Re: [OT] Test
On Oct 19, 2017, at 5:48 AM, Jürgen Wondzinskiwrote: > > Just checking in after several years of absence. > > I sent a more formal message yesterday, but that didn't seem to work, since > it's not in the digest and not in the archive, but I also haven't got any > mailer-error back? All mail from non-subscribers is automatically held, and I try to go through the list every few days. Seeing this email, I looked through the held queue, and found yours, so I released them. They should show up soon. The other thing is that a lot of ISPs block email from any IP address that is a known virtual machine provider, and my email server is in that category. So you may not have gotten a held mail notice, but they are sent. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b0a78df0-e810-4eb1-925f-4e1f53236...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Test
A blast from the past ? On Oct 19, 2017 1:27 PM, "Dave Crozier"wrote: > Will the real Jurgen please stand up! > > ;-) > > Dave > > -Original Message- > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jürgen > Wondzinski > Sent: 19 October 2017 11:52 > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: AW: [OT] Test > > Another test about frauding the list... > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Jürgen > Wondzinski > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017 12:48 > An: ProFox@leafe.com > Betreff: [OT] Test > > [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they > appear to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing] > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOByV=ho4zttz7feler6v0y4qdfrii5hu3zdhzepf4be...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Test
Will the real Jurgen please stand up! ;-) Dave -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jürgen Wondzinski Sent: 19 October 2017 11:52 To: ProFox Email ListSubject: AW: [OT] Test Another test about frauding the list... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Jürgen Wondzinski Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017 12:48 An: ProFox@leafe.com Betreff: [OT] Test [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing] [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/18725b8cd2d5d247873a2baf401d4ab2b48bd...@ex2010-a-fpl.fpl.LOCAL ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Test
Looks like it's working... Fred On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Gene Wirchenkowrote: > Hello: > > I noticed no messages since yesterday. This is rather unusual. > > Sincerely, > > Gene Wirchenko > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajcbksog-ku-92cexizi4lytphbvjbd0za8ttvagxpf5f4b...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Test
On 2014-04-29 09:45, Adam Buckland wrote: Ping! Pong! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1af2471c2a2b42900b2812d08d57b...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] TEST
On Nov 17, 2010, at 12:26 PM, willaim tormey wrote: ASDADADADADADA Are all these tests really necessary? -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c034248c-21c3-4010-8fcf-22a4180f5...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] test
Test your spellchecker --- On Mon, 9/20/10, Leland Jackson lela...@mail.smvfp.com wrote: From: Leland Jackson lela...@mail.smvfp.com Subject: [OT] test To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Monday, September 20, 2010, 12:46 PM Test email. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4c978fdb.7080...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/379079.81972...@web31401.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] TEST
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 15:49 +0100, william wrote: ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1279551306.5983.0.ca...@client-desktop ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] TEST
TORMEY wrote: Hi Dr. William, Interesting that test 2 came before this one. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4bec0b42.2030...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] test
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: On 02/13/2010 03:36 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: Leland Jackson wrote: Test Sent from my iPhone failed :-) Nope, it passed with flying colors. Hi Leland, You never answered a single question! Oh, Teddy Kennedy scoring - never mind. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4b77bbe3.5000...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] test
On 02/14/2010 03:01 AM, Pete Theisen wrote: Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: On 02/13/2010 03:36 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: Leland Jackson wrote: Test Sent from my iPhone failed :-) Nope, it passed with flying colors. Hi Leland, You never answered a single question! Oh, Teddy Kennedy scoring - never mind. The really important tests aren't about scoring 75 or better on a written exam. LOL Regards, LelandJ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4b781ce8.3070...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] test
Leland Jackson wrote: Test Sent from my iPhone failed :-) -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4b771b56.7070...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] test
Reply with my nokia On 2/13/10, Leland Jackson lelandj12...@gmail.com wrote: Test Sent from my iPhone [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/a2b0cc711002131602n64896ff2k58ade97bfb360...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] test
On 02/13/2010 03:36 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: Leland Jackson wrote: Test Sent from my iPhone failed :-) Nope, it passed with flying colors. Regards, LelandJ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4b775e28.5070...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] test
Jean, take a look at your connection settings in your nokia, and tell me if you can connect using ldap. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweight_Directory_Access_Protocol Regards, LelandJ On 02/13/2010 06:02 PM, Jean Laeremans wrote: Reply with my nokia On 2/13/10, Leland Jacksonlelandj12...@gmail.com wrote: Test Sent from my iPhone [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4b776033.6030...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] test
Leland Jackson wrote: test email Hi Leland, You flunk. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4b6a154e.4060...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] test your antivirus software
I just got an email from UPS It seems they cannot locate my house, all of a sudden. Looking at the return email address, I see - United Parcel Service [EMAIL PROTECTED] [//] Anyone want to test their anti-virus software?G JH ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@shelbynet.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT Test - revised subject label filter
On May 13, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: OK, I turned on logging to see if that helps identify what's going on... That helped... one more try now... -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT Test - revised subject label filter
On May 14, 2008, at 7:59 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: OK, I turned on logging to see if that helps identify what's going on... That helped... one more try now... OK, I lied. *Two* more tries! -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT Test - revised subject label filter
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Test to see if changes to the script that filters OT messages work. If they do, this message should be filtered out of the tech list. Even if you leave off the closing square bracket? -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT Test - revised subject label filter
On May 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Ted Roche wrote: Test to see if changes to the script that filters OT messages work. If they do, this message should be filtered out of the tech list. Even if you leave off the closing square bracket? Yeah... that was the point of the change. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT Test - revised subject label filter
On May 13, 2008, at 6:50 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: Even if you leave off the closing square bracket? Yeah... that was the point of the change. OK, I turned on logging to see if that helps identify what's going on... -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] test
On Mar 2, 2008, at 3:37 PM, Ricardo Araoz wrote: test Can you read it? Sorry, I don't know how to read. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] TEST
William Tormey wrote: TEST Your score was 64. Please study, and try again. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.