Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Melanie Corr]

Any other comments?

Ar Máirt 28 Iúil 2020 ag 10:30, scríobh Ina Panova :

>
>
>
> 
> Regards,
>
> Ina Panova
> Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>
> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 1:48 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey Ina,
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing.
>>
>> Ar Luan 27 Iúil 2020 ag 12:32, scríobh Ina Panova :
>>
>>> Can we add a follow up question to: "To what extent have you tried Pulp
>>> 3?"
>>> "If you are already familiar with Pulp 3 and/or have tried it , what do
>>> you like/dislike about?"
>>>
>>
>> That question is in the Pulp 2 section. I didn't enter anything about
>> Pulp 3 because if they answer Yes to having installed Pulp 3, they then
>> answer the Pulp 3 section. Also. I thought that might be repetitive? But I
>> can easily add that if you still think it is a good idea.
>>
>
> It makes sense. I missed the very first question about the pulp version. I
> agree that we can skip this question.
>
> Thank you for working on this, it looks great!
>
>>
>>> It would be interesting to see what users find beneficial and are
>>> excited about (including feature set, workflows, installation, etc) or on
>>> the contrary what in their opinion has gotten worse or they do not see
>>> value in certain areas.
>>>
>>
>> Can I just clarify that this would be a question to ask people who use
>> Pulp 2?
>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ina Panova
>>> Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>
>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:07 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>>>


 Ar Aoine 24 Iúil 2020 ag 18:24, scríobh Bryan Kearney <
 bkear...@redhat.com>:

> On 7/24/20 12:59 PM, Melanie Corr wrote:
> > I just saw the email subject. Total mislabel on my part :-O
> > Demo! I meant survey. Luckily it is just the draft.
> > https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>
> Can the questions like
>
> Which Pulp 3 plugins do you use?
>
>
> be a selection so that you can run percentage based analysis on it and
> not have to
> deal with cleaning up the answers.
>

 They can and they are now. Thanks for pointing that out.

>
> -- bk
>
>

 --

 Melanie Corr, RHCE

 Community Manager

 Red Hat 

 Remote, Ireland

 mc...@redhat.com
 M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
 

 ___
 Pulp-dev mailing list
 Pulp-dev@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>
>> Community Manager
>>
>> Red Hat 
>>
>> Remote, Ireland
>>
>> mc...@redhat.com
>> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
>> 
>>
>>

-- 

Melanie Corr, RHCE

Community Manager

Red Hat 

Remote, Ireland

mc...@redhat.com
M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr

___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Ina Panova]

Regards,

Ina Panova
Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.

"Do not go where the path may lead,
 go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."


On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 1:48 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:

>
> Hey Ina,
>
> Thanks for reviewing.
>
> Ar Luan 27 Iúil 2020 ag 12:32, scríobh Ina Panova :
>
>> Can we add a follow up question to: "To what extent have you tried Pulp 3?
>> "
>> "If you are already familiar with Pulp 3 and/or have tried it , what do
>> you like/dislike about?"
>>
>
> That question is in the Pulp 2 section. I didn't enter anything about Pulp
> 3 because if they answer Yes to having installed Pulp 3, they then answer
> the Pulp 3 section. Also. I thought that might be repetitive? But I can
> easily add that if you still think it is a good idea.
>

It makes sense. I missed the very first question about the pulp version. I
agree that we can skip this question.

Thank you for working on this, it looks great!

>
>> It would be interesting to see what users find beneficial and are excited
>> about (including feature set, workflows, installation, etc) or on the
>> contrary what in their opinion has gotten worse or they do not see value in
>> certain areas.
>>
>
> Can I just clarify that this would be a question to ask people who use
> Pulp 2?
>
>>
>> 
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ina Panova
>> Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>
>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:07 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ar Aoine 24 Iúil 2020 ag 18:24, scríobh Bryan Kearney <
>>> bkear...@redhat.com>:
>>>
 On 7/24/20 12:59 PM, Melanie Corr wrote:
 > I just saw the email subject. Total mislabel on my part :-O
 > Demo! I meant survey. Luckily it is just the draft.
 > https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5

 Can the questions like

 Which Pulp 3 plugins do you use?


 be a selection so that you can run percentage based analysis on it and
 not have to
 deal with cleaning up the answers.

>>>
>>> They can and they are now. Thanks for pointing that out.
>>>

 -- bk


>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>>
>>> Community Manager
>>>
>>> Red Hat 
>>>
>>> Remote, Ireland
>>>
>>> mc...@redhat.com
>>> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
>>> 
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>
> Community Manager
>
> Red Hat 
>
> Remote, Ireland
>
> mc...@redhat.com
> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
> 
>
>
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Melanie Corr]

Ar Luan 27 Iúil 2020 ag 13:02, scríobh Tatiana Tereshchenko <
ttere...@redhat.com>:

> For "Which Pulp 2 plugins do you use?"
>
>  - Is the OSTree plugin left out on purpose? I heard questions/concerns
> from the Fedora Core OS community about missing OSTree plugin in Pulp3 for
> mirroring their content. Having it in the list helps to provide more
> information about how widely it's used.
>
I was told a few months ago to remove this from the website? I assumed it
was no longer functional. I can add it though!

 - We know that some of our contributors have their own plugins, which may
> or may not be open sourced and which they use within their company. Maybe
> it's worth adding "my own plugin" or something like that. In
> combination with questions about upgrading to Pulp 3, it will help to gauge
> how much focus the Migration plugin needs to have with regards to
> the plugin writers.
>

Great idea.  Thank you!

>
> Thanks for working on this,
> Tanya
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 1:48 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey Ina,
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing.
>>
>> Ar Luan 27 Iúil 2020 ag 12:32, scríobh Ina Panova :
>>
>>> Can we add a follow up question to: "To what extent have you tried Pulp
>>> 3?"
>>> "If you are already familiar with Pulp 3 and/or have tried it , what do
>>> you like/dislike about?"
>>>
>>
>> That question is in the Pulp 2 section. I didn't enter anything about
>> Pulp 3 because if they answer Yes to having installed Pulp 3, they then
>> answer the Pulp 3 section. Also. I thought that might be repetitive? But I
>> can easily add that if you still think it is a good idea.
>>
>>>
>>> It would be interesting to see what users find beneficial and are
>>> excited about (including feature set, workflows, installation, etc) or on
>>> the contrary what in their opinion has gotten worse or they do not see
>>> value in certain areas.
>>>
>>
>> Can I just clarify that this would be a question to ask people who use
>> Pulp 2?
>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ina Panova
>>> Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>>
>>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:07 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>>>


 Ar Aoine 24 Iúil 2020 ag 18:24, scríobh Bryan Kearney <
 bkear...@redhat.com>:

> On 7/24/20 12:59 PM, Melanie Corr wrote:
> > I just saw the email subject. Total mislabel on my part :-O
> > Demo! I meant survey. Luckily it is just the draft.
> > https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>
> Can the questions like
>
> Which Pulp 3 plugins do you use?
>
>
> be a selection so that you can run percentage based analysis on it and
> not have to
> deal with cleaning up the answers.
>

 They can and they are now. Thanks for pointing that out.

>
> -- bk
>
>

 --

 Melanie Corr, RHCE

 Community Manager

 Red Hat 

 Remote, Ireland

 mc...@redhat.com
 M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
 

 ___
 Pulp-dev mailing list
 Pulp-dev@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>
>> Community Manager
>>
>> Red Hat 
>>
>> Remote, Ireland
>>
>> mc...@redhat.com
>> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>

-- 

Melanie Corr, RHCE

Community Manager

Red Hat 

Remote, Ireland

mc...@redhat.com
M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr

___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Tatiana Tereshchenko]

For "Which Pulp 2 plugins do you use?"

 - Is the OSTree plugin left out on purpose? I heard questions/concerns
from the Fedora Core OS community about missing OSTree plugin in Pulp3 for
mirroring their content. Having it in the list helps to provide more
information about how widely it's used.
 - We know that some of our contributors have their own plugins, which may
or may not be open sourced and which they use within their company. Maybe
it's worth adding "my own plugin" or something like that. In
combination with questions about upgrading to Pulp 3, it will help to gauge
how much focus the Migration plugin needs to have with regards to
the plugin writers.

Thanks for working on this,
Tanya


On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 1:48 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:

>
> Hey Ina,
>
> Thanks for reviewing.
>
> Ar Luan 27 Iúil 2020 ag 12:32, scríobh Ina Panova :
>
>> Can we add a follow up question to: "To what extent have you tried Pulp 3?
>> "
>> "If you are already familiar with Pulp 3 and/or have tried it , what do
>> you like/dislike about?"
>>
>
> That question is in the Pulp 2 section. I didn't enter anything about Pulp
> 3 because if they answer Yes to having installed Pulp 3, they then answer
> the Pulp 3 section. Also. I thought that might be repetitive? But I can
> easily add that if you still think it is a good idea.
>
>>
>> It would be interesting to see what users find beneficial and are excited
>> about (including feature set, workflows, installation, etc) or on the
>> contrary what in their opinion has gotten worse or they do not see value in
>> certain areas.
>>
>
> Can I just clarify that this would be a question to ask people who use
> Pulp 2?
>
>>
>> 
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ina Panova
>> Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>
>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:07 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ar Aoine 24 Iúil 2020 ag 18:24, scríobh Bryan Kearney <
>>> bkear...@redhat.com>:
>>>
 On 7/24/20 12:59 PM, Melanie Corr wrote:
 > I just saw the email subject. Total mislabel on my part :-O
 > Demo! I meant survey. Luckily it is just the draft.
 > https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5

 Can the questions like

 Which Pulp 3 plugins do you use?


 be a selection so that you can run percentage based analysis on it and
 not have to
 deal with cleaning up the answers.

>>>
>>> They can and they are now. Thanks for pointing that out.
>>>

 -- bk


>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>>
>>> Community Manager
>>>
>>> Red Hat 
>>>
>>> Remote, Ireland
>>>
>>> mc...@redhat.com
>>> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
>>> 
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>
> Community Manager
>
> Red Hat 
>
> Remote, Ireland
>
> mc...@redhat.com
> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
> 
>
> ___
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Melanie Corr]

Hey Ina,

Thanks for reviewing.

Ar Luan 27 Iúil 2020 ag 12:32, scríobh Ina Panova :

> Can we add a follow up question to: "To what extent have you tried Pulp 3?
> "
> "If you are already familiar with Pulp 3 and/or have tried it , what do
> you like/dislike about?"
>

That question is in the Pulp 2 section. I didn't enter anything about Pulp
3 because if they answer Yes to having installed Pulp 3, they then answer
the Pulp 3 section. Also. I thought that might be repetitive? But I can
easily add that if you still think it is a good idea.

>
> It would be interesting to see what users find beneficial and are excited
> about (including feature set, workflows, installation, etc) or on the
> contrary what in their opinion has gotten worse or they do not see value in
> certain areas.
>

Can I just clarify that this would be a question to ask people who use Pulp
2?

>
> 
> Regards,
>
> Ina Panova
> Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>
> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:07 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Ar Aoine 24 Iúil 2020 ag 18:24, scríobh Bryan Kearney <
>> bkear...@redhat.com>:
>>
>>> On 7/24/20 12:59 PM, Melanie Corr wrote:
>>> > I just saw the email subject. Total mislabel on my part :-O
>>> > Demo! I meant survey. Luckily it is just the draft.
>>> > https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>>>
>>> Can the questions like
>>>
>>> Which Pulp 3 plugins do you use?
>>>
>>>
>>> be a selection so that you can run percentage based analysis on it and
>>> not have to
>>> deal with cleaning up the answers.
>>>
>>
>> They can and they are now. Thanks for pointing that out.
>>
>>>
>>> -- bk
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>
>> Community Manager
>>
>> Red Hat 
>>
>> Remote, Ireland
>>
>> mc...@redhat.com
>> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>

-- 

Melanie Corr, RHCE

Community Manager

Red Hat 

Remote, Ireland

mc...@redhat.com
M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr

___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Ina Panova]

Can we add a follow up question to: "To what extent have you tried Pulp 3?"
"If you are already familiar with Pulp 3 and/or have tried it , what do you
like/dislike about?"

It would be interesting to see what users find beneficial and are excited
about (including feature set, workflows, installation, etc) or on the
contrary what in their opinion has gotten worse or they do not see value in
certain areas.


Regards,

Ina Panova
Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.

"Do not go where the path may lead,
 go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."


On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:07 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:

>
>
> Ar Aoine 24 Iúil 2020 ag 18:24, scríobh Bryan Kearney  >:
>
>> On 7/24/20 12:59 PM, Melanie Corr wrote:
>> > I just saw the email subject. Total mislabel on my part :-O
>> > Demo! I meant survey. Luckily it is just the draft.
>> > https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>>
>> Can the questions like
>>
>> Which Pulp 3 plugins do you use?
>>
>>
>> be a selection so that you can run percentage based analysis on it and
>> not have to
>> deal with cleaning up the answers.
>>
>
> They can and they are now. Thanks for pointing that out.
>
>>
>> -- bk
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>
> Community Manager
>
> Red Hat 
>
> Remote, Ireland
>
> mc...@redhat.com
> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
> 
>
> ___
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Melanie Corr]

Hi David!
Thank you!
Answers inline.

Ar Aoine 24 Iúil 2020 ag 18:31, scríobh David Davis :

> The Pulp 2 questions all look good to me. A couple suggestions on the Pulp
> 3 questions:
>
> - The relational db question might not be helpful since we only support
> PostgreSQL. I don't see us changing that anytime soon. But maybe asking
> what db people would like to use might be helpful.
>
I removed this because ideally we would focus the questions around issues
we hope to focus on over the next year. If anyone feels strongly about it,
I can add it back in.

- For the install question, maybe have an answer in case they're using Pulp
> inside of Katello. Also, I don't think it's possible to install Pulp 3 with
> RPMs right now (but my knowledge here is limited. Hopefully someone from
> the installer team chimes in and can review the survey).
>
I added Katello and removed RPMs.


> - I'd add a question to ask what version of Pulp 3 they are on. The
> options would currently be 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, and master.
>
Done, thanks.

> - Also, maybe a question about what features are missing if any (similar
> to the question about what plugins they want)
>
I added a question.


> David
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:59 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>
>> I just saw the email subject. Total mislabel on my part :-O
>> Demo! I meant survey. Luckily it is just the draft.
>> https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>>
>>
>> Ar Aoine 24 Iúil 2020 ag 17:47, scríobh Robin Chan :
>>
>>>
>>> Robin Chan
>>>
>>> She/Her/Hers
>>>
>>> Satellite Software Engineering Manager - Pulp
>>>
>>> Red Hat 
>>>
>>> IRC: rchan
>>>
>>> Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to
>>> answer this email out of your office hours.
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:32 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>>>


 Ar Déar 23 Iúil 2020 ag 17:35, scríobh David Davis <
 davidda...@redhat.com>:

> Thanks for working on this. Responses inline below.
>
> David
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Melanie Corr 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I need your help in shaping the survey[0].
>>
>> I copied over some questions from last year's survey and added what I
>> thought might be interesting. Last year's survey contains a lot of
>> "planning" questions for future upgrades to Pulp 3. Many things have
>> changed since then, and I think you know best where we need to focus.
>>
>> I added conditions to the survey to try and separate the following:
>>
>> * Questions for Pulp 2 Users
>> * Questions for Pulp 3 Users
>> * Questions for people who are in-between their migration. This last
>> category of user may exist only in my head. Let me know :)
>>
>
>> Questions for you:
>>
>> Do you think streaming the survey into separate user groups like this
>> is a good idea?
>>
>
> Is it possible though to compare the results across surveys (like what
> OS people are using)?
>
 It's the same survey, with sections that redirect for Pulp 2 users or
 Pulp 3 users.
 I had to think about this. The answer was yes but with added work.
 To avoid extra processing of answers, I added the generic questions
 (OS, size, etc) to one section while keeping conditional Pulp 2 and Pulp 3
 sections.
 If someone in the Pulp 2 section answers that they have installed Pulp
 3, they also get redirected to the Pulp 3 section afterward so they can
 give their opinion on that :)
 Am happy to apply any feedback.

>>>
>>> Gotcha. Ok, that could be nice for the user - skip questions that aren't
>>> relevant to them.
>>>
>>>


>>>
>> [0]
>> https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>>
>
 This link is live. Take a look :)

 I also applied Matthias's feedback and added timeline options for when
 users plan to upgrade to Pulp 2.
 There's a duplication of a question "Where are you located" in the
 first and last section. I deleted it but it is still there. If it doesn't
 go away, I'll create a new survey when we are happy with the questions.

>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>
>> Community Manager
>>
>> Red Hat 
>>
>> Remote, Ireland
>>
>> mc...@redhat.com
>> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>

 --

 Melanie Corr, RHCE

 Community Manager

 Red Hat 

 Remote, Ireland

 mc...@redhat.com
 M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
 

 ___

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Melanie Corr]

Ar Aoine 24 Iúil 2020 ag 18:24, scríobh Bryan Kearney :

> On 7/24/20 12:59 PM, Melanie Corr wrote:
> > I just saw the email subject. Total mislabel on my part :-O
> > Demo! I meant survey. Luckily it is just the draft.
> > https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>
> Can the questions like
>
> Which Pulp 3 plugins do you use?
>
>
> be a selection so that you can run percentage based analysis on it and not
> have to
> deal with cleaning up the answers.
>

They can and they are now. Thanks for pointing that out.

>
> -- bk
>
>

-- 

Melanie Corr, RHCE

Community Manager

Red Hat 

Remote, Ireland

mc...@redhat.com
M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr

___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[David Davis]

The Pulp 2 questions all look good to me. A couple suggestions on the Pulp
3 questions:

- The relational db question might not be helpful since we only support
PostgreSQL. I don't see us changing that anytime soon. But maybe asking
what db people would like to use might be helpful.
- For the install question, maybe have an answer in case they're using Pulp
inside of Katello. Also, I don't think it's possible to install Pulp 3 with
RPMs right now (but my knowledge here is limited. Hopefully someone from
the installer team chimes in and can review the survey).
- I'd add a question to ask what version of Pulp 3 they are on. The options
would currently be 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, and master.
- Also, maybe a question about what features are missing if any (similar to
the question about what plugins they want)

David


On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:59 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:

> I just saw the email subject. Total mislabel on my part :-O
> Demo! I meant survey. Luckily it is just the draft.
> https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>
>
> Ar Aoine 24 Iúil 2020 ag 17:47, scríobh Robin Chan :
>
>>
>> Robin Chan
>>
>> She/Her/Hers
>>
>> Satellite Software Engineering Manager - Pulp
>>
>> Red Hat 
>>
>> IRC: rchan
>>
>> Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to
>> answer this email out of your office hours.
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:32 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ar Déar 23 Iúil 2020 ag 17:35, scríobh David Davis <
>>> davidda...@redhat.com>:
>>>
 Thanks for working on this. Responses inline below.

 David


 On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Melanie Corr  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I need your help in shaping the survey[0].
>
> I copied over some questions from last year's survey and added what I
> thought might be interesting. Last year's survey contains a lot of
> "planning" questions for future upgrades to Pulp 3. Many things have
> changed since then, and I think you know best where we need to focus.
>
> I added conditions to the survey to try and separate the following:
>
> * Questions for Pulp 2 Users
> * Questions for Pulp 3 Users
> * Questions for people who are in-between their migration. This last
> category of user may exist only in my head. Let me know :)
>

> Questions for you:
>
> Do you think streaming the survey into separate user groups like this
> is a good idea?
>

 Is it possible though to compare the results across surveys (like what
 OS people are using)?

>>> It's the same survey, with sections that redirect for Pulp 2 users or
>>> Pulp 3 users.
>>> I had to think about this. The answer was yes but with added work.
>>> To avoid extra processing of answers, I added the generic questions (OS,
>>> size, etc) to one section while keeping conditional Pulp 2 and Pulp 3
>>> sections.
>>> If someone in the Pulp 2 section answers that they have installed Pulp
>>> 3, they also get redirected to the Pulp 3 section afterward so they can
>>> give their opinion on that :)
>>> Am happy to apply any feedback.
>>>
>>
>> Gotcha. Ok, that could be nice for the user - skip questions that aren't
>> relevant to them.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> [0]
> https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>

>>> This link is live. Take a look :)
>>>
>>> I also applied Matthias's feedback and added timeline options for when
>>> users plan to upgrade to Pulp 2.
>>> There's a duplication of a question "Where are you located" in the first
>>> and last section. I deleted it but it is still there. If it doesn't go
>>> away, I'll create a new survey when we are happy with the questions.
>>>

>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>
> Community Manager
>
> Red Hat 
>
> Remote, Ireland
>
> mc...@redhat.com
> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
> 
>
> ___
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>

>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>>
>>> Community Manager
>>>
>>> Red Hat 
>>>
>>> Remote, Ireland
>>>
>>> mc...@redhat.com
>>> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
>>> 
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>
> Community Manager
>
> Red Hat 
>
> Remote, Ireland
>
> mc...@redhat.com
> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
> 
>
>
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Bryan Kearney]

On 7/24/20 12:59 PM, Melanie Corr wrote:
> I just saw the email subject. Total mislabel on my part :-O 
> Demo! I meant survey. Luckily it is just the draft.
> https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5

Can the questions like

Which Pulp 3 plugins do you use?


be a selection so that you can run percentage based analysis on it and not have 
to
deal with cleaning up the answers.

-- bk



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Melanie Corr]

I just saw the email subject. Total mislabel on my part :-O
Demo! I meant survey. Luckily it is just the draft.
https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5


Ar Aoine 24 Iúil 2020 ag 17:47, scríobh Robin Chan :

>
> Robin Chan
>
> She/Her/Hers
>
> Satellite Software Engineering Manager - Pulp
>
> Red Hat 
>
> IRC: rchan
>
> Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to
> answer this email out of your office hours.
> 
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:32 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Ar Déar 23 Iúil 2020 ag 17:35, scríobh David Davis > >:
>>
>>> Thanks for working on this. Responses inline below.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>>>
 Hi all,

 I need your help in shaping the survey[0].

 I copied over some questions from last year's survey and added what I
 thought might be interesting. Last year's survey contains a lot of
 "planning" questions for future upgrades to Pulp 3. Many things have
 changed since then, and I think you know best where we need to focus.

 I added conditions to the survey to try and separate the following:

 * Questions for Pulp 2 Users
 * Questions for Pulp 3 Users
 * Questions for people who are in-between their migration. This last
 category of user may exist only in my head. Let me know :)

>>>
 Questions for you:

 Do you think streaming the survey into separate user groups like this
 is a good idea?

>>>
>>> Is it possible though to compare the results across surveys (like what
>>> OS people are using)?
>>>
>> It's the same survey, with sections that redirect for Pulp 2 users or
>> Pulp 3 users.
>> I had to think about this. The answer was yes but with added work.
>> To avoid extra processing of answers, I added the generic questions (OS,
>> size, etc) to one section while keeping conditional Pulp 2 and Pulp 3
>> sections.
>> If someone in the Pulp 2 section answers that they have installed Pulp 3,
>> they also get redirected to the Pulp 3 section afterward so they can give
>> their opinion on that :)
>> Am happy to apply any feedback.
>>
>
> Gotcha. Ok, that could be nice for the user - skip questions that aren't
> relevant to them.
>
>
>>
>>
>
 [0]
 https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5

>>>
>> This link is live. Take a look :)
>>
>> I also applied Matthias's feedback and added timeline options for when
>> users plan to upgrade to Pulp 2.
>> There's a duplication of a question "Where are you located" in the first
>> and last section. I deleted it but it is still there. If it doesn't go
>> away, I'll create a new survey when we are happy with the questions.
>>
>>>




 --

 Melanie Corr, RHCE

 Community Manager

 Red Hat 

 Remote, Ireland

 mc...@redhat.com
 M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
 

 ___
 Pulp-dev mailing list
 Pulp-dev@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>
>> Community Manager
>>
>> Red Hat 
>>
>> Remote, Ireland
>>
>> mc...@redhat.com
>> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>

-- 

Melanie Corr, RHCE

Community Manager

Red Hat 

Remote, Ireland

mc...@redhat.com
M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr

___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Robin Chan]

Robin Chan

She/Her/Hers

Satellite Software Engineering Manager - Pulp

Red Hat 

IRC: rchan

Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to
answer this email out of your office hours.




On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:32 PM Melanie Corr  wrote:

>
>
> Ar Déar 23 Iúil 2020 ag 17:35, scríobh David Davis  >:
>
>> Thanks for working on this. Responses inline below.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I need your help in shaping the survey[0].
>>>
>>> I copied over some questions from last year's survey and added what I
>>> thought might be interesting. Last year's survey contains a lot of
>>> "planning" questions for future upgrades to Pulp 3. Many things have
>>> changed since then, and I think you know best where we need to focus.
>>>
>>> I added conditions to the survey to try and separate the following:
>>>
>>> * Questions for Pulp 2 Users
>>> * Questions for Pulp 3 Users
>>> * Questions for people who are in-between their migration. This last
>>> category of user may exist only in my head. Let me know :)
>>>
>>
>>> Questions for you:
>>>
>>> Do you think streaming the survey into separate user groups like this is
>>> a good idea?
>>>
>>
>> Is it possible though to compare the results across surveys (like what OS
>> people are using)?
>>
> It's the same survey, with sections that redirect for Pulp 2 users or Pulp
> 3 users.
> I had to think about this. The answer was yes but with added work.
> To avoid extra processing of answers, I added the generic questions (OS,
> size, etc) to one section while keeping conditional Pulp 2 and Pulp 3
> sections.
> If someone in the Pulp 2 section answers that they have installed Pulp 3,
> they also get redirected to the Pulp 3 section afterward so they can give
> their opinion on that :)
> Am happy to apply any feedback.
>

Gotcha. Ok, that could be nice for the user - skip questions that aren't
relevant to them.


>
>

>>> [0]
>>> https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>>>
>>
> This link is live. Take a look :)
>
> I also applied Matthias's feedback and added timeline options for when
> users plan to upgrade to Pulp 2.
> There's a duplication of a question "Where are you located" in the first
> and last section. I deleted it but it is still there. If it doesn't go
> away, I'll create a new survey when we are happy with the questions.
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>>
>>> Community Manager
>>>
>>> Red Hat 
>>>
>>> Remote, Ireland
>>>
>>> mc...@redhat.com
>>> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
>>> 
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>
> Community Manager
>
> Red Hat 
>
> Remote, Ireland
>
> mc...@redhat.com
> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
> 
>
> ___
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Melanie Corr]

Ar Déar 23 Iúil 2020 ag 17:35, scríobh David Davis :

> Thanks for working on this. Responses inline below.
>
> David
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I need your help in shaping the survey[0].
>>
>> I copied over some questions from last year's survey and added what I
>> thought might be interesting. Last year's survey contains a lot of
>> "planning" questions for future upgrades to Pulp 3. Many things have
>> changed since then, and I think you know best where we need to focus.
>>
>> I added conditions to the survey to try and separate the following:
>>
>> * Questions for Pulp 2 Users
>> * Questions for Pulp 3 Users
>> * Questions for people who are in-between their migration. This last
>> category of user may exist only in my head. Let me know :)
>>
>
>> Questions for you:
>>
>> Do you think streaming the survey into separate user groups like this is
>> a good idea?
>>
>
> Is it possible though to compare the results across surveys (like what OS
> people are using)?
>
It's the same survey, with sections that redirect for Pulp 2 users or Pulp
3 users.
I had to think about this. The answer was yes but with added work.
To avoid extra processing of answers, I added the generic questions (OS,
size, etc) to one section while keeping conditional Pulp 2 and Pulp 3
sections.
If someone in the Pulp 2 section answers that they have installed Pulp 3,
they also get redirected to the Pulp 3 section afterward so they can give
their opinion on that :)
Am happy to apply any feedback.

>
>> [0]
>> https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>>
>
This link is live. Take a look :)

I also applied Matthias's feedback and added timeline options for when
users plan to upgrade to Pulp 2.
There's a duplication of a question "Where are you located" in the first
and last section. I deleted it but it is still there. If it doesn't go
away, I'll create a new survey when we are happy with the questions.

>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>
>> Community Manager
>>
>> Red Hat 
>>
>> Remote, Ireland
>>
>> mc...@redhat.com
>> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>

-- 

Melanie Corr, RHCE

Community Manager

Red Hat 

Remote, Ireland

mc...@redhat.com
M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr

___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Matthias Dellweg]

Only thing i could find is that "Do you plan to migrate to pulp3?" is quite
vague. Do you think "... to migrate within one year?" would be a good
question? (maybe quarter or half a year...)
Or we provide Intervals to choose from.
That would kind of shift the notion of the questions below to "What is
stopping you now?", the sort of information we want.

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 9:34 PM Robin Chan  wrote:

>
> Robin Chan
>
> She/Her/Hers
>
> Satellite Software Engineering Manager - Pulp
>
> Red Hat 
>
> IRC: rchan
>
> Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to
> answer this email out of your office hours.
> 
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:37 PM David Davis 
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for working on this. Responses inline below.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I need your help in shaping the survey[0].
>>>
>>> I copied over some questions from last year's survey and added what I
>>> thought might be interesting. Last year's survey contains a lot of
>>> "planning" questions for future upgrades to Pulp 3. Many things have
>>> changed since then, and I think you know best where we need to focus.
>>>
>>> I added conditions to the survey to try and separate the following:
>>>
>>> * Questions for Pulp 2 Users
>>> * Questions for Pulp 3 Users
>>> * Questions for people who are in-between their migration. This last
>>> category of user may exist only in my head. Let me know :)
>>>
>>
>>> Questions for you:
>>>
>>> Do you think streaming the survey into separate user groups like this is
>>> a good idea?
>>>
>>
>> Is it possible though to compare the results across surveys (like what OS
>> people are using)?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> With the Pulp 2 survey, do we want to collect, for example, what version
>>> of MongoDB they're using? I'm assuming we ultimately want to guide users
>>> away from Pulp 2, so most of what I added related to a future migration to
>>> Pulp 3. I kept all the "what features would you like" type questions for
>>> the Pulp 3 part of the survey and focused on what they need to get away
>>> from Pulp 2. What do you think?
>>>
>>
>> For Pulp 2, I would ditch most of the questions that aren't relevant to
>> why they are still on Pulp 2 and what their upgrade/trial experience of
>> Pulp 3 is like (if any).
>>
>
> Agreed. I think the EOL on Pulp 2 was a question just to try to get that
> info out/awareness.
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> For the Pulp 3 users, are there any areas I haven't covered where you
>>> want to focus and learn their experiences?
>>>
>> What content types they are using. What features they want still.
> anything we need to know to get users to use Pulp 3 (start or move to).
>
>
>>
>>>
>>
>>> I asked Greg Sutcliffe, the MBU's Data Analyst, a question related to
>>> rewording I was doing on one question. One piece of advice he gave me was
>>> to beware of asking about solutions to complex problems. For example, on
>>> his advice, I changed "If there was a Pulp 3 web-based interface, would you
>>> use it?" from the 2019 survey to "Do you need a Pulp 3 web UI for your
>>> environment?" with the follow-up question to describe that workflow if they
>>> answer yes. He said to focus the questions on their experiences and their
>>> problems rather than having them propose hypothetical solutions.
>>>
>>
>> +1, good idea.
>>
> agreed. no leading questions. I think before we asked a similar question
> about the cli. "Would like a free cookie" vs. "what do you need right now"
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Feel free to reply here or enter "That is a terrible question, Melanie"
>>> into the survey :)
>>> Am happy to apply any feedback.
>>>
>>> [0]
>>> https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>>
>>> Community Manager
>>>
>>> Red Hat 
>>>
>>> Remote, Ireland
>>>
>>> mc...@redhat.com
>>> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
>>> 
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>> ___
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
> ___
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Robin Chan]

Robin Chan

She/Her/Hers

Satellite Software Engineering Manager - Pulp

Red Hat 

IRC: rchan

Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to
answer this email out of your office hours.




On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:37 PM David Davis  wrote:

> Thanks for working on this. Responses inline below.
>
> David
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Melanie Corr  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I need your help in shaping the survey[0].
>>
>> I copied over some questions from last year's survey and added what I
>> thought might be interesting. Last year's survey contains a lot of
>> "planning" questions for future upgrades to Pulp 3. Many things have
>> changed since then, and I think you know best where we need to focus.
>>
>> I added conditions to the survey to try and separate the following:
>>
>> * Questions for Pulp 2 Users
>> * Questions for Pulp 3 Users
>> * Questions for people who are in-between their migration. This last
>> category of user may exist only in my head. Let me know :)
>>
>
>> Questions for you:
>>
>> Do you think streaming the survey into separate user groups like this is
>> a good idea?
>>
>
> Is it possible though to compare the results across surveys (like what OS
> people are using)?
>
>
>>
>> With the Pulp 2 survey, do we want to collect, for example, what version
>> of MongoDB they're using? I'm assuming we ultimately want to guide users
>> away from Pulp 2, so most of what I added related to a future migration to
>> Pulp 3. I kept all the "what features would you like" type questions for
>> the Pulp 3 part of the survey and focused on what they need to get away
>> from Pulp 2. What do you think?
>>
>
> For Pulp 2, I would ditch most of the questions that aren't relevant to
> why they are still on Pulp 2 and what their upgrade/trial experience of
> Pulp 3 is like (if any).
>

Agreed. I think the EOL on Pulp 2 was a question just to try to get that
info out/awareness.


>
>
>>
>> For the Pulp 3 users, are there any areas I haven't covered where you
>> want to focus and learn their experiences?
>>
> What content types they are using. What features they want still. anything
we need to know to get users to use Pulp 3 (start or move to).


>
>>
>
>> I asked Greg Sutcliffe, the MBU's Data Analyst, a question related to
>> rewording I was doing on one question. One piece of advice he gave me was
>> to beware of asking about solutions to complex problems. For example, on
>> his advice, I changed "If there was a Pulp 3 web-based interface, would you
>> use it?" from the 2019 survey to "Do you need a Pulp 3 web UI for your
>> environment?" with the follow-up question to describe that workflow if they
>> answer yes. He said to focus the questions on their experiences and their
>> problems rather than having them propose hypothetical solutions.
>>
>
> +1, good idea.
>
agreed. no leading questions. I think before we asked a similar question
about the cli. "Would like a free cookie" vs. "what do you need right now"


>
>
>>
>> Feel free to reply here or enter "That is a terrible question, Melanie"
>> into the survey :)
>> Am happy to apply any feedback.
>>
>> [0]
>> https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>>
>> Community Manager
>>
>> Red Hat 
>>
>> Remote, Ireland
>>
>> mc...@redhat.com
>> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
> ___
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[David Davis]

Thanks for working on this. Responses inline below.

David


On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Melanie Corr  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I need your help in shaping the survey[0].
>
> I copied over some questions from last year's survey and added what I
> thought might be interesting. Last year's survey contains a lot of
> "planning" questions for future upgrades to Pulp 3. Many things have
> changed since then, and I think you know best where we need to focus.
>
> I added conditions to the survey to try and separate the following:
>
> * Questions for Pulp 2 Users
> * Questions for Pulp 3 Users
> * Questions for people who are in-between their migration. This last
> category of user may exist only in my head. Let me know :)
>

> Questions for you:
>
> Do you think streaming the survey into separate user groups like this is a
> good idea?
>

Is it possible though to compare the results across surveys (like what OS
people are using)?


>
> With the Pulp 2 survey, do we want to collect, for example, what version
> of MongoDB they're using? I'm assuming we ultimately want to guide users
> away from Pulp 2, so most of what I added related to a future migration to
> Pulp 3. I kept all the "what features would you like" type questions for
> the Pulp 3 part of the survey and focused on what they need to get away
> from Pulp 2. What do you think?
>

For Pulp 2, I would ditch most of the questions that aren't relevant to why
they are still on Pulp 2 and what their upgrade/trial experience of Pulp
3 is like (if any).


>
> For the Pulp 3 users, are there any areas I haven't covered where you want
> to focus and learn their experiences?
>

>

> I asked Greg Sutcliffe, the MBU's Data Analyst, a question related to
> rewording I was doing on one question. One piece of advice he gave me was
> to beware of asking about solutions to complex problems. For example, on
> his advice, I changed "If there was a Pulp 3 web-based interface, would you
> use it?" from the 2019 survey to "Do you need a Pulp 3 web UI for your
> environment?" with the follow-up question to describe that workflow if they
> answer yes. He said to focus the questions on their experiences and their
> problems rather than having them propose hypothetical solutions.
>

+1, good idea.


>
> Feel free to reply here or enter "That is a terrible question, Melanie"
> into the survey :)
> Am happy to apply any feedback.
>
> [0]
> https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Melanie Corr, RHCE
>
> Community Manager
>
> Red Hat 
>
> Remote, Ireland
>
> mc...@redhat.com
> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr
> 
>
> ___
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

[Pulp-dev] Draft Community Demo - Your Opinion Please

[Melanie Corr]

Hi all,

I need your help in shaping the survey[0].

I copied over some questions from last year's survey and added what I
thought might be interesting. Last year's survey contains a lot of
"planning" questions for future upgrades to Pulp 3. Many things have
changed since then, and I think you know best where we need to focus.

I added conditions to the survey to try and separate the following:

* Questions for Pulp 2 Users
* Questions for Pulp 3 Users
* Questions for people who are in-between their migration. This last
category of user may exist only in my head. Let me know :)

Questions for you:

Do you think streaming the survey into separate user groups like this is a
good idea?

With the Pulp 2 survey, do we want to collect, for example, what version of
MongoDB they're using? I'm assuming we ultimately want to guide users away
from Pulp 2, so most of what I added related to a future migration to Pulp
3. I kept all the "what features would you like" type questions for the
Pulp 3 part of the survey and focused on what they need to get away from
Pulp 2. What do you think?

For the Pulp 3 users, are there any areas I haven't covered where you want
to focus and learn their experiences?

I asked Greg Sutcliffe, the MBU's Data Analyst, a question related to
rewording I was doing on one question. One piece of advice he gave me was
to beware of asking about solutions to complex problems. For example, on
his advice, I changed "If there was a Pulp 3 web-based interface, would you
use it?" from the 2019 survey to "Do you need a Pulp 3 web UI for your
environment?" with the follow-up question to describe that workflow if they
answer yes. He said to focus the questions on their experiences and their
problems rather than having them propose hypothetical solutions.

Feel free to reply here or enter "That is a terrible question, Melanie"
into the survey :)
Am happy to apply any feedback.

[0]
https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5





-- 

Melanie Corr, RHCE

Community Manager

Red Hat 

Remote, Ireland

mc...@redhat.com
M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr

___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev