Re: rm www/cherokee?

2016-09-03 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado 
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 01:41:35AM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado  writes:
> 
> > On sábado, 3 de septiembre de 2016 10:14:19 (CEST) Stuart Henderson 
> > wrote:
> >> On 2016/09/03 02:38, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> >> > Upstream is dead and the maintainer has not updated the port for
> >> > years. OK?.
> >> 
> >> Either it should be updated or removed. There are a couple of commits
> >> recently so it doesn't seem *totally* dead upstream, but it's not very
> >> active.
> >
> > cherokee was an amazing webserver long time ago. Unfortunately, the 
> > founder is not working in the project anymore.
> >
> >> 
> >> If nobody is using it -> remove
> >> 
> >> If somebody is using it and willing to maintain -> keep
> >> 
> >> > Subpackages require something special in quirks?
> >> 
> >> You just need to list all the subpackages.
> >
> > I was not sure if the correct entry for -main is just "cherokee" or 
> > "cherokee-main". I added "cherokee-main" to quirks.
> 
> Rather the PKGNAME stem, here "cherokee".
> 
>   $ make show=PKGNAME-main
>   cherokee-1.2.101

Fixed. Thanks!

-- 
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info

Re: rm www/cherokee?

2016-09-03 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas 
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado  writes:

> On sábado, 3 de septiembre de 2016 10:14:19 (CEST) Stuart Henderson 
> wrote:
>> On 2016/09/03 02:38, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
>> > Upstream is dead and the maintainer has not updated the port for
>> > years. OK?.
>> 
>> Either it should be updated or removed. There are a couple of commits
>> recently so it doesn't seem *totally* dead upstream, but it's not very
>> active.
>
> cherokee was an amazing webserver long time ago. Unfortunately, the 
> founder is not working in the project anymore.
>
>> 
>> If nobody is using it -> remove
>> 
>> If somebody is using it and willing to maintain -> keep
>> 
>> > Subpackages require something special in quirks?
>> 
>> You just need to list all the subpackages.
>
> I was not sure if the correct entry for -main is just "cherokee" or 
> "cherokee-main". I added "cherokee-main" to quirks.

Rather the PKGNAME stem, here "cherokee".

  $ make show=PKGNAME-main
  cherokee-1.2.101

-- 
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Re: rm www/cherokee?

2016-09-03 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado 
On sábado, 3 de septiembre de 2016 10:14:19 (CEST) Stuart Henderson 
wrote:
> On 2016/09/03 02:38, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> > Upstream is dead and the maintainer has not updated the port for
> > years. OK?.
> 
> Either it should be updated or removed. There are a couple of commits
> recently so it doesn't seem *totally* dead upstream, but it's not very
> active.

cherokee was an amazing webserver long time ago. Unfortunately, the 
founder is not working in the project anymore.

> 
> If nobody is using it -> remove
> 
> If somebody is using it and willing to maintain -> keep
> 
> > Subpackages require something special in quirks?
> 
> You just need to list all the subpackages.

I was not sure if the correct entry for -main is just "cherokee" or 
"cherokee-main". I added "cherokee-main" to quirks.

-- 
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info

Re: rm www/cherokee?

2016-09-03 Thread lists 
Sat, 3 Sep 2016 10:14:19 +0100 Stuart Henderson 
> On 2016/09/03 02:38, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> > Upstream is dead and the maintainer has not updated the port for years.
> > OK?.  
> 
> Either it should be updated or removed. There are a couple of commits
> recently so it doesn't seem *totally* dead upstream, but it's not very
> active.

Hi ports@,

There is one possible use case as transition away from rewrite rules,
the approach cherokee uses allows beginners a hands on with rewrites.

Kind regards,
Anton

> If nobody is using it -> remove
> 
> If somebody is using it and willing to maintain -> keep
> 
> > Subpackages require something special in quirks?  
> 
> You just need to list all the subpackages.
>

Re: rm www/cherokee?

2016-09-03 Thread Stuart Henderson 
On 2016/09/03 02:38, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> Upstream is dead and the maintainer has not updated the port for years.
> OK?.

Either it should be updated or removed. There are a couple of commits
recently so it doesn't seem *totally* dead upstream, but it's not very
active.

If nobody is using it -> remove

If somebody is using it and willing to maintain -> keep

> Subpackages require something special in quirks?

You just need to list all the subpackages.