On Mon, 17 Apr 2017, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > * Various fixes from a forked Github version (there was no official
> > elvis release since 2004), clang warns about most of them.
>
> Not an elvis user or familiar with development, but would it make
> any sense to switch to the fork rather than just take some patches?
Yes, I agree. However, we'd probably be the first to use this fork,
so I want to make sure that the first patches are OK, and I'll probably
switch to the forked version in a second step.
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017/04/17 15:55, Donovan Watteau wrote:
> > * Fix a build failure with clang; some symbols were
> > redefined (patch-guitcap_c).
>
> This class of failures is being looked at (and doesn't affect arm64
> which is the only arch where this will actually be built with clang
> in bulks for now) so I think it makes sense to skip this one for now.
>
> Others committed.
OK, thank you!
