Re: NEW: www/mozilla-seamonkey 1.0.6

2006-12-14 Thread Jolan Luff
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:59:57PM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 December 2006 10:43 am, you wrote:   
> > I have added a -devel subpackage to the port (attached), I included the 
> > IDL files in the PLIST, but I am uncertain as to the absolute correct 
> > place to put them, for now they get installed into 
> > ${LOCALBASE}/share/idl/seamonkey-1.0.6/ though a patch to install them 
> > under ${MOZ}/idl (and change the .pc file) does exist.
> 
> I'm not sure about the best place for these at the moment (or
> even if they're needed - we haven't installed them in the past).
> Anyone else have input on this?

They're used when building x11/vlc's mozilla plugin which is something
that I'm working on.



Re: NEW: www/mozilla-seamonkey 1.0.6

2006-12-11 Thread Marc Espie
Fascinating... so mozilla gets bloated to the point where no-one
wants it, so they split it into firefox and thunderbird so that
people don't get the bloat, and now people complain that stuff
is not *integrated* so they put the bloat back together and label
it `seamonkey'.

Oh yes, and if we use the wrong name and build `official' releases,
we get a bad rep (but then, we don't really care at this point. OpenBSD
is not known for playing into political games...)

Is this it ? am I missing some insight ?



Re: NEW: www/mozilla-seamonkey 1.0.6

2006-12-11 Thread Kurt Miller
On Saturday 02 December 2006 2:46 pm, James Wright wrote:
> Nikolay Sturm wrote:
> > * James Wright [2006-12-02]:
> >   
> >> latest -stable mozilla seamonkey (the next generation suite) version
> >> 1.0.6 (equivalent to the 1.5.0.8 releases of firefox/thunderbird), 
> >> 
> >
> > What is the point of this port? Is there anything genuine in seamonkey
> > that is not in firefox and friends?
> >
> > Nikolay
> >
> >   
> integrated chatzilla/composer/mail and news, no need to go through hoops 
> to get firefox and thunderbird to work together, the same advantages the 
> suite has but using the new rendering engine for 'modern' websites, same 
> network layer.  its really for people who used and got used to the suite 
> but want to use it on modern websites and against newer servers.

This should positioned as a replacement for the old mozilla
suite (www/mozilla) with a -devel subpackage and updates
to www/galeon and www/epiphany to use it. My next update
to eclipse will be able to use seamonkey to build, so there's
no need to update that. Actually I'm planning on adding a
firefox -devel package at some point and switching eclipse
over to use that instead.

If you update your diff to include a -devel subpackage and
create diffs for galeon and ephiphay to use it, I think
this would be a worthwhile addition to the ports tree.

-Kurt



Re: NEW: www/mozilla-seamonkey 1.0.6

2006-12-02 Thread James Wright

Nikolay Sturm wrote:

* James Wright [2006-12-02]:
  

latest -stable mozilla seamonkey (the next generation suite) version
1.0.6 (equivalent to the 1.5.0.8 releases of firefox/thunderbird), 



What is the point of this port? Is there anything genuine in seamonkey
that is not in firefox and friends?

Nikolay

  
integrated chatzilla/composer/mail and news, no need to go through hoops 
to get firefox and thunderbird to work together, the same advantages the 
suite has but using the new rendering engine for 'modern' websites, same 
network layer.  its really for people who used and got used to the suite 
but want to use it on modern websites and against newer servers.




Re: NEW: www/mozilla-seamonkey 1.0.6

2006-12-02 Thread Nikolay Sturm
* James Wright [2006-12-02]:
> latest -stable mozilla seamonkey (the next generation suite) version
> 1.0.6 (equivalent to the 1.5.0.8 releases of firefox/thunderbird), 

What is the point of this port? Is there anything genuine in seamonkey
that is not in firefox and friends?

Nikolay



NEW: www/mozilla-seamonkey 1.0.6

2006-12-02 Thread James Wright
latest -stable mozilla seamonkey (the next generation suite) version 
1.0.6 (equivalent to the 1.5.0.8 releases of firefox/thunderbird), 
-current required, switched over to use devel/nspr, should build/run 
wherever firefox/thunderbird does, basically the same set of patches, 
same version of gecko, etc.  as previously stated, the README.OpenBSD 
needs work.  port also needs testing on something other than i386 (all i 
have at the moment).  There may be some no longer necessary patches and 
some of the files installed into ${LOCALBASE}/mozilla-seamonkey are 
really only needed for development.


go to 
http://blogs.loveandnature.co.za/www/openbsd-ports/archives/cat_seamonkey.html 
or mail me to comment/insult/rant/rave.  thanks.


(and yes, as soon as i've tested the nss and firefox2 ports i'll create 
a seamonkey1.1 port).

-
james


www_mozilla-seamonkey106.tgz
Description: Binary data