0100, Remi Pointel wrote:
   On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:06:53 +0100
   Remi Pointel remi.poin...@xiri.fr wrote:
Hi,
   
this is the port of Dojo, an open-source JavaScript toolkit.
   
I didn't find better than cp the 3 directories, has someone an other 
idea ? is it correct ?
   
   [...]
   
Critical positive or negative would be appreciated ;-).
  
   Hi, no comments for this port ? Is the do-install correct ?
 
  To be honest, i doubt a js framework has its place in the portstree.
  Usually you just unzip stuff directly in www dirs..

 There's precedent for that. I don't see why not, especially if we can
 share stuff.

To share stuff like that nowadays people use CDNs.

http://code.google.com/apis/libraries/devguide.html#dojo

Alexey



Re: [OT] loading Javascript from CDN (was: [NEW] www/dojo)

2010-12-06 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:47:26PM +0200, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
 Marc Espie wrote:
  On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 06:20:51PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
   To be honest, i doubt a js framework has its place in the portstree.
   Usually you just unzip stuff directly in www dirs..
 
  There's precedent for that. I don't see why not, especially if we can
  share stuff.
 
 To share stuff like that nowadays people use CDNs.
 
 http://code.google.com/apis/libraries/devguide.html#dojo

There are some disadvantages to that, e.g. a connection to an extra
domain and reliance on Google. It's not *always* the best solution.

Joachim



Re: [OT] loading Javascript from CDN (was: [NEW] www/dojo)

2010-12-06 Thread remi.pointel
Le lun 06/12/10 14:43, Joachim Schipper joac...@joachimschipper.nl a écrit:
 On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:47:26PM +0200, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
  Marc Espie wrote:
   On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 06:20:51PM +0100,
 Landry Breuil wrote:
   To be honest, i doubt a js framework has
 its place in the portstree.
   Usually you just unzip stuff directly in
 www dirs..
 
   There's precedent for that. I don't see why
 not, especially if we can
  share stuff.
  
  To share stuff like that nowadays people use
 CDNs.
 
  http://code.google.com/apis/libraries/devguide.html#dojo

 There are some disadvantages to that, e.g. a connection to an extra
 domain and reliance on Google. It's not *always* the best solution.
 
 Joachim

I'm OK with you, I think not all people want to be connected to Google.

But thanks Alexey for the link, I didn't know this.

Remi.




Re: [NEW] www/dojo

2010-12-05 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 01:24:14PM +0100, Remi Pointel wrote:
 On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:06:53 +0100
 Remi Pointel remi.poin...@xiri.fr wrote:
  Hi,
  
  this is the port of Dojo, an open-source JavaScript toolkit.
  
  I didn't find better than cp the 3 directories, has someone an other idea 
  ? is it correct ?
 
 [...] 
  
  Critical positive or negative would be appreciated ;-).
 
 Hi, no comments for this port ? Is the do-install correct ?

To be honest, i doubt a js framework has its place in the portstree.
Usually you just unzip stuff directly in www dirs..

Landry



Re: [NEW] www/dojo

2010-12-05 Thread Marc Espie
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 06:20:51PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
 On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 01:24:14PM +0100, Remi Pointel wrote:
  On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:06:53 +0100
  Remi Pointel remi.poin...@xiri.fr wrote:
   Hi,
   
   this is the port of Dojo, an open-source JavaScript toolkit.
   
   I didn't find better than cp the 3 directories, has someone an other 
   idea ? is it correct ?
  
  [...] 
   
   Critical positive or negative would be appreciated ;-).
  
  Hi, no comments for this port ? Is the do-install correct ?
 
 To be honest, i doubt a js framework has its place in the portstree.
 Usually you just unzip stuff directly in www dirs..

There's precedent for that. I don't see why not, especially if we can
share stuff.

I remember dojo being very very slow, though. did it improve recently ?



Re: [NEW] www/dojo

2010-12-04 Thread Remi Pointel
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:06:53 +0100
Remi Pointel remi.poin...@xiri.fr wrote:
 Hi,
 
 this is the port of Dojo, an open-source JavaScript toolkit.
 
 I didn't find better than cp the 3 directories, has someone an other idea ? 
 is it correct ?

[...] 
 
 Critical positive or negative would be appreciated ;-).

Hi, no comments for this port ? Is the do-install correct ?

Thanks,

Remi.



[NEW] www/dojo

2010-12-01 Thread Remi Pointel
Hi,

this is the port of Dojo, an open-source JavaScript toolkit.

I didn't find better than cp the 3 directories, has someone an other idea ? 
is it correct ?

Few information :

$ pkg_info dojo
Information for inst:dojo-1.5.0

Comment:
modular JavaScript toolkit

Description:
Dojo is an Open Source JavaScript Toolkit for constructing dynamic web
user interfaces.  It is designed to ease the rapid development of
cross-platform, JavaScript/Ajax-based applications and web sites.
This package contains Dojo, Dijit and Dojox.

Maintainer: Remi Pointel remi.poin...@xiri.fr

WWW: http://www.dojotoolkit.org/


Critical positive or negative would be appreciated ;-).

Thanks,

Remi.


dojo-1.5.0.tar.gz
Description: Binary data