Problem with dynamic __import__ of gpb modules
Hi
I'm building a generic editor for creating loading and saving gpb
objects and am running into problems with dynamic __import__
statements. I've nailed it down to a very simple testcase. This is all
with python 2.5.2 and protobuf 2.0.3 on Linux.
test.proto:
message test {optional int32 x=1; }
C.py:
class K:
def __init__(self):
print new K
import test_pb2, C
a=getattr(test_pb2,test)
a
class 'test_pb2.test'
b=getattr(C,K)
b
class C.K at 0xb64ceddc
Why is one of the classnames in quotes, and the other not?
When I try a dynamic import I've narrowed my problem down to :
#!/usr/bin/python
def test():
for module,klass in [('test_pb2','test'), ('C', 'K')]:
m=__import__(module)
k=getattr(m, klass)
print *, m, k, type(k)
print k()
test()
Which when run gives me the following
* module 'test_pb2' from 'gpbedit/test_pb2.pyc' class
'test_pb2.test' class
'google.protobuf.reflection.GeneratedProtocolMessageType'
new k=
* module 'C' from '...gpbedit/C.pyc' C.K type 'classobj'
new k= new K
C.K instance at 0xb7d2764c
When I try to create a protocol object of the 'test' type, my python
script returns None.
So where does this go wrong?
Bart
P.S. the editor is at http://github.com/bvdeenen/gpbedit/tree/master.
It's still alpha quality, but it is capable of editing proto objects
and generating a gui from proto files
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Java socket based rpc implementation
protobuf-c now has an rpc implementation, check it out: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-c/wiki/RPC_System On Feb 10, 10:19 am, sagar.i...@gmail.com wrote: any plans on extending this to C? looking for a simple cross-language client-server library. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Java socket based rpc implementation
I guess i should mention a few design features of the protobuf-c api: - completely introspectable - able to wrap into another application's main-loop I think those features should make it easy to write a language binding to it. I am considering someday improving it to be able to create a ProtobufC_*Descriptor without running the compiler, by re-implmenting the .proto parsing code. On Feb 18, 9:22 pm, lahike...@gmail.com wrote: protobuf-c now has an rpc implementation, check it out: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-c/wiki/RPC_System On Feb 10, 10:19 am, sagar.i...@gmail.com wrote: any plans on extending this to C? looking for a simple cross-language client-server library. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
