Re: Remove access from inactive maintainers

[Donald Stufft]

> On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:53 PM, Jason R. Coombs  wrote:
> 
> All fine by me.
> 
> Any reason I shouldn’t be an owner of PyPA and Setuptools shouldn’t inherit 
> similar permissions to the other projects? I really don’t want it to be a 
> special snowflake.
> 
> 

I don’t have a problem with you being an owner on the GH org. PyPA has always 
been in a bit of a weird place that it started out as a pip/virtualenv only org 
that got expanded out to covering the whole spectrum. In that vein, I was still 
thinking of who was active within pip for managing that.

So yea, totally fine with you being an owner. It doesn’t really affect the 
project itself much, being an owner mostly just gives you the 
rights/responsibility of managing teams/repos/etc when a new project gets added.

—
Donald Stufft

Re: Remove access from inactive maintainers

[Jason R. Coombs]

All fine by me.

Any reason I shouldn’t be an owner of PyPA and Setuptools shouldn’t inherit 
similar permissions to the other projects? I really don’t want it to be a 
special snowflake.

On 6 Jun, 2017, at 04:50, Xavier Fernandez 
> wrote:

Fine with me also and xafer is my username.

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Paul Moore 
> wrote:
On 5 June 2017 at 23:05, Donald Stufft 
> wrote:
> Absent any objections, I’ll take these actions in the next couple of days
> (and I’ll need PyPI usernames for Paul and Xavier).

Fine with me (my PyPI username is pf_moore).
Paul

Re: Remove access from inactive maintainers

[Xavier Fernandez]

Fine with me also and xafer is my username.

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Paul Moore  wrote:

> On 5 June 2017 at 23:05, Donald Stufft  wrote:
> > Absent any objections, I’ll take these actions in the next couple of days
> > (and I’ll need PyPI usernames for Paul and Xavier).
>
> Fine with me (my PyPI username is pf_moore).
> Paul
>