Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL
On Friday, October 11, 2013, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 7/31/13 10:05 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > >> On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: >> >>> Thanks, indeed the CR->PR transition was made with a test suite that was >>> linked to this WebIDL reference, and not the other one. >>> >>> That said, if you have tests and better, a report for a stricter >>> conformance to WebIDL, it would be good to highlight them. >>> >>> No need. Let just go to REC and be done please ^_^ >> > > Marcos, Yves - what specific things must be done to move widgets-apis to > REC? Update the date and should be good to go? >
Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL
On 7/31/13 10:05 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: Thanks, indeed the CR->PR transition was made with a test suite that was linked to this WebIDL reference, and not the other one. That said, if you have tests and better, a report for a stricter conformance to WebIDL, it would be good to highlight them. No need. Let just go to REC and be done please ^_^ Marcos, Yves - what specific things must be done to move widgets-apis to REC? -Thanks, AB
Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL
On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: > Thanks, indeed the CR->PR transition was made with a test suite that was > linked to this WebIDL reference, and not the other one. > > That said, if you have tests and better, a report for a stricter > conformance to WebIDL, it would be good to highlight them. > No need. Let just go to REC and be done please ^_^ -- Marcos Caceres
Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote: On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: Yes, that would be helpful (hence the report), thanks. Done. Spec now sez: "Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs defined in this specification must implement them in a manner consistent with the ECMAScript Bindings defined in the Web IDL specification [WebIDL], as this specification uses that specification and terminology." Whoops. Seems I misunderstood. The spec actually now says: "The IDL blocks in this specification are conforming IDL fragments as defined by the WebIDL specification." Thanks, indeed the CR->PR transition was made with a test suite that was linked to this WebIDL reference, and not the other one. That said, if you have tests and better, a report for a stricter conformance to WebIDL, it would be good to highlight them. Cheers, -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves
Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: > > > > Yes, that would be helpful (hence the report), thanks. > > Done. Spec now sez: > "Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs defined in this > specification must implement them in a manner consistent with the ECMAScript > Bindings defined in the Web IDL specification [WebIDL], as this specification > uses that specification and terminology." > Whoops. Seems I misunderstood. The spec actually now says: "The IDL blocks in this specification are conforming IDL fragments as defined by the WebIDL specification."
Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three > > > conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2]. > > > > > > Could > > > "This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application programming > > > interfaces." be clarified using one of the proposed wordings from WebIDL? > > > (likely 'Conforming IDL Fragments' per reading of the spec). > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Sure, I can add that if you think it will be helpful. > > Yes, that would be helpful (hence the report), thanks. Done. Spec now sez: "Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs defined in this specification must implement them in a manner consistent with the ECMAScript Bindings defined in the Web IDL specification [WebIDL], as this specification uses that specification and terminology." -- Marcos Caceres
Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote: On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: Hi, In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2]. Could "This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application programming interfaces." be clarified using one of the proposed wordings from WebIDL? (likely 'Conforming IDL Fragments' per reading of the spec). Thanks, Sure, I can add that if you think it will be helpful. Yes, that would be helpful (hence the report), thanks. -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves
Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL
On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: > Hi, > In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three > conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2]. > > Could > "This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application programming > interfaces." be clarified using one of the proposed wordings from WebIDL? > (likely 'Conforming IDL Fragments' per reading of the spec). > Thanks, > Sure, I can add that if you think it will be helpful. -- Marcos Caceres
Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL
On 7/29/13 4:15 PM, ext Yves Lafon wrote: Hi, In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2]. Could "This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application programming interfaces." be clarified using one of the proposed wordings from WebIDL? (likely 'Conforming IDL Fragments' per reading of the spec). Hi Yves - it's unfortunate that spec wasn't more clear on its WebIDL conformance but, yes, my recollection is that the implementors of that spec focused on conformance to the IDL fragments (and not the other conformance classes). -AB Thanks, [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-widgets-apis-20120522/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/#conformance
[widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL
Hi, In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2]. Could "This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application programming interfaces." be clarified using one of the proposed wordings from WebIDL? (likely 'Conforming IDL Fragments' per reading of the spec). Thanks, [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-widgets-apis-20120522/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/#conformance -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves
