Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)
I have run up a fresh Ubuntu 14.04.3 install didn't see any issues (once I figured out what packages to install to get the tests all running). Can you elaborate on the problem you are seeing? Robbie On 12 August 2015 at 22:41, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote: I've tested proton-c on ubuntu1404, ubuntu1204 FreeBSD 10.1p17 Ubuntu 1204 builds and ctests fine. This is our the OS on our travis CI so it's not a surprise it works. Ubuntu 1404 - I'm having problems with the python tests and SSL - investigating whether this is my config or something more. This is a little worrying FreeBSD - I'm getting test failures in proton_tests.messenger.SelectableMessengerTest.testSelectable* This might reflect some difference in poll() behaviour. I'm also getting failures in ...*_valgrind with output like this... AssertionError: Unexpected input while waiting for receiver to initialize: ==12271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8 Which seems like valgrind detected use of an uninitialised value. I don't know it this is in proton or one of the lib it uses yet. Not sure if FreeBSD is important enough to care too much, but it should work. [so no -1 yet, but investigating. IMO the FreeBSD failures aren't enough to reject the release, but the Ubuntu failures might be] Andrew On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hi all, I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly. Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899. The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/ Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042 It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly to see it, e.g: git fetch --tags Regards, Robbie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)
I've now figured out the issue (and it's an instructive problem): PROTON-979: [1] It seems that both OpenSSL and Cyrus SASL have interacting global state. If SASL gets to initialise libcrypto first then when the SSL code tries to do it it fails. Just another emphasis that neither openssl nor Cyrus sasl is really suitable to be used as part of a library. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-979 On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 17:41 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: I've tested proton-c on ubuntu1404, ubuntu1204 FreeBSD 10.1p17 Ubuntu 1204 builds and ctests fine. This is our the OS on our travis CI so it's not a surprise it works. Ubuntu 1404 - I'm having problems with the python tests and SSL - investigating whether this is my config or something more. This is a little worrying FreeBSD - I'm getting test failures in proton_tests.messenger.SelectableMessengerTest.testSelectable* This might reflect some difference in poll() behaviour. I'm also getting failures in ...*_valgrind with output like this... AssertionError: Unexpected input while waiting for receiver to initialize: ==12271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8 Which seems like valgrind detected use of an uninitialised value. I don't know it this is in proton or one of the lib it uses yet. Not sure if FreeBSD is important enough to care too much, but it should work. [so no -1 yet, but investigating. IMO the FreeBSD failures aren't enough to reject the release, but the Ubuntu failures might be] Andrew On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hi all, I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly. Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899. The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/ Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-10 42 It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly to see it, e.g: git fetch --tags Regards,
Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)
Great, well done figuring it out! Care to vote yet? :) Robbie On 13 August 2015 at 21:16, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote: I've now figured out the issue (and it's an instructive problem): PROTON-979: [1] It seems that both OpenSSL and Cyrus SASL have interacting global state. If SASL gets to initialise libcrypto first then when the SSL code tries to do it it fails. Just another emphasis that neither openssl nor Cyrus sasl is really suitable to be used as part of a library. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-979 On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 17:41 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: I've tested proton-c on ubuntu1404, ubuntu1204 FreeBSD 10.1p17 Ubuntu 1204 builds and ctests fine. This is our the OS on our travis CI so it's not a surprise it works. Ubuntu 1404 - I'm having problems with the python tests and SSL - investigating whether this is my config or something more. This is a little worrying FreeBSD - I'm getting test failures in proton_tests.messenger.SelectableMessengerTest.testSelectable* This might reflect some difference in poll() behaviour. I'm also getting failures in ...*_valgrind with output like this... AssertionError: Unexpected input while waiting for receiver to initialize: ==12271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8 Which seems like valgrind detected use of an uninitialised value. I don't know it this is in proton or one of the lib it uses yet. Not sure if FreeBSD is important enough to care too much, but it should work. [so no -1 yet, but investigating. IMO the FreeBSD failures aren't enough to reject the release, but the Ubuntu failures might be] Andrew On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hi all, I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly. Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899. The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/ Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-10 42 It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly to see it, e.g: git fetch --tags Regards,
Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)
I vote +1: I've tested proton-c python on: Ubuntu 12.04 (amd64) Ubuntu 14.04 (amd64/i686) Raspberry Pi2 (Raspbian Jesse) FreeBSD 10.1p17 Windows 8.1 with Visual Studio 12 (2013) [Some of these test have had Java tox as well but it's been uneven) And modulo some (severe) irritations (see the other messages) there have been no blocking problems. Andrew On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hi all, I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly. Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899. The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/ Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042 It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly to see it, e.g: git fetch --tags Regards, Robbie
Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3)
+1 Built visual studio (2008, 2010, 2012, 2013)(x86, x64). Ran tests against qpidd and activemq 5.12 brokers using qpid client auth. - Original Message - From: Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com To: us...@qpid.apache.org, proton@qpid.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 4:08:01 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.10 (RC3) Hi all, I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote accordingly. Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and PROTON-899. The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/ Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging repo at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042 It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly to see it, e.g: git fetch --tags Regards, Robbie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC3 as 0.8 final
[ ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC3 as 0.8 final Verified dispatch and qpid tests that use proton, all good. NOTE: had to rebuild dispatch from clean, segfaults with simple rebuild. - Original Message - Hi Everyone, As usual the call for a formal vote flushed out a few last minute issues, so here is a quick respin with the following items fixed. - PROTON-708 - PROTON-711 (fixed for Java6) - PROTON-712 - PROTON-714 - PROTON-715 The sources can be found at the usual location: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.8rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1018 Please check them out and register your vote: [ ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC3 as 0.8 final [ ] No, because ... --Rafael
Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC3 as 0.8 final
[X] No, because ... ... I'm paranoid: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-717 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-716 While there's no (known) POODLE-like exploit involving AMQP (POODLE attacks browsers to decrypt cookies), now that a vulnerability is known we should avoid this protocol in case some e_N_terpri_S_ing p_A_rty takes up the challenge. -K - Original Message - From: Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu To: proton@qpid.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 12:46:25 PM Subject: VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC3 as 0.8 final Hi Everyone, As usual the call for a formal vote flushed out a few last minute issues, so here is a quick respin with the following items fixed. - PROTON-708 - PROTON-711 (fixed for Java6) - PROTON-712 - PROTON-714 - PROTON-715 The sources can be found at the usual location: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.8rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1018 Please check them out and register your vote: [ ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC3 as 0.8 final --Rafael -- -K
VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC3 as 0.8 final
Hi Everyone, As usual the call for a formal vote flushed out a few last minute issues, so here is a quick respin with the following items fixed. - PROTON-708 - PROTON-711 (fixed for Java6) - PROTON-712 - PROTON-714 - PROTON-715 The sources can be found at the usual location: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.8rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1018 Please check them out and register your vote: [ ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC3 as 0.8 final [ ] No, because ... --Rafael
Proton 0.7 RC3
Hi Everyone, I've put out RC3 due to the compilation issue found on OSX (PROTON-559). The source is posted here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.7rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1003/ The only delta from RC2 is the fix contributed by Bozo (thanks!). Please continue to test and post any issues you find here. Given the isolated nature of the delta, any issues you find in RC2 should also be relevant to RC3, so feel free to post those here as well. --Rafael
Re: Proton 0.7 RC3
On 10. 04. 14 17:26, Rafael Schloming wrote: Hi Everyone, I've put out RC3 due to the compilation issue found on OSX (PROTON-559). The source is posted here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.7rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1003/ The only delta from RC2 is the fix contributed by Bozo (thanks!). Please continue to test and post any issues you find here. Given the isolated nature of the delta, any issues you find in RC2 should also be relevant to RC3, so feel free to post those here as well. --Rafael trunk now works for me, didn't test with RC as such. right now using proton-c (no proton-j) and running on OSX 10.7, Windows 7 and Linux ubuntu. Bozzo
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE]: Release Proton 0.6 RC3 as 0.6 final
The Java binaries for 0.6 seem to be MIA. Still sitting in a staging repo somewhere? Robbie On 16 January 2014 10:42, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: The release artifacts for Proton 0.6 are now available from the web site: http://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-proton-0.6/index.html --Rafael On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: The vote carries with 3 binding +1's, 2 non-binding +1's, and no other votes. I'll post the artifacts shortly. --Rafael On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Hi Everyone, It looks like there haven't been any major issues reported so far with 0.6 RC3, so I guess it's about time to call for a formal vote. Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.6rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-003/ Please peruse/test and register your vote: [ ] Yes, release 0.6 RC3 as 0.6 final [ ] No, 0.6 RC3 has the following issues... --Rafael
Re: [VOTE]: Release Proton 0.6 RC3 as 0.6 final
Adding my +1 for the record. --Rafael On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Hi Everyone, It looks like there haven't been any major issues reported so far with 0.6 RC3, so I guess it's about time to call for a formal vote. Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.6rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-003/ Please peruse/test and register your vote: [ ] Yes, release 0.6 RC3 as 0.6 final [ ] No, 0.6 RC3 has the following issues... --Rafael
[RESULT] [VOTE]: Release Proton 0.6 RC3 as 0.6 final
The vote carries with 3 binding +1's, 2 non-binding +1's, and no other votes. I'll post the artifacts shortly. --Rafael On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Hi Everyone, It looks like there haven't been any major issues reported so far with 0.6 RC3, so I guess it's about time to call for a formal vote. Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.6rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-003/ Please peruse/test and register your vote: [ ] Yes, release 0.6 RC3 as 0.6 final [ ] No, 0.6 RC3 has the following issues... --Rafael
[VOTE]: Release Proton 0.6 RC3 as 0.6 final
Hi Everyone, It looks like there haven't been any major issues reported so far with 0.6 RC3, so I guess it's about time to call for a formal vote. Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.6rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-003/ Please peruse/test and register your vote: [ ] Yes, release 0.6 RC3 as 0.6 final [ ] No, 0.6 RC3 has the following issues... --Rafael
Re: [VOTE]: Release Proton 0.6 RC3 as 0.6 final
+1, release RC3 as final. -Ted On 01/02/2014 02:17 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: Hi Everyone, It looks like there haven't been any major issues reported so far with 0.6 RC3, so I guess it's about time to call for a formal vote. Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.6rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-003/ Please peruse/test and register your vote: [ ] Yes, release 0.6 RC3 as 0.6 final [ ] No, 0.6 RC3 has the following issues... --Rafael
Proton 0.6 RC3
Hi Everyone, I've put out an RC3 with fixes to the issues people have noted so far with RC2. You can find the source tarballs here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.6rc3/ The java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-003/ I've attached the list of changes since RC2. --Rafael r1552390 | rhs | 2013-12-19 13:22:51 -0500 (Thu, 19 Dec 2013) | 1 line PROTON-420: modified pn_messenger_route comment to use alternative detailed block syntax to avoid comment warnings due to embedded examples containing /\* r1552341 | mcpierce | 2013-12-19 11:29:19 -0500 (Thu, 19 Dec 2013) | 3 lines PROTON-482: Fix the Ruby install directory. Use vendorarchdir rather than vendorlibdir. r1552223 | rhs | 2013-12-18 22:48:51 -0500 (Wed, 18 Dec 2013) | 1 line added released status r1552221 | rhs | 2013-12-18 22:41:15 -0500 (Wed, 18 Dec 2013) | 1 line PROTON-420: added error.h portion of patch r1552218 | rhs | 2013-12-18 22:16:12 -0500 (Wed, 18 Dec 2013) | 1 line fixed braino in PROTON-439
Re: [VOTE]:[RESULT] Release Proton 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final
FYI, the artifacts were posted yesterday and should have propagated to all the mirrors by now. I've also updated the web site. --Rafael On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: The vote carries with 4 +1's and 0 -1's. I've created the 0.5 tag and branch in the repo, and I'll post the final artifacts shortly. --Rafael On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.eduwrote: I was going to close the vote/branch/tag/etc today. --Rafael On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Phil Harvey p...@philharveyonline.comwrote: Hi, Is there a rough date in the frame for when 0.5 will be released? Phil On 23 August 2013 16:56, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:26:54PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: Hi Everyone, After a bunch more tests/fixes I think we're ready to go for a vote now. I've posted 0.5 RC3 in the usual places: Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.5rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-109/ I've attached the svn change log for everything since RC2. Please peruse/test and register your vote: [X] Yes, release 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final [ ] No, 0.5 RC3 has the following issues... -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
Re: [VOTE]:[RESULT] Release Proton 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final
Nothing showing up on search.maven.org yet, have you released the staging repo (and dropped the old ones) ? Robbie On 28 August 2013 15:20, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: FYI, the artifacts were posted yesterday and should have propagated to all the mirrors by now. I've also updated the web site. --Rafael On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: The vote carries with 4 +1's and 0 -1's. I've created the 0.5 tag and branch in the repo, and I'll post the final artifacts shortly. --Rafael On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: I was going to close the vote/branch/tag/etc today. --Rafael On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Phil Harvey p...@philharveyonline.com wrote: Hi, Is there a rough date in the frame for when 0.5 will be released? Phil On 23 August 2013 16:56, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:26:54PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: Hi Everyone, After a bunch more tests/fixes I think we're ready to go for a vote now. I've posted 0.5 RC3 in the usual places: Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.5rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-109/ I've attached the svn change log for everything since RC2. Please peruse/test and register your vote: [X] Yes, release 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final [ ] No, 0.5 RC3 has the following issues... -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
Re: [VOTE]:[RESULT] Release Proton 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final
Oops, I forgot. Thanks for the reminder! --Rafael On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.comwrote: Nothing showing up on search.maven.org yet, have you released the staging repo (and dropped the old ones) ? Robbie On 28 August 2013 15:20, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: FYI, the artifacts were posted yesterday and should have propagated to all the mirrors by now. I've also updated the web site. --Rafael On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: The vote carries with 4 +1's and 0 -1's. I've created the 0.5 tag and branch in the repo, and I'll post the final artifacts shortly. --Rafael On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: I was going to close the vote/branch/tag/etc today. --Rafael On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Phil Harvey p...@philharveyonline.com wrote: Hi, Is there a rough date in the frame for when 0.5 will be released? Phil On 23 August 2013 16:56, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:26:54PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: Hi Everyone, After a bunch more tests/fixes I think we're ready to go for a vote now. I've posted 0.5 RC3 in the usual places: Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.5rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-109/ I've attached the svn change log for everything since RC2. Please peruse/test and register your vote: [X] Yes, release 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final [ ] No, 0.5 RC3 has the following issues... -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
Re: [VOTE]: Release Proton 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final
I was going to close the vote/branch/tag/etc today. --Rafael On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Phil Harvey p...@philharveyonline.comwrote: Hi, Is there a rough date in the frame for when 0.5 will be released? Phil On 23 August 2013 16:56, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:26:54PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: Hi Everyone, After a bunch more tests/fixes I think we're ready to go for a vote now. I've posted 0.5 RC3 in the usual places: Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.5rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-109/ I've attached the svn change log for everything since RC2. Please peruse/test and register your vote: [X] Yes, release 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final [ ] No, 0.5 RC3 has the following issues... -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
Re: [VOTE]:[RESULT] Release Proton 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final
The vote carries with 4 +1's and 0 -1's. I've created the 0.5 tag and branch in the repo, and I'll post the final artifacts shortly. --Rafael On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: I was going to close the vote/branch/tag/etc today. --Rafael On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Phil Harvey p...@philharveyonline.comwrote: Hi, Is there a rough date in the frame for when 0.5 will be released? Phil On 23 August 2013 16:56, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:26:54PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: Hi Everyone, After a bunch more tests/fixes I think we're ready to go for a vote now. I've posted 0.5 RC3 in the usual places: Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.5rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-109/ I've attached the svn change log for everything since RC2. Please peruse/test and register your vote: [X] Yes, release 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final [ ] No, 0.5 RC3 has the following issues... -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
Re: [VOTE]: Release Proton 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final
[X ] Yes, release 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final [ ] No, 0.5 RC3 has the following issues... -- View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Proton-0-5-RC3-as-0-5-final-tp7597401p7597436.html Sent from the Apache Qpid Proton mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE]: Release Proton 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final
[X ] Yes, release 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final [ ] No, 0.5 RC3 has the following issues...
Re: [VOTE]: Release Proton 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:26:54PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: Hi Everyone, After a bunch more tests/fixes I think we're ready to go for a vote now. I've posted 0.5 RC3 in the usual places: Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.5rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-109/ I've attached the svn change log for everything since RC2. Please peruse/test and register your vote: [X] Yes, release 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final [ ] No, 0.5 RC3 has the following issues... -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ pgpmvriR5vY3d.pgp Description: PGP signature
[VOTE]: Release Proton 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final
Hi Everyone, After a bunch more tests/fixes I think we're ready to go for a vote now. I've posted 0.5 RC3 in the usual places: Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.5rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-109/ I've attached the svn change log for everything since RC2. Please peruse/test and register your vote: [ ] Yes, release 0.5 RC3 as 0.5 final [ ] No, 0.5 RC3 has the following issues... --Rafael r1516495 | rhs | 2013-08-22 12:04:14 -0400 (Thu, 22 Aug 2013) | 1 line fixed java driver stall; fixed java messenger to clean up the driver after stopping; added useful illegal state exceptions to the java messenger impl r1516485 | rhs | 2013-08-22 11:25:32 -0400 (Thu, 22 Aug 2013) | 1 line made logging use consistent ids r1516484 | rhs | 2013-08-22 11:24:14 -0400 (Thu, 22 Aug 2013) | 1 line added -n option for running multiple iterations; useful in debugging intermittent failures r1516433 | rhs | 2013-08-22 08:28:19 -0400 (Thu, 22 Aug 2013) | 1 line PROTON-397: added example contributed by Marc Berkowitz r1516431 | rhs | 2013-08-22 08:25:26 -0400 (Thu, 22 Aug 2013) | 1 line added target to svn:ignore r1516430 | rhs | 2013-08-22 08:24:43 -0400 (Thu, 22 Aug 2013) | 1 line added target directories to svn:ignore r1516427 | rhs | 2013-08-22 08:14:20 -0400 (Thu, 22 Aug 2013) | 1 line Fixed hang in Messenger.stop(); added recv() to Messenger interface. r1516194 | chug | 2013-08-21 12:03:42 -0400 (Wed, 21 Aug 2013) | 4 lines PROTON-405: Windows install can't find jar files. This patch adds a cmake option to skip building/installing jars. r1516192 | chug | 2013-08-21 11:46:17 -0400 (Wed, 21 Aug 2013) | 1 line NO-JIRA: Repair windows build after nonportable rhs commit r1516161 r1516184 | rhs | 2013-08-21 11:16:19 -0400 (Wed, 21 Aug 2013) | 1 line don't set an error for PN_OVERFLOW, this fixes PROTON-336, also fixed error accessors to be consistent r1516161 | rhs | 2013-08-21 09:53:25 -0400 (Wed, 21 Aug 2013) | 11 lines Added simple smoke tests for the bindings. Encountered numerous issues along the way and fixed as appropriate, including: - added tracker return values for ruby put/get - fixed ruby accept/reject to omit the tracker arg - fixed a deprecation warning in the perl binding - added disposition calls for php (PROTON-365) - added incoming/outgoing window properties for php - fixed put of messages without an address (PROTON-368) - added C level inspection method for messages to allow consistent printing of messages across bindings r1515860 | rhs | 2013-08-20 12:31:43 -0400 (Tue, 20 Aug 2013) | 1 line PROTON-389: added all dispositions to switch statement r1515858 | rhs | 2013-08-20 12:18:19 -0400 (Tue, 20 Aug 2013) | 1 line removed reference to a nonexistent file r1515795 | mcpierce | 2013-08-20 08:20:53 -0400 (Tue, 20 Aug 2013) | 6 lines PROTON-406: Fix installing the Ruby bindings. Previously it checked for RUBY_VENDORLIB_DIR as provided by Cmake. But this variable is not provided by older versions of CMake. Additionally, older versions of Ruby did not provide a vendorlibdir. In those cases, the behavior is to now get the Ruby sitearch dir instead. r1515614 | chug | 2013-08-19 17:30:57 -0400 (Mon, 19 Aug 2013) | 2 lines PROTON-407: [proton-c] Windows install does not install .lib nor .pdb files This patch installs the .lib file(s) to the /bin directory. r1515559 | chug | 2013-08-19 15:01:10 -0400 (Mon, 19 Aug 2013) | 1 line PROTON-408: [proton-c] Windows build does not put d suffix on debug file names r1515455 | philharveyonline | 2013-08-19 10:58:11 -0400 (Mon, 19 Aug 2013) | 2 lines PROTON-343: Removed proton-logging module and its usages (all of which
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] 0.4 RC3
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Bozo Dragojevic bo...@digiverse.si wrote: Where in the repository can I see which revision/branch/tag are the release candidates? Thanks, Bozzo FYI, all the releases are now available at both https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/tags/0.x and https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/branches/0.x --Rafael
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] 0.4 RC3
On 2/25/13 9:44 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: The vote carries with 5 +1's and 0 -1's. I'll upload the artifacts shortly. --Rafael On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Rafael Schlomingr...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble issues that turned up with RC2. Please check it out and cast your vote. Source is here: - http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc3/ Java binaries are here: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-292/ Changes since RC2: PROTON-230, PROTON-246: Copying nested data fails in some cases PROTON-245: make swig skip pn_dtag for compatibility with older versions of swig [ ] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final [ ] No, because ... Where in the repository can I see which revision/branch/tag are the release candidates? Thanks, Bozzo
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] 0.4 RC3
+1 we should have a tag in the repo for each of our releases -- Rob On 26 February 2013 20:34, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote: Rafi, I don't want to sound pedantic, but we should tag our releases as per the guidelines provided by Apache. The previous releases don't have tags either (at least they do have a branch, but the current release doesn't have a branch either). Regards, Rajith On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: I've uploaded the artifacts and updated the download page[1]. It will be about 24 hours or so until the mirrors are fully synced. [1] http://qpid.apache.org/proton/download.html --Rafael On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: The vote carries with 5 +1's and 0 -1's. I'll upload the artifacts shortly. --Rafael On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.eduwrote: Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble issues that turned up with RC2. Please check it out and cast your vote. Source is here: - http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc3/ Java binaries are here: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-292/ Changes since RC2: PROTON-230, PROTON-246: Copying nested data fails in some cases PROTON-245: make swig skip pn_dtag for compatibility with older versions of swig [ ] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final [ ] No, because ...
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] 0.4 RC3
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:36:20PM +0100, Rob Godfrey wrote: +1 we should have a tag in the repo for each of our releases Definitely since, as package maintainer in Fedora, I need to then branch from that in order to maintain patches on top of our official releases easily. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ pgpxtgObNfC67.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] 0.4 RC3
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:05:16PM -0800, Rafael Schloming wrote: I've uploaded the artifacts and updated the download page[1]. It will be about 24 hours or so until the mirrors are fully synced. [1] http://qpid.apache.org/proton/download.html Fedora packages are now released: F17: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qpid-proton-0.4-1.fc17 F18: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qpid-proton-0.4-1.fc18 -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ pgpegPXyOX5WY.pgp Description: PGP signature
[RESULT] [VOTE] 0.4 RC3
The vote carries with 5 +1's and 0 -1's. I'll upload the artifacts shortly. --Rafael On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble issues that turned up with RC2. Please check it out and cast your vote. Source is here: - http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc3/ Java binaries are here: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-292/ Changes since RC2: PROTON-230, PROTON-246: Copying nested data fails in some cases PROTON-245: make swig skip pn_dtag for compatibility with older versions of swig [ ] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final [ ] No, because ...
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] 0.4 RC3
I've uploaded the artifacts and updated the download page[1]. It will be about 24 hours or so until the mirrors are fully synced. [1] http://qpid.apache.org/proton/download.html --Rafael On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: The vote carries with 5 +1's and 0 -1's. I'll upload the artifacts shortly. --Rafael On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.eduwrote: Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble issues that turned up with RC2. Please check it out and cast your vote. Source is here: - http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc3/ Java binaries are here: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-292/ Changes since RC2: PROTON-230, PROTON-246: Copying nested data fails in some cases PROTON-245: make swig skip pn_dtag for compatibility with older versions of swig [ ] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final [ ] No, because ...
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 RC3
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 01:54:27PM -0800, Rafael Schloming wrote: Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble issues that turned up with RC2. Please check it out and cast your vote. Source is here: - http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc3/ Java binaries are here: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-292/ Changes since RC2: PROTON-230, PROTON-246: Copying nested data fails in some cases PROTON-245: make swig skip pn_dtag for compatibility with older versions of swig [X] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final [ ] No, because ... -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ pgpC13yaXMClw.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 RC3
[X] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final FYI: tested Centos-5 x86_64, proton-c build, proton-c unit tests, and install tested F17 x86_64, proton-c/proton-j/proton-jni unit tests pass (aside from PROTON-214) -K - Original Message - Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble issues that turned up with RC2. Please check it out and cast your vote. Source is here: - http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc3/ Java binaries are here: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-292/ Changes since RC2: PROTON-230, PROTON-246: Copying nested data fails in some cases PROTON-245: make swig skip pn_dtag for compatibility with older versions of swig [ ] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final [ ] No, because ...
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 RC3
All topology tests pass. Nihil obstat. Imprimatur. +1 - Original Message - From: Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu To: proton@qpid.apache.org Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:54:27 PM Subject: [VOTE] 0.4 RC3 Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble issues that turned up with RC2. Please check it out and cast your vote. Source is here: - http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc3/ Java binaries are here: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-292/ Changes since RC2: PROTON-230, PROTON-246: Copying nested data fails in some cases PROTON-245: make swig skip pn_dtag for compatibility with older versions of swig [ ] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final [ ] No, because ...
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 RC3
[X] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final [ ] No, because ...
[VOTE] 0.4 RC3
Hi everyone, I've spun an RC3 with fixes for the two immediately soluble issues that turned up with RC2. Please check it out and cast your vote. Source is here: - http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.4rc3/ Java binaries are here: - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-292/ Changes since RC2: PROTON-230, PROTON-246: Copying nested data fails in some cases PROTON-245: make swig skip pn_dtag for compatibility with older versions of swig [ ] Yes, I believe we should make 0.4 RC3 into 0.4 final [ ] No, because ...
Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:35:08PM -0500, Rajith Attapattu wrote: Rafi, We should create tags for the releases. Unless I have missed (in which case I apologize), I don't see any for 0.1 and 0.2 releases (I do see branches for them though). There are branches for the releases, if not tags. I do see the branches, but no tags! The Apache process requires us to tag each release to do repeatable builds. (In the case of 0.1 and 0.2 the stuff on the branch may or may not correspond to the exact released versions) Rajith -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3
The staging repo has been released, the RCs were copied over to dist last night, and the download page was updated this morning. I've also created a 0.3 branch. --Rafael On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.comwrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:14:26PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote: +1 from me as well. I think we have enough votes/time to call this one. I'll post the RC3 as 0.3 shortly. Sorry, thought I'd posted before my +1. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3
+1 from me as well. I think we have enough votes/time to call this one. I'll post the RC3 as 0.3 shortly. --Rafael On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ted Ross tr...@redhat.com wrote: +1 Tested against a couple of applications I'm developing. It looks good. -Ted On 01/08/2013 09:53 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/**qpid-proton-0.3rc3/http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**orgapacheqpid-118/https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/ Fixes since RC2 include: - messenger now reports aborted connections - tarball for ruby gem generation - ssl fix (PROTON-171) --Rafael
Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:35:08PM -0500, Rajith Attapattu wrote: Rafi, We should create tags for the releases. Unless I have missed (in which case I apologize), I don't see any for 0.1 and 0.2 releases (I do see branches for them though). There are branches for the releases, if not tags. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ pgpeLXL8rjhq0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:14:26PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote: +1 from me as well. I think we have enough votes/time to call this one. I'll post the RC3 as 0.3 shortly. Sorry, thought I'd posted before my +1. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ pgp3SlDxYPAwq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3
+1 Tested on FreeBSD 9.1: + cproton builds with gcc + cproton tests clean with manual PYTHONPATH setup. But there are some install caveats (but not enough imo to nack this release) - by default make install puts the libraries in the wrong place for freebsd (in /usr/local/lib64 instead of /usr/local/lib). This isn't terrible as it is possible to specify the correct location with -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR=lib. -- the package config file gets installed in the wrong place and there's no way to specify the correct place. On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 21:53 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote: Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/ Fixes since RC2 include: - messenger now reports aborted connections - tarball for ruby gem generation - ssl fix (PROTON-171) --Rafael
Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3
+1 Tested against a couple of applications I'm developing. It looks good. -Ted On 01/08/2013 09:53 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/ Fixes since RC2 include: - messenger now reports aborted connections - tarball for ruby gem generation - ssl fix (PROTON-171) --Rafael
Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3
+1 for qpid-proton-c-0.3.tar.gz., builds and proton-test passes on rhel6. For fun, I also tried clang. It builds and runs too, but I had to turn off -Werror to get past a handful of warnings about enums. I will get a JIRA on that for the 0.4 release. Cliff On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/ Fixes since RC2 include: - messenger now reports aborted connections - tarball for ruby gem generation - ssl fix (PROTON-171) --Rafael
Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3
+1 Looks good to me. I used Maven to fetch the Java api and implementation jars, and ran the Python tests against them. All tests passed. I also eyeballed the jar contents including the MANIFEST.mf files and everything looked sensible. Phil On 9 January 2013 02:53, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/ Fixes since RC2 include: - messenger now reports aborted connections - tarball for ruby gem generation - ssl fix (PROTON-171) --Rafael
Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3
+1 for qpid-proton-c-0.3.tar.gz. Unpacked built on my Debian6 i686 vm. Manually set PYTHONPATH and successfully ran proton-tests. -K - Original Message - Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/ Fixes since RC2 include: - messenger now reports aborted connections - tarball for ruby gem generation - ssl fix (PROTON-171) --Rafael
Re: [VOTE] 0.2 RC3
-1 Sadly I have to vote against myself due to a bug I just found. Will follow up with RC4 presently. --Rafael On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Hi, I did a bit more testing over the weekend and posted an RC3 here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.2rc3 The only changes are fixing a minor bug in the ack stuff and adding the C examples. Given that the delta from 0.1 is quite contained, I'm going to optimistically call for a release vote based on RC3. Please check it out and give your +1 if it looks good. I'd like to do the same 24 hour thingy as last time so I can post the release tomorrow if there are no serious issues. [ ] Ship it! (Release 0.2 RC3 as 0.2) [ ] No! (We need to fix ...) --Rafael
[VOTE] 0.2 RC3
Hi, I did a bit more testing over the weekend and posted an RC3 here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.2rc3 The only changes are fixing a minor bug in the ack stuff and adding the C examples. Given that the delta from 0.1 is quite contained, I'm going to optimistically call for a release vote based on RC3. Please check it out and give your +1 if it looks good. I'd like to do the same 24 hour thingy as last time so I can post the release tomorrow if there are no serious issues. [ ] Ship it! (Release 0.2 RC3 as 0.2) [ ] No! (We need to fix ...) --Rafael
Re: RC3
Centos5 x64 build failure - funny didn't I see this before? [ 69%] Building C object CMakeFiles/qpid-proton.dir/src/driver.c.o /home/kgiusti/proton/qpid-proton-c-0.1/src/driver.c:75:1: error: NAME_MAX redefined In file included from /usr/include/bits/local_lim.h:36, from /usr/include/bits/posix1_lim.h:153, from /usr/include/limits.h:145, from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/include/limits.h:122, from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/include/syslimits.h:7, from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/include/limits.h:11, from /usr/include/bits/socket.h:31, from /usr/include/sys/socket.h:35, from /home/kgiusti/proton/qpid-proton-c-0.1/src/driver.c:29: /usr/include/linux/limits.h:13:1: error: this is the location of the previous definition make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/qpid-proton.dir/src/driver.c.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/qpid-proton.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 -K - Original Message - Are the examples supposed to work for this release? Because the instructions don't tell people how to get them running. I don't see the config.sh file. (I mentioned this in a previous email. I'll log a Jira.) William - Original Message - I've put up an RC3 here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc3/ The following are the changes from RC2: - added README and LICENSE for proton-j - updated the proton-c README - fixed cmake build to not use the OPTIONAL thing for older versions - fixed detection of LIB_SUFFIX (i.e. we won't install into lib64 on 32 bit systems anymore) --Rafael
Re: RC3
Thanks. It was ambiguous. Looked like it was optional and had a default (which it did) Now hopefully people can just deduce more info about the examples from the examples/README.txt and PROTON-100 can be ignored ;-) Sent from my iPhone On Oct 25, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Done. I stopped short of putting Hey William! Set the install prefix. ;-) --Rafael On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:22 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: Change: # depending on your system you may want to adjust the install prefix cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr .. To: # Set the install prefix. You may need to adjust depending on your system cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr .. - Original Message - It looks like you installed everything into /usr/local. I'm guessing the system python (installed in /usr) does not look under /usr/local as part of it's module search path. Try installing into /usr instead. --Rafael On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:10 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: $ more build/install_manifest.txt /usr/local/bin/proton /usr/local/bin/proton-dump /usr/local/lib64/libqpid-proton.so /usr/local/include/proton/parser.h /usr/local/include/proton/util.h /usr/local/include/proton/ssl.h /usr/local/include/proton/scanner.h /usr/local/include/proton/cproton.i /usr/local/include/proton/messenger.h /usr/local/include/proton/message.h /usr/local/include/proton/sasl.h /usr/local/include/proton/driver.h /usr/local/include/proton/types.h /usr/local/include/proton/buffer.h /usr/local/include/proton/framing.h /usr/local/include/proton/codec.h /usr/local/include/proton/engine.h /usr/local/include/proton/error.h /usr/local/share/proton/LICENSE /usr/local/share/proton/README /usr/local/share/proton/TODO /usr/local/lib64/pkgconfig/libqpid-proton.pc /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cproton.py /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cproton.pyc /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cproton.pyo /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/proton.py /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/proton.pyc /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/proton.pyo /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_cproton.so /usr/local/lib64/ruby/cproton.so /usr/local/lib64/php/modules/cproton.so /usr/local/share/php/cproton.php /usr/local/share/php/proton.php /etc/php.d/cproton.ini - Original Message - Can you post the contents of your install_manifest.txt? On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:50 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: Ok install was successful. Still have an ImportError for proton. Not sure what I'm missing William Sent from my iPhone On Oct 24, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: The examples should work without the config.sh, it just sets up stuff for the dev environment. If you do the make install, all the proton stuff should be available without any special environmental config. --Rafael On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:11 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: Are the examples supposed to work for this release? Because the instructions don't tell people how to get them running. I don't see the config.sh file. (I mentioned this in a previous email. I'll log a Jira.) William - Original Message - I've put up an RC3 here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc3/ The following are the changes from RC2: - added README and LICENSE for proton-j - updated the proton-c README - fixed cmake build to not use the OPTIONAL thing for older versions - fixed detection of LIB_SUFFIX (i.e. we won't install into lib64 on 32 bit systems anymore) --Rafael
RC3
I've put up an RC3 here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc3/ The following are the changes from RC2: - added README and LICENSE for proton-j - updated the proton-c README - fixed cmake build to not use the OPTIONAL thing for older versions - fixed detection of LIB_SUFFIX (i.e. we won't install into lib64 on 32 bit systems anymore) --Rafael
Re: RC3
I got the following failure on proton-c from this release on 32-bit Ubuntu 12.04: proton_tests.codec.DataTest.testDecimal64 fail Error during test: Traceback (most recent call last): File ./proton-test, line 331, in run phase() File /home/rob/qpid-proton-c-0.1/tests/proton_tests/codec.py, line 246, in testDecimal64 self._test(decimal64, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2**60) File /home/rob/qpid-proton-c-0.1/tests/proton_tests/codec.py, line 183, in _test putter(v) File /home/rob/qpid-proton-c-0.1/bindings/python/proton.py, line 1134, in put_decimal64 self._check(pn_data_put_decimal64(self._data, d)) TypeError: in method 'pn_data_put_decimal64', argument 2 of type 'pn_decimal64_t' On 24 October 2012 21:29, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: I've put up an RC3 here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc3/ The following are the changes from RC2: - added README and LICENSE for proton-j - updated the proton-c README - fixed cmake build to not use the OPTIONAL thing for older versions - fixed detection of LIB_SUFFIX (i.e. we won't install into lib64 on 32 bit systems anymore) --Rafael
Re: RC3
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:24:47PM +0200, Rob Godfrey wrote: I got the following failure on proton-c from this release on 32-bit Ubuntu 12.04: And I'm still failing on the package build with: /home/mcpierce/Packaging/rpms/BUILD/qpid-proton-c-0.1/src/driver.c: In function 'pn_driver_wakeup': /home/mcpierce/Packaging/rpms/BUILD/qpid-proton-c-0.1/src/driver.c:673:5: error: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Werror=unused-result] cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/qpid-proton.dir/src/driver.c.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/mcpierce/Packaging/rpms/BUILD/qpid-proton-c-0.1' make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/qpid-proton.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mcpierce/Packaging/rpms/BUILD/qpid-proton-c-0.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /home/mcpierce/Packaging/rpms/tmp/rpm-tmp.pJTeSb (%build) -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ pgpjEV36bLpuC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RC3
The examples should work without the config.sh, it just sets up stuff for the dev environment. If you do the make install, all the proton stuff should be available without any special environmental config. --Rafael On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:11 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: Are the examples supposed to work for this release? Because the instructions don't tell people how to get them running. I don't see the config.sh file. (I mentioned this in a previous email. I'll log a Jira.) William - Original Message - I've put up an RC3 here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc3/ The following are the changes from RC2: - added README and LICENSE for proton-j - updated the proton-c README - fixed cmake build to not use the OPTIONAL thing for older versions - fixed detection of LIB_SUFFIX (i.e. we won't install into lib64 on 32 bit systems anymore) --Rafael
Re: RC3
Thanks I'll try that. Sorry I guess I had built up a habit. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 24, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: The examples should work without the config.sh, it just sets up stuff for the dev environment. If you do the make install, all the proton stuff should be available without any special environmental config. --Rafael On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:11 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: Are the examples supposed to work for this release? Because the instructions don't tell people how to get them running. I don't see the config.sh file. (I mentioned this in a previous email. I'll log a Jira.) William - Original Message - I've put up an RC3 here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc3/ The following are the changes from RC2: - added README and LICENSE for proton-j - updated the proton-c README - fixed cmake build to not use the OPTIONAL thing for older versions - fixed detection of LIB_SUFFIX (i.e. we won't install into lib64 on 32 bit systems anymore) --Rafael
Re: RC3
Can you post the contents of your install_manifest.txt? On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:50 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: Ok install was successful. Still have an ImportError for proton. Not sure what I'm missing William Sent from my iPhone On Oct 24, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: The examples should work without the config.sh, it just sets up stuff for the dev environment. If you do the make install, all the proton stuff should be available without any special environmental config. --Rafael On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:11 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: Are the examples supposed to work for this release? Because the instructions don't tell people how to get them running. I don't see the config.sh file. (I mentioned this in a previous email. I'll log a Jira.) William - Original Message - I've put up an RC3 here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc3/ The following are the changes from RC2: - added README and LICENSE for proton-j - updated the proton-c README - fixed cmake build to not use the OPTIONAL thing for older versions - fixed detection of LIB_SUFFIX (i.e. we won't install into lib64 on 32 bit systems anymore) --Rafael
Re: RC3
$ more build/install_manifest.txt /usr/local/bin/proton /usr/local/bin/proton-dump /usr/local/lib64/libqpid-proton.so /usr/local/include/proton/parser.h /usr/local/include/proton/util.h /usr/local/include/proton/ssl.h /usr/local/include/proton/scanner.h /usr/local/include/proton/cproton.i /usr/local/include/proton/messenger.h /usr/local/include/proton/message.h /usr/local/include/proton/sasl.h /usr/local/include/proton/driver.h /usr/local/include/proton/types.h /usr/local/include/proton/buffer.h /usr/local/include/proton/framing.h /usr/local/include/proton/codec.h /usr/local/include/proton/engine.h /usr/local/include/proton/error.h /usr/local/share/proton/LICENSE /usr/local/share/proton/README /usr/local/share/proton/TODO /usr/local/lib64/pkgconfig/libqpid-proton.pc /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cproton.py /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cproton.pyc /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cproton.pyo /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/proton.py /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/proton.pyc /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/proton.pyo /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_cproton.so /usr/local/lib64/ruby/cproton.so /usr/local/lib64/php/modules/cproton.so /usr/local/share/php/cproton.php /usr/local/share/php/proton.php /etc/php.d/cproton.ini - Original Message - Can you post the contents of your install_manifest.txt? On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:50 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: Ok install was successful. Still have an ImportError for proton. Not sure what I'm missing William Sent from my iPhone On Oct 24, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: The examples should work without the config.sh, it just sets up stuff for the dev environment. If you do the make install, all the proton stuff should be available without any special environmental config. --Rafael On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:11 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: Are the examples supposed to work for this release? Because the instructions don't tell people how to get them running. I don't see the config.sh file. (I mentioned this in a previous email. I'll log a Jira.) William - Original Message - I've put up an RC3 here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc3/ The following are the changes from RC2: - added README and LICENSE for proton-j - updated the proton-c README - fixed cmake build to not use the OPTIONAL thing for older versions - fixed detection of LIB_SUFFIX (i.e. we won't install into lib64 on 32 bit systems anymore) --Rafael
Re: RC3
It looks like you installed everything into /usr/local. I'm guessing the system python (installed in /usr) does not look under /usr/local as part of it's module search path. Try installing into /usr instead. --Rafael On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:10 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: $ more build/install_manifest.txt /usr/local/bin/proton /usr/local/bin/proton-dump /usr/local/lib64/libqpid-proton.so /usr/local/include/proton/parser.h /usr/local/include/proton/util.h /usr/local/include/proton/ssl.h /usr/local/include/proton/scanner.h /usr/local/include/proton/cproton.i /usr/local/include/proton/messenger.h /usr/local/include/proton/message.h /usr/local/include/proton/sasl.h /usr/local/include/proton/driver.h /usr/local/include/proton/types.h /usr/local/include/proton/buffer.h /usr/local/include/proton/framing.h /usr/local/include/proton/codec.h /usr/local/include/proton/engine.h /usr/local/include/proton/error.h /usr/local/share/proton/LICENSE /usr/local/share/proton/README /usr/local/share/proton/TODO /usr/local/lib64/pkgconfig/libqpid-proton.pc /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cproton.py /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cproton.pyc /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cproton.pyo /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/proton.py /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/proton.pyc /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/proton.pyo /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_cproton.so /usr/local/lib64/ruby/cproton.so /usr/local/lib64/php/modules/cproton.so /usr/local/share/php/cproton.php /usr/local/share/php/proton.php /etc/php.d/cproton.ini - Original Message - Can you post the contents of your install_manifest.txt? On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:50 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: Ok install was successful. Still have an ImportError for proton. Not sure what I'm missing William Sent from my iPhone On Oct 24, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: The examples should work without the config.sh, it just sets up stuff for the dev environment. If you do the make install, all the proton stuff should be available without any special environmental config. --Rafael On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:11 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: Are the examples supposed to work for this release? Because the instructions don't tell people how to get them running. I don't see the config.sh file. (I mentioned this in a previous email. I'll log a Jira.) William - Original Message - I've put up an RC3 here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc3/ The following are the changes from RC2: - added README and LICENSE for proton-j - updated the proton-c README - fixed cmake build to not use the OPTIONAL thing for older versions - fixed detection of LIB_SUFFIX (i.e. we won't install into lib64 on 32 bit systems anymore) --Rafael
Re: RC3
Change: # depending on your system you may want to adjust the install prefix cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr .. To: # Set the install prefix. You may need to adjust depending on your system cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr .. - Original Message - It looks like you installed everything into /usr/local. I'm guessing the system python (installed in /usr) does not look under /usr/local as part of it's module search path. Try installing into /usr instead. --Rafael On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:10 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: $ more build/install_manifest.txt /usr/local/bin/proton /usr/local/bin/proton-dump /usr/local/lib64/libqpid-proton.so /usr/local/include/proton/parser.h /usr/local/include/proton/util.h /usr/local/include/proton/ssl.h /usr/local/include/proton/scanner.h /usr/local/include/proton/cproton.i /usr/local/include/proton/messenger.h /usr/local/include/proton/message.h /usr/local/include/proton/sasl.h /usr/local/include/proton/driver.h /usr/local/include/proton/types.h /usr/local/include/proton/buffer.h /usr/local/include/proton/framing.h /usr/local/include/proton/codec.h /usr/local/include/proton/engine.h /usr/local/include/proton/error.h /usr/local/share/proton/LICENSE /usr/local/share/proton/README /usr/local/share/proton/TODO /usr/local/lib64/pkgconfig/libqpid-proton.pc /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cproton.py /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cproton.pyc /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cproton.pyo /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/proton.py /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/proton.pyc /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/proton.pyo /usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_cproton.so /usr/local/lib64/ruby/cproton.so /usr/local/lib64/php/modules/cproton.so /usr/local/share/php/cproton.php /usr/local/share/php/proton.php /etc/php.d/cproton.ini - Original Message - Can you post the contents of your install_manifest.txt? On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:50 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: Ok install was successful. Still have an ImportError for proton. Not sure what I'm missing William Sent from my iPhone On Oct 24, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: The examples should work without the config.sh, it just sets up stuff for the dev environment. If you do the make install, all the proton stuff should be available without any special environmental config. --Rafael On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:11 PM, William Henry whe...@redhat.com wrote: Are the examples supposed to work for this release? Because the instructions don't tell people how to get them running. I don't see the config.sh file. (I mentioned this in a previous email. I'll log a Jira.) William - Original Message - I've put up an RC3 here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc3/ The following are the changes from RC2: - added README and LICENSE for proton-j - updated the proton-c README - fixed cmake build to not use the OPTIONAL thing for older versions - fixed detection of LIB_SUFFIX (i.e. we won't install into lib64 on 32 bit systems anymore) --Rafael
