[Proto-Scripty] Try.these deprecated?
According to the documentation Try.these has been deprecated. Is this right? It's still being used in the Ajax class. The change was in this checkin: https://github.com/sstephenson/prototype/commit/f12b83ef236a54306c7f686ae4c1c45910e2fc57#src/lang.js rick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?
I have been chasing my tail on a slow script error, and just now discovered that if I disable my call to make a 1,000 element list sortable the problem goes entirely away. First, is there any sort of tool I can use to determine where this function is spending all of its time? Second, is there any way to get around these slow script errors? The issue I am seeing is that once the page loads, and this function is called, the browser goes into beachball mode, eventually shows an alert about the slow script. If I okay that (keep trying, I tell it) the page loads and works perfectly. Sortable does exactly what it's supposed to do, and very snappily. Thanks in advance, Walter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?
Walter, I had the timeout problem on a script with a different purpose. What I did was hijacked the code here: http://www.mcfedries.com/JavaScript/timer.asp I created an array: var funcTimers[] and then modified the above code to insert into the array and each func started the timer on entry and ended it on exit. At the end, I dumped the funcTimers out with an alert() and I had my answer. Also, about 10 years ago (when I was younger and smarter) I wrote a table sort function that would sort a standard html table based on the column clicked. It was quite fast and would sort through 1000 columns pretty quickly. I looked on my backup drive and couldnt find it but if you want, I'll root around and post it might give you a different strategy. P~ On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.comwrote: I have been chasing my tail on a slow script error, and just now discovered that if I disable my call to make a 1,000 element list sortable the problem goes entirely away. First, is there any sort of tool I can use to determine where this function is spending all of its time? Second, is there any way to get around these slow script errors? The issue I am seeing is that once the page loads, and this function is called, the browser goes into beachball mode, eventually shows an alert about the slow script. If I okay that (keep trying, I tell it) the page loads and works perfectly. Sortable does exactly what it's supposed to do, and very snappily. Thanks in advance, Walter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@** googlegroups.com prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+** unsubscr...@googlegroups.comprototype-scriptaculous%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/prototype-scriptaculous?**hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?
Thanks very much for the offer. I seem to have fixed it here, but the problem wasn't specifically in Sortable. What I ended up doing was staggering some of the Ajax loading events that were also happening while that function fired using setTimeout and that got around the problem. Somewhere on one of my computers I have a copy of a framework called light sortable or lite sortable, which aims to ape the Scriptaculous API without being so heavy. It eschews the fancy animation effects for simple fast drag sorting. But my page (and client) are pretty wedded to that eye candy, so I guess Im stuck with that. Thanks, Walter On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Phil Petree wrote: Walter, I had the timeout problem on a script with a different purpose. What I did was hijacked the code here: http://www.mcfedries.com/JavaScript/timer.asp I created an array: var funcTimers[] and then modified the above code to insert into the array and each func started the timer on entry and ended it on exit. At the end, I dumped the funcTimers out with an alert() and I had my answer. Also, about 10 years ago (when I was younger and smarter) I wrote a table sort function that would sort a standard html table based on the column clicked. It was quite fast and would sort through 1000 columns pretty quickly. I looked on my backup drive and couldnt find it but if you want, I'll root around and post it might give you a different strategy. P~ On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote: I have been chasing my tail on a slow script error, and just now discovered that if I disable my call to make a 1,000 element list sortable the problem goes entirely away. First, is there any sort of tool I can use to determine where this function is spending all of its time? Second, is there any way to get around these slow script errors? The issue I am seeing is that once the page loads, and this function is called, the browser goes into beachball mode, eventually shows an alert about the slow script. If I okay that (keep trying, I tell it) the page loads and works perfectly. Sortable does exactly what it's supposed to do, and very snappily. Thanks in advance, Walter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?
On 30 June 2011 15:41, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote: Thanks very much for the offer. I seem to have fixed it here, but the problem wasn't specifically in Sortable. What I ended up doing was staggering some of the Ajax loading events that were also happening while that function fired using setTimeout and that got around the problem. Somewhere on one of my computers I have a copy of a framework called light sortable or lite sortable, which aims to ape the Scriptaculous API without being so heavy. It eschews the fancy animation effects for simple fast drag sorting. But my page (and client) are pretty wedded to that eye candy, so I guess Im stuck with that. Thanks, Walter On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Phil Petree wrote: Walter, I had the timeout problem on a script with a different purpose. What I did was hijacked the code here: http://www.mcfedries.com/JavaScript/timer.asp I created an array: var funcTimers[] and then modified the above code to insert into the array and each func started the timer on entry and ended it on exit. At the end, I dumped the funcTimers out with an alert() and I had my answer. Also, about 10 years ago (when I was younger and smarter) I wrote a table sort function that would sort a standard html table based on the column clicked. It was quite fast and would sort through 1000 columns pretty quickly. I looked on my backup drive and couldnt find it but if you want, I'll root around and post it might give you a different strategy. P~ On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote: I have been chasing my tail on a slow script error, and just now discovered that if I disable my call to make a 1,000 element list sortable the problem goes entirely away. First, is there any sort of tool I can use to determine where this function is spending all of its time? Second, is there any way to get around these slow script errors? The issue I am seeing is that once the page loads, and this function is called, the browser goes into beachball mode, eventually shows an alert about the slow script. If I okay that (keep trying, I tell it) the page loads and works perfectly. Sortable does exactly what it's supposed to do, and very snappily. Thanks in advance, Walter I use http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/sorttable/ -- Richard Quadling Twitter : EE : Zend : PHPDoc @RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY : bit.ly/lFnVea -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?
Ah yes.. the stacked ajax calls... kill ya every time! Glad you got it working! On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.comwrote: Thanks very much for the offer. I seem to have fixed it here, but the problem wasn't specifically in Sortable. What I ended up doing was staggering some of the Ajax loading events that were also happening while that function fired using setTimeout and that got around the problem. Somewhere on one of my computers I have a copy of a framework called light sortable or lite sortable, which aims to ape the Scriptaculous API without being so heavy. It eschews the fancy animation effects for simple fast drag sorting. But my page (and client) are pretty wedded to that eye candy, so I guess Im stuck with that. Thanks, Walter On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Phil Petree wrote: Walter, I had the timeout problem on a script with a different purpose. What I did was hijacked the code here: http://www.mcfedries.com/** JavaScript/timer.asp http://www.mcfedries.com/JavaScript/timer.asp I created an array: var funcTimers[] and then modified the above code to insert into the array and each func started the timer on entry and ended it on exit. At the end, I dumped the funcTimers out with an alert() and I had my answer. Also, about 10 years ago (when I was younger and smarter) I wrote a table sort function that would sort a standard html table based on the column clicked. It was quite fast and would sort through 1000 columns pretty quickly. I looked on my backup drive and couldnt find it but if you want, I'll root around and post it might give you a different strategy. P~ On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote: I have been chasing my tail on a slow script error, and just now discovered that if I disable my call to make a 1,000 element list sortable the problem goes entirely away. First, is there any sort of tool I can use to determine where this function is spending all of its time? Second, is there any way to get around these slow script errors? The issue I am seeing is that once the page loads, and this function is called, the browser goes into beachball mode, eventually shows an alert about the slow script. If I okay that (keep trying, I tell it) the page loads and works perfectly. Sortable does exactly what it's supposed to do, and very snappily. Thanks in advance, Walter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@** googlegroups.com prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+** unsubscr...@googlegroups.comprototype-scriptaculous%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/prototype-scriptaculous?**hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@** googlegroups.com prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+** unsubscr...@googlegroups.comprototype-scriptaculous%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/prototype-scriptaculous?**hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@** googlegroups.com prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+** unsubscr...@googlegroups.comprototype-scriptaculous%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/prototype-scriptaculous?**hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?
On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Richard Quadling wrote: I use http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/sorttable/ -- Richard Quadling Twitter : EE : Zend : PHPDoc @RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY : bit.ly/lFnVea Thanks, that's completely a different thing from what I'm doing. I have a drag-to-sort widget that lets users put photos in a specific order, then saves that order in an Ajax callback. Scripty.Sortable does precisely that. Walter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv
Using html5shiv 1.6.2 (latest) (http://code.google.com/p/html5shiv/)
and Prototype v1.7..
So, html5shiv makes article, section etc elements work nicely in
IE9 .. they appear, you can style them etc. All good. The HTML5
elements all exist within the IE DOM tree in Developer Tools.
However, when you try to grab any such HTML5 elements using
Prototype's DOM-traversal methods (e.g. down(), up()), then they
always return undefined in IE8/IE7 (who cares about IE6?). For
example:
article id=foo
div/div
section/section
ul id=abc123/ul
/article
..then..
var bar = $('foo').down('div'); // works
var baz = $('foo').down('section'); // undefined
..and..
var theArticle = $('abc123').up('article'); // undefined
Is this a gaping hole/bug?
Code to reproduce: http://pastebin.com/TC1Dp5At
Jon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv
On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Jonny Nott wrote:
Using html5shiv 1.6.2 (latest) (http://code.google.com/p/html5shiv/)
and Prototype v1.7..
So, html5shiv makes article, section etc elements work nicely in
IE9 .. they appear, you can style them etc. All good. The HTML5
elements all exist within the IE DOM tree in Developer Tools.
However, when you try to grab any such HTML5 elements using
Prototype's DOM-traversal methods (e.g. down(), up()), then they
always return undefined in IE8/IE7 (who cares about IE6?). For
example:
article id=foo
div/div
section/section
ul id=abc123/ul
/article
..then..
var bar = $('foo').down('div'); // works
var baz = $('foo').down('section'); // undefined
..and..
var theArticle = $('abc123').up('article'); // undefined
Is this a gaping hole/bug?
Code to reproduce: http://pastebin.com/TC1Dp5At
Try adding this line in a dom:loaded callback, inside an IE
conditional comment:
$w('article aside details figcaption figure footer header hgroup menu
nav section').each(function(elm){
new Element(elm);
});
As far as I know, IE won't let you script something unless you build
one such in memory first. Once you do that, you're golden. Not sure if
I'm just duplicating what HTML5shiv is supposed to do, but this is the
way I've done it before.
Walter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype
script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv
I *think* this is exactly what html5shiv is doing. Could try adding your suggestion into the test HTML on pastebin, but I'm not at my computer right now :( -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv
One thought, is HTML5shiv loading before or after Prototype? Walter On Jun 30, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Jonny Nott wrote: I *think* this is exactly what html5shiv is doing. Could try adding your suggestion into the test HTML on pastebin, but I'm not at my computer right now :( -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv
On Jun 30, 5:44 pm, Jonny Nott jonn...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] Is this a gaping hole/bug? I'm sure the core folks have thick skins, but was gaping _really_ necessary? On Jun 30, 6:57 pm, Jonny Nott jonn...@gmail.com wrote: I *think* this is exactly what html5shiv is doing. Could try adding your suggestion into the test HTML on pastebin, but I'm not at my computer right now :( Correct, that's exactly what html5shiv does: Creates elements using the new tags so that IE understands that those tags are elements. It looks like a bug in the old version of Sizzle that Prototype incorporates. You can see it vs. the current version of Sizzle (in jQuery) here: http://jsbin.com/osufay In contrast, if I go back to an earlier version of jQuery with an older Sizzle, it fails in the same sort of way: http://jsbin.com/osufay/2 And if I go back to Prototype 1.6.0 (which didn't use Sizzle, it had its own selector engine), it works: http://jsbin.com/osufay/3 So it was a bug in Sizzle that's been fixed. The fix would be to upgrade the Sizzle bundled in Prototype to the latest version. -- T.J. Crowder Independent Software Engineer tj / crowder software / com www / crowder software / com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv
Aha, Mr Crowder, you always have the answers! Thanks. So, any news on Prototype v 1.7.0.1, 1.7.1 or 1.8? Will the next version have the latest Sizzle in? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv
Thanks Mr Crowder! You the man, as always.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv
So, any news on Prototype 1.7.0.1, 1.7.1 or 1.8? Assuming it'll have the latest sizzlejs included? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
