Re: indexeddb and object store events
On 2/17/13 10:34 AM, ext Miko Nieminen wrote: So far I haven't got other feedback than this is fairly good idea and probably should be included in the official API, but is it stillpossible to get this kind of changes included in the API or am I too late with this request? If it is possible to have this change, is there anything I can do to help it getting forward? I added your request to the IDB feature list http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/IndexedDatabaseFeatures#Feature_List. As I mentioned on www-tag, I think it is too late to add this feature (or any other features) to v1 of the spec but ultimately, that is a discussion for the entire group. I'm working on reference implementation in Mozilla's codebase and I feel I'm quite close getting the first version working, but I'm hacking it on my free time and I have no previous experience from Mozilla's code so the progress is somewhat slow. I think reporting your findings on this list would be useful e.g. to understand the benefits/costs of your request. -AB
Selectors API Level 1 is a W3C Recommendation
Congratulations to Lachlan and Anne on the publication of a Recommendation for Selectors API Level 1 http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-selectors-api-20130221/. Great job guys! -ArtB
RE: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
± From: Aryeh Gregor [mailto:a...@aryeh.name] ± Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:59 AM ± ± On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Ms2ger ms2...@gmail.com wrote: ± FWIW, Aryeh is currently studying full time and doesn't follow web ± standards discussions regularly. ± ± I do check them from time to time, though, and will check any personal e-mail I ± receive for the time being. In particular, I'm happy to answer any questions in ± public or private about the spec, particularly to help a new editor get the hang of ± it. It's giant and complicated and very hard to read -- which I suspect is an ± accurate description of implementations' source code as well! (At least I've ± heard terrible things about WebKit's implementation, and Gecko's I've seen. As ± specs get more precise, their complexity eventually matches that of ± implementations . . .) Thanks for taking time to help here. Your work is a major advance from spec vacuum that we had in the past, it will be very valuable to have your perspective and input as (hopefully) we get to move it forward. Alex
