[Prototype-core] ******FREE DOWNLOADS Pics. n Vids.***********
**FREE DOWNLOADS Pics. n Vids.*** http://Earnfre.blogspot.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype: Core group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Prototype-core] Re: unloadCache error in IE7 in 1.5x prototype
Ah, yeah, that makes sense. We're staying on 1.5x, for a bit (until we get around to the upgrade process, basically, and I'd like to wait untill a new point release of lowpro is out). I guess you aren't taking patches for the 1.5x line anymore, but if anybody else encounters a problem with the page unload in IE7, then where the code checks for IE before clearing/destroying the cache, just add a !IE7 to teh conditional, where IE7 is any of the easy to google IE7 checks, such as the existing stuff + a check for xhr. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype: Core group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Prototype-core] $super and Function.toString()
Hello Latest version of Prototype uses Function.toString() method to find names of function arguments and detect presence of $super argument. However, some time ago one of Opera developers warned in his blog (http://my.opera.com/hallvors/blog/2007/03/28/a-problem-with-john-resigs-addevent) against relying on function serialization. He said that mobile devices are limited in resources and thus may lack this functionality. Did developers take this into consideration while creating new and shiny class system? -- arty ( http://arty.name ) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype: Core group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Prototype-core] Re: $super and Function.toString()
On Nov 11, 2007 10:16 PM, Artemy Tregoubenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: some time ago one of Opera developers warned in his blog ( http://my.opera.com/hallvors/blog/2007/03/28/a-problem-with-john-resigs-addevent ) against relying on function serialization. He said that mobile devices are limited in resources and thus may lack this functionality. Hi Artemy, Yeah, the $super argument is a hack. Class instances will misbehave if the JavaScript interpreter is unable to serialize functions. But this issue aside, can we expect the rest of the framework to work if the JS interpreter is limited? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype: Core group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Prototype-core] Re: $super and Function.toString()
There are other popular scripts that rely on this behavior, most notably Dean Edwards's original base.js inheritance script. It should also be noted that this behavior does not comply with ECMA-262, which states that Function.prototype.toString shall return a string that has the syntax of a function declaration. I'm sure it was necessary to get a JS environment running on mobile devices, but the point remains. Prototype supports the major desktop browsers, but I don't think we have any _official_ level of support for browsers on mobile devices. Cheers, Andrew On Nov 11, 3:57 pm, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 11, 2007 10:16 PM, Artemy Tregoubenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: some time ago one of Opera developers warned in his blog ( http://my.opera.com/hallvors/blog/2007/03/28/a-problem-with-john-resi... ) against relying on function serialization. He said that mobile devices are limited in resources and thus may lack this functionality. Hi Artemy, Yeah, the $super argument is a hack. Class instances will misbehave if the JavaScript interpreter is unable to serialize functions. But this issue aside, can we expect the rest of the framework to work if the JS interpreter is limited? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype: Core group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Prototype-core] Re: $super and Function.toString()
probably yes if disabled toString() is the only limitation Yeah, the $super argument is a hack. Class instances will misbehave if the JavaScript interpreter is unable to serialize functions. But this issue aside, can we expect the rest of the framework to work if the JS interpreter is limited? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype: Core group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Prototype-core] Re: $super and Function.toString()
I see. Actually I haven't studied js spec, but if it says so then I agree on using Function.toString is absolutely fair. It should also be noted that this behavior does not comply with ECMA-262, which states that Function.prototype.toString shall return a string that has the syntax of a function declaration. I'm sure it was necessary to get a JS environment running on mobile devices, but the point remains. Prototype supports the major desktop browsers, but I don't think we have any _official_ level of support for browsers on mobile devices. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype: Core group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
