Re: Protocol Buffers Compiler Maven Plug-In
So is this going anywhere? Bueller...? Bueller...? After my last post I was curious to build my first Maven2 plugin, and I also now have a working plugin that binds to the generate-sources phase like Tom's original post in this thread. I was just about to (ask to) put it on Codehaus but re-read this thread first and realized Tom is already in position to do so, so I'll hold off. However, it seems like if this is going to be further delayed maybe it makes sense to pursue this option. Gregory, I'm sure you are a busy man but do you have an estimate of when you think you might be able to publish this? Or do you think it's a good idea for either myself or Tom to post to Codehaus/elsewhere in the meantime? Nat --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Protocol Buffers Compiler Maven Plug-In
[cc Greg to get his attention] On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Nat nharw...@gmail.com wrote: So is this going anywhere? Bueller...? Bueller...? After my last post I was curious to build my first Maven2 plugin, and I also now have a working plugin that binds to the generate-sources phase like Tom's original post in this thread. I was just about to (ask to) put it on Codehaus but re-read this thread first and realized Tom is already in position to do so, so I'll hold off. However, it seems like if this is going to be further delayed maybe it makes sense to pursue this option. Gregory, I'm sure you are a busy man but do you have an estimate of when you think you might be able to publish this? Or do you think it's a good idea for either myself or Tom to post to Codehaus/elsewhere in the meantime? Nat --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Generating subclasses of a protocol buffer serialized class
Sorry, but we don't allow subclassing of protocol buffer objects (in any
language). Allowing this leads to too many fragile base class problems.
If you want to expose all of the fields of your protocol message (which is
what you'd get from subclassing), you can always add an accessor to your
wrapper which returns the wrapped message object. Then you do not need to
add a new accessor for every new field added. If you only want to expose
some fields but not others, you could separate your message into two
messages like:
message MyMessage {
message Public {
// public fields here
}
required Public public_fields = 1;
// private fields here
}
Then your wrapper class can provide a method to access the MyMessage.Public
part but not the rest.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Chris chrisjcoll...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Mark, Its java. So far people keep recommending me what I am
already doing (delegation) which is itself not maintainable. Sounds
like there is a need for a code generator to generate the delegation
of those methods you want to expose :-}
On Jan 18, 2:17 am, Marc Gravell marc.grav...@gmail.com wrote:
What language are you using? In C#, partial classes are a viable way
of adding extra logic into generated classes - the protobuf-net
generator allows this fairly well. In the more general sense, consider
encapsulation over inheritance, or simply keep the two separate (for
example, passing the generated object into static methods defined in
the business class etc),
Marc Gravell
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Protocol Buffers Compiler Maven Plug-In
I don't really consider this slacking; anything going to the open source community is a public gift and should be treated as such. I mostly just want to avoid fragmentation and having three different plugins doing the same thing, so that it can be focused and as high-quality as possible. Even if it has no tests I'd love to see it as an alpha-release plugin, and perhaps Tom, myself and others can help out with tests and/or enhancements to bring it to beta and/or release. As I said I made one for internal use at my workplace and it will satisfy our needs until this one pops up. Thanks in advance to you and Tom (and anyone else working on it); I'd love to see protobuf gain in popularity and tooling and in particular replace XML where it makes sense (which is a LOT of places); I just can't take any more inappropriate use of XML in my life :) Nat On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Gregory Kick g...@google.com wrote: I totally understand the frustration. This had slipped to the bottom of the priorities, but I'm actually working on this stuff today. Basically, my plan is to check in the plugin today. The plugin is more or less done, but I have no tests. (ack!) I would really, really, really appreciate it if somebody could contribute some. As soon as I check in the plugin everybody that expressed interest will get a notice about a code review. Sorry again for the slacking. On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote: [cc Greg to get his attention] On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Nat nharw...@gmail.com wrote: So is this going anywhere? Bueller...? Bueller...? After my last post I was curious to build my first Maven2 plugin, and I also now have a working plugin that binds to the generate-sources phase like Tom's original post in this thread. I was just about to (ask to) put it on Codehaus but re-read this thread first and realized Tom is already in position to do so, so I'll hold off. However, it seems like if this is going to be further delayed maybe it makes sense to pursue this option. Gregory, I'm sure you are a busy man but do you have an estimate of when you think you might be able to publish this? Or do you think it's a good idea for either myself or Tom to post to Codehaus/elsewhere in the meantime? Nat --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Quick Hacky text_mode Parse in Python
I sent a partial patch a while ago and I disappeared without completing the text_format in python, sorry about that. So far I've only implemented the tokenizer part (w/ test cases), but anyone is free to use it to implement the parser part (I'd be really glad), and for some reason I couldn't set up the codereview (I didn't try hard though). For various reasons I won't be able to touch it in the next few weeks. This is such an important feature, specially if you use protobufs for configuration files, it'd be so handy! Thanks, Helder On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Piotr Findeisen piotr.findei...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 8, 7:27 pm, Petar Petrov pe...@google.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote: Hey Petar, isn't there a patch someone was trying to submit that implements text format parsing? (For real, not by wrapping protoc.) What's the status of that? I'll review it today. Hopefully the author hasn't forgotten about it. Hey! This gonna be a feature I miss really much! Is there happening anything about this? regards! Piotr --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
