Re: RC6

2012-10-26 Thread Robbie Gemmell
I dont think KEYS should be proton specific, its just the Qpid committers
and should be the same file as a result. Commons-* seem to use the same
KEYS file for example.

(Aside: we should probably be transitioning away from the KEYS file anyway
and using the new system they put in place for distribution via
https://people.apache.org/keys/).

Robbie

On 26 October 2012 02:05, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:

 Sorry I should have done this before you posted RC6 :(
 We have a few files (mostly java files) that are missing license headers.
 Please look at the RAT output I posted.

 Once the final RC is voted, the release manager (in this case Rafi)
 will have to sign the final artefacts.
 You already have your key listed here [1]
 We should move [1] under the proton main dir.

 Regards,

 Rajith

 [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/KEYS

 On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu
 wrote:
  I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
  properly. That's the only change from RC5.
 
  [1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/
 
  --Rafael



Re: RC6

2012-10-26 Thread Rajith Attapattu
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Robbie Gemmell
robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote:
 I dont think KEYS should be proton specific, its just the Qpid committers
 and should be the same file as a result. Commons-* seem to use the same
 KEYS file for example.

 (Aside: we should probably be transitioning away from the KEYS file anyway
 and using the new system they put in place for distribution via
 https://people.apache.org/keys/).


Sorry I haven't looked at this stuff for a while now, so wasn't aware
about the new mechanism.
The existing KEYS file was inside the qpid tree, hence my suggestion.
Actually a better suggestion would have been to move that file to the top level.

But anyways, given that we have a new system in place it's irrelevant now.
We should make an attempt to use the new approach.

Rajith

 Robbie

 On 26 October 2012 02:05, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:

 Sorry I should have done this before you posted RC6 :(
 We have a few files (mostly java files) that are missing license headers.
 Please look at the RAT output I posted.

 Once the final RC is voted, the release manager (in this case Rafi)
 will have to sign the final artefacts.
 You already have your key listed here [1]
 We should move [1] under the proton main dir.

 Regards,

 Rajith

 [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/KEYS

 On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu
 wrote:
  I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
  properly. That's the only change from RC5.
 
  [1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/
 
  --Rafael



Re: RC6

2012-10-26 Thread Rafael Schloming
Do you know how I get my key to show up there?

--Rafael

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.comwrote:

 I dont think KEYS should be proton specific, its just the Qpid committers
 and should be the same file as a result. Commons-* seem to use the same
 KEYS file for example.

 (Aside: we should probably be transitioning away from the KEYS file anyway
 and using the new system they put in place for distribution via
 https://people.apache.org/keys/).

 Robbie

 On 26 October 2012 02:05, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:

  Sorry I should have done this before you posted RC6 :(
  We have a few files (mostly java files) that are missing license headers.
  Please look at the RAT output I posted.
 
  Once the final RC is voted, the release manager (in this case Rafi)
  will have to sign the final artefacts.
  You already have your key listed here [1]
  We should move [1] under the proton main dir.
 
  Regards,
 
  Rajith
 
  [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/KEYS
 
  On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu
  wrote:
   I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
   properly. That's the only change from RC5.
  
   [1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/
  
   --Rafael
 



Re: RC6

2012-10-26 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:38:04PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
 I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
 properly. That's the only change from RC5.
 
 [1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/

Packages build fine locally (F17 x86_64).
Scratch build in Koji [1] was successful as well.

[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4628740

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/



pgp7Fso70zc9R.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RC6

2012-10-25 Thread Rafael Schloming
I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
properly. That's the only change from RC5.

[1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/

--Rafael