Unless I've missed it, I don't believe the #PubRules provides guidelines on
what documents are referenced by a spec and whether the reference is
normative or non-normative. If I'm wrong, please point out the policy or
pubrules text that addresses this issue.
Just to be clear, I don't object to including a non-normative reference to
the WHATWG variant specification; however, if it is to be a normative
reference, I'd like to insist it be the official W3C document that is
referenced.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote:
The W3C's process documents (e.g. #PubRules) define the policies for
publications and this issue will be addressed if/when the CR is actually
published.
WebApps is simply a user of the publication policy. If you want to discuss
W3C processes such as PubRules, please use some other list - and not any of
WebApps' lists - such as public-w3cprocess #ProcCG.
-Thanks, AB
#PubRules
http://www.w3.org/2005/07/**pubrules?uimode=filterhttp://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules?uimode=filter
#ProcCG
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-w3process/http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/
On 11/16/12 8:51 AM, ext Ms2ger wrote:
I object to making such a change.
On 11/16/2012 02:32 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
Before going to CR, I believe the [HTML] entry in the references section
needs to be changed to reference an appropriate W3C specification. A
present, it reference a non-W3C document.
