[issue1498363] Improve super() objects support for implicit method calls

2011-02-15 Thread Senthil Kumaran

Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:


--
keywords:  -after moratorium

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1498363
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1498363] Improve super() objects support for implicit method calls

2010-08-11 Thread Raymond Hettinger

Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:

Am rejecting this feature request because of the concerns mentioned in the post 
on 4/3.  The current requirement for explicit forwarding may be slightly 
inconvenient to type but it does add provide clarity that the method should be 
applied to the next-in-mro instead of the super object itself.

I appreciate the idea but think it would complicate an object that is already 
very difficult to understand and use correctly.

--
assignee: collinwinter - rhettinger
resolution:  - rejected
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1498363
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1498363] Improve super() objects support for implicit method calls

2010-08-09 Thread Terry J. Reedy

Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:

I believe this is covered by the PEP3003 3.2 change moratorium.

--
keywords: +after moratorium -patch
nosy: +terry.reedy
versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.2

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1498363
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1498363] Improve super() objects support for implicit method calls

2010-07-16 Thread Mark Lawrence

Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:

msg50389 asked for this to be discussed on python-dev.  I've searched the 
archives but didn't find anything obvious.  Did I simply miss it or was it 
never discussed?

--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1498363
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1498363] Improve super() objects support for implicit method calls

2009-03-20 Thread Daniel Diniz

Changes by Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com:


--
stage:  - patch review
type:  - feature request
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1 -Python 2.6

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1498363
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com