[protobuf] PROTOMAK 0.0.2.RELEASE just released
Hi, Protomak is a tool to auto-convert XSDs to .proto files. We have just released version 0.0.2.RELEASE. You can find out more at http://www.jemos.eu/projects/protomak Regards, Marco -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
RE: [protobuf] Uploading the maven-protoc-plugin to Maven Central?
So, the google maven-protoc plugin has been retired in favour of dtrott one. I had a look at dtrott plugin and it seems to me unnecessary convoluted. Additionally it runs under the BSD license, which is not very Enterprise Friendly. I created my own, which is just a wrapper around protoc and runs under the MIT license *and* is on Maven central: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/uk/co/jemos/maven/plugins/maven-jemosProtoc-plugin/ Regards, Marco -Original Message- From: Gregory Kick [mailto:g...@google.com] Sent: 21 June 2011 18:26 To: Pherl Liu Cc: Marco Tedone; Protocol Buffers Subject: Re: [protobuf] Uploading the maven-protoc-plugin to Maven Central? See http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81#c20 On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Pherl Liu liuj...@google.com wrote: +Gregory On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Marco Tedone marco.ted...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Is there a reason why the plugin hasn't been uploaded to Maven Central? If you want I could take ownership of that but then I'd have to be the owner of the com.google.protobuf Maven groupId, which I don't think is a good idea. There are already two other maven-protoc-plugin out there, both custom and this is causing confusion. I believe people would like to see the Google maven-protoc-plugin and use that, but in a way is easy to use (e.g. available in Maven Central). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. -- Greg Kick Data Liberation -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
RE: [protobuf] Uploading the maven-protoc-plugin to Maven Central?
I have already talked to dtrott and he confirmed his plugin runs under the BSD license. Time allowing I will attempt to contact him and suggest an official release. In the meantime I'm releasing version 0.0.2.RELEASE of my one. Regards, Marco -Original Message- From: Gregory Kick [mailto:g...@google.com] Sent: 21 June 2011 19:28 To: Marco Tedone Cc: Pherl Liu; Protocol Buffers Subject: Re: [protobuf] Uploading the maven-protoc-plugin to Maven Central? I can't seem to find anything about licenses in that code and IANAL anyway. That said, much of that code is derived from my original code, which was under the same license as protobuf anyway. Might be worth emailing him to make sure that the licensing is what you think it is. Anyway, I definitely support a community effort to build a better plugin. I'd suggest reaching out to dtrott and discussing collaboration and if you guys want to work on making some version of either plugin official then we can get CLAs for you guys and do that. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Marco Tedone marco.ted...@gmail.com wrote: So, the google maven-protoc plugin has been retired in favour of dtrott one. I had a look at dtrott plugin and it seems to me unnecessary convoluted. Additionally it runs under the BSD license, which is not very Enterprise Friendly. I created my own, which is just a wrapper around protoc and runs under the MIT license *and* is on Maven central: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/uk/co/jemos/maven/plugins/maven-jemosPro toc-plugin/ Regards, Marco -Original Message- From: Gregory Kick [mailto:g...@google.com] Sent: 21 June 2011 18:26 To: Pherl Liu Cc: Marco Tedone; Protocol Buffers Subject: Re: [protobuf] Uploading the maven-protoc-plugin to Maven Central? See http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81#c20 On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Pherl Liu liuj...@google.com wrote: +Gregory On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Marco Tedone marco.ted...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Is there a reason why the plugin hasn't been uploaded to Maven Central? If you want I could take ownership of that but then I'd have to be the owner of the com.google.protobuf Maven groupId, which I don't think is a good idea. There are already two other maven-protoc-plugin out there, both custom and this is causing confusion. I believe people would like to see the Google maven-protoc-plugin and use that, but in a way is easy to use (e.g. available in Maven Central). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. -- Greg Kick Data Liberation -- Greg Kick Data Liberation -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Uploading the maven-protoc-plugin to Maven Central?
Hi all, Is there a reason why the plugin hasn't been uploaded to Maven Central? If you want I could take ownership of that but then I'd have to be the owner of the com.google.protobuf Maven groupId, which I don't think is a good idea. There are already two other maven-protoc-plugin out there, both custom and this is causing confusion. I believe people would like to see the Google maven-protoc-plugin and use that, but in a way is easy to use (e.g. available in Maven Central). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Numeric range not supported?
Hi all, I'm checking the protobuf language definition and I couldn't find anywhere support for numeric range. In XSD, for instance, one could have: simpleType name=ZeroToTen restriction base=int minInclusive value=0 / maxInclusive value=10 / /restriction /simpleType However I couldn't find equivalent translation in the proto language definition. I could find defaults and enums, but not number ranges. Regards, Marco -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] XSD to define .proto format?
Hi all, Is there an XML schema (XSD) which defines the .proto file format? I need it so that JAXB can create the POJOs to fill a .proto file. Regards, Marco -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
