Re: AW: VFP9rerr.log file supposedly created...but not there

2017-12-11 Thread mbsoftwaresolutions

On 2017-12-09 04:10, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:

Additionally:
Why are you using an outdated VFP9 runtime?  The latest and greatest 
runtime

is version 7423 from 3.April 2009
Are you keen to explicitely experience even more than your own software
errors? Or what else reasons hinder you to just run that damn 
VFP9SP2RT.exe

runtime installer and be more errorfree?

Get your copy from www.vfpx.org

wOOdy




This is from an installation where their app (supplied by their 
Corporate...which happened to be the last app I delivered when I was 
still at Sylvan back in 2009) used VFP9SP1.  I can't recall why it 
wasn't upgraded to SP2 (7423) back then?  I explored the idea of 
updating those runtimes awhile back but those efforts failed in 
C0005 errors (or some other C? code) so I reverted to their 
previous DLL files.  The lead developer over me insisted on 
Installshield (although I would have used Inno) and he used the M$ 
suggested best practice locations instead of putting the runtimes right 
into the app's folder.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/401926cf07692ca1ec73c5395bc1b...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: AW: VFP9rerr.log file supposedly created...but not there

2017-12-11 Thread mbsoftwaresolutions

On 2017-12-09 04:10, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:

Additionally:
Why are you using an outdated VFP9 runtime?  The latest and greatest 
runtime

is version 7423 from 3.April 2009
Are you keen to explicitely experience even more than your own software
errors? Or what else reasons hinder you to just run that damn 
VFP9SP2RT.exe

runtime installer and be more errorfree?

Get your copy from www.vfpx.org

wOOdy




This is from an installation where their app (supplied by their 
Corporate...which happened to be the last app I delivered when I was 
still at Sylvan back in 2009) used VFP9SP1.  I can't recall why it 
wasn't upgraded to SP2 (7423) back then?  I explored the idea of 
updating those runtimes awhile back but those efforts failed in 
C0005 errors (or some other C? code) so I reverted to their 
previous DLL files.  The lead developer over me insisted on 
Installshield (although I would have used Inno).


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/11a3c85c0c2b4e641e9c7917aed85...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.